Iran FM Looks to More Nuclear Talks, but Warns US Against Any Attack
Formal & News Style Tehran signals openness to diplomacy while setting firm military red lines Foreign minister balances negotiation hopes with warnings of retaliation Talks resume amid rising regional tension Iran keeps dialogue alive but rejects U.S. threats 🔹 Neutral & Analytical Diplomacy and deterrence move in parallel Why Iran is negotiating while preparing for conflict A fragile path between talks and confrontation 🔹 Catchy & Impactful Talks on the table, missiles in the background Diplomacy under threat Between dialogue and defense

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said this week that Tehran hopes to continue negotiations with the United States over its nuclear programme, while issuing stark warnings that any American military action would trigger retaliation against U.S. bases in the region. The remarks, delivered amid fragile indirect talks in Oman and growing military tension in the Middle East, reflect Tehran’s dual strategy of keeping diplomatic channels open but asserting firm red lines over defence and sovereignty.
Geo News
Speaking at the Al Jazeera Forum in Doha, Araghchi described the recent indirect talks in Muscat, Oman — the first such engagement since nuclear negotiations collapsed last year — as a “good start” and said both sides had agreed to continue discussions soon. The negotiations came after a period of heightened threats and military buildup, including U.S. warnings of possible strikes and increased American naval deployments in the Gulf.
Al-Monitor
Talks Resume Amid Tense Backdrop
The February 7 session in Oman brought Iranian and U.S. officials together in a rare diplomatic engagement between the two adversaries, but with major differences still unresolved. Araghchi reiterated that Iran considers its nuclear enrichment a sovereign and “inalienable right” and said Tehran remains ready to seek a “reassuring agreement” through negotiations while rejecting external pressure or ultimatums.
Al-Monitor
U.S. President Donald Trump described the Muscat discussions as “very good” and pledged another round of talks next week, but also signed new sanctions and measures aimed at curbing Iran’s oil exports and economic lifelines.
Al-Monitor
Despite these diplomatic overtures, Araghchi made clear that Tehran’s ballistic missile programme is “never negotiable” because it relates to national defence, and warned that if the United States were to attack Iranian territory, Tehran would strike U.S. military bases in the Middle East — though not those of host countries — as accessible targets.
Press TV
Firm Red Lines on Defence and Negotiation Scope
Araghchi’s comments highlight major sticking points in the negotiations. Iran has insisted that talks should focus strictly on the nuclear issue and not be broadened to include its missile programmes or support for regional groups — issues that Washington and some U.S. allies want to include in future discussions. Tehran has refused to cede its missile capacity, calling it essential for deterrence, a position that complicates diplomatic progress.
Geo News
The minister also said Tehran and Washington must avoid “threats and pressure” that could derail talks, emphasising that trust-building would take time. Officials from both sides have framed the Oman meeting as preliminary, with follow-up consultations expected in capitals before further negotiation dates are set.
Al-Monitor
Military Posture and Regionwide Risk
The warning against military attack comes as U.S.–Iran tensions remain high. Recent U.S. rhetoric has repeatedly mentioned military options if diplomatic efforts fail, and the Pentagon has maintained a visible force presence in the Gulf. Tehran, for its part, has responded with its own warnings that any direct U.S. involvement in conflict would trigger swift retaliation.
Reuters
This mutual signalling underscores the precarious balance: each side appears to want to avoid a direct clash while maintaining leverage. Iran’s strategy — combining warnings with limited diplomatic engagement — reflects its broader approach to navigating sanctions, regional rivalries, and global scrutiny.
Al-Monitor
Trust, Sanctions, and Stalled Progress
Beyond security concerns, economic issues remain central. Tehran has faced crippling sanctions targeting its oil sector and financial networks, and while diplomatic engagements offer a path to potential relief, differences over enrichment limits and inspection protocols persist. Iranian officials repeatedly stress that any deal must respect their right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.
Geo News
Analysts say the current phase of talks is fragile. Building meaningful trust after years of conflict, sanctions, and broken negotiations will be difficult. Tehran’s insistence on excluding its missile programme from discussions, along with continued threats of retaliation, reflect deep mistrust between the two sides.
Al-Monitor
A Fragile Path Forward
Despite the serious warnings, Tehran’s announcement that talks could resume — even indirectly — suggests both sides recognize the severe risks of outright conflict in a volatile region. Leaders in the Gulf, Europe, and beyond have called for restraint and continued diplomatic engagement as the most viable path to manage the nuclear issue without war.
For now, Iran’s foreign minister is walking a fine line: signalling openness to negotiation while making clear that any military move by the United States would be met with force. Whether this cautious diplomacy can evolve into real progress remains uncertain, but the message from Tehran is clear: dialogue is possible, but so is retaliation.
Geo News
About the Creator
Fiaz Ahmed
I am Fiaz Ahmed. I am a passionate writer. I love covering trending topics and breaking news. With a sharp eye for what’s happening around the world, and crafts timely and engaging stories that keep readers informed and updated.




Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.