The Swamp logo

FTC Warns Apple Over Alleged Suppression of Conservative News in Apple News App

Federal Trade Commission Raises Concerns That Apple News May Be Prioritizing Left‑Lean Writings and Excluding Right‑Wing Voices

By Ayesha LashariPublished 3 days ago 3 min read

The United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a formal warning to Apple Inc., alleging that its widely used news aggregation platform, Apple News, may be systematically sidelining conservative news sources in favor of left‑leaning outlets. This could potentially violate federal consumer protection statutes.

The warning, delivered by FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson to Apple CEO Tim Cook, reflects growing regulatory scrutiny over how major technology platforms curate news content for their users.

What the FTC Allegation Says

In February 2026, Chairman Ferguson raised concerns that Apple News might:

Limit visibility for conservative‑leaning publications.

Disproportionately feature news from left‑of‑center or centrist outlets.

Potentially mislead consumers if Apple’s curation is inconsistent with its own terms of service.

Ferguson emphasized:

“If Apple suppresses or promotes news articles based on ideological or political viewpoint, this conduct could violate consumer protection laws.”

Although the warning is not an enforcement action (like a fine or lawsuit), it signals that regulators are monitoring how digital platforms manage content. The focus is on consumer expectations and transparency, rather than speech control.

Basis of the Allegations: The Media Research Center Report

The FTC cited research by the conservative Media Research Center (MRC), which found that during January 2026:

Apple News did not feature major conservative outlets among top stories.

Hundreds of articles from left‑leaning or mainstream sources were prominently displayed.

Notable conservative sources reportedly absent:

Fox News

The Daily Wire

The New York Post

Breitbart

Prominent center or left‑leaning sources featured:

The Washington Post

Associated Press

NBC News

The Wall Street Journal

Reuters

These findings fueled public debate and reinforced FTC concerns about potential bias in Apple News.

FTC’s Legal Framing: Consumer Protection, Not Censorship

The FTC framed the warning in terms of consumer protection law, not ideological enforcement:

The FTC does not regulate speech.

The focus is on whether Apple misrepresents what consumers can expect from the service.

Violating the FTC Act could occur if Apple promises unbiased news but the algorithm systematically excludes certain viewpoints.

Ferguson highlighted:

“Big Tech companies that suppress or promote news articles may violate the FTC Act if that suppression or promotion is inconsistent with terms of service or consumer expectations.”

Political and Regulatory Backdrop

Apple is one of the world’s largest tech companies and has faced regulatory scrutiny over the past decade. Key context includes:

FTC Chairman Ferguson, a conservative, has prioritized investigating alleged anti‑conservative bias in Big Tech.

Republican lawmakers and advocacy groups have raised similar concerns.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has also expressed interest in digital news bias, reflecting growing political pressure on technology platforms.

Apple’s Position and Response

Apple has yet to issue a detailed public response to the FTC warning. Historically, Apple has stated that:

Apple News aggregates a variety of sources.

Users control content through personalization and algorithmic recommendations.

Editorial decisions aim to surface trustworthy reporting, not political bias.

Whether Apple will adjust curation practices or increase algorithmic transparency remains uncertain.

Implications for News Platforms and Consumers

The FTC warning raises broader questions about digital news platforms:

Does algorithmic prioritization of certain sources constitute unfair treatment of others?

Can regulators police news curation without infringing on free speech?

What counts as reasonable consumer expectations in news consumption?

These questions are central to debates on fairness, transparency, and corporate responsibility in shaping public discourse.

Key Takeaways

The FTC warning is a regulatory signal, not a legal penalty.

Allegations focus on potential suppression of conservative viewpoints.

Apple may need to review content curation to align with consumer expectations.

Big Tech platforms are under increasing pressure to demonstrate neutrality and transparency in news delivery.

As this story develops, it will serve as a benchmark for how regulators address claims of political bias in digital news platforms, shaping the future of news aggregation in the U.S.

politics

About the Creator

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.