The Swamp logo

CCSA Doesn't Care

The LAUSD tried to protect students attending schools in the most economically vulnerable neighborhoods. Charter schools sued to stop them.

By Carl J. PetersenPublished 5 months ago 4 min read

The single largest variable that predicts SAT scores is family income. If you want higher SAT scores, you need to get your kids born into wealthier families. You know, it's great to tell kids to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps, but you better put boots on them first.

– Paul Houston

Public schools in Los Angeles serve a student population overwhelmingly impacted by poverty. Yet, the resources they need to meet these challenges are being undermined by a legal and political fight over school space, led by the California Charter School Association (CCSA).

When critics of the public education system complain about its failures, especially in urban areas, they usually ignore one critical fact - the ability to perform well academically is significantly tied to the socioeconomic status of the student:

  • Financial Resources: While families in poorer neighborhoods may struggle to provide necessities, those without this concern have more funds to invest in tutors and extracurricular activities that are proven to boost academic performance. A parent working multiple jobs is less likely to provide supervision of homework or otherwise oversee academic progress. Older children may need to work to help support their family, reducing the time available for studying or forcing a student to drop out of school
  • Health and Wellness: Since socioeconomic status is linked to health outcomes, students in poorer neighborhoods are more likely to miss class due to illness or be affected by the stress of a medical crisis within the home. Food and housing insecurity increase stress levels, which interfere with learning. Not receiving proper nourishment can also impair cognitive development.
  • The Chain of Poverty: Since parents in poorer neighborhoods were also likely to have grown up in families that were also low socioeconomic, their academic progress was likely affected. This would mean that they are less prepared to give their children the help they need and makes it harder for them to set the proper academic expectations for their children.

Recognizing these challenges, the teachers’ union (UTLA) fought during the 2019 strike to force the District to expand the use of community schools throughout the LAUSD. These schools go beyond the delivery of education to confront other needs so children can be better equipped to learn. This may include on-site health care clinics for students and their families, parent classes to enable caregivers to be better partners in their children's education, or providing access to food to eliminate food insecurity.

Providing these types of support services to improve the lives of our city’s vulnerable children requires a significant investment of space on school campuses. The ability of the LAUSD to do this is hampered when space is given away to charter schools under PROP-39. To prevent this from happening, the District’s elected School Board passed a resolution blocking “the co-location of charter public schools at more than 300 LAUSD campuses designated as Community Schools, Black Student Achievement Plan schools, and Priority Schools.

Ignoring the needs of the vulnerable children who attend these schools, the CCSA sued the LAUSD, requesting that the publicly funded private schools they represent be given priority over programs to help District students achieve their full academic potential. Instead of allowing Los Angeles public schools to provide medical clinics, parent education centers, and other programs to help compensate for the effects of being from low-income families, they want to allow failing charter schools, such as the North Valley Military Institute (NVMI) and Crete Academy, to be given their space. They have no problem denying this space to children of color so that white flight charter school chains like Citizens of the World can operate instead.

PROP-39 never mentioned “co-location,” yet the CCSA continues to use it as a legal wedge to seize space from public schools. This lawsuit is the latest in a series brought by the CCSA that has resulted in denying vulnerable students, whose parents have chosen to send them to public schools, the space they need. In the past, this has resulted in children with special education needs receiving services in closets and stairwells after charter schools were given their classrooms. In another case, a student was subjected to severe bullying over his disability because a charter school was operating on his campus without any meaningful oversight.

In a press release celebrating their victory in the latest battle in this court case, the CCSA bragged that this “is a major win for Los Angeles’ charter…school communities.” Admitting that these privately operated schools are often unable to provide “safe, suitable facilities” without taking space from public school students, CCSA Vice President Keith Dell’Aquila ironically claimed the District’s policy “disproportionately harmed Black and Latino students in LAUSD,” the very groups who will be denied important services because portions of their public school buildings will be given to charter schools.

The Charter School Industry was created with the promise that privatizing education would improve academic outcomes. Despite their ability to select the students they wish to serve, these publicly funded private schools have not been able to significantly outperform public schools in the 32 years they have been operating in California. In many cases, charter schools underperform compared to the schools they aim to replace. This is largely because they face the same socioeconomic challenges as their public school counterparts. CCSA should drop its objections and allow the LAUSD to have the chance to improve the lives of these children.

_____

Carl Petersen is a proud father of five adult children, including two daughters on the severe end of the Autism spectrum. A passionate advocate for special education, he ran as a Green Party candidate for the LAUSD School Board. Renowned education advocate Dr. Diane Ravitch has praised him as “a valiant fighter for public schools in Los Angeles.” Recently, Carl relocated to the State of Washington, where he is embracing his role as “Poppy” to two grandsons. You can explore his insights and perspectives through his blogs at www.ChangeTheLAUSD.com.

education

About the Creator

Carl J. Petersen

Carl Petersen is a parent advocate for students with SpEd needs and public education. As a Green Party candidate in LAUSD’s District 2 School Board race, he was endorsed by Network for Public Education (NPE) Action. Opinions are his own.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (1)

Sign in to comment
  • sophieee5 months ago

    Hi, I read your story and I really liked it. It seems like you are a professional writer because you give each scene its own unique value, which very few people manage to do. I really liked your work it was very, very good. Actually, I’m just a casual reader, and I really enjoy reading stories. and I liked it a lot, too. Also, how long have you been doing this work?

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.