Alina Habba: A Detailed Look at Her Career, Public Role, and Legal Challenges
How a New Jersey attorney rose to national attention through high-profile cases and political appointments.
Early Life and Background
Alina Habba was born on March 25, 1984, in Summit, New Jersey. She grew up in a family with Iraqi Chaldean Catholic roots, and her cultural background played a meaningful part in shaping her early identity. She has described herself as a devout Catholic and a first-generation Arab-American, often reflecting on how her upbringing influenced her personal and professional drive.
Habba attended Kent Place School before moving on to Lehigh University, where she completed her undergraduate studies. She later earned her law degree from Widener University Commonwealth Law School. After graduating, she became licensed to practice law in New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut. These early educational steps formed the foundation for her eventual rise in the legal world.
Legal Career: From Private Practice to Founding Her Firm
Shortly after law school, Habba worked as a law clerk for a judge in the civil division of New Jersey’s court system. This experience introduced her to the daily operations of the courtroom and gave her a practical understanding of legal processes.
After clerking, she entered private practice as an associate at a law firm. She remained in that role until 2013, developing her skills in civil litigation and building a broader understanding of the field. That same year, she became a partner at a small firm she helped establish, marking her first major step toward leadership in legal practice.
In 2020, she founded her own firm, Habba, Madaio & Associates LLP, with offices in Bedminster, New Jersey, and New York City. Her firm handled a range of civil matters, including class-action cases, consumer disputes, and general civil litigation. This period allowed her to expand her client base and take on more complex legal issues, eventually leading to opportunities that brought her national recognition.
Ties with Donald Trump and Rise to Prominence
Habba’s career shifted significantly in 2021 when she joined the legal team of Donald Trump. Their professional connection began after she became known in the community near Trump’s golf club in Bedminster, located close to her firm’s New Jersey office.
Working with Trump placed her at the center of several major legal battles. She represented him in matters involving business investigations, defamation claims, civil fraud allegations, and the widely discussed “hush-money” case. These cases consistently drew national attention, and her role as one of Trump’s attorneys made her a prominent public figure.
In December 2024, she was named Trump’s legal spokeswoman and counselor. This position blended legal representation with public communication, making her one of the most visible voices speaking on behalf of Trump during key political and legal developments. The role expanded her influence beyond the courtroom and placed her in a fast-moving political environment.
Appointment as Interim U.S. Attorney — and Legal Challenges
In March 2025, she was announced as the interim U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey. The appointment immediately drew widespread attention due to her close professional ties with Trump. Habba stated that her focus would be on addressing what she viewed as political misuse of the justice system.
Soon after assuming the role, she initiated investigations involving Democratic officials in New Jersey and pursued charges tied to local political activity. Supporters saw these actions as attempts to enforce accountability. Critics argued that her appointment and actions raised concerns about political motivation.
Her appointment faced legal challenges almost immediately. In August 2025, a federal judge ruled that she did not have the legal authority to serve in the position based on procedural requirements for federal appointments. Habba contested the ruling, but in December 2025, a three-judge panel from the Court of Appeals upheld the decision and formally disqualified her from the role. The ruling intensified debate about political influence in federal prosecutorial offices and the separation of powers between branches of government.
Controversies and Public Reaction
Throughout her time in the public eye, Habba has faced controversy. A lawsuit she helped file involving several political figures resulted in nearly one million dollars in sanctions against her legal team after the court deemed the claims lacking in legal foundation. This outcome generated significant discussion about the strategies used in the case.
Her work in the defamation trial involving E. Jean Carroll also drew widespread attention. Observers scrutinized her courtroom approach, and the trial concluded with a substantial financial award to Carroll.
In early 2025, Habba faced criticism after praising a figure who was widely accused of serious criminal conduct. The comments led some public officials and legal commentators to call for her removal from public service. Supporters defended her statements as expressions of her personal perspective, while opponents questioned whether they were appropriate for someone in a federal role.
Personal Life and Identity
Habba has often spoken about her background as a first-generation American and how it shaped her experience in the legal profession. She values her Chaldean Catholic heritage and credits her family history with motivating her approach to work and public life.
She was previously married to attorney Matthew Eyet, with whom she shares two children. In 2020, she married businessman Gregg Reuben. Together they live in Bernardsville, New Jersey, with a blended family that includes children from previous relationships. Habba speaks both English and Arabic and has discussed how her identity influences her role in public life and law.
About the Creator
Saad
I’m Saad. I’m a passionate writer who loves exploring trending news topics, sharing insights, and keeping readers updated on what’s happening around the world.
Ultra-Orthodox Fury Over Military Enlistment Turns Deadly in Israel
Tensions surrounding military enlistment in Israel have erupted into deadly violence, exposing one of the country’s deepest and most persistent social divides. At the heart of the crisis lies a long-standing exemption that allows many ultra-Orthodox Jewish men, known as Haredim, to avoid compulsory military service in order to pursue full-time religious studies. As Israel faces prolonged security challenges and an overstretched army, efforts to enforce broader enlistment have ignited anger, protests, and, most recently, fatal clashes. A Longstanding Divide in Israeli Society Military service is a defining institution in Israel. For most Jewish citizens, compulsory enlistment is seen not only as a legal duty but as a moral obligation tied to national survival. However, since the country’s founding, ultra-Orthodox communities have largely been exempt, based on the belief that Torah study contributes spiritually to the defense of the state. Over time, this arrangement has become increasingly controversial. The ultra-Orthodox population has grown rapidly and now represents a significant portion of Israeli society. Many secular and religious-Zionist Israelis argue that the exemption places an unfair burden on those who serve, particularly during times of heightened conflict. Calls for equality in service have intensified as reserve soldiers are repeatedly mobilized and casualties mount. Renewed Push for Enlistment Recent court rulings and political pressure have pushed the government to reconsider blanket exemptions. Israel’s Supreme Court has ruled that prolonged unequal treatment in enlistment is unconstitutional, forcing lawmakers to draft new policies. As a result, authorities began issuing draft notices to ultra-Orthodox men who had previously been shielded from service. This shift was perceived by many Haredi leaders as an existential threat to their way of life. They argue that military service undermines religious devotion, exposes young men to secular influences, and weakens tightly knit religious communities. Influential rabbis urged followers to resist enlistment, framing the issue as a spiritual battle rather than a civic dispute. Protests Turn Violent What began as demonstrations quickly escalated. Large crowds of ultra-Orthodox protesters gathered in several cities, blocking roads, clashing with police, and setting fires. Tensions reached a breaking point when confrontations turned deadly, with reports of serious injuries and at least one fatality linked to the unrest. The violence shocked the nation. While protests against enlistment are not new, the deadly outcome marked a dramatic escalation. Security forces responded with riot control measures, arrests, and road closures, further inflaming tempers within already volatile communities. Political Fallout and Public Anger The deadly clashes have placed immense pressure on Israel’s political leadership. Coalition governments often rely on ultra-Orthodox parties for parliamentary support, making decisive action politically risky. Critics accuse leaders of prioritizing coalition survival over national unity and equality. Public anger has surged, particularly among families of soldiers currently serving. Many argue that continued exemptions erode social cohesion and undermine trust in state institutions. Social media and opinion columns are filled with calls for universal service, while others warn that forcing enlistment could tear the social fabric even further. The Ultra-Orthodox Perspective From within the Haredi community, the crisis is viewed very differently. Many see state enforcement as persecution of religious life. Community leaders insist that Torah study is a sacred duty equal to military defense, and they reject narratives portraying them as unwilling to contribute to society. Some ultra-Orthodox citizens do serve in specialized military units designed to accommodate religious practices, but these programs have not been widely embraced. Skepticism remains high, fueled by fears of cultural erosion and loss of autonomy. A Nation at a Crossroads The deadly turn in protests underscores how unresolved the enlistment issue remains. Israel is grappling with fundamental questions: How can it balance religious freedom with civic equality? Can a society under constant security threat afford exemptions for a growing population? And is compromise still possible after violence has entered the equation? Experts warn that without meaningful dialogue, the situation could worsen. Some propose alternative national service options for ultra-Orthodox men, while others advocate gradual integration rather than abrupt enforcement. Trust-building measures, they argue, are essential to prevent further bloodshed. Conclusion The deadly unrest over military enlistment is more than a policy dispute—it is a reflection of Israel’s struggle to reconcile tradition, security, and equality in a rapidly changing society. As the nation mourns the loss of life and confronts rising divisions, the challenge ahead is clear. Finding a solution that respects religious identity while ensuring shared responsibility may be one of Israel’s most critical tests yet. The outcome will shape not only the future of military service, but the cohesion and character of the country itself.
By Fiazahmedbrohi 4 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.