Afridi Slams Punjab Government for Blocking PTI Activities in Lahore

Former Pakistan cricket captain and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Shahid Afridi has strongly criticised the Punjab government for what he described as the systematic blocking of PTI’s political activities in Lahore, calling it an attack on democratic rights and freedom of expression. Afridi’s remarks come amid heightened political tensions in Pakistan, where opposition parties continue to accuse provincial and federal authorities of suppressing dissent.
Afridi’s Sharp Criticism
Speaking to the media and sharing his views publicly, Afridi expressed deep concern over restrictions placed on PTI gatherings, rallies, and organisational meetings in Lahore. He argued that preventing a major political party from mobilising supporters reflects a fear of public opinion rather than a commitment to democracy.
According to Afridi, political disagreement should be addressed through dialogue and the ballot box—not through administrative barriers, police deployments, or bans on assembly. He emphasised that Lahore, historically a political and cultural heart of Pakistan, should remain open to all political voices regardless of party affiliation.
Lahore as a Political Symbol
Lahore holds immense symbolic importance in Pakistan’s political landscape. It has long been a hub for rallies, protests, and mass movements across party lines. Afridi noted that restricting PTI activities in such a city sends a troubling message about the shrinking space for democratic participation.
He added that when governments attempt to silence opposition voices, they risk alienating citizens and deepening political polarisation. Afridi warned that suppressive tactics often backfire, strengthening public sympathy for those being targeted rather than weakening them.
PTI’s Ongoing Struggles
Since the ouster of Imran Khan from office, PTI has faced significant hurdles, including arrests of leaders, legal challenges, and limitations on public gatherings. Afridi argued that these measures have gone beyond law enforcement and entered the realm of political victimisation.
He stressed that PTI supporters have the same constitutional rights as any other citizens, including the right to peaceful assembly. Blocking rallies, he said, undermines confidence in institutions and fuels frustration among the youth—many of whom see PTI as a vehicle for political change.
Call for Fair Political Competition
Afridi urged the Punjab government to ensure a level playing field for all political parties. He maintained that true democracy thrives when competing ideas are allowed to reach the public freely. Rather than fearing opposition gatherings, governments should focus on governance, economic stability, and addressing public grievances.
Drawing from his own background as a national sports hero, Afridi compared politics to sportsmanship—where rules must apply equally to all teams. He said selective enforcement of laws damages credibility and erodes trust in the system.
Public Reaction and Political Climate
Afridi’s comments quickly gained traction on social media, with supporters praising him for speaking out and critics accusing him of politicising issues. Regardless of differing views, his statement has reignited debate about civil liberties, political tolerance, and state power in Pakistan.
Political analysts note that Pakistan’s current climate remains highly charged, with protests, court battles, and accusations dominating headlines. In such an environment, voices like Afridi’s—well-known beyond politics—carry added weight and influence public discourse.
Warning Against Escalation
Afridi also cautioned that continued restrictions could escalate tensions further. He argued that silencing political activity does not eliminate dissent; instead, it pushes it underground, making situations more volatile. Allowing peaceful expression, he said, is the safest and most democratic path forward.
He called on authorities to prioritise stability through inclusion rather than exclusion, reminding them that democracy is strongest when institutions protect rights—even for opponents.
Conclusion
Shahid Afridi’s criticism of the Punjab government’s handling of PTI activities in Lahore highlights broader concerns about democratic freedoms in Pakistan. As political divisions deepen, his message underscores the need for tolerance, dialogue, and respect for constitutional rights.
Whether one agrees with Afridi’s stance or not, his remarks reflect a growing public conversation about the limits of state authority and the importance of political openness. In a democracy, silencing voices rarely brings peace—listening to them often does.