I Listen, Therefore I Am

Music, in its vast array of genres, rhythms, and harmonies, has a unique ability to connect with people on an emotional level, creating an individual soundscape that can reflect our innermost thoughts and feelings. Yet, the music we listen to is often a source of intrigue—why do we gravitate toward certain sounds, artists, or styles, while others leave us indifferent or untouched? The answers to these questions are as complex as the music itself. Our music preferences are shaped by a blend of psychological, social, and cultural factors, making it a fascinating subject to explore. Music does not exist in a vacuum; it intertwines with our identities, our social interactions, and even the ways we understand the world. Each individual’s playlist is a window into their experiences, emotions, and even their place within the wider social and cultural fabric (Juslin and Sloboda, 2010).

The concept of music preferences is not only about personal taste but also a reflection of broader human experiences. While some might claim to simply “like what they like,” music is far from being a mere reflection of personal whims. It is influenced by a host of underlying factors, many of which go unnoticed or are taken for granted. For instance, the type of music a person enjoys can often correlate with their personality traits, their emotional state, or even their socio-economic background (Rentfrow and Gosling, 2003). These preferences, however, are not static; they can evolve over time, influenced by changing life circumstances, exposure to new genres, and shifting social landscapes. What’s more, the music we choose to listen to can reflect the culture we belong to, the social groups we align with, or even the historical moment we are living through (DeNora, 2000).

Music preferences vary widely across individuals, and these differences are particularly stark when examined in a cultural context (Sloboda, 2005). What one culture deems a meaningful and powerful form of expression may hold no appeal to another. For example, the sounds and rhythms that define the traditional music of India may sound foreign to a listener raised in Western countries, while pop music from the West might feel alien to someone immersed in the musical traditions of the African continent.

These variations are not merely about differences in sound, but in the meanings that these sounds carry within different cultural contexts. Music is deeply embedded in the cultural fabric of a society—it represents historical narratives, cultural norms, and collective identity. What’s more, it serves as a means of communicating shared values, whether through national anthems, protest songs, or traditional folk tunes. In this sense, our music preferences often act as markers of our cultural affiliation, whether consciously or subconsciously (Tarrant, North, and Hargreaves, 2001).

Yet, even within a single culture or social group, music preferences can differ significantly. Social influences, such as peer pressure, media consumption, and the cultural trends of a particular time, can shape and redefine what is considered desirable or “cool” in terms of music. While certain genres may dominate the mainstream, individual tastes often follow a more personal path.

The popularity of music genres such as rock, hip hop, or classical can be understood as much through the lens of social influence as through personal preference, with individuals choosing to align themselves with particular movements or identities that resonate with the themes and values expressed within those genres. The rise of streaming platforms, too, has expanded the diversity of music choices, allowing listeners to experiment and discover music that may have been inaccessible to them in the past.

Ultimately, music preferences are a reflection of the complex intersection between individual identity and social context. They evolve as people grow, adapt to new experiences, and interact with changing cultural landscapes. At its core, music has the power to express what words often cannot, and our preferences speak volumes about who we are, where we come from, and the world we are navigating. The exploration of why we listen to the music we do is, in many ways, a journey through the human experience itself—an exploration of identity, emotion, and culture that resonates deeply with us all.

Music and the Brain

Music holds a unique power to connect with our emotions, providing an outlet for expression and a tool for emotional regulation. For many, music offers a way to articulate feelings that words cannot capture. Whether we are elated, heartbroken, anxious, or contemplative, the melodies and rhythms we choose often reflect or amplify our emotional states. One of the most compelling reasons people turn to music is its ability to mirror our feelings. A melancholic song can comfort someone grieving a loss, while an upbeat track can lift the spirits of someone feeling low. This connection between music and emotion is not coincidental but rather rooted in deep psychological mechanisms (Juslin and Sloboda, 2010).

The emotional power of music lies in its ability to evoke memories and connect with the listener's personal experiences. Certain tunes can transport us back in time to significant moments in our lives, making music a form of emotional recall. Research has demonstrated that music can trigger emotional responses that are as powerful as those caused by real-life events. When we listen to a piece of music that resonates with us emotionally, the brain releases neurotransmitters like dopamine, which are associated with feelings of pleasure and reward. In this way, music serves as an emotional language, communicating feelings that might otherwise be hard to articulate. This phenomenon is especially evident when we use music to regulate our moods (Rentfrow and Gosling, 2003). People often turn to specific genres or songs to either amplify their feelings or shift their emotional states. For example, someone feeling down might seek out a melancholic ballad, not because they want to feel worse, but because the song validates their feelings and provides a sense of emotional release.

Beyond emotional expression, music also plays a significant role in regulating mood. Music can have a calming effect on the nervous system, with slower tempos and gentle harmonies lowering heart rates and reducing stress (Gabrielsson, 2011). This is particularly evident in therapeutic contexts, where music is used as a tool for relaxation and healing. Studies have shown that listening to soothing music can activate the parasympathetic nervous system, which counteracts the body's stress response, leading to feelings of relaxation and comfort. The use of music as a mood regulator is not just a modern phenomenon but has been embedded in human culture for centuries. From ancient rituals to contemporary self-care practices, music has long been an essential part of emotional well-being (Koelsch, 2010).

The way the brain processes music adds another layer to our emotional and cognitive experience of music. Cognitive neuroscience has provided insights into why certain musical patterns or sounds resonate with people. The brain processes music in multiple regions, involving both the auditory cortex, which helps interpret sound, and the limbic system, which governs emotions (O'Neill, 1997). When we listen to music, our brains are not merely hearing the notes; they are actively predicting, processing, and responding to them. Music’s structure—whether it’s the repetition of a catchy melody, the surprise of an unexpected chord, or the resolution of a dissonant passage—engages the brain in a way that is both pleasurable and intellectually stimulating. This process is thought to explain why certain musical patterns, like harmony or rhythmic predictability, can evoke feelings of pleasure and satisfaction.

The brain’s processing of music is also highly individualised. Research has shown that people’s preferences for certain sounds or styles of music are often linked to neural responses that differ from one person to another. For example, some individuals may have stronger reactions to melodies with complex rhythms, while others are drawn to simpler, more predictable tunes. This variation may stem from differences in brain structure or function, as well as personal experiences that shape how music is processed. In this sense, music serves not only as a tool for emotional expression but also as a mirror reflecting the unique neural architecture of each listener (Vuoskoski and Eerola, 2012).

The connection between music and personality is another fascinating aspect of music preference. Studies have shown that an individual’s personality traits—such as their level of introversion or extraversion—can influence their music choices. People who are more introverted, for instance, tend to prefer music that is more introspective, complex, and emotional, whereas extraverted individuals are often drawn to more energetic, upbeat, and socially engaging genres. This connection between personality and music is not merely coincidental (Greenberg et al., 2015). Research has found that music can act as a form of self-expression, reflecting an individual's inner world and reinforcing their identity. For example, an introvert might gravitate toward genres such as classical or folk, which often feature introspective lyrics and more subtle emotional nuances, while an extravert might favour pop, dance, or hip-hop, which are characterised by their energy, rhythm, and social connectivity.

In addition to introversion and extraversion, other personality factors—such as openness to experience—have also been linked to music preferences. People who score highly in openness are more likely to enjoy eclectic, experimental, or unconventional music, as they tend to seek novelty and appreciate the intellectual and emotional complexity that such music offers. On the other hand, those with lower levels of openness may gravitate towards familiar and mainstream genres that feel more comfortable and predictable (Rentfrow and Gosling, 2006).

The interplay between personality and music is a reflection of the complex ways in which we use music to navigate our emotional landscapes and express our identities. The music we choose is not just a matter of taste—it is deeply entwined with who we are, how we feel, and how we interact with the world around us. Whether we are seeking comfort, expression, or stimulation, music provides a language that speaks directly to our hearts and minds.

Influence and Identity

Music is more than just an auditory experience; it is a complex social and cultural phenomenon shaped by numerous external influences. While individual taste plays a role in determining musical preferences, external factors such as peer groups, cultural identity, and media exposure significantly impact the music people listen to. These influences are interconnected, reinforcing one another to shape listening habits in ways that extend beyond personal inclination. The music an individual enjoys is often deeply embedded in their social and cultural environment, and preferences are not formed in isolation but through ongoing interactions with others and with media.

Peer influence plays a critical role in shaping musical preferences, particularly in adolescence and young adulthood when social identity is being developed. Research has shown that individuals are more likely to adopt the musical tastes of their social group, often as a means of fitting in or strengthening group cohesion. Tarrant, North, and Hargreaves (2001) found that people tend to perceive others who share their musical preferences as having similar personality traits to their own. This suggests that listening to a particular genre is not simply a matter of enjoyment but also an expression of social belonging. When an individual’s peer group listens to a specific type of music, they may feel inclined to do the same, even if that genre does not initially align with their personal tastes. Social identity theory suggests that people categorise themselves into in-groups and out-groups, and musical preferences can serve as a marker of these divisions (Tarrant, North and Hargreaves, 2001). Consequently, music can function as a social currency, determining the extent to which individuals feel included within their peer networks.

Beyond immediate social circles, broader cultural identity plays a crucial role in shaping musical preferences. Music has long been associated with cultural and ethnic heritage, serving as a means of both expressing and preserving identity. Different cultures have distinct musical traditions, and exposure to these from an early age influences the sounds individuals find appealing. Rentfrow and Gosling (2006) argue that music preferences are partly shaped by the cultural environment in which a person grows up, reinforcing values, traditions, and even language. For many individuals, listening to music from their own cultural background fosters a sense of connection to their heritage, particularly for those living in diaspora communities. For example, second-generation immigrants may use music from their parents’ country of origin as a way to maintain a connection with their roots, even if they have never lived there themselves. Music’s ability to evoke nostalgia and reinforce collective memory further strengthens its role in cultural identity. Moreover, different genres are often associated with particular subcultures or ethnic groups, and listening to these styles can be a way of affirming one's place within a particular community (Greenberg et al., 2015).

In addition to social and cultural factors, media and advertising play a significant role in shaping music preferences by determining what individuals are exposed to. In the past, radio and television were the primary means through which new music reached audiences, but the rise of streaming platforms and social media has transformed how people discover and consume music. Algorithms on platforms such as Spotify and YouTube recommend songs based on listening history, subtly shaping users’ preferences by reinforcing certain musical styles over others. While this can introduce individuals to artists they might not have otherwise encountered, it can also create an echo chamber effect, limiting exposure to a narrow selection of music (O’Neill, 1997). Furthermore, music is frequently used in advertising to evoke particular emotions or associations with a brand. Schubert (2013) highlights how companies strategically select music that aligns with their brand identity to create a lasting impression on consumers. Whether through television adverts, film soundtracks, or social media trends, exposure to certain songs in commercial contexts influences how people perceive and engage with music.

The interaction of peer influence, cultural identity, and media exposure highlights the complexity of music preferences. Rather than being purely individual choices, the music people listen to is shaped by the social groups they belong to, the cultural backgrounds they identify with, and the media they consume. As digital technology continues to evolve, these influences are likely to become even more interconnected, reinforcing the idea that music is not just a personal preference but a deeply social and cultural experience.

History, Generations and Evolving Contexts

Music preferences are not static but evolve across generations, shaped by historical events, technological advancements, and shifting cultural values. Each era sees the emergence of new musical styles, often in response to social and political changes, while older genres are reinterpreted or revived. The interplay between tradition and innovation ensures that music remains both a reflection of its time and a vehicle for historical continuity. Alongside this, music plays an integral role in social interactions, rituals, and collective identities, carrying deep symbolic meanings within different cultures and subcultures.

The evolution of music preferences is often driven by technological and cultural shifts. The early twentieth century, for instance, saw the rise of jazz, a genre deeply rooted in African American musical traditions but quickly embraced internationally as a symbol of modernity and rebellion. The rock and roll explosion of the 1950s reflected the growing influence of youth culture, challenging conservative norms and creating a generational divide in musical taste (Middleton, 1990). The development of digital media and streaming platforms in the twenty-first century has further transformed listening habits, allowing for greater accessibility and personalisation of music consumption (Bennett, Shank and Toynbee, 2006). As each generation grows up with different musical experiences, nostalgia plays a significant role in shaping preferences, with individuals often forming deep emotional attachments to the music of their formative years.

Beyond personal preferences, music serves essential social functions, shaping communal experiences and reinforcing social bonds. Across cultures, music is a fundamental element of social gatherings, from weddings and religious ceremonies to political protests and national celebrations. Its ability to evoke shared emotions and memories makes it a powerful tool for social cohesion. DeNora (2000) highlights how music structures everyday interactions, creating atmospheres that influence behaviour in both public and private settings. Whether played at a family gathering or a stadium concert, music facilitates a collective experience that strengthens group identity. In participatory musical traditions, such as folk singing or choral performances, the act of making music together enhances a sense of belonging and reinforces cultural continuity (Turino, 2008). Even in more individualised listening experiences, such as through headphones, music still connects individuals to broader social narratives, linking them to particular subcultures or generational movements.

The symbolic power of music extends beyond its immediate social functions, serving as a vehicle for cultural narratives and expressions of identity. Certain genres and songs become closely associated with specific social groups, political ideologies, or historical moments. Frith (1996) argues that musical genres carry embedded cultural meanings, shaping perceptions of class, race, and gender. Punk music, for example, emerged in the 1970s as a direct challenge to mainstream commercialism and was embraced as a symbol of resistance by working-class youth. Similarly, hip-hop has long served as a voice for marginalised communities, addressing themes of racial injustice, economic struggle, and urban life. Music also reinforces national and ethnic identities, with folk traditions preserving cultural heritage and shaping collective memory. Hesmondhalgh (2013) explores how music functions as a form of social commentary, allowing artists and listeners to engage with broader societal issues. From protest songs to anthems of empowerment, music provides a platform for storytelling, resistance, and solidarity.

While music preferences are often deeply personal, they are also shaped by historical and social contexts that influence how individuals and communities engage with sound. The generational transmission of musical taste, the communal functions of music in social life, and its role in constructing cultural meaning all contribute to its enduring significance. Music is not merely entertainment but a dynamic cultural force that reflects and shapes human experiences across time.

The Digital Revolution

The ways in which people discover, access, and engage with music have been fundamentally altered by digital technologies. The internet, streaming services, and social media have democratized music consumption, breaking down geographical and economic barriers while increasing the influence of algorithms in shaping individual listening habits. The rise of personalized recommendations has changed how listeners encounter new artists and genres, while the ease of digital distribution has fostered cross-cultural musical exchange on an unprecedented scale. These developments have transformed not only individual listening experiences but also the broader dynamics of the global music industry.

One of the most significant impacts of the digital revolution is the increased accessibility of music. Historically, music consumption was limited by physical distribution and radio broadcasting, meaning that access was often restricted by location, cost, and industry gatekeeping. The advent of online platforms such as YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Music has drastically expanded availability, allowing users to stream vast catalogues of music at little to no cost (Morris and Powers, 2015). This shift has reduced the dominance of traditional record labels, enabling independent artists to reach global audiences without the backing of major companies (Baym, 2018). The ability to share music through social media has also accelerated trends, with viral songs spreading rapidly across platforms such as TikTok, often influencing mainstream charts (Burgess and Green, 2018). While this democratization has provided greater opportunities for artists, it has also created challenges, particularly in terms of financial sustainability and the devaluation of recorded music as a commodity.

Another defining feature of the digital age is the growing role of algorithms in shaping musical exposure. Unlike traditional radio, which relied on DJs or curated playlists, streaming services use machine learning to recommend songs based on a user’s previous listening behaviour. Platforms such as Spotify and YouTube employ complex data-driven systems to suggest music, reinforcing familiar patterns while occasionally introducing new material (Eriksson et al., 2019). While this can enhance the listening experience by providing personalized recommendations, it also raises concerns about the narrowing of musical diversity. The reinforcement of existing preferences can lead to "filter bubbles," where listeners are primarily exposed to music that aligns with their past choices rather than encountering a wider range of styles and artists (Prey, 2020). Despite this, some argue that algorithmic curation can be beneficial, particularly for emerging musicians who may struggle to gain exposure through traditional media channels.

The digital revolution has also intensified globalization in music, facilitating the blending of cultural influences. Whereas past musical exchanges were often dependent on migration, physical distribution, or the mediation of record labels, online platforms now allow artists and listeners to interact with a wide array of musical traditions in real time (Toynbee and Dueck, 2011). The rise of K-pop, for instance, demonstrates how digital media can propel non-Western music into global consciousness, with artists leveraging YouTube and social networks to engage international audiences (Jin, 2016). Similarly, genres such as reggaeton, Afrobeat, and Latin trap have gained widespread popularity beyond their regions of origin, illustrating how streaming services have contributed to a more interconnected musical landscape. While some critics argue that this globalisation risks homogenising music by encouraging formulaic production, others highlight its potential for fostering cultural appreciation and hybrid innovation (Holt, 2020).

The shift from physical to digital music consumption has reshaped listening habits, industry structures, and the ways in which people engage with music across cultures. Increased accessibility has allowed for greater diversity in musical exposure, while the role of algorithms has transformed discovery processes in both beneficial and restrictive ways. The growing ease of cross-cultural exchange has further expanded the possibilities for musical fusion, creating new hybrid styles that reflect a more interconnected world. As technology continues to evolve, the implications for music’s role in society will remain a dynamic area of cultural and economic transformation.

Personal Memories, Nostalgia and Self-Expression

Music has a profound ability to connect individuals to their past, shape personal identity, and provide an escape from the pressures of daily life. Whether through evoking memories, reinforcing self-expression, or offering a means of emotional relief, music plays a significant role in personal and psychological well-being. These aspects of musical engagement illustrate the deep emotional and cognitive connections that people form with the music they listen to.

Nostalgia is one of the most powerful ways in which music influences memory and personal experience. Research suggests that songs from one’s youth are particularly effective at triggering autobiographical memories, often linked to significant emotional or social experiences (Jäncke, 2020). The concept of the "reminiscence bump" describes how individuals tend to recall music from their formative years more vividly, reinforcing a sense of identity and continuity over time (Krumhansl and Zupnick, 2013). This connection between music and memory is frequently leveraged in therapeutic contexts, particularly in working with individuals experiencing dementia, where familiar songs can elicit strong emotional and cognitive responses even in cases of severe memory loss (Baird and Thompson, 2018).

Music is also central to self-expression and the construction of personal identity. People often use music to signal aspects of their personality, affiliations, or emotions, shaping how they perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others (Frith, 1996). Musical taste can serve as a marker of subcultural belonging, with different genres associated with distinct values, aesthetics, and lifestyles (Bennett, 2000). For example, punk and hip-hop movements have historically provided platforms for political and social expression, allowing individuals to align themselves with broader cultural narratives. Moreover, personal playlists curated on digital platforms reflect an individual’s emotions, moods, and evolving sense of self, reinforcing the role of music as a deeply personal experience (DeNora, 2000).

Beyond memory and identity, music also functions as a form of psychological escape. In times of stress or emotional distress, certain genres or styles of music can provide comfort, distraction, or even catharsis (Garrido and Schubert, 2015). Some listeners seek calming classical compositions or ambient music to reduce anxiety, while others turn to high-energy genres such as rock or electronic music to release tension. The role of music as a coping mechanism is evident in its widespread use during challenging periods, including personal hardships or collective crises (Van den Tol and Edwards, 2013). The immersive nature of music allows listeners to step away from immediate concerns and enter a different emotional or imaginative space, highlighting its therapeutic potential.

The personal significance of music extends beyond entertainment, influencing memory recall, identity formation, and emotional well-being. Whether by triggering nostalgia, reinforcing self-expression, or offering a means of escape, music remains deeply embedded in human experience. As digital technologies continue to shape access and engagement, the ways in which individuals connect with music may evolve, but its fundamental role in personal and emotional life is unlikely to diminish.

Conclusion

Music preferences are deeply embedded in human experience, shaping emotions, identity, and social interactions. The ways in which individuals engage with music are influenced by psychological, cultural, and technological factors, demonstrating the complex interplay between personal choice and external influences. As music continues to evolve, so too does its role in everyday life, from self-expression to collective identity formation. The rise of digital platforms and personalised algorithms has further reshaped how people discover and interact with music, raising questions about the balance between curated experiences and organic exploration.

Future research could explore how music preferences shift across different life stages and whether emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, will further personalise musical engagement. Additionally, examining music preferences across diverse cultural contexts could provide valuable insights into the universality and specificity of musical experiences. Understanding these dynamics may not only deepen our appreciation of music’s role in society but also inform industries ranging from music therapy to streaming services. As music remains an integral part of human life, continued exploration of its psychological, social, and cultural dimensions will be essential in understanding its evolving significance.

Works Cited:

• Baird, A. and Thompson, W.F., (2018). "Music-evoked autobiographical memory in people with Alzheimer’s disease: Comparing native and foreign musical cues." Psychology of Music, 46(4), pp. 568-579
• Baym, N.K., (2018). Playing to the Crowd: Musicians, Audiences, and the Intimate Work of Connection. New York: NYU Press
• Bennett, A., (2000). Popular Music and Youth Culture: Music, Identity and Place. London: Palgrave Macmillan
• Bennett, A., Shank, B. and Toynbee, J., (2006). The Popular Music Studies Reader. London: Routledge
• Burgess, J. and Green, J., (2018). YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press
• DeNora, T., (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Eriksson, M., Fleischer, R., Johansson, A., Snickars, P. and Vonderau, P., (2019). Spotify Teardown: Inside the Black Box of Streaming Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
• Frith, S., (1996). Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Gabrielsson, A., (2011). Strong Experiences with Music: Music is Much More Than Just Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Garrido, S. and Schubert, E., (2015). Music and Mourning: A Review of the Literature on the Role of Music in Coping with Bereavement. Music and Medicine, 7 (2), pp. 26-36
• Greenberg, D.M., et al., (2015). The Role of Music in Personality: A New Perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, pp. 143-150
• Hesmondhalgh, D., (2013). Why Music Matters. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell
• Holt, F., (2020). Popular Music in the Post-Digital Age: Politics, Economy, Culture and Technology. London: Bloomsbury
• Jäncke, L., (2020). "Music, memory and emotion." Journal of Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 10 (1), pp. 1-10
• Jin, D.Y., (2016). New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
• Juslin, P.N. and Sloboda, J.A, (2010). Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Koelsch, S., (2010). A Neuroscientific Perspective on Music and Emotion. In: Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 99-116
• Krumhansl, C.L. and Zupnick, J.A., (2013). "Cascading reminiscence bumps in popular music." Psychological Science, 24 (10)
• Middleton, R., (1990). Studying Popular Music. Milton Keynes: Open University Press
• Morris, J.W. and Powers, D., (2015). Selling Digital Music, Formatting Culture. Oakland: University of California Press
• O'Neill, S.A., (1997). The Role of Music in Emotional Regulation: A Review of Current Research. Music Perception, 15 (4), pp. 431-453
• Prey, R., (2020). "Locating power in platformization: Music streaming playlists and curatorial power." Social Media & Society, 6 (2), pp.1-10
• Rentfrow, P.J., and Gosling, S.D., (2006). Message in a Ballad: The Role of Music Preferences in Predicting Personality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7 (5), pp. 453-460
• Rentfrow, P.J. and Gosling, S.D., (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), pp. 330-340
• Schubert, E., 2013. The influence of music on consumer behaviour: A psychological approach. Psychology of Music, 41 (6), pp.764-787
• Sloboda, J.A., (2005). Exploring the musical mind: Cognition, emotion, ability, function. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Tarrant, M., North, A.C., and Hargreaves, D.J., (2001). The influence of musical preferences on perceptions of personality. Journal of Music Therapy, 38 (2), pp. 125-133
• Toynbee, J. and Dueck, B., (2011). Migrating Music. London: Routledge
• Turino, T., (2008). Music as Social Life: The Politics of Participation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
• Van den Tol, A.J.M. and Edwards, J., (2013). "Exploring a rationale for choosing to listen to sad music when feeling sad." Psychology of Music, 41(4), pp. 440-465
• Vuoskoski, J.K., and Eerola, T., (2012). The Perception of Emotion in Music. In: Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications. Oxford. Oxford University Press, pp. 429-464