Trump wants the credit not the blame for U.S economy

Trump Wants the Credit, but Not the Blame, for the U.S. Economy

Former President Donald Trump has long positioned himself as the architect of America's economic prosperity. During his first term, he championed tax cuts, deregulation, and a robust stock market as hallmarks of his economic agenda. Upon returning to office in 2025, Trump has continued to claim credit for positive economic indicators, such as job growth and stock market gains. However, he has also been quick to attribute any economic downturns to the policies of his predecessor, President Joe Biden. This selective ownership of economic outcomes raises questions about the complexities of economic policy and the challenges of attributing success or failure to any single administration.

Politico

The Trump Economic Agenda: Tax Cuts and Deregulation

One of Trump's signature legislative achievements was the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017. The TCJA slashed the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and provided temporary tax cuts for individuals. Proponents argued that these cuts would stimulate investment and job creation. However, critics contended that the benefits disproportionately favored corporations and the wealthy, with limited trickle-down effects for the broader population. Indeed, many corporations used the tax savings for stock buybacks rather than increasing wages or expanding their workforces. Additionally, the TCJA contributed to a significant increase in the federal deficit and national debt. By the end of Trump's first term, the national debt had risen by 39%, reaching $27.75 trillion. The debt-to-GDP ratio also hit a post-World War II high .

Wikipedia

+2

NBC News

+2

Wikipedia

+2

Wikipedia

Deregulation was another cornerstone of Trump's economic policy. His administration rolled back numerous environmental and financial regulations, arguing that reducing government intervention would spur economic growth. While some industries benefited from these deregulations, others, particularly in sectors like healthcare and environmental protection, faced increased risks and costs. The long-term implications of these regulatory rollbacks remain a subject of debate among economists and policymakers.

The Trade War and Its Economic Impact

Trump's trade policies, particularly his trade war with China, were among the most contentious aspects of his economic agenda. The imposition of tariffs on Chinese goods led to retaliatory measures from China and other trading partners. While the administration argued that these tariffs would protect American jobs and reduce the trade deficit, the actual outcomes were mixed. Many American consumers faced higher prices on imported goods, and U.S. farmers and manufacturers experienced disruptions in their supply chains. The trade deficit, contrary to Trump's promises, continued to rise during his tenure .

Wikipedia

In 2025, Trump resumed his aggressive trade stance, implementing new tariffs aimed at restructuring global trade and reviving domestic manufacturing. While he paused some tariffs for 90 days to negotiate new trade deals, these policies coincided with a shrinking U.S. economy in the first quarter of 2025, reversing the 2.4% growth from late 2024. Trump insisted that tariffs would ultimately benefit the country, despite declining consumer confidence and modest job additions .

Politico

+1

Financial Times

+1

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Economic Fallout

The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges to the global economy, and the United States was no exception. Under Trump's leadership, the federal response was criticized for its lack of coordination and clarity. The pandemic led to widespread business closures, job losses, and a sharp contraction in economic activity. While the administration implemented stimulus measures, many economists argue that a more robust and timely response could have mitigated some of the economic damage. The economic fallout from the pandemic continued to affect the U.S. economy into 2025, with rising inflation and consumer uncertainty.

Selective Attribution: Credit for Success, Blame for Failure

As President Trump navigates his second term, he has been quick to claim credit for positive economic indicators. In a recent interview on NBC's "Meet the Press," Trump stated that the "good parts" of the economy are due to his policies, while "bad parts" are remnants of Biden's administration . This selective attribution raises questions about the complexities of economic policy and the challenges of attributing success or failure to any single administration.

axios.com

+2

Politico

+2

reuters.com

+2

Critics argue that Trump's approach oversimplifies the multifaceted nature of economic performance. Economic outcomes are influenced by a myriad of factors, including global market trends, technological advancements, and demographic shifts. Attributing economic success solely to one administration overlooks these complexities and risks distorting public understanding of economic policy.

Public Perception and Political Implications

Public perception of Trump's economic stewardship has fluctuated throughout his presidency. During periods of economic growth, he enjoyed high approval ratings. However, economic downturns, such as the 2025 contraction, have led to declining support. As of May 2025, Trump's approval rating on economic management stands at 39%, according to a CNN poll .

theguardian.com

Politico

+1

thetimes.co.uk

+1

This decline in approval has political implications, particularly as the 2026 midterm elections approach. Republican candidates may face challenges in distancing themselves from Trump's economic policies, especially if the economy continues to underperform. Conversely, Democrats may seek to capitalize on economic dissatisfaction to gain electoral advantages.

theguardian.com

Conclusion

President Trump's approach to economic policy has been characterized by bold initiatives and a willingness to challenge established norms. While he has achieved certain policy goals, such as tax cuts and deregulation, the broader economic outcomes have been mixed. The complexities of economic performance defy simplistic narratives of credit and blame. As the U.S. economy continues to evolve, it is essential to consider the multifaceted nature of economic policy and the myriad factors that influence economic outcomes. A nuanced understanding of these dynamics is crucial for informed public discourse and effective policymaking.

Sources