I want you to do something for me: Turn to your wife, talk to her, look deep into her eyes and nourish her with your presence. Communicate with her. Make her laugh even. Watch as she unfolds like a rose.
Firstly though, get off your phone. What’s out there will never be the same as what’s in front of you.
This, if you allow it could be a side effect of Coronavirus. A rediscovery of who and what you are.
In the words of Achilles; “Go home, make love to your wife” 😜
I guess what I’m trying to say is that although I’m unsure if we are entering the Age of Reason or maybe some weird new romantic period; I urge you to listen in on the lessons right now. Patience, what really matters.
First of all, I’d like to say that this piece has not been written in the midst of the hysteria. I have spent some time reflecting, thinking, feeling. And I am here because I see things in a different way these days. I am already seeing the somewhat amazing effects Coronavirus has had on the Earth. I am astounded. We really are moving towards a better tomorrow.
I have written countless poems, and anecdotes throughout this process. But there are mindblowing times ahead. Even in the midst of a situation that has effected and touched the lives of so many. There is more to come. Wait and be amazed I keep feeling.
First of all, the last two years of my life I have come to realise how important the family unit it. How charity starts at home, but ultimately how we can learn from each other and our differences. We don’t have to always agree.. everyone’s journey is different.
But what better way could be thought out in order to remind people what is important. To learn patience, to learn that when the doors open up again we will be propelled into something new, and maybe we don’t have to take matters into our own hands right now.
What other situation could shut down cities, towns, letting the animals go out and do their thing. What more accurate way to sort ourselves out, stopping us from going to the pub every night of the week, reminding us that we have been too distracted on this planet for too We have a forgotten the all too beautiful connections that were already designed for us before we decided to all be heroes. After all, there is a time and place for us all. And it doesn’t all have to be right now.
If there is one major lesson I have learnt in my life, it is that if there is a predatory situation that arrives is that perhaps the best thing we can do is simply shut it out. Let the storm pass and work from the inside out.
The social media effects this has had has also been frightening at times. Social media has given us a platform to speak openly and freely but so too often we do not think we before speak (post). The saying should be “Think before you post” these days really. But seeing so much negativity and hatred and the countless toilet paper stories was just too much to bare for me at times. After all, maybe the lesson is that there is always enough to go round.
In the last two years I had developed a strong adversity to toilet paper. Sorry I mean social media. There were times that I wished social media had coronavirus. It felt in its own way like a type of prison. After all, I, like you am a soul with real feelings and emotions. And I want be kind to all. But the differentiating factor lies in that my true time and attentions is really only designed for a small few. Not for the masses. On this Earth anyway.
I had taken the vow to get completely off it. But there really was nowhere I could run from it. And now the only main form of outside contact being on social media platforms amidst Covid 19 have been left with little choice. At this time at least. I don’t want to live in a world that is stuck on the web. I hope it doesn’t last forever. Eventually I want to see beautiful, tradition human connection and love restored. But for now it’s out of our hands. We are not, and never wear in control.
What we can do, at this time perhaps is clean up our act. Remember fully, that people have real problems and emotions off that screen. Now more so than ever. What you see, is definitely not always wha you get.
This generation of westernised society has never been put to a test such as this. Many of our boys have not (thankfully) experienced war, a fight for country, or been trained to acquire a deep understanding of how to navigate an electronic, visual and instantly gratifying world.
Maybe we have to be ok with isolation. Be ok with stillness. Let the workers work. And let the “be-ers” be. Right now anyway.
If we can overcome what we want then we can get what we need.
There are so many beautiful charities and organisations thriving right now. But never underestimate the power of picking up the phone to a friend. It could change their world.
About the Creator
Day 4 of Quitting
If this is how sobriety feels, maybe it’s better to go through life a little buzzed… this, along with other hits like, I want to kill myself, I wish I was dead, and I’m going to throw myself off a bridge have been the only thoughts on rotation these past few days. I promise myself that if, in a month, I still feel like this (‘this’ meaning despondent, full of rage, and simultaneously numb) I can go back to smoking. Until mid-February though? Nicotine is off the table.
By sleepy drafts7 days ago in Longevity
The Return of the Aircraft Carrier Truman Is Being Seen as a Snub to the Navy in the War of the Future
The return of the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman to active deployment has sparked debate far beyond naval circles. While some see it as a show of enduring American naval power, others interpret the move as a symbolic snub—particularly in the context of how modern warfare is rapidly evolving. In an era dominated by drones, cyber warfare, hypersonic missiles, and artificial intelligence, the decision to once again lean heavily on a traditional aircraft carrier has raised uncomfortable questions about whether the Navy is preparing for the wars of tomorrow or clinging to the strategies of yesterday. A Floating Symbol of 20th-Century Power For decades, aircraft carriers have been the ultimate symbol of U.S. military dominance. These massive floating airbases project power thousands of miles from American shores and allow the U.S. to strike almost anywhere in the world. The Truman, like other Nimitz-class carriers, represents this legacy—housing nearly 5,000 sailors, dozens of fighter jets, and unmatched logistical capability. However, critics argue that what once made carriers indispensable now makes them vulnerable. Their sheer size, cost, and visibility turn them into high-value targets in a battlefield increasingly defined by precision strikes and long-range weapons. The “War of the Future” Looks Very Different Modern conflict is no longer limited to sea, land, and air. Cyber attacks can cripple infrastructure without a single shot fired. Drones can swarm targets at a fraction of the cost of traditional aircraft. Hypersonic missiles can reach targets faster than current defenses can respond. In this context, sending a massive carrier strike group into contested waters can appear less like a strategic necessity and more like a risky gamble. Critics argue that the return of the Truman reflects an outdated mindset—one that prioritizes visible force projection over adaptability and technological evolution. A Snub to Naval Innovation? Many analysts and serving officers believe the Navy’s future lies in distributed lethality—smaller, more agile platforms networked together, harder to detect and cheaper to replace. Unmanned surface vessels, autonomous submarines, and land-based missile systems are increasingly viewed as the backbone of next-generation naval warfare. Against this backdrop, recommitting to a traditional carrier is seen by some as sidelining innovation. It sends a message that, despite years of discussion about transformation, the Navy still defaults to familiar tools when tensions rise. This perception has led to frustration among those advocating for faster modernization. They argue that resources devoted to maintaining and protecting carriers like the Truman could instead accelerate investment in emerging technologies that are more relevant to future conflicts. The Strategic Signal to Allies and Rivals Supporters of the decision counter that the Truman’s return is not about nostalgia—it’s about deterrence. Aircraft carriers remain powerful political tools. Their presence reassures allies, signals commitment, and demonstrates readiness in a way few other assets can. Yet even here, the message is mixed. To technologically advanced rivals, the deployment may signal predictability rather than strength. Adversaries have spent years developing strategies specifically designed to neutralize carriers, including anti-ship ballistic missiles and advanced surveillance systems. Cost Versus Capability The financial reality cannot be ignored. A single carrier strike group costs billions of dollars to build, maintain, and operate. In contrast, drone fleets and missile systems can be produced and deployed at a much lower cost, often with greater strategic flexibility. Critics argue that continuing to rely on carriers drains resources from areas where the Navy needs to grow most urgently. In a future conflict defined by speed, dispersion, and digital dominance, the cost-benefit equation of aircraft carriers looks increasingly questionable. Why the Carrier Still Matters—For Now Despite the criticism, aircraft carriers are not obsolete—yet. They remain unmatched in their ability to sustain prolonged air operations without relying on foreign bases. In regions where access is limited or politically sensitive, carriers still provide options no other platform can. The real issue, many experts say, is not the existence of carriers like the Truman, but over-reliance on them. Using them as one component of a broader, more flexible strategy may still make sense. Treating them as the centerpiece of future war planning may not. A Turning Point for Naval Strategy The return of the USS Harry S. Truman highlights a deeper tension within modern military thinking. It represents a crossroads between tradition and transformation, between proven power and emerging threats. Whether history views this moment as a wise assertion of strength or a missed opportunity for innovation will depend on what comes next. If the Navy pairs legacy platforms with bold technological change, the carrier’s return may be justified. If not, it risks becoming a powerful symbol—not of dominance, but of reluctance to adapt in a rapidly changing world.
By Fiazahmedbrohi a day ago in Longevity
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.