Brian Freeman Adventurer Shares Winter Hiking Tips
Ready for your next cold winter hike? Check out these tips before you head out.
Although winter hiking can be a bit more challenging than in the warmer months, it's still a great way to stay in shape and have fun while staying safe. Follow these winter hiking tips to ensure you're safe when the temperatures drop.
Layering
The weather can change quickly during winter, and it's essential to prepare for the change by wearing multiple layers. This will allow you to remove and add the appropriate clothing quickly. If you're planning on hiking up a higher elevation, keep in mind that the temperature will be colder on the summit.
Find a Partner
Getting stranded alone can be very dangerous, especially during winter. Having a partner can help you avoid getting lost and caught in the elements. Having an experienced trail mate can also help you navigate the hazards that can occur during winter.
You should also notify other people about your location if something goes wrong while you're out and about. You should provide them with details about your trip, such as when you plan on returning, your destination, and whom you intend to contact should you get lost.
Good Equipment
If you're planning on hiking in colder temperatures, you should consider investing in high-quality materials such as down and merino wool. These will allow you to regulate your body temperature and keep you warm. These will also last much longer than your standard cold-weather gear.
A good jacket, a lightweight backpack, and waterproof boots are some basic pieces of equipment you should have for winter hiking. You can also use hiking poles and snowshoes to make your trip easier when you're out in the snow.
Be Prepared
Even if you're unfamiliar with the route you're hiking on, you should always have a plan in place in case something goes wrong. This includes having a trail map, a first aid kit, a cell phone, and other survival equipment.
For longer trips, it's also essential to think about what you'll need if you have to spend the night outdoors. These include a flashlight, a sleeping bag, and waterproof matches. Although a backpack might be a little heavier, these items will be worth it if you get stranded.
ABOUT BRIAN FREEMAN ADVENTURER
Brian Freeman is often regarded as one Australia’s finest adventurers, and with good reason. He is one of Australia’s most accomplished adventurers in recent decades and unquestionably one of the world’s top adventurers of the moment. As a standard, most endurance athletes, and adventurers, have traditionally specialized in one discipline, such as high altitude mountain climbing, long-distance kayaking, desert and jungle running, survival experiences, or endurance swimming. Brian Freeman stands out as someone who has achieved them all. He has excelled in every discipline he has ever attempted.
Brian holds several world records and “firsts” in adventure endurance events. Some examples include being the only person to walk, run and kayak to and from Australia’s four cardinal extremes (north to south and east to west); crossing Australia’s Simpson Desert on foot twice; crossing the Kokoda Trail 59 times, including the record for the fastest ever crossing and walking from Australia’s easternmost point to its westernmost point, a total distance of almost 5500 kilometers; swimming the famed Melbourne RIP; and being the sole person to run from Australia’s northernmost point to its southernmost point, in between kayaking Bass Strait, a trip that took 85 days and covered almost 6000 kilometers.
Brian Freeman Australia is the only person to have conquered this journey, and the four cardinal extremes of Australia, under full human power. Amongst climbing other high altitude mountains of the world, he is also a summiteer on Mount Everest.
About the Creator
Brian Freeman Brisbane
Brian Freeman is one of Australia’s most accomplished adventurers in recent decades and unquestionably one of the world’s top adventurers of the moment. Brian Freeman Australia has excelled in every discipline he has ever attempted.
Keep reading
More stories from Brian Freeman Brisbane and writers in Longevity and other communities.
What is the Difference Between Wellness and Fitness? | Brian Freeman Australia
What do you think of when you hear the word “fitness”? It conjures images of that time they ran three miles after work for many people. They may also remember when they first learned to squat and deadlift compound lifts. “fitness” is often closely associated with physical activity and weight loss.
By Brian Freeman Brisbane3 years ago in Longevity
Day 4 of Quitting
If this is how sobriety feels, maybe it’s better to go through life a little buzzed… this, along with other hits like, I want to kill myself, I wish I was dead, and I’m going to throw myself off a bridge have been the only thoughts on rotation these past few days. I promise myself that if, in a month, I still feel like this (‘this’ meaning despondent, full of rage, and simultaneously numb) I can go back to smoking. Until mid-February though? Nicotine is off the table.
By sleepy drafts11 days ago in Longevity
The Return of the Aircraft Carrier Truman Is Being Seen as a Snub to the Navy in the War of the Future
The return of the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman to active deployment has sparked debate far beyond naval circles. While some see it as a show of enduring American naval power, others interpret the move as a symbolic snub—particularly in the context of how modern warfare is rapidly evolving. In an era dominated by drones, cyber warfare, hypersonic missiles, and artificial intelligence, the decision to once again lean heavily on a traditional aircraft carrier has raised uncomfortable questions about whether the Navy is preparing for the wars of tomorrow or clinging to the strategies of yesterday. A Floating Symbol of 20th-Century Power For decades, aircraft carriers have been the ultimate symbol of U.S. military dominance. These massive floating airbases project power thousands of miles from American shores and allow the U.S. to strike almost anywhere in the world. The Truman, like other Nimitz-class carriers, represents this legacy—housing nearly 5,000 sailors, dozens of fighter jets, and unmatched logistical capability. However, critics argue that what once made carriers indispensable now makes them vulnerable. Their sheer size, cost, and visibility turn them into high-value targets in a battlefield increasingly defined by precision strikes and long-range weapons. The “War of the Future” Looks Very Different Modern conflict is no longer limited to sea, land, and air. Cyber attacks can cripple infrastructure without a single shot fired. Drones can swarm targets at a fraction of the cost of traditional aircraft. Hypersonic missiles can reach targets faster than current defenses can respond. In this context, sending a massive carrier strike group into contested waters can appear less like a strategic necessity and more like a risky gamble. Critics argue that the return of the Truman reflects an outdated mindset—one that prioritizes visible force projection over adaptability and technological evolution. A Snub to Naval Innovation? Many analysts and serving officers believe the Navy’s future lies in distributed lethality—smaller, more agile platforms networked together, harder to detect and cheaper to replace. Unmanned surface vessels, autonomous submarines, and land-based missile systems are increasingly viewed as the backbone of next-generation naval warfare. Against this backdrop, recommitting to a traditional carrier is seen by some as sidelining innovation. It sends a message that, despite years of discussion about transformation, the Navy still defaults to familiar tools when tensions rise. This perception has led to frustration among those advocating for faster modernization. They argue that resources devoted to maintaining and protecting carriers like the Truman could instead accelerate investment in emerging technologies that are more relevant to future conflicts. The Strategic Signal to Allies and Rivals Supporters of the decision counter that the Truman’s return is not about nostalgia—it’s about deterrence. Aircraft carriers remain powerful political tools. Their presence reassures allies, signals commitment, and demonstrates readiness in a way few other assets can. Yet even here, the message is mixed. To technologically advanced rivals, the deployment may signal predictability rather than strength. Adversaries have spent years developing strategies specifically designed to neutralize carriers, including anti-ship ballistic missiles and advanced surveillance systems. Cost Versus Capability The financial reality cannot be ignored. A single carrier strike group costs billions of dollars to build, maintain, and operate. In contrast, drone fleets and missile systems can be produced and deployed at a much lower cost, often with greater strategic flexibility. Critics argue that continuing to rely on carriers drains resources from areas where the Navy needs to grow most urgently. In a future conflict defined by speed, dispersion, and digital dominance, the cost-benefit equation of aircraft carriers looks increasingly questionable. Why the Carrier Still Matters—For Now Despite the criticism, aircraft carriers are not obsolete—yet. They remain unmatched in their ability to sustain prolonged air operations without relying on foreign bases. In regions where access is limited or politically sensitive, carriers still provide options no other platform can. The real issue, many experts say, is not the existence of carriers like the Truman, but over-reliance on them. Using them as one component of a broader, more flexible strategy may still make sense. Treating them as the centerpiece of future war planning may not. A Turning Point for Naval Strategy The return of the USS Harry S. Truman highlights a deeper tension within modern military thinking. It represents a crossroads between tradition and transformation, between proven power and emerging threats. Whether history views this moment as a wise assertion of strength or a missed opportunity for innovation will depend on what comes next. If the Navy pairs legacy platforms with bold technological change, the carrier’s return may be justified. If not, it risks becoming a powerful symbol—not of dominance, but of reluctance to adapt in a rapidly changing world.
By Fiaz Ahmed Brohi6 days ago in Longevity
Miss Persephone's Manual to a Seemingly Ordinary Life
Miss Persephone was found at the dining table, her blue eyes swollen, her tears arriving and retreating like the tides of the ocean. Earlier that day, her family had visited her in the retirement home where she had lived for eight years. It was her eightieth birthday.
By Imola Tóth3 days ago in Fiction
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.