7 Simple Morning Habits to Help You Lose Weight Fast
If you're attempting to lose weight, the diet and activity choices you make throughout the day are important.
However, there are a few morning routines that may truly set you up for success.
As it turns out, there's a lot of science to back up the old adage "the early bird gets the worm."
Morning people are not just happy and may potentially live longer lives, but they may also be leaner.
Simply getting up early and preparing your day leads to increased productivity as well as a better understanding of any potential bottlenecks or difficulties that may interfere with your diet and exercise habits.
Making the most of your mornings allows you to be more 'proactive' and less reactive,' which naturally leads to more effective weight-loss attempts.
If that isn't enough motivation to set your alarm an hour or two early, try these nutritionist-approved morning routines for weight reduction.
1. EAT A PROTEIN-RICH BREAKFAST
You're on the right road if you already understand the value of a full meal. However, you should also ensure that your breakfast contains an adequate quantity of protein.
Because this macronutrient takes longer to digest than carbs or fat, high-protein meals keep you full for several hours. Protein aids in both appetite management and blood sugar regulation.
Aim for 25 to 30 grams of protein for breakfast from eggs, plain Greek yogurt, nut butter, and lean chicken or turkey sausage for maximum satiety and muscle-building effects.
2. CHECK OUT THAT CUP OF COFFEE
Caffeine may really help your morning routine burn fat.
One research published in the journal Scientific Reports in June 2019 discovered that consuming one cup of coffee was enough to increase "brown fat," also known as brown adipose tissue or BAT, which helps the body burn calories more quickly.
Furthermore, having a caffeine boost in the morning has the extra benefit of improving your attention for your morning workout.
3. DO YOUR WORKOUT
Though pressing the snooze button is undoubtedly more appealing than a morning workout, research suggests that exercising early may help you lose weight.
When Tehran University researchers looked at the effects of morning versus evening aerobic exercise, they discovered that getting moving in the morning resulted in lower caloric intake later in the day, as well as a more significant change in body weight, BMI, abdominal skinfold thickness, and abdominal circumference. Their findings were published in the June 2017 edition of Clinical Obesity.
In short, exercising first thing in the morning appears to have a greater impact on appetite control, calorie intake, and weight reduction.
4. WALK AS MUCH OF YOUR COMMUTING DISTANCE AS POSSIBLE.
Getting some outside exercise in early in the morning, even if it's only a few minutes of walking, can be useful for another reason.
Morning light wavelengths have been proven to influence the levels of the satiety hormones leptin and ghrelin as well as body fat.
Indeed, an April 2014 study published in PLoS One discovered that changing the timing of light exposure may increase metabolism and improve weight management.
Bonus: Spending time outside in the morning will improve your exposure to vitamin D, a substance that many Americans are deficient in.
5. SET YOUR GOALS FOR THE DAY
There are several advantages to practicing mindfulness, or constantly checking in with your emotions, thoughts, feelings, and sensations in order to achieve a state of awareness.
Mindfulness, according to the American Psychological Association, can reduce stress, improve memory, increase attention, and contribute to relationship pleasure. Another advantage? You guessed it - it may aid with weight loss.
One study, published in the journal Eating Behaviors in April 2014, discovered that mindfulness training might reduce both emotional eating and binge eating.
Mindfulness does not have to take a long time or take place in an ideal location. If you have five minutes and a peaceful place to yourself, you may utilize that time to be attentive to your thoughts and feelings.
6. SLEEP IN IF YOU NEED MORE ZZZS
Most of us understand the importance of a good night's sleep for general health, but according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one-third of American adults aren't sleeping long enough.
According to research published in Current Biology in February 2019, getting the required 7 to 9 hours of sleep each night may also help you lose weight. Sleep deprivation was connected to an increase in eating after supper and weight gain.
What is the takeaway?
Waking up too early to gain a head start on the day may result in fewer sleep hours. So, if you want to rise before the crack of dawn, make sure to alter your bedtime accordingly.
7. PERFORM A WEIGH-IN
Dieters who weigh themselves daily lose almost three times as much weight and body fat as those who measure themselves less regularly, according to research published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics in April 2016.
To achieve the most accurate readings, walk on the scale soon after waking up and going to the restroom — either naked or in the same amount of clothes each morning.
ONE MORE THING... TRY THIS 10-SECOND "DAILY FIX" THAT BURNS UP TO 2 POUNDS OF BELLY FAT PER DAY...
Click here to see the 10-second "daily fix" that assisted me in losing 24 pounds in just 19 days.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Nikhil Shah and writers in Longevity and other communities.
Day 4 of Quitting
If this is how sobriety feels, maybe it’s better to go through life a little buzzed… this, along with other hits like, I want to kill myself, I wish I was dead, and I’m going to throw myself off a bridge have been the only thoughts on rotation these past few days. I promise myself that if, in a month, I still feel like this (‘this’ meaning despondent, full of rage, and simultaneously numb) I can go back to smoking. Until mid-February though? Nicotine is off the table.
By sleepy drafts11 days ago in Longevity
The Return of the Aircraft Carrier Truman Is Being Seen as a Snub to the Navy in the War of the Future
The return of the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman to active deployment has sparked debate far beyond naval circles. While some see it as a show of enduring American naval power, others interpret the move as a symbolic snub—particularly in the context of how modern warfare is rapidly evolving. In an era dominated by drones, cyber warfare, hypersonic missiles, and artificial intelligence, the decision to once again lean heavily on a traditional aircraft carrier has raised uncomfortable questions about whether the Navy is preparing for the wars of tomorrow or clinging to the strategies of yesterday. A Floating Symbol of 20th-Century Power For decades, aircraft carriers have been the ultimate symbol of U.S. military dominance. These massive floating airbases project power thousands of miles from American shores and allow the U.S. to strike almost anywhere in the world. The Truman, like other Nimitz-class carriers, represents this legacy—housing nearly 5,000 sailors, dozens of fighter jets, and unmatched logistical capability. However, critics argue that what once made carriers indispensable now makes them vulnerable. Their sheer size, cost, and visibility turn them into high-value targets in a battlefield increasingly defined by precision strikes and long-range weapons. The “War of the Future” Looks Very Different Modern conflict is no longer limited to sea, land, and air. Cyber attacks can cripple infrastructure without a single shot fired. Drones can swarm targets at a fraction of the cost of traditional aircraft. Hypersonic missiles can reach targets faster than current defenses can respond. In this context, sending a massive carrier strike group into contested waters can appear less like a strategic necessity and more like a risky gamble. Critics argue that the return of the Truman reflects an outdated mindset—one that prioritizes visible force projection over adaptability and technological evolution. A Snub to Naval Innovation? Many analysts and serving officers believe the Navy’s future lies in distributed lethality—smaller, more agile platforms networked together, harder to detect and cheaper to replace. Unmanned surface vessels, autonomous submarines, and land-based missile systems are increasingly viewed as the backbone of next-generation naval warfare. Against this backdrop, recommitting to a traditional carrier is seen by some as sidelining innovation. It sends a message that, despite years of discussion about transformation, the Navy still defaults to familiar tools when tensions rise. This perception has led to frustration among those advocating for faster modernization. They argue that resources devoted to maintaining and protecting carriers like the Truman could instead accelerate investment in emerging technologies that are more relevant to future conflicts. The Strategic Signal to Allies and Rivals Supporters of the decision counter that the Truman’s return is not about nostalgia—it’s about deterrence. Aircraft carriers remain powerful political tools. Their presence reassures allies, signals commitment, and demonstrates readiness in a way few other assets can. Yet even here, the message is mixed. To technologically advanced rivals, the deployment may signal predictability rather than strength. Adversaries have spent years developing strategies specifically designed to neutralize carriers, including anti-ship ballistic missiles and advanced surveillance systems. Cost Versus Capability The financial reality cannot be ignored. A single carrier strike group costs billions of dollars to build, maintain, and operate. In contrast, drone fleets and missile systems can be produced and deployed at a much lower cost, often with greater strategic flexibility. Critics argue that continuing to rely on carriers drains resources from areas where the Navy needs to grow most urgently. In a future conflict defined by speed, dispersion, and digital dominance, the cost-benefit equation of aircraft carriers looks increasingly questionable. Why the Carrier Still Matters—For Now Despite the criticism, aircraft carriers are not obsolete—yet. They remain unmatched in their ability to sustain prolonged air operations without relying on foreign bases. In regions where access is limited or politically sensitive, carriers still provide options no other platform can. The real issue, many experts say, is not the existence of carriers like the Truman, but over-reliance on them. Using them as one component of a broader, more flexible strategy may still make sense. Treating them as the centerpiece of future war planning may not. A Turning Point for Naval Strategy The return of the USS Harry S. Truman highlights a deeper tension within modern military thinking. It represents a crossroads between tradition and transformation, between proven power and emerging threats. Whether history views this moment as a wise assertion of strength or a missed opportunity for innovation will depend on what comes next. If the Navy pairs legacy platforms with bold technological change, the carrier’s return may be justified. If not, it risks becoming a powerful symbol—not of dominance, but of reluctance to adapt in a rapidly changing world.
By Fiaz Ahmed Brohi6 days ago in Longevity
Miss Persephone's Manual to a Seemingly Ordinary Life
Miss Persephone was found at the dining table, her blue eyes swollen, her tears arriving and retreating like the tides of the ocean. Earlier that day, her family had visited her in the retirement home where she had lived for eight years. It was her eightieth birthday.
By Imola Tóth3 days ago in Fiction
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.