Installing a dating app, two pals give it a shot. The man makes an effort to create the ideal profile. A lovely frontal image. A group photo to give the impression that he has buddies. A photo taken in Paris gives the impression that he is cultured. And an image of him scaling mountains gives the impression that he is daring. After much effort, the profile is complete. The woman decides to use the first image she finds because she doesn't feel comfortable disclosing much personal information. They begin to swipe and pray for the best. When the woman checks her phone at the end of the day, her counter is complete.
Almost every profile she likes is a match right away. She soon finds her inbox overflowing with matches and messages. It's a different tale for the male. He hasn't had any matches yet and has only gotten a few likes. He loses patience with the app and begins to doubt his self-worth. After all, he spent a lot of time creating a great profile. How come he can't find any matches? We must comprehend the statistics underlying dating applications to respond to that query.
To determine why males receive so few matches on dating apps, I created a simulation using 1000 dummies. The absolute dating scene may reflect something other than what is seen on dating apps. Some research suggests that dating apps can lower self-esteem, with men being more affected than women. And women frequently need to develop coping mechanisms for men's intrusive behavior on these apps. Because so little information is provided, it can be challenging to comprehend exactly what is happening within these apps. Nevertheless, we can infer conclusions from the scant data we have.
I'll start with a perfect, fanciful scenario, and then I'll start introducing real-world elements to watch how rapidly things change. We're discussing dating people of different genders as an aside. The mechanics of same-gender relationships on dating apps are completely different, so this video is not about them. Let's say there are an equal number of men as well as women accessing the app because we're aiming to create the best-case scenario. Let's assume that everyone views 100 profiles daily and that the algorithm treats each profile equally. I suppose that users only like one of every four profiles they see. This indicates that every time a user's profile is displayed, there is a 25% chance that they will be liked. It's okay that some of these constraints aren't realistic. Starting this way, we'll gradually make it more plausible. So, at the end of the day, how many likes as well as matches will everyone receive? Run the simulation now. Men and women receive 25 likes and 6 matches daily on average. This seems different from actual dating applications, but why?
Let's begin with the first justification: Male users outnumber female users. For two of the most well-known dating applications in the world, Tinder and Bumble, I was able to locate user gender information. In both apps, there were noticeably more men than women users. I will keep things simple in our simulation and suppose that there are 2 males for every woman, a ratio that falls between Bumble's and Tinder's. The differences were significant when I reran the simulation. You'll have an opportunity to pause the movie if you want to make an educated prediction about the number of likes and matches users receive. The data are now showing the first hints of a gender gap. Because there are twice as many men as women, ladies receive twice as many likes, while males only receive half as many. And intriguing things happen when we look at the number of matches. Women received 50 likes on average. You may anticipate they would receive an average of 12 or 13 matches since they like 1 out of every 4 profiles. But they only receive 6. This is because there are so many male users right now that women barely have an opportunity to see half of the individuals that liked them. There are simply too many males waiting since they can only view 100 profiles daily. It is understandable at this point for ladies to begin to feel a little overwhelmed by the number of likes they are receiving.
Additionally, girls are forced to consider carefully who they give likes to because they frequently experience men's intrusive behavior. At the same time, men are beginning to show signs of desperation. They know they can't be too selective because they don't receive many likes, so they start distributing likes more freely to increase their chances of finding matches. And that brings us to reason two: Men like more than women. Men are almost three times more likely than women to like a profile on Tinder, according to this 2014 New York Times story. So let's apply those figures. In the simulation I'm updating, women and men offer likes in 14% and 46% of cases. What impact do you believe this will have on the outcomes? The gender gap has now grown much more comprehensive. Men only get 7 likes compared to women's average of 92. Men like 46% of the users they see; therefore, this results in an average of 3.2 matches from these 7 likes. Women receive 6.4 matches per day on average, two more than males. For the typical male user, things might become even more challenging. Although subjective, there is evidence that more people will find some profiles attractive than others. This takes us to the third reason: A small percentage of individuals receive most of the likes. One of the Hinge developers provided some information regarding this issue in a Q&A post in 2017 on the company's website. He emphasized how some individuals receive astronomically more attention than others: According to his findings, 25% of women received likes from men, while only 15% of men received likes from women. This indicates that a small group of users receives a significant portion of the total likes, particularly among men. Try to incorporate that into our simulation, please. I'm assigning each user a score, ranging from 0 to 100%, based on how attractive other users find them to be. Until now, attractiveness has had no bearing on the likelihood of receiving likes. This means that regardless of how appealing a profile was judged, there was a 46 and 14% chance that it would be liked each time it was displayed for a particular gender.
I'm currently seeking a new distribution that ensures the top users receive significantly more likes while maintaining the same average like percentages. I used the most straightforward formulas I could think of. I expected that people with a score of 0 would have a 0% probability of receiving likes and users with a score of 100 would have a 100% chance of doing so. Although this is oversimplified, I'm doing my best to keep it that way because I couldn't find any data.
According to these curves, 50% of male likes to go to the top 27% of female users, and 50% of female likes to go to the top 10% of male users, which is quite similar to the data provided by Hinge. So, this ought to be relatively accurate. Let's start the last simulation. You can now try to predict the outcomes.
This was a little deceptive question. The figures remain constant. This is because, despite adding inequality among users of the same gender, we didn't significantly alter the behavior of men and women. They continue to like the same number of posts. The distribution is now skewed by the top users who receive the most likes, which is the difference. This indicates that the averages no longer capture the average user's experience. So let's introduce a new metric called the median, which measures the number of likes and matches the typical user receives. The average male visitor only obtains one like and no matches, as seen presently.
The most liked ten percent of male users receive an average of 37 likes. In contrast, the typical user receives between 0 and one like, according to data on the average amount of likes for various beauty scores. And fascinating things occur if we look at the average amount of matches. The top 10% of men receive more matches than the top 10% of women. Though they receive fewer likes, they find more partners because they are less picky than women. I'm curious if this occurs in real life as well. The average male received fewer likes as I made my simulation more realistic, dropping from 25 to 12 to 7 to 1.
Again, based on the scant information I could uncover, I attempted to mimic a dating app. Depending on your experience with dating apps, it might apply to you. For instance, I assumed that users view 100 profiles daily because I couldn't locate any data on this. And I left out elements like varying demographics and cultural backgrounds and the effect of premium memberships that benefit those who pay. However, the simulation enabled me to comprehend what is likely occurring within these dating apps. So what should we learn from this?
In no way is this piece advocating against the usage of dating apps. According to this report, meeting online has become the most common way for American couples to get together. As a result, dating apps are effective and have helped many people find love. My takeaway from this post is that, for the reasons I listed, dating apps may skew our perception of the actual dating scene, and I believe we should be conscious of the effects this may have on users' experiences and self-esteem. Because ultimately, in my opinion, both men and women may be harmed by this imbalance.
Men will have difficulty finding matches, which only encourages them to like as many profiles as possible to increase their chances of finding a match. And when a woman matches with a man, they are aware that he is likely to like every other profile they come across, making it likely that he is not genuinely interested. That's my opinion; however, I'd love to hear yours in the comments.
About the Creator
Ian Sankan
Writer and storyteller passionate about health and wellness, personal development, and pop culture. Exploring topics that inspire and educate. Let’s connect and share ideas!
Keep reading
More stories from Ian Sankan and writers in Journal and other communities.
What About the Hypothesis That Gravity Is Just a Myth?
Sir Isaac Newton is said to have observed an apple fall from a tree in the 17th century and wondered why it had fallen to the ground rather than upward or sideways, which would have been freaky. After years of research, he concluded that gravity must be the culprit; scientists called it a force of attraction that was present between all objects, but Albert Einstein revolutionised these ideas about gravity many years later. As a young scientist, Einstein reportedly struggled to develop theories to explain the behaviour of moving objects. When an experiment came to his mind, he is said to have called it the "happiest of thoughts," according to legend. He reportedly wasn't entirely satisfied with Newton's findings because something seemed wrong. He compared the feeling of gravity to writing in an ascending lift. relativity in general. Simply put, Einstein started working arduously to establish this theory, and at a certain point, he even expressed concern that he would go insane. According to general relativity, space warps or curves due to gravity. Our sun is large enough to warp space throughout the entire solar system, which is why our planet and every other planet in the solar system orbit the star. This warping also affects how we measure time; if you look at your watch, time appears to pass at the same rate every day, but if you hike to the top of a mountain, time seems to pass at a different rate. that's because, bearing these studies in mind, gravity influences how quickly time passes. We experience gravity as a force simply because we are placed on a surface; however, if there were no service and no attraction between us and this surface, we would become weightless. If you don't mind some strange looks, Einstein concluded that gravity was not an attraction force but instead a curvature in the fabric of space-time. Attempt this experiment. You'll soon notice that your weight changes, requiring a bathroom scale and a lift to ride. At the International Space Station, astronauts move along with the station, so there is nothing to push them against the station's side so that they have some weight even if we continue to believe that gravity as a force it's the weakest one we know because it only attracts and there is no negative coercion. However, as you move up and down in the building in the lift, the gravitational Force is the same, but your weight varies because the lift speeds up and slows down. The Earth's gravitational pull is less powerful than that of a refrigerator magnet. All species on Earth are constrained in their growth by the height of their skeletons and by how much weight they can support, which is directly related to gravity, which is why some marine creatures are capable of getting bigger. The fact that our planet has gravity also influences the way people look and behave. the largest animal on our planet right now is the Antarctic blue whale it's regarding the size of two school buses paired that's because sea creatures can float which a bit counteracts gravity the effects of gravity can be seen in individuals too we are taller in the morning than we are in the evening our everyday duties and the added impact of gravity make the cartilage in our ankles knees hips back as well as neck compress once you have overnight sleep the cartilage swells back to normal gravity may also affect your shower everyday that is if you're an astronaut they have to depend on the old-fashioned way of bathing up there on the space facility they can't take a shower because the Force of gravity up there is unique and water doesn't flow as it ought to instead they use liquid soap water as well as no rinse shampoo they initially squeeze some liquid soap along with water from pre-made water pouches onto their skin afterwards they open the no rinse shampoo and add a little water to cleanse their hair towels are then utilised to wipe off the extra water which is really precious in space to make sure they recycle it Excess water is immediately evaporated using an airflow system. Weight and gravity should not be equated. Since weight is the Force an object exerts on a person back on Earth, astronauts on the space station do float, and you may occasionally hear that they are in a state of zero gravity, but this is untrue because gravity up there is only about 90% of what it is on Earth. However, astronauts appear and feel weightless because most creatures have evolved to sense and adapt to Earth's gravitational pull in the sea; for example, some fish have floating calcium carbonate deposits. Our own Moon also remains where it is due to the effects of gravity; if not for this Force, our satellite would have floated away by now. The objects with the biggest gravitational pulls in the universe are black holes; fortunately, our planet. Salmonella, the type of bacteria known to cause food poisoning, becomes three times nastier in the condition of microgravity, so you've got to cook your chicken. Even light itself cannot escape a black hole's gravitational pull. similarly gravity is different on each planet and due to of that things weigh differently depending on which planet they're on take Earth for instance an object that weighs 100 pounds here might only be 38 pounds on Mercury but if you're planning on losing weight fast try booking a trip to Pluto an individual who weighs 150 pounds on Earth would weigh no more than 10 pounds on Pluto the same person might weigh considerably more on Jupiter which is the planet with the most powerful gravity 150 pounds on Earth would consequently into more than 354 pounds there no thanks remember that experiment with watches ticking at distinct levels of elevation it transforms out that gravity isn't spread evenly on the surface of Earth why because our planet isn't a flawless sphere the mass of Earth isn't evenly distributed either that's why you get shifts in gravity in different locations more so gravity is weaker at the equator since of the centrifugal forces produced by the planet's rotation since we've always perceived gravity as a force we seem to suspect that it has somewhat of a suction motion but it's not precisely true back in 1998 scientists were baffled to see that the expansion of the universe was speeding up so they related this to the repulsive gravity of mysterious Dark Energy we now know that dark energy makes up for greater than 60 percent of the mass energy of our whole universe but because nobody knows what it actually is we can only make assumptions and when this largely accepted is quantum theory which appears to claim that gravity pushes rather than pulls things.
By Ian Sankan2 years ago in Journal
The 5 AM Myth: Why I Trashed My Alarm Clock to Finally Find My Edge
The blue light of the smartphone screen felt like a laser beam hitting my retinas at 4:58 AM. Outside my window, the world was a bruised purple—silent, freezing, and utterly indifferent to my "ambition."
By George Evan4 days ago in Journal
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.