Why I Hid My Age All These Years - Jemima Osunde Finally Reveals True Age
Jemima gets honest
Nollywood actress Jemima Osunde has been in the industry for quite some time now. Since bursting into the national conscience with her role in Shuga, she has gone on to amass quite a name for herself. But, one thing that has been the topic of a lot of speculation for many years is Jemima Osunde's real age. Many people have guessed and today, if you even Google "Jemima Osunde age", the response that will come out is 26. Even Google has it wrong:
Jemima Osunde is not 26. During an interview with Shoptalk while discussing the topic of ageism, Jemima opened up about her real age and explained why she has hidden it for all these years. Here is Jemima's real age and why, she explains, she hid it.
**Before reading on, please make sure to like and follow my Facebook page (Jide Okonjo) so you don't miss out on any new and interesting lists, articles, and stories that I post every single day. I have a really fun page. If you like my page, you will have fun too. So what's stopping you? Like my page and let's have fun together!
On Shoptalk, Jemima Osunde was asked "Culturally, ageism has affected us in so many ways. You look at how the country runs, could it be better if people who were younger were given more authority? Were respected more? But it doesn't happen because we've decided that "Ah, this person is older than you therefore it is their position or their right?" How has that affected you?" Jemima responded:
Yeah, I get that everywhere I go. Everywhere. For the longest time, I didn't tell anyone my age at work. It was all speculation. No one actually knew how old I was. I'm 23 by the way, I only turned 23 [in 2021] and I only announced it because it was very intentional. But for the longest time, because of what I look like, even when people assumed I was 25 or 26 which is older than I am, they still treated me like I was a baby. So even finding out now, my real age is like a trigger for them. Like okay we were given her the tip of the iceberg before, now just pour the whole mountain on her. And it's annoying because I feel like age should not be a factor to limit you for anything. Imagine I didn't say my age and imagine I didn't look how old I look. Imagine I looked like a 30 year old or whatever, would you disrespect everything I've been able to amount for myself? Or accomplish? I feel like it's basically the way the society in this part of the world, I won't limit it to Nigeria, Africa as a whole, this cultural factor of "if I'm older than you I can get away with anything. I can do whatever I want, you have to be under me." In the professional world, I might have come across as rude to a lot of people because if you come into my daddy's house as my daddy's friend, I will even kneel down to greet you out of respect. But in the professional world, if we're on set and we have the hierarchy of what is supposed to work, or even in the hospital or wherever I find myself, if it's a professional environment, I like to keep it as professional as possible. So it really triggers me when people try to disrespect me or belittle me or downgrade the work that I put in because of my age. It's a trigger for me. I'm sure it's probably a trigger for anyone else out there who's young. It really gets on my nerve. Also because when you now try to speak for yourself, or stand up for yourself, you come across as the rude little girl on set. So it's just like fire and pouring fuel in it.
So Jemima Osunde is actually 23, not 26. What do you think about her reason for hiding her age all these years? Do you agree with what she said? Do you not? Let me know your thoughts by leaving a comment either below or on my Jide Okonjo Facebook post.
That's All.
I hope you’ve had fun. Don’t forget to like my page (Jide Okonjo) if you don’t already for more stories like this, the fun never ends
To catch up on other content you might have missed, click here.
Until next time, have a wonderful rest of your day.
About the Creator
Jide Okonjo
This account is dedicated to TWO things:
🇳🇬 Nigerian news stories for my dedicated Nigerian readers.
💡 The Six Figure Series (A Vocal Exclusive) for writers, readers, and fans of Vocal.
Keep reading
More stories from Jide Okonjo and writers in Humans and other communities.
What Vocal Sent When I Crossed 25,000 Reads (Photo)
So, this is pretty cool, pretty sweet, and pretty interesting, and you may not know this. But when you cross certain Vocal milestones, the company sends you something. At least, it did for me (not sure if they still do now, so please let me know in the comments if you received the same when you crossed your own milestones).
By Jide OkonjoExclusive • about a year ago
Autonomy Is The Real Privilege
Good morning, freedom-seekers! Today we’re gonna be looking at autonomy. A strange word, I know; one many would probably look at blankly and run away from on sight. We’re gonna figure out what it actually means, consider how it’s achieved, and decipher just how deeply most of us are tangled up in dependence without realising it.
By That ‘Freedom’ Guyabout 11 hours ago in Humans
Los Angeles Billionaire Moves to Nevada After California Threatens to Tax Wealth
When a prominent Los Angeles billionaire quietly packed up and moved to Nevada, it wasn’t just a personal lifestyle change — it was a political statement. The move came shortly after California lawmakers revived proposals to tax extreme wealth, targeting the state’s richest residents as a way to fund public services and address inequality. Now, that single relocation has become a symbol in a much larger debate: Do wealth taxes strengthen states — or drive their most valuable taxpayers away? The Trigger: California’s Wealth Tax Proposal California has long wrestled with how to fund its ambitious social programs while addressing widening income inequality. In recent years, progressive lawmakers have floated proposals to introduce a wealth tax, aimed at individuals with net worths above a certain threshold — often tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Unlike income taxes, which apply to yearly earnings, wealth taxes target accumulated assets such as stocks, real estate, and business holdings. Supporters argue that this approach ensures the ultra-rich contribute a fairer share to public infrastructure, education, and housing. Critics, however, warn that wealth taxes are difficult to enforce and easy to avoid, especially in a mobile economy where residency can shift across state lines. The Los Angeles billionaire’s move appears to validate those concerns. Why Nevada? Nevada has become a magnet for wealthy individuals — and the reasons are straightforward. The state has: No personal income tax No capital gains tax Business-friendly regulations A growing financial and tech services sector For high-net-worth individuals, relocating to Nevada can mean saving millions of dollars annually. For someone facing the possibility of a wealth tax layered on top of California’s already high income taxes, the financial incentive is hard to ignore. In this case, the billionaire reportedly established legal residency in Nevada, purchased property, and shifted business operations — all steps that tax experts say are increasingly common among ultra-wealthy Californians. A Broader Trend, Not an Isolated Case This move is far from unique. Over the past decade, California has seen a steady outflow of wealthy residents to states like Nevada, Texas, Florida, and Arizona. While climate, housing costs, and lifestyle play roles, tax policy has become a central factor. High-profile departures — from tech executives to hedge fund managers — often spark political backlash. Critics argue that the wealthy are abandoning the state that helped them succeed. Defenders counter that states should not penalize success to fund unsustainable spending. The Los Angeles billionaire’s relocation has once again brought this tension into the spotlight. The Political Reaction in California California lawmakers defending the wealth tax proposal insist that fear of capital flight is exaggerated. They argue that the state’s economic advantages — including access to talent, innovation hubs, and cultural influence — outweigh tax concerns for most entrepreneurs. Some lawmakers also point out that California already relies heavily on its highest earners, with a small percentage of taxpayers contributing a large share of total revenue. In their view, asking the ultra-rich to contribute more is not radical — it’s necessary. Opponents, however, see the billionaire’s move as a warning sign. They argue that when even a single wealthy individual leaves, the state can lose not only tax revenue but also investment, philanthropy, and job creation. What This Means for State Finances The departure of one billionaire may not immediately dent California’s massive budget, but the long-term implications are harder to ignore. Wealthy individuals often: Pay a disproportionate share of state taxes Fund startups and venture capital Support universities, museums, and nonprofits If enough high-net-worth residents follow the same path, critics warn, the tax base could shrink faster than lawmakers expect. Supporters of the wealth tax counter that public investment funded by higher taxes could improve quality of life for millions — potentially attracting new residents and businesses in the long run. A National Debate Over Wealth and Mobility This story extends beyond California. Across the U.S., states are competing for residents — especially wealthy ones. Tax policy has become one of the most powerful tools in that competition. While progressive states push for redistribution, low-tax states market themselves as havens for capital. The Los Angeles billionaire’s move underscores a key reality of modern economics: wealth is increasingly mobile. Assets can move digitally, businesses can relocate headquarters, and individuals can change residency with relative ease. This mobility complicates efforts to tax extreme wealth at the state level, fueling calls for federal solutions instead. The Ethical Divide At the heart of the controversy lies a philosophical question: Should wealthy individuals feel a moral obligation to remain and pay higher taxes in the states that enabled their success — or are they justified in seeking the most favorable financial environment? Supporters of wealth taxes argue that extreme inequality threatens social stability and that those who benefit most from the system should help sustain it. Opponents argue that punitive taxation discourages innovation and rewards capital flight, ultimately harming the very communities lawmakers aim to help. The billionaire’s move doesn’t settle the debate — but it sharpens it. What Happens Next? California’s wealth tax proposals are still evolving, and it remains unclear whether a final version will pass. Even if enacted, legal challenges and enforcement hurdles loom large. Meanwhile, states like Nevada are likely to continue benefiting from California’s policy uncertainty, attracting wealthy residents and businesses seeking predictability. For policymakers, the challenge is balancing fairness, revenue needs, and competitiveness in a system where borders are increasingly porous. Final Thoughts The Los Angeles billionaire’s move to Nevada is more than a headline — it’s a case study in how tax policy shapes behavior. It highlights the difficulty of taxing wealth at the state level and the unintended consequences that can follow even well-intentioned reforms. As California debates its economic future, one thing is clear: in a mobile, interconnected economy, policy decisions don’t just redistribute wealth — they redirect it. Whether wealth taxes become a solution or a cautionary tale will depend on how lawmakers respond to the signals already being sent.
By Muhammad Hassan5 days ago in Humans
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.