What to Do When You Realize You and Your Partner Have Chemistry
Chemistry is more than an attraction—it's a necessity to any thriving relationship! So what do you do when you realize you and your new partner have chemistry?
Chemistry is defined as a strong attraction between two people. But when asked to explain the how and why of sexual attraction, many are left scratching their heads. One thing I know for sure is that sexual chemistry is based on more than looks alone. That’s just one tiny part of the equation. There’s also the way the other person smells. The two of you could have a spiritual connection, possibly from living past lives together. Also, attraction is very strong when two people have karmic patterns that need to be worked out (or these patterns will keep repeating). I truly believe that two people are drawn together in order to fulfill a special purpose, learn lessons about themselves or about life, or to figure out what it is they desire in a mate.
So now that we know there’s chemistry, what are we supposed to do with it?
For Women
1. You know it’s there.
Women are blessed (or cursed?) with strong intuition. We can feel a connection to a man that completely transcends all logic. There’s a “knowing” that can’t be explained, and it’s possible you’ve had dreams about him. Trust me, you’re not crazy.
2. Keep it to yourself.
You can seriously scare any good man away by professing to him that you feel a strong connection. He has to feel it too, and men work on a different timeline then women do. Give the poor chap some time to catch up. Let him feel the connection and be the first to express it to you.
3. Realize it may not be forever.
A man that you feel a very strong connection to may not be your life partner. Soulmates come into our lives for us to learn something about ourselves or as a catalyst for change. The sex is amazing for a reason—you two are drawn together for a purpose! But he may not be your life partner. Get over it.
For Men
Photo by Zoriana Stakhniv on Unsplash
1. It’s not about looks.
While I realize that men are very visual creatures, sexual chemistry is not just about looks. Try and look deeper into her soul. Or don’t. There are plenty of shallow women out there and I’m sure you can find one for the night.
2. When you feel it.
If you happen to meet an amazing woman that you have chemistry with, don’t let her be the one that got away. It’s worth pursuing to find out why you feel such a strong attraction. Maybe you’ve shared many past lives together. It’s possible she’s your future wife! You never know…
3. Learn from it.
Maybe the woman that you had amazing chemistry with didn’t work out and never became a relationship. Take what you learned and move on! The most mature way to date (when you’re really looking for something serious) is to end it the moment you don’t see a future with her. The longer it goes on with the wrong person, the more painful it will be to walk away!
You can follow me on Instagram @savvysinglegirl and Twitter @savvysinglebook.
Love Savvy Single Girl? Help me continue to create by sending a small gift below!
About the Creator
Heart Centered Universe
Author of Transcendence-A Memoir, SAG-AFTRA Actress, and Model based in Miami Beach, FL. This blog is about what I feel called to share with the world🌍 I would love to hear your comments! Remember to Be Happy and VIBE HIGH! ⭐️❤️
Keep reading
More stories from Heart Centered Universe and writers in Humans and other communities.
How To Deal with Breadcrumbing
Dating in the modern world is getting super confusing and chaotic. With all these online dating sites and apps, people tend to get a misconstrued view of the world and begin to think that there are millions of options. However, nothing could be farther from the truth. While there are plenty of single people out there, meeting someone you truly connect with is a rare and precious thing.
By Heart Centered Universe8 years ago in Humans
Trump Voices Reluctance at Nominating Hassett as Fed Chair
Former President Donald Trump has publicly expressed reluctance to nominate economist Kevin Hassett as the next Chair of the Federal Reserve, igniting discussion across political and financial circles. Hassett, a well-known economic adviser during Trump’s administration, has long been considered a candidate capable of bridging the divide between market confidence and presidential expectations. Yet Trump’s latest statements suggest hesitation, prompting questions about the dynamics between the White House, the Federal Reserve, and Wall Street. The Federal Reserve and Its Importance The Federal Reserve, or Fed, is the central bank of the United States and plays a crucial role in steering the economy. Its responsibilities include controlling inflation, stabilizing employment, and guiding monetary policy through tools such as interest rates and quantitative easing. The selection of a Fed Chair is one of the most significant economic decisions a president can make, as the position directly impacts financial markets, consumer confidence, and international economic relations. Hassett’s name has circulated in financial and political circles as a potential candidate due to his extensive background in economic policy. He previously served as Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under Trump and has consistently advocated for growth-oriented policies. His nomination could signal continuity with Trump-era economic priorities, but the former president’s reluctance has created uncertainty. Trump’s Reluctance In recent interviews, Trump expressed hesitation over formally nominating Hassett, citing concerns about market volatility and potential political backlash. Analysts suggest several factors could be influencing his reluctance: Public Scrutiny: Nominating a high-profile economist invites intense media attention and political debate. Any misstep could impact Trump’s image and perceived influence over economic policy. Policy Differences: Although Hassett and Trump worked closely during his administration, disagreements over interest rates, inflation control, or fiscal strategy could cause hesitation. Timing and Strategy: The timing of a Fed nomination is critical. Trump may be weighing market conditions, congressional response, or broader political calculations before making a decision. Market Implications Financial markets respond strongly to news about Fed leadership. The Chair influences interest rates, lending policies, and overall investor confidence. Uncertainty around the nomination can lead to short-term market volatility, affecting stock prices, bond yields, and the U.S. dollar. Economists argue that hesitation in announcing a nominee could signal indecision or caution, which may affect investor sentiment. “Markets value predictability,” says Julia Ramirez, a senior economist at Global Insights. “A prolonged period without a clear candidate can create temporary instability, particularly in sectors sensitive to interest rate changes, such as banking and real estate.” Hassett’s Profile Kevin Hassett is widely recognized for his academic and policy expertise. He co-authored several influential works on economic growth, tax policy, and productivity. During his tenure as Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Hassett emphasized tax reform, deregulation, and measures aimed at stimulating investment. Supporters argue that Hassett’s experience equips him to manage complex economic challenges, including inflationary pressures, labor market fluctuations, and post-pandemic recovery strategies. Critics, however, question whether his policy preferences align with the current economic landscape, particularly with inflation and debt concerns dominating headlines. Political Dynamics Trump’s reluctance also reflects broader political dynamics. The Federal Reserve, while independent, often becomes a focal point for political debate. Decisions about leadership, policy direction, and rate adjustments carry political weight. By hesitating to nominate Hassett, Trump may be signaling caution, balancing his desire to influence economic policy with the need to avoid potential criticism from lawmakers, economists, or the media. The situation underscores the intersection of politics and economics, where decisions extend beyond technical expertise to considerations of public perception and political strategy. Historical Context Presidents have historically faced scrutiny over Fed appointments. The Chair’s term typically spans four years, but the position’s influence extends well beyond the tenure of any single administration. Past presidents have occasionally delayed nominations, weighing the impact on markets, the Senate confirmation process, and economic policy continuity. Trump’s reluctance echoes these historical patterns. By pausing, he may be ensuring that any nomination strengthens both market stability and his political positioning, rather than generating controversy or uncertainty. Potential Outcomes Several scenarios could emerge from Trump’s hesitation: Nomination Moves Forward: After careful consideration, Trump could formally nominate Hassett, signaling confidence in his abilities and reinforcing Trump-era economic priorities. Alternative Candidate: Hesitation might indicate Trump is exploring other options, potentially favoring a candidate with different policy views or broader bipartisan appeal. Prolonged Uncertainty: Extended delay could increase market anxiety and political debate, complicating the nomination process and influencing investor sentiment. Each outcome carries implications not only for Hassett and the Fed but also for the broader economy, highlighting the significance of leadership decisions at the nation’s central bank. Reactions from Economists and Analysts Reactions to Trump’s statements have been mixed. Some economists see the reluctance as prudent, emphasizing the need to assess market conditions and congressional sentiment before nominating a Fed Chair. Others view it as unnecessary delay, creating uncertainty in a period when stable leadership is critical. Investors and analysts are watching closely, understanding that the Fed Chair’s influence extends to mortgage rates, borrowing costs, and overall economic growth. Even perceived hesitation can ripple through financial markets, underscoring the intertwined nature of politics and economics. Conclusion Trump’s reluctance to nominate Kevin Hassett as Fed Chair highlights the complex balance between politics, economics, and leadership. While Hassett’s credentials suggest he could provide stability and continuity, the former president’s hesitation underscores the broader considerations at play, from market confidence to political optics. As discussions continue, the financial world and the public remain attentive. The Fed Chairship is one of the most consequential appointments in U.S. economic history, affecting everything from consumer borrowing to global markets. Whether Hassett eventually receives the nomination or an alternative candidate emerges, the situation illustrates the delicate interplay between political decision-making and economic stewardship—a dynamic that shapes not just Washington, but the daily financial lives of millions of Americans.
By Muhammad Hassana day ago in Humans
A Dart at Dusk
Seconds ago, the sullen sun set on the two of us… my exuberant furry companion and me. A fresh breeze embraces us, delivering welcome relief from the day’s oppressive heat. His typical stumbling and staggering along — apace with a sloth — has turned into trip-trapping, high-stepping, almost skipping along.
By Angie the Archivist 📚🪶4 days ago in Petlife
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.