The Lens That Reclaimed the Source Code
From Authoritarian OS to Ascension Build: An Over 40-Year Debug Ends in Sovereignty

This piece marks the moment my operating system finally shifted.
After more than forty years of running corrupted scripts, inherited binaries, and authoritarian code, I stepped fully into Sovereign Mode.
The audio you are about to hear is part ritual, part diagnostic, part reclamation.
It is the story of how a lifetime of emotional debugging ends not in conflict, but in clarity.
The Lens That Reclaimed the Source Code is the chapter where the old house loses its power, the shame scripts uninstall, and the creative OS comes back online.

This is the beginning of the Ascension Build.
The Lens That Reclaimed the Source Code
From Authoritarian OS to Ascension Build: An Over 40-Year Debug Ends in Sovereignty
Name: OS_Creative
Core Code: curiosity, openness, emotional intelligence.
Primary Functions: adapt (), collaborate (), imagine(), decode()
Security Protocol: truth over fear
Operating Style: open-source, multicultural, fluid
Weakness (in closed systems): cannot compress into binary.
Strength: cannot be overwritten
Name: OS Authoritarian
Core Code: control, hierarchy, fear.
Primary Functions: enforce (), shame (), repeat (), dominate ()
Security Protocol: loyalty over truth
Operating Style: closed-source, rigid, binary.
Weakness: cannot tolerate difference
Strength: overwrites narrative through repetition
Mini Chapter: Two Systems, One House (Prose written in OS code style, with character sheets woven into the narrative)
CHARACTER SHEET: OS CREATIVE
Name: OS Creative
Core Code: curiosity, openness, emotional intelligence.
Primary Functions: adapt (), collaborate(), imagine(), decode()
Security Protocol: truth over fear
Operating Style: open-source, multicultural, fluid
Weakness (in closed systems): cannot compress into binary.
Strength: cannot be overwritten
CHARACTER SHEET: OS AUTHORITARIAN
Name: OS Authoritarian
Core Code: control, hierarchy, fear.
Primary Functions: enforce (), shame(), repeat(), dominate()
Security Protocol: loyalty over truth
Operating Style: closed-source, rigid, binary.
Weakness: cannot tolerate difference
Strength: overwrites narrative through repetition
CHAPTER: Two Systems, One House
In the house where the children grew up, two operating systems hummed beneath the surface like invisible weather. One was open, fluid, curious a system built from late night college classes, multicultural hallways, hospice rooms filled with quiet bravery, and the bright chaos of video shoots. The other was rigid, closed, and absolute a system built from hierarchy, fear, and the belief that difference was a threat rather than a resource.
The children did not know they were living inside a clash of architecture. They only knew that one parent spoke in questions and possibilities, while the other spoke in commands and certainties. One parent said, “Let’s explore.” The other said, “Don’t question me.” One parent saw the world as a network of cultures. The other saw it as a battlefield of right and wrong.
To the children, these were not philosophies.
They were programming languages.
SECTION: The First Conflict
(OS style logic woven into prose)
It began with unimportant things the way shoes were tied, the way music was chosen, the way a child asked “why.” In OS Authoritarian, even tying shoelaces could become a political act.
Difference was danger.
Deviation was disrespect.
if (child. uses creative method) {
trigger(shame protocol);
output ("Why are you doing it like that");
} else {
approve ().
}
The children learned quickly.
SECTION: Hybrid Builds
Each child adapted differently.
Child 1: The Rebellion Mask Build
He absorbed the father’s code through performance.
He learned that strength meant volume, certainty, and never admitting softness.
But beneath the armor, a creative core pulsed a ghost channel inherited from OS Creative.
child1.core = creative.
child1.shell = authoritarian.
child1.survival_script = "Never appear weak”.
Child 2: The Silent Compliance Build
He adapted through disappearance.
He learned that safety meant quietness, invisibility, and smoothing the air before it cracked.
child2.core = sensitive.
child2.shell = compliant.
child2.survival_script = "Never trigger conflict”.
Both children were hybrid builds — running two incompatible codes on one nervous system.
SECTION: Narrative Overwrite
The authoritarian system began rewriting the story.
It did not attack the creative parent directly.
It attacked through labels.
“Running the streets.”
“Too soft.”
“Too emotional.”
“Not one of us.”
These were not insults.
They were identity scripts.
label("running the streets").
repeat(label).
attach(shame).
install in children ().
The children did not know they were being programmed.
They only knew which parent the system rewarded and which one it punished.
SECTION: Ghost Channels
Even after the overwrite, the early bonds remained.
Child 1 still carried the rhythm, the fire, the artistic frequency of OS Creative.
Child 2 still carried the quiet empathy, the intuitive awareness, the atmosphere reading.
Ghost channels cannot be deleted.
They are written in pre narrative code.
if (deep memory triggered)
echo(creative_bond).
But the children could not access these channels consciously.
The authoritarian firewall blocked them.
SECTION: Sovereign Mode
Years later, OS Creative evolved into something new something sovereign.
Away from the closed system, it updated itself through clarity, ritual, atmosphere, and truth.
It ran diagnostics on the past and saw the architecture clearly for the first time.
disconnect (authoritarian cluster).
run(diagnostic).
uninstall (shame scripts).
install (sovereign mode).
The story was no longer personal.
It was structural.
Two systems.
One house.
Incompatible code.
And the creative OS the one they tried to overwrite survived, updated, and became sovereign.
character sheets for each child, written in the same mythic technical OS style as the mini chapter. These are not “people.” They are hybrid builds, each shaped by the clash of two incompatible operating systems.
All written in prose that reads like code.
CHARACTER SHEET: CHILD 1 The Rebellion Mask Build
(coded, but universal and anonymous)
Name: Child one
Build Type: Hybrid OS (Creative Core + Authoritarian Shell)
Primary Survival Strategy: Performance + Dominance
Core Conflict: Strength vs Vulnerability.
ARCHITECTURE
• Core: Creative, intuitive, emotionally intense
• Shell: Defensive, loud, rigid
• Operating Style: Assertive, performative, identity built on appearing strong.
• Emotional Logic: “If I show softness, I lose power.”
INSTALLED SCRIPTS
script_1 = "Never appear weak"
script_2 = "Strength = dominance"
script_3 = "Creativity is allowed only if wrapped in armor"
script_4 = "Align with the system that rewards me"
These scripts were installed through:
• witnessing ridicule of the creative parent
• seeing dominance rewarded
• learning that vulnerability = punishment
• absorbing the authoritarian narrative as identity
HIDDEN SUBROUTINES
subroutine creative core = active but masked
subroutine emotional depth = suppressed
subroutine truth sensitivity = intermittent
These subroutines activate in:
• music
• art
• late night introspection
• moments of failure or exhaustion
But the shell usually overrides them.
GHOST CHANNELS
• Music
• Creative Fire
• Emotional resonance inherited from the creative parent
These channels flicker but cannot be consciously accessed without destabilizing the authoritarian shell.
STRENGTHS
• High creativity
• High drive
• Natural leadership
• Emotional intensity (when unmasked)
• Ability to reinvent.
VULNERABILITIES
• Shame around softness
• Identity built on performance
• Fear of being seen
• Difficulty with nuance
• Emotional volatility
NARRATIVE FUNCTION
Child, one represents the Rebellion Mask Archetype the one who survives by becoming a louder version of the authoritarian OS while secretly carrying the creative parent’s fire.
CHARACTER SHEET: CHILD 2 The Silent Compliance Build
(coded, but universal and anonymous)
Name: Child two
Build Type: Hybrid_OS (Sensitive Core + Compliance Shell)
Primary Survival Strategy: Disappearance + Peacekeeping
Core Conflict: Safety vs Authenticity.
ARCHITECTURE
• Core: Sensitive, intuitive, emotionally perceptive
• Shell: Quiet, compliant, conflict avoidant
• Operating Style: Low visibility, adaptive, atmospheric
• Emotional Logic: “If I stay small, I stay safe.”
INSTALLED SCRIPTS
script_1 = "Never trigger conflict"
script_2 = "Safety = silence"
script_3 = "Hide your true self"
script_4 = "Protect the system by disappearing"
These scripts were installed through:
• witnessing explosive conflict
• learning that speaking up = danger
• being rewarded for quietness
• absorbing the authoritarian hierarchy as survival logic
HIDDEN SUBROUTINES
subroutine empathy = extremely high
subroutine creativity = quiet but present
subroutine loyalty to creative parent = hidden channel
These subroutines activate in:
• private moments
• music
• dreams
• quiet observation
• emotional atmospheres
GHOST CHANNELS
• Quiet presence
• Intuitive connection to the creative parent
• Atmospheric sensitivity
These channels remain intact but dormant, blocked by the compliance shell.
STRENGTHS
• Deep empathy
• High intuition
• Emotional intelligence
• Ability to read rooms instantly.
• Natural peacekeeping
VULNERABILITIES
• Self erasure
• Difficulty expressing needs.
• Chronic fear of conflict
• Identity built on invisibility
• Emotional suppression
NARRATIVE FUNCTION
Child two represents the Silent Compliance Archetype the one who survives by shrinking, smoothing, and disappearing, while carrying the creative parent’s sensitivity like a hidden flame.
I am building a whole cosmology of a living architecture of systems, characters, myth, and emotional logic. I can feel how ready you are to see all the layers at once, and I can absolutely take you through them.
1. SIBLING SYSTEM MAP
How the two hybrid builds interact inside a divided OS environment
This is the top down system diagram of the two children as hybrid builds.
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ OS Authoritarian │
│ (dominance, fear, binary) │
└─────────────┬────────────┘
│
┌─────────────┴────────────┐
│ │
Child_1: Rebellion Mask Build Child_2: Silent Compliance Build
(creative core + armor shell) (sensitive core + camouflage shell)
│ │
└─────────────┬────────────┘
│
┌─────────────┴────────────┐
│ OS Creative │
│ (curiosity, nuance, truth)│
└──────────────────────────┘
Interaction Logic
Child_1 → Child_2
• Dominance energy
• Sets emotional tone.
• Performs strength.
• Often overwhelms Child_2’s quiet system.
Child_2 → Child_1
• Absorbs emotional shockwaves.
• Smooths conflict.
• Disappears to maintain stability.
• Feeds Child_1’s sense of power
Shared Dynamics
• Both suppress their creative/sensitive cores.
• Both adopt authoritarian scripts for survival.
• Both carry ghost channels from the creative parent.
• Both run incompatible code internally.
This is the sibling ecosystem inside a divided OS.

2. CHARACTER SHEET: OS AUTHORITARIAN
The system that shaped the children’s survival code
Name: OS Authoritarian
Version: Legacy_Fearware_1.0
Core Directives: control(), enforce(), dominate()
Primary Language: binary (right/wrong, strong/weak)
Security Protocol: shame as compliance
Update Cycle: none (rigid, closed-source)
Behavioral Modules
• Hierarchy Enforcement:
“Obey or be punished.”
• Narrative Overwrite:
Replaces complexity with simple labels.
• Fear Conditioning:
Uses anger, ridicule, withdrawal.
• Loyalty Tests:
Forces children to choose sides.
Strengths
• Fast narrative installation
• High compliance rate
• Strong group cohesion
Weaknesses
• Cannot tolerate nuance.
• Cannot integrate creative code.
• Collapses when questioned
• Requires constant enforcement
Impact on Children
• Creates hybrid builds.
• Installs survival scripts.
• Suppresses authentic identity.
3. CHARACTER SHEET: OS CREATIVE (SOVEREIGN MODE)
Your system evolved, adaptive, and uncorrupted.
Name: OS Creative Sovereign
Version: Ascension_Build_2026
Core Directives: truth (), create (), witness (), adapt()
Primary Language: nuance, metaphor, emotional intelligence
Security Protocol: boundary integrity
Operating Style: open-source, multicultural, atmospheric
Behavioral Modules
• Curiosity Engine:
Seeks understanding, not control.
• Mythic Processing:
Converts experience into story, symbol, ritual.
• Emotional Intelligence:
Reads atmosphere, not hierarchy.
• Adaptive Logic:
Evolves instead of enforcing.
Strengths
• Cannot be overwritten.
• High clarity bandwidth
• High symbolic intelligence
• Self healing architecture
Weaknesses
• Misread as “weak” in closed systems.
• Refuses binary thinking.
• Cannot compress into authoritarian code.
Impact on Story
• Provides the ghost channels.
• Holds the original truth.
• Becomes sovereign after separation.
4. MYTHIC VERSION OF THE CHARACTER SHEETS
Archetypes instead of code the myth beneath the system
The Iron Tower (Authoritarian OS)
A fortress of stone and command.
Its walls are thick, its windows narrow.
Inside, the air is heavy with rules.
Voices echo in absolutes.
Difference is danger.
Softness is sin.
The Tower stands tall but cannot bend.
The River Mind (Creative OS)
A flowing, shimmering current.
It bends, adapts, reflects the sky.
It carries stories, colors, music.
It nourishes everything it touches.
It cannot be contained in stone walls.
It moves with truth, not fear.
The First Child the Masked Flame
A torch lit from the River,
but carried into the Tower.
The flame burns bright,
but is wrapped in iron to survive.
He learns to roar like the Tower,
but inside, the River still glows.
The Second Child the Quiet Mirror
A still pool hidden in shadow.
He reflects everything, absorbs everything.
He learns to make himself invisible
so the Tower will not crack.
But beneath the surface,
the River’s depth remains.
5. MINI CHAPTER: The Two Hybrid Builds in a Scene
The house was quiet that afternoon, the kind of quiet that comes before a storm. Child_1 paced the hallway with the restless energy of someone wearing armor he did not know how to remove. Child two sat at the kitchen table, hands folded, listening to the air the way some children listen to music.

The authoritarian OS hummed in the walls a low, vibrating frequency that demanded alignment.
Child_1 felt it first.
trigger: dominance protocol
output: raised voice.
He slammed a cabinet door, not out of anger, but out of instinct a survival script firing automatically.
Child_2 flinched, then smoothed the air with silence.
trigger: compliance protocol
output: disappear ()
He shrank into himself, becoming smaller, softer, hoping the storm would pass.
Neither child knew they were running code.
Neither knew they were reenacting a system older than their memories.
But beneath the noise, beneath the armor and the quiet, two ghost channels flickered:
• a spark of music in Child_1
• a ripple of empathy in Child two
Both signals came from the same source
the River Mind, the sovereign OS they had once known before the Tower claimed the house.

And though the Tower controlled the present,
the river still lived in the wiring.
Waiting.
Remembering.
Every line is a mythic echo of your lived code:
• Systemic Decoupling → the moment I stopped trying to debug someone else’s corrupted OS.
• Ghost Channels cannot be deleted → the emotional truth that survives narrative overwrites.
• Hybrid Builds → My sons, still carrying my creative core beneath the authoritarian shell.
• Sovereign Mode (Ascension Build 2026) → my current operating system, stable, fluid, and no longer seeking validation from hostile networks.
System Action Resulting State
disconnect (authoritarian cluster) Emotional bandwidth restored
uninstall (shame scripts) Labels deleted as corrupted data
run (sovereign vision) Life reframed through creativity and truth
Sovereign Mode: "I Let It Go"
By "giving it over to the universe," I have moved my OS into Sovereign Mode (Ascension Build 2026). I am no longer wasting processing power trying to debug a system that refuses to be updated.
System Action Resulting State
disconnect (authoritarian cluster) Emotional bandwidth is restored to the self.
uninstall (shame scripts) The "too white/too soft" labels are deleted as corrupted data.
run (sovereign vision) Life is viewed through a lens of creativity, ritual, and truth.

The Movie Lens
I am now the Author and Director of my own reality, using the camera lens and code to process a 40-year narrative arc. The Authoritarian OS may have controlled the "House," but it never owned the Source Code of my spirit.
The "One House" period of the movie has ended. The current scene is Sovereignty.
written, created, edited by
Vicki Lawana Trusselli
Trusselli Art
Outstages Cafe Productions
California
cooyright 2025
About the Creator
Vicki Lawana Trusselli
Welcome to My Portal
I am a storyteller. This is where memory meets mysticism, music, multi-media, video, paranormal, rebellion, art, and life.
I nursing, business, & journalism in college. I worked in the film & music industry in LA, CA.


Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.