Humans logo

Immigration Officer Misconduct at KLIA

Multiple Cases Expose Integrity Challenges

By Anie LibanPublished a day ago 3 min read
Immigration Officer Misconduct at KLIA
Photo by Muhammad Faiz Zulkeflee on Unsplash

The Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) has become the focal point of several significant immigration officer misconduct investigations in recent months, revealing systemic integrity issues within Malaysia's immigration operations.

These cases range from unauthorized document processing to large-scale bribery schemes, prompting heightened scrutiny from enforcement and regulatory authorities.

"Flying Passport" Breach at KLIA Terminal 1

The Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) announced on January 19, 2026, its completion of an investigation into allegations of "flying passport" activities at KLIA Terminal 1.

The investigation confirmed that an immigration officer processed a passenger's entry into Malaysia on June 2, 2025, without the passenger's physical presence at the immigration counter—a critical procedural violation.

The officer entered the passenger's details and passport information into the Malaysian Immigration Integrated Management System (MyIMMs) despite the absence of the traveler at the point of transaction.

This breach violated the Immigration Department's Quality Management System guidelines, specifically directive PK(0)IM.H.03-02 issued by the Director-General of Immigration.

The EAIC formally classified the officer's conduct as misconduct under paragraph 24(1)(f) of the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission Act 2009 (Act 700).

Following this determination, the commission referred the case to the Immigration Department's Disciplinary Authority with a dual recommendation for disciplinary action: first, under paragraph 4(2)(f) of the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 for dishonest and untrustworthy conduct; and second, under paragraph 4(2)(g) for irresponsible behavior.

Understanding "Flying Passport" Activities

"Flying passport" refers to the unauthorized practice of submitting a passport for immigration-related transactions—such as renewal, visa endorsement, or entry processing—without the physical presence of the passport holder. This practice circumvents essential security and verification protocols designed to prevent fraudulent entries and identity misuse.

Large-Scale Bribery and Corruption Charges

Beyond the procedural breach, KLIA has been the operational base for immigration officers engaged in more serious corrupt practices. In January 2026, multiple officers faced corruption charges:

Mastura Aziz Case

A 48-year-old senior immigration officer serving as deputy assistant director at KLIA Terminal 1 pleaded not guilty to four counts of accepting RM140,000 in bribes for illegally admitting 56 Bangladeshi nationals into Malaysia.

The alleged offences occurred in May 2025 at various locations in the Selangor area. The officer faces prosecution under Section 16(a)(B) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years' imprisonment and fines of at least five times the bribe value or RM10,000, whichever is higher. She was released on bail of RM20,000 with monthly reporting requirements to MACC.

Mohamad Fazli Abdul Rahim Case

A grade 22 immigration officer was charged with 53 counts involving RM789,100 in alleged corrupt transactions and money laundering. Of these charges, 42 relate to corruption involving RM510,500 in alleged bribes received from foreign nationals and intermediaries to facilitate illegal entry procedures.

An additional 11 charges address money laundering activities spanning transactions between February 2023 and August 2024. His wife, Suhana Ismail, faces seven additional charges for using RM125,850 in proceeds from illegal activities to purchase gold. Both pleaded not guilty; bail was set at RM20,000 and RM40,000 respectively.

Broader Pattern of Misconduct

These recent cases reflect a broader pattern of integrity challenges at KLIA. In August 2025, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission arrested two senior immigration officers in simultaneous operations in Nilai and Johor Bahru following an earlier crackdown on a "counter setting syndicate" at both KLIA Terminal 1 and Terminal 2.

The syndicate is suspected of collecting hundreds of thousands of ringgit in bribes to permit foreigners entry without proper immigration checks, with the scheme allegedly operating from 2022 to 2024.

Regulatory and Disciplinary Response

The EAIC's public pronouncement of its investigation findings signals heightened accountability mechanisms. The commission reiterated its commitment to upholding integrity and accountability among enforcement agencies to safeguard public interest.

The progression from investigation to formal referral to disciplinary authorities represents the standard enforcement pathway for misconduct within Malaysia's immigration system.

Immigration Department procedures now fall under enhanced scrutiny, and the explicit citation of quality management guidelines in official statements indicates that systemic compliance monitoring may be intensified.

The convergence of these cases—ranging from procedural breaches to criminal corruption—suggests that immigration management at KLIA requires comprehensive institutional review and reinforced oversight protocols.

Implications for Border Security and Public Trust

These misconduct cases carry significant implications for Malaysia's border security and public confidence in immigration administration. Unauthorized entry procedures bypass identity verification, health screening, and security background checks, creating potential security vulnerabilities.

The scale of the alleged bribery schemes—involving hundreds of thousands of ringgit and dozens to hundreds of unauthorized entries—underscores gaps in supervisory controls and transaction verification systems at the airport's immigration operations.

The EAIC's investigative action and subsequent referrals to disciplinary authorities demonstrate the institutional machinery for addressing misconduct, yet the persistence and scope of these violations suggest that preventative and monitoring mechanisms may require strengthening to deter future violations and ensure consistent compliance with immigration protocols.

fact or fiction

About the Creator

Anie Liban

Hi, nice to meet you. I'm Anie Liban. The anonymous writer trying to make sense of the complicated world sharing Longevity tips, Health tips, Life Hacks, Natural remedies, Life lessons, etc.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.