How to live longer like Hunza? What do Hunza Eat 2022
What do Hunza Eat And thier lifestyle
Hunza Valley is located in northern Pakistan, near the border with India.
One of the longest-lived peoples in the world lives here.
The valley is fertile and suitable for agriculture,
but it is located at a high altitude and is quite isolated from the rest of the world.
How long do the Hunza people live?
Long-lived peoples are always the subject of attention and research.
Some sources claim that Hunza people live to be 120 years old.
But let's leave aside the documented age and how accurate it is.
Doctors who examined the Hunza population were fascinated by the fact
that the older generations of Hunza people are completely healthy, vital and disease-free.
These people do not get cancer at all.
Experts have proven that the people from the Hunza Valley are the only ones with a complete absence of cancer.
The Hunza people consume mostly plant foods and raw foods.
The food consists mainly of fruits and vegetables, as well as cereals, and they also consume cheese.
During the summer, they eat raw fruits and vegetables.
During the winter, they eat dried apricots, sheep cheese and sprouted cereals.
They use what is available to them, as they are quite isolated.
There is a period of about 3 months when they do not eat anything, but only drink dried apricot juice.
That is in the spring, when there is a lack of other foods anyway.
This is very important to them and is respected, same as fasting is important in some cultures.
What is the secret of the Hunza people?
Hunza people are happy.
They are in a good mood and relieved.
Their way of life is close to ideal.
It seems that due to the circumstances and conditions in which they live, they have received an ideal diet for their health.
They bathe in ice water.
They give birth to children at the age of 65.
Genes and a clean environment certainly contribute to making these people look younger.
They live and work in pure nature, are very active and go many steps a day.
Still, nutrition seems to be the key to their healthy lives.
They are vegetarians and eat a lot of raw foods, dominated by fruits and vegetables.
They must observe a starvation period of 3 months.
The easiest way to support our work is to share this post with people you care most,
This means a lot of thanks to us for your support.
You can find more content on this kind of topics on our website feel free to go through from our menu bar
About the Creator
vikram M Gholap
www.earnwithvik.com
Financial Freedom & Self Help Knowledge
Get Paid To Use Facebook, Twitter And Youtube
Feel Free To Visit Our Posts And pages And share this with your friends and family members
Keep reading
More stories from vikram M Gholap and writers in Humans and other communities.
12 signs you have genius-level intelligence
1) The natural observer most people love to talk about themselves they'll ramble for half an hour about all their funny little quirks but a select few people spend less time talking and more time listening if you have genius-level intelligence you're probably more observant than the average person when you engage in a conversation ,you aren't just thinking about what you're going to say next you aren't trying to boost your own ego instead you're genuinely paying attention to the other person you're picking up on patterns in their speech in body language you're taking in everything they're telling you and you're thinking of new and interesting ways to brighten up the conversation the smartest people rarely step into the spotlight more often than not they're quiet and careful listeners who spend most of their time just taking the world in .
By vikram M Gholap4 years ago in Motivation
Autonomy Is The Real Privilege
Good morning, freedom-seekers! Today we’re gonna be looking at autonomy. A strange word, I know; one many would probably look at blankly and run away from on sight. We’re gonna figure out what it actually means, consider how it’s achieved, and decipher just how deeply most of us are tangled up in dependence without realising it.
By That ‘Freedom’ Guyabout 7 hours ago in Humans
Los Angeles Billionaire Moves to Nevada After California Threatens to Tax Wealth
When a prominent Los Angeles billionaire quietly packed up and moved to Nevada, it wasn’t just a personal lifestyle change — it was a political statement. The move came shortly after California lawmakers revived proposals to tax extreme wealth, targeting the state’s richest residents as a way to fund public services and address inequality. Now, that single relocation has become a symbol in a much larger debate: Do wealth taxes strengthen states — or drive their most valuable taxpayers away? The Trigger: California’s Wealth Tax Proposal California has long wrestled with how to fund its ambitious social programs while addressing widening income inequality. In recent years, progressive lawmakers have floated proposals to introduce a wealth tax, aimed at individuals with net worths above a certain threshold — often tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Unlike income taxes, which apply to yearly earnings, wealth taxes target accumulated assets such as stocks, real estate, and business holdings. Supporters argue that this approach ensures the ultra-rich contribute a fairer share to public infrastructure, education, and housing. Critics, however, warn that wealth taxes are difficult to enforce and easy to avoid, especially in a mobile economy where residency can shift across state lines. The Los Angeles billionaire’s move appears to validate those concerns. Why Nevada? Nevada has become a magnet for wealthy individuals — and the reasons are straightforward. The state has: No personal income tax No capital gains tax Business-friendly regulations A growing financial and tech services sector For high-net-worth individuals, relocating to Nevada can mean saving millions of dollars annually. For someone facing the possibility of a wealth tax layered on top of California’s already high income taxes, the financial incentive is hard to ignore. In this case, the billionaire reportedly established legal residency in Nevada, purchased property, and shifted business operations — all steps that tax experts say are increasingly common among ultra-wealthy Californians. A Broader Trend, Not an Isolated Case This move is far from unique. Over the past decade, California has seen a steady outflow of wealthy residents to states like Nevada, Texas, Florida, and Arizona. While climate, housing costs, and lifestyle play roles, tax policy has become a central factor. High-profile departures — from tech executives to hedge fund managers — often spark political backlash. Critics argue that the wealthy are abandoning the state that helped them succeed. Defenders counter that states should not penalize success to fund unsustainable spending. The Los Angeles billionaire’s relocation has once again brought this tension into the spotlight. The Political Reaction in California California lawmakers defending the wealth tax proposal insist that fear of capital flight is exaggerated. They argue that the state’s economic advantages — including access to talent, innovation hubs, and cultural influence — outweigh tax concerns for most entrepreneurs. Some lawmakers also point out that California already relies heavily on its highest earners, with a small percentage of taxpayers contributing a large share of total revenue. In their view, asking the ultra-rich to contribute more is not radical — it’s necessary. Opponents, however, see the billionaire’s move as a warning sign. They argue that when even a single wealthy individual leaves, the state can lose not only tax revenue but also investment, philanthropy, and job creation. What This Means for State Finances The departure of one billionaire may not immediately dent California’s massive budget, but the long-term implications are harder to ignore. Wealthy individuals often: Pay a disproportionate share of state taxes Fund startups and venture capital Support universities, museums, and nonprofits If enough high-net-worth residents follow the same path, critics warn, the tax base could shrink faster than lawmakers expect. Supporters of the wealth tax counter that public investment funded by higher taxes could improve quality of life for millions — potentially attracting new residents and businesses in the long run. A National Debate Over Wealth and Mobility This story extends beyond California. Across the U.S., states are competing for residents — especially wealthy ones. Tax policy has become one of the most powerful tools in that competition. While progressive states push for redistribution, low-tax states market themselves as havens for capital. The Los Angeles billionaire’s move underscores a key reality of modern economics: wealth is increasingly mobile. Assets can move digitally, businesses can relocate headquarters, and individuals can change residency with relative ease. This mobility complicates efforts to tax extreme wealth at the state level, fueling calls for federal solutions instead. The Ethical Divide At the heart of the controversy lies a philosophical question: Should wealthy individuals feel a moral obligation to remain and pay higher taxes in the states that enabled their success — or are they justified in seeking the most favorable financial environment? Supporters of wealth taxes argue that extreme inequality threatens social stability and that those who benefit most from the system should help sustain it. Opponents argue that punitive taxation discourages innovation and rewards capital flight, ultimately harming the very communities lawmakers aim to help. The billionaire’s move doesn’t settle the debate — but it sharpens it. What Happens Next? California’s wealth tax proposals are still evolving, and it remains unclear whether a final version will pass. Even if enacted, legal challenges and enforcement hurdles loom large. Meanwhile, states like Nevada are likely to continue benefiting from California’s policy uncertainty, attracting wealthy residents and businesses seeking predictability. For policymakers, the challenge is balancing fairness, revenue needs, and competitiveness in a system where borders are increasingly porous. Final Thoughts The Los Angeles billionaire’s move to Nevada is more than a headline — it’s a case study in how tax policy shapes behavior. It highlights the difficulty of taxing wealth at the state level and the unintended consequences that can follow even well-intentioned reforms. As California debates its economic future, one thing is clear: in a mobile, interconnected economy, policy decisions don’t just redistribute wealth — they redirect it. Whether wealth taxes become a solution or a cautionary tale will depend on how lawmakers respond to the signals already being sent.
By Muhammad Hassan5 days ago in Humans
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.