The Evolution of Soccer Balls
From Controversies to Innovations
It's 1930, and the inaugural FIFA World Cup is already facing its first controversy. Finalists Argentina and Uruguay find themselves in a dilemma over which country's ball to use. In a fair compromise, they agree to use Argentina's ball, the tiento, in the first half, and Uruguay's larger, heavier T model in the second. The end result? Argentina leads 2-1 at halftime, but Uruguay stages a comeback with their own ball, winning the cup 4-2 and declaring the following day a national holiday.
Coincidence or not, the design of a soccer ball has a profound impact on the outcome of a match. Even when the rules remain unchanged, the match ball holds significant importance. But what exactly goes into creating a successful match ball? Let's delve into the fascinating world of soccer ball development, with a special focus on the upcoming 2022 World Cup ball, Al Reala.
Long gone are the days of irregularly shaped balls, such as those made from human heads or pig bladders. In 1839, American chemist Charles Goodyear introduced vulcanized rubber to the world, revolutionizing the game. By combining rubber and sulfur over a hot stove, he created a more rigid ball with improved bounce and kick ability. It was a significant step towards the modern soccer ball we know today.
When the English Football Association (E. F .A) established the rules in 1863, the ball was not initially mentioned. It wasn't until 1872 that they agreed it must be spherical and 27 to 28 inches in circumference. These dimensions have remained relatively unchanged, except for a slight increase in weight from 13 to 15 ounces to 14 to 16 ounces in 1937.
However, the manufacturing process and materials have continuously evolved. The Telstar, introduced for the 1970 World Cup in Mexico, marked the beginning of Adidas's match ball supplier streak. With 32 panels, it became an iconic design. Yet, in 2006, Germany took a bold step by reducing the number of panels to 14, thermally bonded together. This decision resulted in a rounder, better-balanced, and more accurate ball known as the Teamgeist.
The Jabulani, the official ball for the 2010 World Cup, took a further leap with just eight panels. However, it faced criticism due to the drag crisis caused by its smooth surface. Players, especially goalkeepers, struggled with its unpredictable flight. The subsequent Brazuca ball for the 2014 World Cup had fewer panels than the Jabulani, but its longer seams and textured surface enhanced stability and trajectory.
In 2018, the Telstar 18 paid tribute to the past with a chip embedded in the ball for fan engagement. This year's Al Reala ball, featuring 20 thermally bonded panels, aims to be the fastest World Cup ball in history. Adidas emphasizes its environmental friendliness, but concerns have been raised about the associated carbon emissions and human rights violations.
Adidas's strategy of releasing a new ball every four years for the World Cup has proven successful. The allure of the latest design drives sales, contributing significantly to their revenue. The host countries also have the opportunity to leave their mark by influencing the ball's naming, color scheme, and aesthetic properties.
While the quest for the perfect ball continues, one thing remains certain: soccer balls have a profound impact on the game. Players, fans, and consumers alike rely on a ball that offers predictable flight and consistent performance. As we look ahead to future World Cups, we can expect further innovations and advancements in soccer ball design. So, regardless of what the future holds, the ball will always and forever be at the center of the beautiful game.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Myke & Amy and writers in History and other communities.
The Battle for Castle Ita
Throughout history, humans have engaged in warfare, following a simple set of rules: one side initiates a fight, the other side retaliates, and the cycle continues until a resolution is reached. However, sometimes war unfolds in unexpected ways, leading to bizarre and extraordinary events. Such was the case on May 5, 1945, just three days before the end of World War II in Europe, when a peculiar battle took place at Castle Ita.
By Myke & Amy3 years ago in History
Girolamo Segato: The Scientist Who Turned Humans into Stone
The Mysterious Italian Genius Behind the Art of Human Petrification Girolamo Segato remains one of the most mysterious scientists of the 19th century, remembered not only for his scientific brilliance but also for a secret he took to his grave. Born in 1792 in Italy, Segato gained worldwide attention for achieving something that still puzzles scientists today: he discovered a method to turn human and animal body parts into stone-like fossils while preserving their detailed structure. Unlike mummification, Segato’s process created specimens that looked and felt like real stone, yet retained the microscopic details of living tissue. Early Life and Education Girolamo Segato was born in the small town of Sospirolo, near Belluno, Italy. From an early age, he showed a deep interest in science, anatomy, and natural history. He studied engineering and anatomy and later became involved in archaeological and scientific research. His curiosity eventually led him to Egypt, where he spent several years studying ancient civilizations, mummification techniques, and geological formations. Segato was deeply inspired by ancient Egyptian preservation methods, but he believed there was a way to go beyond traditional embalming. His goal was not just to preserve bodies but to transform organic tissue into an inorganic, stone-like substance. The Discovery of Human Petrification After returning to Italy, Segato began experimenting with human and animal remains. Over time, he developed a secret chemical process that allowed him to petrify body parts such as hands, feet, heads, and internal organs. These specimens were not dried or decayed. Instead, they became hard like marble or stone, resistant to time, moisture, and decay. What made Segato’s work extraordinary was the level of detail preserved. Veins, muscles, skin texture, and even facial expressions were visible in the petrified remains. Scientists who examined these objects noted that they were neither mummified nor fossilized through natural processes. They appeared to be something entirely new. Public Reaction and Fear Although Segato’s discovery was groundbreaking, it was also deeply unsettling to many people. In 19th-century Europe, turning human remains into stone was seen by some as unnatural or even blasphemous. Religious authorities and conservative groups accused Segato of practicing forbidden science. Because of this backlash, Segato struggled financially and socially. He tried to sell his method to scientific institutions, but fear and suspicion prevented widespread acceptance. Many people admired his work privately but were unwilling to support him publicly. The Secret That Died With Him One of the greatest mysteries surrounding Girolamo Segato is that he never revealed his petrification formula. Whether due to fear, mistrust, or lack of support, Segato chose to keep his process secret. When he died in 1836, the knowledge died with him. Today, no scientist has been able to fully replicate his results. Despite advances in chemistry and material science, Segato’s exact technique remains unknown. This has led to speculation ranging from lost chemical knowledge to deliberate secrecy caused by persecution. Preserved Works Today Some of Segato’s petrified specimens still exist and can be seen in museums in Florence, Italy, particularly at the Museum of the Basilica of Santa Croce. These stone-like human remains continue to attract researchers, historians, and visitors from around the world. Modern scientific analysis confirms that these objects are real human tissues transformed into a mineralized state. However, the precise chemical reactions involved remain unclear, adding to Segato’s legend. Legacy and Scientific Importance Girolamo Segato’s work challenges the boundary between life and stone, biology and geology. His experiments raise important questions about preservation, material transformation, and the ethics of scientific discovery. Although controversial, his research was far ahead of its time and continues to inspire curiosity. Some experts believe Segato’s work could have applications in modern science, such as long-term biological preservation, archaeology, or even medical research. Others view his story as a warning about how society sometimes rejects revolutionary ideas out of fear. Conclusion Girolamo Segato was not a madman, nor a magician. He was a scientist whose discovery frightened the world around him. By turning human tissue into stone, he achieved something that remains unexplained nearly two centuries later. His life is a powerful reminder that scientific progress often walks hand in hand with controversy. Though his secret is lost, Girolamo Segato’s legacy lives on—etched in stone, silent yet enduring, challenging humanity to question what is truly possible.
By Hasbanullahabout 23 hours ago in History
Russia Deploys Rare Hypersonic Missile in “Massive” Strike on Ukraine
In the early hours of January 9, 2026, Russian forces launched a major military assault on Ukrainian territory that marked only the second known combat use of the Oreshnik hypersonic missile, one of Moscow’s most advanced and strategically significant weapons. The attack, accompanied by a barrage of drones and conventional missiles, has heightened fears of escalation, particularly given the missile’s potential nuclear capability and long range (Reuters, 2026).
By Games Mode On4 days ago in History
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.