"Beyond the Gates" Week 23 Review
Loads of curveballs are thrown in the 23rd week of the CBS soap
Beyond the Gates is fully into the month of August, and even though summer is slowly coming to an end, it's getting hotter and hotter on this show. The week that passed was the 23rd in the soap's existence, and as a sports fan, I can tell ya, the number 23, well, that's a big deal. Seriously, this soap has really helped me out as I wait out the final few weeks until the NFL's regular season starts.
So much to talk about regarding this past week, and here are the highlights:
August 4
The Monday episode was the continuation of the Articulettes reunion performance that finally happened on the August 1 episode that ended Week 22. We saw Anita give a speech about the group's history, which led to the mention of Barbara Mitchell; the founding member who tragically took her own life years prior. As we saw weeks ago, the first mention of Barbara brought back waves of sadness and guilt from Anita, as she felt immensely responsible for Barbara's suicide. What we saw was not only a tribute to the Articulettes' fallen founding sister, but Anita honoring Barbara in such a heartwarming manner, while still carrying some guilt and some hope that she can be fully forgiven.
August 5
I absolutely love Doug McBride; I really do. I always have. I mentioned how he's basically a guy who fears that he is letting people down, and that's something I can relate to. However, this past week, he really showed out. For one, Doug gets read the riot act by Ted, and I couldn't but roll my eyes at this. I've said that regarding the sins of some of the guys on this show, Doug is so tame compared to Bill and especially Ted, yet Ted casts all sorts of aspersions on Doug? Please. So Doug decides he's done; quit his job, told Vanessa, stated he wants in on Vanessa and Joey's game--which he threatens to blow up! Holy moley!
August 6
Where do I start with Hayley? It's clear that Hayley is not preggers in the least, and the week saw Hayley go into double overtime to plan her "miscarriage." We saw Hayley "fall" in Bill's office, but the Wednesday episode saw Hayley quadruple down on the ruse. She starts a fight with Dani, because that's what she does best, and then the "anguish" starts. Suddenly, Hayley resurfaces--bleeding. How convenient. The worst part, for the first time, Dani actually had doubts about Hayley faking it. Now, as a result, Dani's carrying all sorts of guilt. So yeah, Hayley really pulled of a deceptive act. Now here's hoping Bill burns down the lie that keeps adding more layers to it.
August 7
Weeks ago, I said I'm pulling for Doug and Vanessa to make it. Now, I'm increasing that hope. Those two are so made for each other. What do those vows say? "For better or for worse." It's been chaotic as hell for Doug and Vanessa, and that's an understatement. However, what I saw in the Thursday episode between Doug and Vanessa was amazing. For all Doug's gambling vices and his troubles, for all of Vanessa's willingness to enjoy the dark side, their devotion to each other is still intact. I truly hope that they somehow get out of this unscathed, and that they remain together; stronger than ever.
August 8
Derek is such an idiot. From what I've seen, it seems like he still wants Ashley in his life. Why, I don't know. Does he not remember the last time they talked!? The woman is an anal-retentive nutjob! Yet Derek still seems to be hard up for her. I really don't get it. I thought he had something going with Shanise, but it looks like Derek's still pining for Ashley, who isn't even thinking about him. Ashley is deeper and deeper into Andre's web, and she's not looking to get out of it. But sure, Derek, keep chasing that lunatic who reacted to your proposal like you had committed murder or something.
* * *
The twists and turns on Beyond the Gates are getting wilder! As I said before, summer is about to come to an end, but the show is getting hotter and hotter!
About the Creator
Clyde E. Dawkins
I'm a big sports fan, especially hockey, and I've been a fan of villainesses since I was eight! My favorite shows are The Simpsons and Family Guy, etc.
Keep reading
More stories from Clyde E. Dawkins and writers in Geeks and other communities.
Looney Tunes Review: "Box Office Bunny"
I do love Looney Tunes so much. I forget how old I was when I first saw Bugs Bunny and crew. I always say to myself that I was five, but some memories have me watching The Bugs Bunny and Tweety Show as early as the age of three. BB&T was a variation of The Bugs Bunny Show that aired during my childhood in the 1990s, and mostly on ABC's Saturday morning lineup--always at 10AM like clockwork. So many classic shorts appeared during that hour long block, and even some shorts that were actually released early in my lifetime. One such short I definitely remember seeing on BB&T is the subject of this review: Box Office Bunny.
By Clyde E. Dawkins5 months ago in Geeks
Trump’s Attacks on Iran
Tensions between the United States and Iran have once again drawn global attention, fueled by renewed political rhetoric from former U.S. President Donald Trump and an increasingly fragile Middle East landscape. While Trump is no longer in office, his influence on American foreign policy discourse remains strong, especially regarding Iran. His recent statements and past actions continue to shape how the situation is discussed, both domestically and internationally. The ongoing Iran situation cannot be understood without revisiting Trump’s long-standing approach to Tehran—one defined by pressure, confrontation, and a belief that economic and political force could reshape Iran’s behavior. As events unfold in the region, Trump’s attacks on Iran, primarily through rhetoric and policy advocacy, have reentered the conversation at a time when stability is already uncertain. A History of Confrontation During his presidency, Donald Trump positioned Iran as one of the primary adversaries of U.S. foreign policy. His decision to withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, marked a turning point. Trump argued that the agreement was flawed, claiming it failed to permanently prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and did not address Iran’s regional influence or missile program. Following the withdrawal, the U.S. imposed sweeping economic sanctions under what the administration called a “maximum pressure” campaign. These measures significantly affected Iran’s economy, targeting oil exports, banking systems, and international trade relationships. Trump consistently framed these actions as necessary to protect U.S. interests and global security. That confrontational posture remains central to Trump’s public messaging today. Rhetoric That Resonates Trump’s attacks on Iran in recent speeches and interviews have focused less on diplomacy and more on strength. He often portrays Iran as a destabilizing force in the Middle East, accusing its leadership of funding proxy conflicts, threatening U.S. allies, and undermining regional peace. This language resonates with segments of the American public who favor a hardline approach to foreign policy. At the same time, critics argue that such rhetoric escalates tensions rather than easing them. Words from influential political figures carry weight, especially when they echo previous policies that brought the two nations close to direct confrontation. Even without immediate military action, strong language can affect markets, diplomatic relations, and public perception across the region. The Current Iran Situation Iran today faces a complex set of challenges. Economic pressure from sanctions continues to strain daily life for many citizens, while internal political dynamics remain tense. Regionally, Iran is involved in multiple theaters through alliances and influence, making it a central player in broader Middle Eastern conflicts. Against this backdrop, Trump’s renewed focus on Iran adds another layer of uncertainty. While the current U.S. administration may pursue different strategies, Trump’s voice amplifies debates about whether negotiation or force is the more effective path forward. Supporters of Trump argue that his tough stance kept Iran in check, claiming that pressure limited its resources and influence. Opponents counter that the approach isolated the U.S. from allies and reduced opportunities for diplomatic solutions, leaving the region more volatile. Global Reactions and Diplomatic Concerns International responses to Trump’s attacks on Iran have been mixed. Some U.S. allies in the Middle East view his rhetoric favorably, seeing Iran as a shared threat. Others, particularly in Europe, remain cautious, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and multilateral agreements. Diplomats warn that escalating language can undermine ongoing efforts to stabilize the region. Even symbolic threats or aggressive statements may provoke responses that spiral beyond control. In a region already marked by conflict, restraint is often seen as a necessary component of effective diplomacy. Political Strategy at Home Trump’s focus on Iran is also tied to domestic politics. Foreign policy strength has long been a cornerstone of his political identity. By highlighting Iran as an adversary, Trump reinforces his image as a leader unwilling to compromise with perceived threats. This strategy plays well among voters who believe the U.S. should project power globally. However, it also raises questions about long-term consequences. Critics argue that consistent confrontation without clear diplomatic off-ramps risks entrenching hostility rather than resolving underlying issues. What Comes Next? The future of U.S.-Iran relations remains uncertain. While Trump’s attacks on Iran currently take the form of rhetoric and policy advocacy rather than direct action, their impact should not be underestimated. Political language can shape expectations, influence decision-makers, and affect the behavior of nations. For Iran, continued pressure may harden positions within its leadership, reducing incentives for compromise. For the United States, balancing strength with diplomacy remains a delicate challenge—one that will define its role in the Middle East for years to come. Conclusion Trump’s attacks on Iran reflect a broader debate about how powerful nations should handle long-standing adversaries. Is pressure the path to peace, or does it deepen divisions? As the Iran situation continues to evolve, the consequences of words spoken today may shape realities tomorrow. In a world already facing uncertainty, the need for measured dialogue, strategic thinking, and global cooperation has never been greater. Whether confrontation or communication ultimately prevails will depend not just on leaders, but on the choices they make in moments of tension.
By Saboor Brohi a day ago in Geeks
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.