RW or ST? Which one to Take the Marcus Rashford SBC in FC 26

The Ultimate Scream promotion has brought another high-profile Squad Building Challenge: 86-rated Marcus Rashford. Players now face a choice: Right Wing (RW) or Striker (ST). Both versions share similar stats, but subtle differences in playstyle make them fit distinct roles on the pitch. With 5★ skill moves and a 3★ weak foot, Rashford sparks plenty of discussion in the FC community.

This review breaks down how to complete the SBC, how each version performs in-game, and whether the 260k–270k coin cost is justified.

Ultimate Scream Rashford SBC – Cost & How to Complete

Completing this SBC requires four squads and costs around 260k–270k FC 26 Coins. It's available for two weeks, so there's no rush.

Here's the detail of each challenge, including requirements, rewards and solutions:

Challenge 1: FC Barcelona

• Requirements: 1 FC Barcelona Player, 1 TOTW Player, 85-Rated
• Reward: Gold Players Pack (Tradeable)
• Solution:

Challenge 2: England

• Requirements: 1 England Player, 1 TOTW Player, 85-Rated
• Reward: Gold Players Pack (Tradeable)
• Solution:

Challenge 3: Top Form

• Requirements: 1 TOTW Player, 86-Rated
• Reward: Rare Mixed Players Pack (Tradeable)
• Solution:

Challenge 4: 87-Rated Squad

• Requirements: 87-Rated
• Reward: Rare Electrum Players Pack (Tradeable)
• Solution:

For those looking to complete the SBC efficiently, reliable coin platforms like M8X (formerly FIFACOIN) can make building squads faster without spending excessive time on the transfer market.

RW Version - Ultimate Scream Rashford Review

The RW version is designed as a wide creator rather than a central finisher. He excels at pace, dribbling, and chance creation down the right flank.

He feels quick and responsive, capable of beating fullbacks and driving into space. Rashford's ability to deliver cutbacks makes him effective for feeding central finishers. However, being right-footed limits far-post finesse shots, so he's less effective cutting inside to score.

Pros

• 5★ skill moves for reliable 1v1 dribbling
• Great pace and acceleration
• Effective cutback creator

Cons

• 3★ weak foot reduces finishing consistency
• Limited scoring from inside cuts
• No alternative positions (no LW/CAM/ST flexibility)

Ideal for squads that rely on width and cutbacks. Less suited for wingers who need to cut inside and finish consistently.

ST Version – Ultimate Scream Rashford Review

The ST version is built as a direct goal threat, combining strong pace, powerful shooting, and 5★ skill moves.

He feels quick and strong on the ball, with responsive dribbling and stepovers to create space. His shots carry significant power, making him a serious threat inside the box. That said, the 3★ weak foot and missing finishing boosts can make some angles less consistent.

Pros

• 5★ skill moves for creating space
• Strong pace and powerful shooting
• Versatile as ST or Shadow Striker CAM

Cons

• 3★ weak foot can limit tight finishes
• Misses certain shooting playstyle boosts
• SBC cost is relatively high

Great for players who create their own chances using skill moves. If you prefer a striker who automatically finishes everything, there are more consistent alternatives.

Is the SBC Worth Completing?

It depends on your squad needs:

• EVO Rashford owners: Performance is nearly identical, so the SBC isn't essential.
• Flexible attacker needed: The ST version is the stronger pick.
• Wide winger needed: The RW version works, but its value is less unique compared to other market options.

Best Recommendation:

Go for the ST version and use him as ST or Shadow CAM.

Conclusion

Ultimately, choosing between RW and ST Rashford comes down to your playstyle and squad setup. RW excels in creating chances from the wing, while ST is better for finishing and versatile attacking roles. Both versions are solid, but understanding their strengths and limitations will help you make the most of your investment.

Which version fits your team best? Share your thoughts and experiences—does Rashford shine more cutting inside, or as a wide creator setting up others? The community debate is always worth following.