The First-Ever Aircraft Hijacking
How the Hijacking Changed Aviation Security and International Law Forever

On February 21, 1931, the world witnessed the first-ever aircraft hijacking in history. The incident occurred in Arequipa, Peru, and involved a Ford tri-motor plane operated by the airline Peruvian Airways.
The plane, carrying ten passengers and crew, was on a routine flight from Arequipa to the coastal city of Mollendo. However, shortly after takeoff, the plane was hijacked by a lone perpetrator, an American named Byron Rickards.
Rickards, a former World War I pilot, had been living in Peru for several years, working as a mechanic and engineer for various airlines. He had become disillusioned with his life in Peru and decided to hijack the plane as a way to escape the country.
Rickards boarded the plane in Arequipa, carrying a pistol and a letter to the pilot. In the letter, Rickards demanded that the plane be flown to Lima, the capital of Peru. The pilot, Francisco Pizarro, initially refused to comply with Rickards' demands, but he eventually relented when Rickards threatened to shoot him and the passengers.
The plane was diverted to Lima, where Rickards demanded that he be allowed to fly the plane himself to Chile. The authorities, however, refused to allow the plane to leave Peruvian airspace. After a standoff that lasted several hours, Rickards was eventually arrested and taken into custody.
The hijacking of Peruvian Airways Flight 21 was a significant event in aviation history, not only because it was the first hijacking of a commercial airliner but also because it highlighted the need for better security measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Following the hijacking, airlines around the world began to implement new security procedures, including passenger screening, baggage checks, and the installation of cockpit doors. These measures have since become standard practice in the aviation industry, and they have helped to prevent many hijackings and other acts of terrorism.
The hijacking of Peruvian Airways Flight 21 also had a significant impact on international law. At the time, there were no laws specifically addressing aircraft hijacking, and Rickards was ultimately charged with kidnapping and other crimes. However, the incident led to the creation of the Tokyo Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed On Board Aircraft, which established a framework for the prosecution of aircraft hijackers and other criminals who commit crimes on board planes.
The hijacking of Peruvian Airways Flight 21 also had a significant impact on public perception of aviation safety. In the early days of commercial aviation, air travel was considered a luxurious and glamorous mode of transportation. However, the hijacking showed that air travel was not immune to the dangers of criminal activity.
The incident received widespread media coverage, and it quickly became a topic of international discussion. The hijacking demonstrated the vulnerability of commercial airlines and the need for better security measures to ensure the safety of passengers and crew.
In the years following the hijacking of Peruvian Airways Flight 21, there have been numerous other hijackings and acts of terrorism that have shaken the aviation industry. However, the lessons learned from the first hijacking have helped to improve security measures and prevent similar incidents from occurring.
Today, airline security procedures are much more rigorous than they were in the early days of commercial aviation. Passengers are screened before boarding, and their luggage is thoroughly inspected. Cockpit doors are now reinforced to prevent unauthorized access, and air marshals are often present on flights to provide additional security.
Despite the improvements in security, the threat of hijacking and terrorism still exists, and airlines and authorities must remain vigilant to ensure the safety of passengers and crew. The hijacking of Peruvian Airways Flight 21 was a pivotal moment in aviation history, and it serves as a reminder of the need for constant vigilance and preparedness in the face of potential threats.




Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.