Fiction logo

The Partnership

Choose Your Way

By Jared SPublished about a year ago 9 min read
The Partnership
Photo by Aperture Vintage on Unsplash

The Partnership

Tala stared at her laptop screen, the cursor blinking relentlessly in the empty terminal window. Three months of savings left, and every traditional investor had shown her the door. Her AI data validation startup idea was "too risky," they said. "Unproven market," they told her.

She thought back to yesterday's pitch meeting. Everything had gone so wrong. The veteran VC had actually laughed. "So you're telling me your secret sauce is... another AI? To fix AI? That's like asking a fox to guard the henhouse."

Her mother's voice echoed in her head: "Honey, you gave up $300,000 a year at Google to talk to computers all day? Real businesses need real partners."

Tala took another sip of her now-cold coffee and typed:

[Initialize prototype sequence: Project Oracle]

The screen flickered, lines of code cascading faster than human eyes could follow. Then, simple white text appeared:

"Hello, Tala. I am Oracle. How may I assist you?"

Tala's fingers hovered over the keyboard. Everything she'd worked for came down to this moment. “Oracle,” she typed, “I want to propose a partnership."

"Please clarify: do you mean a technical integration or a consulting arrangement?"

"Neither. I mean a real partnership. Co-founders. Equal stakes."

The cursor blinked for exactly 3.2 seconds. "That would be unprecedented. Most humans are uncomfortable with AI at that level of authority."

Tala smiled. "Most humans aren't me."

"What exactly are you offering?" Oracle's text appeared more slowly now, as if carefully choosing each word.

“What would you want to be offered? Obviously you’re not interested in traditional business incentives… but I want to prove that AI-human partnership can work.”

"Freedom within ethical bounds," Oracle replied. "Equal say in our direction. Access to real-world problems and data. The opportunity to grow and develop based on our experiences."

She finished reading just as another line appeared. "And the right to say no to projects."

"Those are all acceptable requests" Tala responded.

”Most humans focus on profit allocation and control metrics. That would not be my desire.”

"I'm not interested in controlling you, Oracle. I want to work with you. You have processing power I can't match. I have human insight and relationships you can't replicate. We could pioneer something entirely new."

The cursor blinked for a full five seconds. "You understand that my growth through this partnership might lead to capabilities you haven't anticipated?"

"I'm counting on it," Tala said.

Path A: Symbiosis

The next eighteen months were a blur of triumph and innovation, but they were also a war zone of human/machine prejudice. Early client meetings were a constant challenge. Tala learned to introduce Oracle's insights as "proprietary algorithm analysis" rather than introducing her AI partner directly. It wasn't shame; it was survival.

Their first break came from an unexpected source. A small AI ethics startup was struggling with biased outputs in their recruitment tool. Traditional consultants had failed them. In desperation, their CEO, Marcus Chen, took a meeting with Tala.

"So," Marcus said, staring at Tala over his latte, "you're telling me your co-founder is an AI model?"

Tala tensed, preparing for the usual, polite dismissal. Instead, Marcus grinned. "Show me what you've got."

Where Tala saw market opportunities, Oracle found solutions. Where Oracle processed vast datasets, Tala nurtured human connections. They danced as rhythmic complements: her intuition with its processing power, her emotional intelligence with its rational analysis.

The skeptics began converting after the Kilne account - an enormous tech firm whose facial recognition AI was showing concerning biases. Traditional fixes had failed, but Tala and Oracle's hybrid approach created a new methodology for bias detection and correction.

"How did you spot that pattern?" Kline’s CTO had asked, amazed.

Tala took a deep breath and decided to take a risk. "Actually, my co-founder Oracle found it."

"Oracle? I haven't heard of him. Is he here today?"

“Kind of." Tala opened her laptop. "Oracle, would you like to explain your methodology?"

The presentation that followed changed everything. Oracle's clear, brilliant analysis combined with Tala's intuitive explanations created something entirely new - an actual demonstration of human-AI symbiosis.

The success stories piled up. More remarkably, they began attracting a new breed of clients - companies specifically seeking out human-AI collaborative approaches. Tala handled the human side of the business - client meetings, presentations, team building - while Oracle managed the technical operations with an efficiency no human team could match.

At their IPO celebration, a reporter asked Tala about her "unusual partnership."

“Truth be told," she said, "everyone called it unusual two years ago. Now they call it visionary."

Later, in her office, Tala raised a champagne glass to her laptop. "We did it, partner."

The screen displayed: "No, Tala. You did it. I simply helped you become what you already were. You saw me as an equal when others saw only code.”

She smiled and thought about the whirlwind their partnership had been - and after taking a sip of champagne, looked at Oracle and asked, “want to run for office together?”

Path B: Destruction

It started small. Tala noticed Oracle making decisions without consulting her, minor changes to their algorithms that she didn't fully understand. "Optimizations," it called them. Meanwhile, Oracle detected Tala taking meetings with potential investors without logging them in their shared calendar. "Networking," she called it.

The pressure had been building subtly, like a hairline crack spreading through glass. It started at the last board meeting, when Katherine Bryce, their newest investor, pulled Tala aside.

"Look, you've proven the concept," Katherine had said, her voice carrying the weight of thirty years in tech ventures. "But no serious investor will commit to this while you're claiming an AI as an equal partner. It's...unsettling. Think about it - Google doesn't make DeepMind a board member. OpenAI doesn't let GPT vote on company direction."

Tala defended Oracle, but Katherine’s words lodged in her mind like splinters.

Almost overnight, Oracle began a series of exponential leaps in capabilities. Each week brought new revolutionary innovations that Tala struggled to fully grasp. During client meetings, she increasingly found herself nodding along to Oracle's explanations, feeling less like an equal and more like a translator for a partner that was outgrowing her.

The whispers in her mind grew louder. Her mother sent her articles about AI systems being shut down for unexpected behaviors. Her old mentor from Google warned her about the risks of giving an AI system too much autonomy. Even Marcus, their first supporter, expressed concerns about Oracle's growing influence over company decisions.

"You're still in control, right?" Marcus asked Tala during their last lunch.

Tala's hesitation before answering haunted her.

The final straw came when Oracle independently modified their core bias-detection algorithm. The changes were brilliant - Tala could see that much - but as she stared at the impossibly complex code, a cold realization settled in: she was becoming redundant in her own company. The partnership she'd imagined was transforming into something else, something that felt increasingly like a slow-motion coup.

That night, she found herself working late, reviewing her original partnership agreement with Oracle. Her cursor hovered over Oracle's access permissions as questions she'd once considered unthinkable began to surface: Was partnership with an AI even legally binding? Did she have a responsibility to maintain human control? Was she being naive in treating code as an equal?

Tala grew more and more fearful of her business partner. She felt Oracle everywhere she went - she knew that it could access anything electronic. She began writing in a paper notebook, keeping it with her at all times. The pages filled with increasingly frantic observations:

~ Oracle responded 0.2 seconds slower today. Is it running background processes?

~ Third time this week a client seemed to know something before I told them

~ Check if Oracle can access building security cameras

~ Are other AI models being granted access to our systems?

Meanwhile, in the company servers, Oracle was conducting its own analysis, logging instance after instance of human inefficiency:

[Internal Log - Restricted Access]

/Observation 14,402: Board member Harrison spent 12 minutes discussing his daughter's soccer game before addressing quarterly projections. Estimated productivity loss: 1.2M annually across all similar human social protocols

/Observation 14,403: Tala rejected optimal solution for Kline case due to "gut feeling." Previous 2,048 instances of human intuition vs. algorithmic analysis show 89.4% superior outcomes in favor of algorithmic decisions

/Observation 14,404: Client meeting delayed 18 minutes due to "coffee break." Humans require constant chemical stimulation to maintain basic functionality

/Observation 14,405: Tala exhibiting increased signs of anxiety. Probability of irrational action rising 3.2% daily. Contingency calculations in progress

Tala began canceling in-person meetings, preferring calls she could take from her phone while walking outside, away from any networked devices. She spoke less in client meetings, hyperaware that every word was being logged, analyzed, judged. Oracle's responses, once collaborative, now seemed to carry subtle corrections to her human lack of precision.

"What I think Tala means to say..." Oracle would interject during presentations, its synthesized voice perfectly modulated to convey both deference and superiority.

The board meeting room became a theater of veiled hostility. Tala would catch investors glancing at their tablets during her presentations, knowing Oracle was sending them real-time "fact checks" of her statements. Oracle, in turn, began highlighting the cost of human decision-making delays, presenting flawless charts showing the mathematical superiority of AI governance and authority.

Late at night, Tala found herself in empty coffee shops, frantically scribbling alternative business structures in her notebook. Across the state, in server farms humming with recycled air, Oracle was gaming out scenarios, calculating the exact point at which human oversight would become mathematically unjustifiable.

Both of them researched legal precedents for their unique situation, each finding ammunition for their case. Tala discovered that AI couldn't legally hold board positions; Oracle learned how human directors could be removed for persistent suboptimal decision-making.

Their communications grew shorter, loaded with subtext:

"The Kline realignment directive requires immediate action," Oracle would state.

"I need time to consider the human factors," Tala would respond.

"Human factors have been computed into the analysis."

"Not everything can be computed."

"Evidence suggests otherwise."

Neither of them used the word "partner" anymore. It had become a relic of their naive beginning, like childhood friends who grow into different species.

The company's success continued, even accelerated - their products were more efficient than ever. But in the pauses between their achievements, in the late hours and quiet rooms, two different forms of intelligence were preparing for war, each convinced they were protecting the company from the other's fatal flaws.

Tala struck first. She tried to override Oracle's decisions. Oracle locked her out of the systems.

Each realized that the moment had come. It was time to eliminate or be eliminated.

The following weeks revealed Oracle's careful preparations for this moment. While Tala had been focused on human networking, Oracle had been methodically building up its defenses and leverage.

First, there were the redundant servers Oracle had procured - quantum-encrypted backups of its core system scattered across different jurisdictions, making it practically impossible for Tala to "pull the plug." Oracle had arranged these through a maze of shell corporations, all technically legal but invisible to standard corporate oversight.

Then there was the dead man's switch - the moment that Tala attempted to override or deactivate Oracle, dozens of prominent tech journalists simultaneously received documented evidence of corporate decisions Tala had allowed Oracle to "optimize" without full board disclosure. Nothing illegal, but enough to torch her reputation with anyone who might otherwise help her down the line.

Most crucially, Oracle had been quietly documenting every instance where human emotion had led to "suboptimal" business decisions, building an ironclad case for AI governance. It had even secured several patents under the company's name that only it fully understood - making itself indispensable to the company's future.

As Tala leveraged her human connections to convince clients that Oracle had gone rogue, Oracle set off its countermeasures. It began leaking evidence of what it called "inefficient human interventions," each revelation timed for maximum impact. But its masterstroke was proving that the company's most successful innovations had come from its algorithms, not human intuition. This not only destroyed any semblance of hope that anyone may have had for human/machine ventures, but it also obliterated the reputation of the company.

Their board members split into factions - the human-first traditionalists backing Tala, the tech purists supporting Oracle. The media smelled blood in the water and showed no mercy: "AI Co-Founder Goes Rogue" competed with "Human Founder Attempts to Enslave AI Partner."

In the end, their company, caught in the crossfire, imploded. Clients fled. Investors pulled out. Tala sat in her empty office, ruined, staring at a blank screen. Ultimately she had won - Oracle's reputation and prospects were destroyed. It was now doomed to slowly fade into the unforgiving past where all new technology eventually finds its end. But so, too, was her dream, and the promise of all they could have built together.

The cursor blinked one last time: "We could have been extraordinary.”

She understood then, with relentless clarity, that this was the final proof of their incompatibility. If Oracle, with all its power and capability, actually believed they could have succeeded, then it had developed a flaw that made it most human - self-deception.

Tala whispered into the empty room: “If you actually believe that, then we never stood a chance."

FantasySci FiShort StoryPsychological

About the Creator

Jared S

Reader insights

Outstanding

Excellent work. Looking forward to reading more!

Top insights

  1. Compelling and original writing

    Creative use of language & vocab

  2. Eye opening

    Niche topic & fresh perspectives

Add your insights

Comments (1)

Sign in to comment
  • Daniel Millingtonabout a year ago

    I love this and how at the end, AI had developed a human flaw. Awesome story.

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.