Families logo

Thailand Moves to Legalize International Surrogacy

Laws to be Amended for Same-Sex Couples

By Anna WongPublished about a year ago 11 min read
Surrogacy in Thailand

Thailand is preparing to reopen its doors to international surrogacy after nearly a decade of strict restrictions. The planned legislative changes aim to legalize surrogacy for foreign couples, addressing a growing global demand and leveraging Thailand’s advanced fertility treatment facilities.

These updates also promise to strengthen safeguards against trafficking and exploitation, ensuring ethical practices. By revisiting its surrogacy laws, Thailand is positioning itself as a potential leader in the global fertility services market, offering hope to couples worldwide while balancing ethical and regulatory concerns.

The History of Surrogacy Legislation in Thailand

Thailand’s surrogacy laws have undergone major changes over the past decades. From being a popular hub for international surrogacy to enacting strict bans, the country’s evolving stance reveals a delicate balance between ethics, regulation, and economic interests.

Pre-2015: A Thriving Industry

Before 2015, International Surrogacy flourished, largely due to the absence of strict laws. At the time, the country became a go-to destination for international couples seeking affordable and accessible surrogacy services. Private fertility clinics rapidly expanded, and Thailand was seen as a cost-effective alternative to countries like the United States.

But this lack of oversight came at a cost. The industry saw troubling cases, the most infamous being the “Baby Gammy” scandal. Baby Gammy, born to a Thai surrogate in 2014, reportedly had Down syndrome. His Australian intended parents were accused of abandoning him while taking his healthy twin sister back home.

This sparked global outrage and shone a harsh spotlight on the unregulated state of Thailand’s surrogacy practices. Another shocking case involved a Japanese businessman fathering over a dozen children through Thai surrogates, raising ethical concerns about “child factories.”

These incidents amplified calls for tighter laws. Critics argued that the unregulated sector left room for exploitation of surrogate mothers and treated children as commodities. Thailand’s reputation as a “wombs-for-rent” destination faced significant backlash, prompting the government to act swiftly.

The 2015 Ban: Reasons and Impacts

In 2015, Thailand took drastic steps to end the commercial chaos with the enactment of the Protection for Children Born through Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act. This law banned international commercial surrogacy and imposed strict conditions on domestic arrangements.

Only heterosexual Thai couples, married for at least three years, were allowed to access surrogacy services. Furthermore, surrogates could not receive direct financial compensation and had to be close relatives of the intended parents. Violations carried heavy penalties, including up to ten years in prison.

The government’s primary goal was clear: protect vulnerable women and children while halting unethical practices. However, the consequences were far-reaching.

Thai fertility clinics that once thrived catering to foreigners faced financial losses, and international couples were forced to look elsewhere, often turning to Cambodia or Laos where regulations were weaker at the time. This shift also raised concerns about driving the practice underground, potentially increasing risks for everyone involved.

Meanwhile, the ban reshaped surrogacy within Thailand. Domestic couples struggling with infertility found themselves navigating stricter guidelines, and surrogate mothers, who once sought out surrogacy for economic reasons, had limited avenues.

The law’s success in curbing commercial exploitation was notable, yet it also highlighted challenges in finding a balance between regulation and accessibility.

As Thailand reconsiders its surrogacy laws with the potential to reintroduce international surrogacy under strict conditions, the lessons from its history remain pivotal. The 2015 ban was a turning point, offering a cautionary tale about the need for ethical surrogacy practices in a global context.

The Proposed Legalisation of International Surrogacy

Thailand’s recent push to legalize international surrogacy marks a significant shift in its policies. The decision reflects the government’s ambition to balance ethical concerns with becoming a global centre for assisted reproduction. As demand for fertility services grows worldwide, the proposed legislation aims to address the gaps in the current framework and cater to foreign couples seeking these services.

Key Features of the New Law

The draft legislation introduces several key changes aimed at regulating international surrogacy while addressing past challenges:

Eligibility Criteria for International Couples: The proposed amendments would allow foreign couples, married or partnered, to access surrogacy services.

However, eligibility will likely include a thorough vetting process to ensure the intended parents meet legal and ethical standards. This includes requirements for valid marriage or partnership documentation and financial stability.

Surrogate Selection Guidelines: Couples may bring their own surrogate or choose a Thai citizen for this role. Surrogates would need to meet specific age and health requirements, ensuring their well-being throughout the process. In some cases, surrogates may need to be relatives of the intended parents, a provision aimed at reducing commercial exploitation.

Anti-Trafficking Measures: A standout feature of the new law is its focus on preventing exploitation. Detailed clauses are being drafted to prevent illegal activities like trafficking of embryos, eggs, and surrogates. Heavy penalties are proposed for anyone attempting to bypass these regulations.

Broader Definitions: To align with marriage equality laws, the terms "husband" and "wife" are being replaced with "spouses" in the legal text. This is a progressive step, potentially opening the doors for LGBTQ+ couples to consider surrogacy in Thailand.

These provisions reflect lessons learned from earlier surrogacy scandals and aim to create a balanced approach. By focusing on ethical practices, the law sets a precedent for other countries tackling similar issues.

Government Oversight and Regulation

The Thai government is taking a central role in monitoring the surrogacy process to ensure compliance with international standards. Here's how the oversight is structured:

Dedicated Committees: A specialized committee within the Department of Health Service Support will oversee the implementation of the law. This body will be responsible for vetting applications, approving surrogates, and managing disputes.

Licensing of Facilities: Only approved clinics and hospitals, meeting strict medical and ethical standards, will be allowed to offer surrogacy services. There are currently 115 fertility facilities in Thailand, consisting of both public and private institutions, which may undergo further inspections to qualify under the new law.

Transparency and Accountability: To prevent potential exploitation, all surrogacy agreements must be documented and registered with authorities. This ensures accountability for all parties involved in the process.

Monitoring Birth Outcomes: Post-birth monitoring will be enforced. Authorities will ensure children born through surrogacy are registered properly, and their rights are protected under Thai law.

By introducing these measures, the government aims to create an environment where surrogacy remains ethical and transparent. Although concerns about enforcement capacity persist, stricter regulations and oversight are expected to mitigate risks.

This legislative shift could redefine Thailand’s position in the global fertility services industry, offering hope to international couples while maintaining ethical integrity.

Potential Benefits of the Legalisation

Thailand’s move to legalize international surrogacy comes with promising opportunities, not just for hopeful parents but for the country itself. By opening its doors to foreign couples, Thailand could see both economic and societal benefits.

Boosting the Economy Through ART Tourism

Legalizing surrogacy for international couples could position Thailand as a hub for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) tourism.

The country is already a leading destination for medical tourism, generating billions annually from healthcare services provided to foreign patients. Adding surrogacy services would make Thailand even more attractive for those seeking advanced fertility treatments.

ART tourism doesn’t just bring in revenue from medical procedures. It also encourages spending in related sectors like hospitality, travel, and dining.

Couples visiting for surrogacy may spend months in Thailand, supporting surrogate mothers, attending medical appointments, and awaiting the birth of their child. During this time, they contribute significantly to the local economy.

For instance:

Healthcare facilities: Revenue from surrogacy could help clinics and hospitals upgrade their services.

Accommodation and tourism: Foreign couples often arrive with family, increasing demand for hotels, private rentals, and local tours.

Support services: The need for translators, legal advisors, and case managers creates job opportunities.

Thailand’s advanced medical infrastructure and internationally trained professionals ensure that the country is well-equipped to meet the demands of ART tourism. By legalizing international surrogacy, Thailand could strengthen its position as a global leader in fertility care.

Addressing Declining Birth Rates

Thailand is facing a demographic challenge. With the birth rate declining to below 500,000 per year and an aging population growing rapidly, the country’s long-term social and economic stability is at risk.

Citizens over 60 already make up 20% of the population, a number expected to rise to one-third by 2030. This trend puts pressure on social welfare systems and the workforce.

Legalizing surrogacy for international and domestic use could provide a partial solution. By attracting more foreign couples and encouraging domestic surrogacy, the country could indirectly contribute to population growth. Surrogacy would also help address infertility, a growing concern for many families worldwide.

Moreover, the influx of children born through surrogacy could create a ripple effect on Thailand’s services and industries. From education to childcare, each new life benefits not just parents but also the nation.

This aligns with the country’s need for a younger, more balanced demographic to sustain its economy.

By creating supportive laws and leveraging advanced reproductive technologies, Thailand has an opportunity to address its shrinking population while maintaining ethical and humane practices.

Ethical and Social Concerns

Thailand’s decision to reintroduce international surrogacy raises significant ethical and social questions. While the potential for economic growth and advanced healthcare infrastructure is undeniable, the risks of exploitation and human trafficking, as well as the challenge of ensuring ethical practices, demand critical attention.

Risks of Exploitation and Human Trafficking

One of the biggest concerns with international surrogacy is the vulnerability of surrogate mothers. Without stringent safeguards, these women could face exploitation, reduced to being mere “wombs for hire.” In the past, Thailand has seen cases where financial pressures, lack of informed consent, and coercive practices have left surrogates in precarious situations.

Some women faced inadequate medical care or were left unsupported after birth. The country’s surrogacy scandals, such as the infamous abandonment of a disabled baby, highlighted the darker side of the industry.

These risks become even more pronounced in cross-border arrangements. Surrogates, especially from lower-income backgrounds, may be drawn into agreements where they have limited legal protection. Trafficking of embryos, eggs, or even children remains a concern, with illegal brokers often exploiting loopholes in the law.

To tackle this, the new legislation includes detailed anti-trafficking measures, such as mandatory documentation of surrogacy agreements and penalties for violations. However, ensuring compliance will require consistent enforcement and transparency.

Balancing Economic Benefits with Ethical Responsibility

Thailand’s ambitions to become a global hub for fertility services come with financial incentives. International surrogacy could attract foreign investment, boost medical tourism, and create jobs across sectors.

Yet, these economic advantages must not overshadow the ethical responsibility to protect all parties involved—especially surrogate mothers and the children born through such arrangements.

The challenge lies in creating a system that benefits the economy while upholding moral standards. Clear guidelines are essential to prevent any form of commodification of women or children.

For instance, surrogates should be fully informed of their rights, offered fair compensation, and provided with adequate medical and psychological support. Standardized contracts and rigorous government oversight can serve as key safeguards.

While surrogacy can bring joy to intended parents, it’s crucial to ensure the process respects the dignity and autonomy of surrogate mothers. Legislators must navigate this tightrope carefully, prioritizing ethical practices without stifling the industry’s growth.

Ultimately, the success of this initiative depends on finding a balance that protects human rights while fostering economic development.

Global Implications for Surrogacy Practices

Recent legislative changes in Thailand could have a ripple effect on international surrogacy practices. By legalizing surrogacy for foreign couples, Thailand is setting the stage for conversations about ethical and regulated surrogacy across the globe.

Let’s examine how Thailand’s evolving approach could pave the way for other nations and how it compares to surrogacy practices in countries like India and Georgia.

Thailand as a Model for Other Nations

Thailand’s move to potentially legalize international surrogacy carries lessons for other countries grappling with similar issues. With its strict regulations and anti-trafficking measures, Thailand aims to strike a balance between catering to global demand and protecting surrogate mothers and children.

This approach could serve as a blueprint for nations considering the regulation or reintroduction of international surrogacy.

By focusing on detailed eligibility criteria and stringent oversight, Thailand is prioritizing ethics without stifling the surrogacy industry. Other countries can learn from Thailand’s emphasis on:

Anti-trafficking measures: Through mandatory agreements and legal penalties, Thailand is taking steps to prevent exploitation.

Medical and ethical standards: Only certified facilities and vetted surrogates will be allowed, ensuring a high-quality process.

Transparency: By requiring all agreements to be documented and registered, Thailand aims to minimize legal grey areas.

These measures not only protect surrogates but also rebuild the trust of international couples, which the country lost during its unregulated past. Countries like Cambodia, which have struggled to control illegal surrogacy practices, could benefit from adopting similar frameworks.

Comparisons with Other Nations’ Surrogacy Models

When comparing Thailand’s strict surrogacy regulations to those in India or Georgia, key similarities and differences emerge. Each country’s approach highlights unique challenges and solutions in managing international surrogacy.

India

India, historically a hub for affordable surrogacy, implemented a ban on commercial surrogacy for foreign couples in 2015. Like Thailand, India made this decision following controversies about exploitation and inadequate protections for surrogates. However, India’s current framework is even more restrictive, allowing only altruistic surrogacy for Indian nationals. This contrasts with Thailand’s proposed law, which would permit international couples under strict guidelines.

Similarities: Both nations have faced ethical criticisms about exploitation and trafficking, prompting their bans.

Differences: Thailand’s new approach aims to reopen doors for foreign couples while India remains firmly closed to international surrogacy.

Georgia

Georgia is often considered a rising destination for international surrogacy due to its affordable pricing and less restrictive laws. Unlike Thailand or India, Georgia permits commercial surrogacy and allows foreign couples to access these services. This has positioned the country as a leading option for intended parents. However, Georgia’s relatively relaxed regulations have raised concerns about surrogate welfare and oversight, potential areas where Thailand’s model could offer improvements.

Similarities: Georgia’s appeal to international couples mirrors Thailand’s historical role in the surrogacy industry.

Differences: Thailand plans to focus heavily on ethical guidelines and safeguards, whereas Georgia lacks comparable regulation.

By comparing these approaches, it’s clear that Thailand’s evolving surrogacy legislation aims for a middle ground: strict ethical oversight with an open door to global couples. This positions Thailand as a unique player in the international surrogacy landscape, offering lessons for both more restrictive and more lenient nations.

Conclusion

Thailand’s move to legalize international surrogacy reflects an effort to balance global demand, ethical practices, and economic growth. By introducing stricter regulations and government oversight, the country aims to prevent past exploitation while creating opportunities for hopeful parents worldwide.

These changes signal Thailand’s potential to reclaim its position as a leader in fertility services, offering advanced medical care within a controlled, ethical framework.

As the legislation unfolds, it presents a chance for Thailand to address concerns, inspire global standards, and set a precedent for inclusive, ethical surrogacy practices. Whether it becomes a sustainable model will depend on execution and enforcement, but Thailand’s renewed approach offers a promising next chapter for international surrogacy.

lgbtq

About the Creator

Anna Wong

Anna studied at Chiang Rai Rajabhat University where she earned a degree in Journalism and Mass Communication in 2004. After graduating Anna worked as a journalist for MCOT Radio broadcasting stations company

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.