Hills Like White Elephants

Unpacking Hemingway’s Silent Tension

Ernest Hemingway’s short story Hills Like White Elephants is one of the most widely analyzed pieces in modern literature. First published in 1927, the story offers a minimalist yet powerfully emotional look into a conversation between a man and a woman waiting for a train in Spain. On the surface, it appears to be a simple dialogue. However, its deeper meanings reveal themes of communication, choice, gender roles, and power dynamics—all hidden beneath Hemingway’s characteristic iceberg style.

At its core, Hills Like White Elephants revolves around a couple debating whether or not the woman should undergo an abortion. Although the word “abortion” is never explicitly mentioned, the story is filled with subtextual clues. The “white elephants” in the title symbolize unwanted gifts, which reflects the way the man perceives the pregnancy. The main point of the story isn’t the decision itself, but rather how communication—or the lack thereof—shapes relationships. It shows how people often skirt around difficult issues, masking true emotions behind casual words.

Throughout the conversation, Jig (the girl) starts off passive, seemingly dependent on the man’s opinion. However, as the story progresses, her tone shifts. She becomes more introspective, even sarcastic, as she realizes the emotional disconnect between her and the man. Her statement, “Would you please please please please please please please stop talking?” reflects her inner turmoil and fatigue with being pressured. She comes to understand that the relationship is unequal and that the man’s love may be conditional, based on her willingness to comply.

Though the couple never directly says the word, they are discussing whether Jig should have an abortion. The man insists that it’s “a very simple operation” and that everything will go back to the way it was. Jig, however, is conflicted. She questions whether things can truly return to normal, and whether her decision is truly hers. The couple’s vague and circular dialogue captures the emotional weight and complexity of making life-changing choices in a strained relationship.

This question has sparked much debate. Some argue that the story is anti-feminist because Jig appears to lack agency and is influenced by the man’s desires. However, others interpret it as feminist for the very same reason—it highlights how women are often silenced or manipulated in relationships. Jig’s growing awareness and subtle resistance suggest that Hemingway may have been criticizing the male-dominated dynamics rather than endorsing them. Ultimately, the story invites the reader to question traditional power structures between men and women.

The moral lesson in Hills Like White Elephants lies in the importance of honest communication and mutual respect. Relationships cannot thrive when one person dominates the narrative while the other suppresses their true feelings. It also emphasizes how life-altering decisions should be made with care, empathy, and equality, not coercion. Through Hemingway’s sparse language and implied emotion, readers are left with a poignant reminder: silence often speaks louder than words.

Hills Like White Elephants may be brief in length, but its emotional and psychological depth continues to resonate nearly a century after its publication. It is a masterclass in subtext, where every line and pause holds meaning. For those interested in literary storytelling that captures human complexity, Hemingway’s story remains a timeless exploration of the choices that define us.

Thank You!