Education logo

Reimagining India’s Waqf Laws with a Global Lens

Waqf Boards and Bharat’s Land Puzzle: A Legal Deep Dive

By Jai KishanPublished 9 months ago 4 min read
Waqf in a Heterogeneous Society: Balancing Faith, Law, and Public Trust in Modern Bharat

Waqf’s Enduring Legacy in India

Waqf, an Islamic tradition of endowment, took root in India under Mughal rulers, dedicating lands for mosques, madrasas, and community welfare. By 1950, British oversight through the 1913 Mussalman Wakf Validating Act managed approximately 52,000 acres, relying on local governance with minimal central control. This early framework, though modest, laid the foundation for a complex journey, as waqf evolved into a significant governance challenge in modern India, navigating the delicate balance between religious charity and legal accountability in a diverse nation.

The Legal Evolution of Waqf

India’s waqf laws transformed over decades. The 1954 Waqf Act established state Waqf Boards, formalizing management and setting the stage for growth. By 2006, waqf properties spanned 6 lakh acres, as reported by the Sachar Committee, reflecting a significant expansion driven by legislative changes. The 1995 Act introduced provisions allowing boards to claim properties based on religious use, without requiring formal documentation, a move that centralized authority but sparked concerns. The 2013 amendment further shifted the burden of proof to landowners, intensifying debates over fairness. By 2025, official records (WAMSI) documented 8.72 lakh properties across 9.4 lakh acres, debunking unverified claims of 39 lakh acres. These laws, while empowering boards, highlighted the urgent need for oversight, as rapid growth often clashed with the rights of diverse communities.

Tensions and Disputes in Waqf Claims

Waqf’s expansion has not been without friction. In Tamil Nadu’s Thiruchendurai village, waqf claims on local lands triggered protests from residents asserting generational ownership. Gujarat’s sacred Bet Dwarka island faced similar contention, with claims challenging its Hindu heritage. Kerala’s Munambam dispute, involving 600 acres and Christian landowners, underscored inter-community tensions. In Delhi, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju pointed to waqf claims on the CGO Complex, raising questions about governance over public assets. Notably, some claims have involved Hindu-owned properties, including temples, prompting India to include non-Muslims on Waqf Boards—a step toward fairness not seen in Muslim-majority nations. These disputes reveal a critical challenge: ensuring waqf’s charitable intent aligns with equitable land governance in India’s pluralistic society.

Learning from Global Waqf Systems

Muslim-majority nations offer valuable lessons for India. Turkey’s waqf system, managed by state agencies, excludes religious bodies entirely, relying on secular courts to settle claims and ensuring appeals are accessible. Malaysia adopts a balanced approach, with state and religious councils sharing authority; clerics guide decisions, but state-enforced rules and court oversight maintain fairness. Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Islamic Affairs aligns religious courts with state regulations, allowing appeals to ensure transparency. Pakistan’s state departments control public waqfs, such as shrines, relegating religious bodies to advisory roles with minimal court recourse. In contrast, India’s post-2025 Waqf Amendment Act introduces state audits and diverse board representation, but religious tribunals still dominate claim adjudication, granting clerics significant influence compared to Turkey’s state-driven model or Malaysia’s balanced oversight.

A Call for Balanced Reform

The 2025 amendment marks a pivotal moment for India’s waqf governance. While waqf’s spiritual essence—prayer, almsgiving, and mosque endowments—remains an exclusive Muslim right, its governance, involving management and claims, now sees state intervention through audits and non-Muslim representation. However, the reliance on religious tribunals, with limited secular court appeals, makes India’s system less state-controlled than Pakistan or Saudi Arabia. Malaysia’s court-backed councils offer a compelling model, blending religious input with judicial oversight to minimize disputes. India must reduce tribunal influence, adopting Turkey’s secular clarity or Saudi Arabia’s appeal mechanisms, to ensure waqf claims are transparent and fair, fostering trust across communities.

Global Inspiration for India’s Future

Turkey’s state-led waqf system eliminates religious overreach, ensuring disputes are rare—an approach India could emulate to streamline governance. Pakistan’s state dominance over public waqfs curbs local conflicts, while Saudi Arabia’s structured appeals provide clarity for all stakeholders. Malaysia’s balanced governance, integrating state and religious roles with court checks, offers a practical path for India to reduce tensions. The 2025 reforms, with audits and diverse boards, are a step forward, but tribunal power persists, lagging behind global standards. By drawing from these international models, India can transform waqf governance into a bridge between communities, ensuring endowments serve their charitable purpose without fueling division.

Uniting Through Waqf’s Potential

Waqf’s religious acts—prayer, almsgiving, mosque endowments—are sacred Muslim rights, but its governance must reflect India’s diversity. The 2025 amendment, while progressive, falls short of Turkey’s state authority or Malaysia’s fairness due to tribunal dominance. Adopting global best practices, such as Malaysia’s court oversight or Saudi Arabia’s appeal system, can help India address disputes like those involving Hindu properties. Waqf has the potential to be a symbol of unity, channeling its charitable roots to benefit all communities. Let’s reimagine waqf governance, blending international rigor with local values—how can we make waqf a unifying force in India’s pluralistic society?

A Vision for Harmony

India’s waqf journey reflects its broader struggle to balance faith and fairness. The 2025 reforms are a foundation, but deeper changes are needed. Tribunal influence must give way to state-led clarity, as in Turkey, or balanced oversight, as in Malaysia. Waqf’s spiritual mission thrives under Muslim stewardship, but governance should unite, not divide. By learning from global systems, India can ensure waqf becomes a beacon of charity and harmony, respecting its religious core while serving the nation’s diverse tapestry.

Read more

https://hinduinfopedia.com/waqf-act-in-india/

#WaqfAct #IndiaLandLaws #LegalReform #HinduInfoPedia #ReligiousProperty #Governance

college

About the Creator

Jai Kishan

Retired from a career as a corporate executive, I am now dedicated to exploring the impact of Hinduism on everyday life, delving into topics of religion, history, and spirituality through comprehensive coverage on my website.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.