Education logo

Peoplay Official

Men of High Stature and Open Narcissism

By John Hess Published 5 years ago 17 min read
What is the most interesting fact of them all?

In my submission for the Black Book Challenge, "High Stature", I touched on many topics that I have found interesting over the course of more than ten years of almost uninterrupted research on the internet and elsewhere. As I stated in that story, I've learned that all letters have a number value in numerology, and the sum of those letters add up to a complete name number that irrefutably dictates a portion of one's personality. Although I did not have room for much elaboration and left it up to the reader to research and verify a lot of the claims, I hope I will be able to do that here and expand into one that I think is the most interesting one of them all.

As it says in the story, I've learned that if your name adds up to 50, as mine does, it means you are well-suited to be a judge or professor, and it also says that you "do not stop until you find the ultimate secrets in any venture." While I, John Evan Hess, don't claim to have accomplished this fully, it is certainly my goal, and I hope the reader will enjoy the forthcoming research that I have done so far. Although I neglected to mention it in the story, another good example is Judge Judy, whose full birth name, Judith Susan Blum, also adds up to 50. Although there are many sites that have the correct number values, this site is a good one to go to if one does not have them memorized like Henry Dowdy does. At that site, you can also find a list of celebrities and their numbers, where Carl Gustav Jung and Jo Raquel Tejada (Raquel Welch) are also listed as 50.

More specific than horoscopes.

In addition to my name number of 50, I've discovered that my "destiny number" is 88, which is my name number plus my life path number. The life path number is what is called "destiny" on the Sanatan Society website, except that on Sanatan Society it is the life path number reduced to a single digit. In my case, my birthday is 11/29/1987. So:

1+1+2+9+1+9+8+7 = 38 (full life path) = 3+8 = 11 = 1+1 = 2 (reduced life path/Sanatan Society destiny)

While the reduction to 2 means that I am admittedly all of the things that it lists on Sanatan Society for the 2 destiny, the 38 number also has significance in itself, some of which can be found here in another source listed in the story. Although it escapes me where to find it, I also once read somewhere that one of the elements of the 38 life path is "laughter," which I then researched and verified with examples such as conspiracy theorist John Wayne Todd (5/19/1949), Kanye West (6/8/1977), and Kobe Bryant (8/23/1978). As a result, I call this the "laughter 2 destiny" in contrast to the others, and I believe that all those who share my exact birthday share this ability to make others laugh.

Besides laughter, it also described intimate details such as my preferences in the bedroom, which I imagine is one of the things that numerologists are talking about when they say that they do not want to give it publicly in their superficial readings. But nevertheless, I found it to be accurate and representative of the specific possibilities contained in numerology (and if you really want to know, you can find it). In fact, towards the bottom of my name number page, it says that because of the combination of my 5 name number (reduced from 50) and 2 life path (destiny in Sanatan), I can "become a great poet, writer, and a captivating speaker," and one of the people with the same combination is Todd, who was a captivating speaker. Another example is Benjamin Aaron Shapiro. Seemingly subjective, different speakers, but equally captivating.

I hate lively dazzle. Ask anyone.

Perhaps this is why when I was growing up that I was a big fan of comedian Stephen Lynch, who is the only one I have ever paid to see in person. As I later found out, his full birth name, Stephen Andrew Lynch, adds up to 88 as well. Although his is his name number and mine is my destiny number, they are interchangeable, and the number is labeled "Divine Knowing":

One of the many number descriptions in The Heart of Numerology describing me (destiny), Stephen Andrew Lynch (name number), George Washington (name number with no middle), and Adolf Hitler (destiny and no middle).

So, sight unseen, you can know all of these things and more about someone without having to actually "know" them, as Lynch says in the following interview. When I first read that 88 is "Divine in many aspects," I did not realize that the creator of the website was referring to the title "Divine Knowing" until I discovered this independent source, giving me more confidence in the research. I think it is important that one goes through this process and really makes sure one knows that it is true before presenting before others, which I think is lost in much of the "fake news" posted on the internet today (I call it "boldly asserting error" or "unsourced diarrhea").

As Lynch says here, people who know him know that he doesn't go out much, or as the 88 name number page previously posted says, "dislike(s) company and brood(s) in solitude." What they don't know is that these actions are preordained since birth and are actually determined by what his parents named him, as I mentioned in the story. To me it stands to reason that, given this information, if you consciously named your child Stephen Andrew Lynch then the person will have the given traits. This could also apply to what I mentioned in the story about "hidden passions," choosing a name that makes them a warrior and a leader and/or possess a good sense of humor. Those are just two that I know from my own name, as 1 and 5 are tied for the predominant number group, but the others have meanings too that I just haven't memorized yet. As you might have also noticed, Stephen Andrew Lynch has predominant 5s.

Hidden passions 1 and 5, respectively.

When I first saw this, I did not know how those things were calculated, but I learned later from a random book at Barnes and Noble that I unfortunately did not purchase that the number group must outnumber the others or be tied with it, again getting independent corroboration. Unfortunately, as with what I said before, I do not remember exactly where I read it but feel as if it does not matter because I looked into it and found out it was true myself, and that that is the crucial process that others should go through as well. My best guess would be this outstanding book by Glynis McCants.

Before I move on, I want to provide one last example. In my story, the villain's name is Henry Dowdy The Second (the way to correctly add such things in numerology), which adds up to 99. Donald John Trump's destiny is also 99, as his name number and his life path number add up to 99. So, the mystery of his own destiny is:

Brute Strength & Terror

Other people I have found who share this number in their numbers include conspiracy theorist Milton William Cooper (name number), Marshall Bruce Mathers The Third (personality number) and Colin Murray Cowherd (name number), an "attractive" 6 dayer (as stated in the story from Sanatan Society) who wrote a book entitled You Herd Me!: I'll Say It If Nobody Else Will. In my opinion, if one cannot see the correlation between name/destiny and predetermined personality traits/actions that must come to pass, they are "living in fantasy land," as Cooper said often on his radio show (another attractive individual, born on May 6th).

To expand on this idea, as I mentioned in my story, I have come across several patterns that indicate physical beauty or attractiveness, including 3 days (Secret Language Network/Secret Language of Birthdays), 5 days (irretrievable website), and 6 days (Sanatan Society). In addition to these number rules, I have located various "attractive," "gorgeous" and "model" days in 365 Birthdays Interpreted that turn out to be correct in every case of investigation.

One of the sites discussing the physical beauty of 3s (Jill Janee Jensen from my story was born on 8/21).

For some reason, these ideas have gotten the most pushback from the few people who have engaged me about them, although it's probably for the same reason of Lynch's bitterness in the video and mine because of things that have happened in my own life (despite 365 saying he's "gorgeous" and "has his pick of the pile" on page 167). The first man didn't really challenge me on the idea but that he thinks that his wife is the most beautiful, and I think he was upset that she wasn't born on a 3 day. The next one challenged the idea that all people who are born on certain days would be models, which implies beauty, so I gave him August 19th as an example from the book on page 189. In my research, some of the people I've found to be born on that day are Bill Clinton, John Stamos, Kirk Cousins, and Matthew Perry.

"Going for it" is all there supposedly is to it.

Really, really, really ridiculously good-looking.

Then, if that wasn't enough for me, I found out that a person I used to work with at a bowling alley who is a former homecoming queen and one of the prettiest people I've ever met has the birthday. So, slowly it becomes fact to me, but I remain open to people who think there might be an anomaly to it. I have gone back and scanned my friends, family and famous people, and it all makes sense, including those who have passed on me because "the opposite sex surrounds" the 3 days (I found another numerology site independent from SLN that stated this about 3 days as well, but I think it is from the same irretrievable website where I read about the 5 day rule, such as the previously mentioned Kobe Bryant. This one, however, says essentially the same thing, and Richard King [discussed more below] discusses it here). But I had to eventually block said man because he would not have a logical discussion, acknowledge points and go from there, which I find exceedingly rare.

Another interesting one that I touched on in my story are the 9 Martians, which Napoleon supposedly knew about and used to construct exclusively Martian armies. While I have read this in multiple places, I haven't found anything that for sure documents it, so I was reluctant to add it into my story. But, nevertheless, the science is real. While most people do not know this, it appears that Lil Wayne does, as I referenced his song "Phone Home" (he was born on a 27 and doesn't have fear). To me, like Eminem's "Mockingbird", it has hidden meaning that only some know about ("something we have no control over, and that's what destiny is," itself paraphrasing Einstein). Perhaps he's privy to some of this obscure knowledge, being an Illuminati puppet who flashes their signs in his videos (including the all-seeing eye).

And finally, before I get to my chosen fact (and runner-up), I also think that it is fascinating that besides beauty, there is a day that predicts wealth in 365 Birthdays Interpreted (December 4th on page 328). After I read that, I started investigating, and the first example I found was Jay-Z, which almost cemented it already for me. Subsequent examples include Skip Bayless and Jeff Bridges.

Jay-Z's wealth predicted.

Although these are good examples because they are "wealthy," I know that it is important to seek out non-famous examples because most famous people are also going to be wealthy. Although I was able to locate a handful on my Facebook page, none of them responded to my inquiry in my post. If it wasn't just because most people always ignore me or don't engage in these discussions even if they don't, I guess that's not something that they would want to proclaim to everybody. But I have a feeling that it is true and people born on that day will eventually grow into wealth as it predicts. Or, as I like to say, he was born destined to sell his soul to the devil and join a secret society in order to gain an abnormal opportunity that has nothing to do with "hard work" ("by any means necessary, whatever the cost").

"Jesus can't save you, life starts when the church ends"

While all of these are nice, there are two things that I've found to be extraordinary that would probably not be believed initially by anyone I told. The first is that, in a similar way to the name manipulation mentioned before to dictate characteristics, it extends past those things to political affiliation. I've found that when you enter someone's name into the calculator that I provided for convenience in the link at the beginning of the article (forevernumerology.com), a value for "KA" comes up, which means Karmic Accumulation and is really a reflection of the sum of the "voids." Although I do not remember exactly what voids are all about and what each one means, articles about them and many other thought-provoking topics can be found at the numerologist Richard King's website. In fact, he wrote an article about naming your kids to avoid having any voids/problems (I think it is about supposed missing wiring in the brain), but to the best of my knowledge there is not one discussing what I have above, actually producing chosen characteristics. But it's the same idea.

Anyway, once you find out what the Karmic Accumulation number is, you can go to the corresponding book, The Heart of Numerology, that has descriptions for each number. The one under KA 19 reads:

KA 19 from The Heart of Numerology

To me, the part in this selection implies that people with this karmic accumulation number are left-leaning and liberal, so instead of being a "disease" that needs to be "cured" as conspiracy theorist Mark Dice (a physical beauty born on a 21) and others often say, it is ingrained and predetermined from what their parents named them in many cases. Examples that I have encountered so far are a few liberal Facebook friends and a person from my would-be missionary trip who I came into conflict with that unfortunately resulted in my dismissal from the program.

I know that she was probably reading the articles I was posting for the World Race that articulated right-wing views and that could be why she had long delays in responding to me and hollow promises she didn't follow through on, but it could be anything else. In fact, it could be because our interaction of weeks as stated on Secret Language Network results in an "awkward" dynamic, instead of a more compatible one like "exciting" or something. While I just briefly mentioned this in my story, I think it is something worth investigating that others do not realize as well. Regardless of one's faith, the type of relationship one has with someone else depends on this, and I have many of them memorized. Different people, but same dynamic every time. But regardless, I never know exactly why people do those things and continually disappoint me.

It's awkward with anyone who falls in the given range.

So, if my theory is correct, which I've found it to be so far, then I think that if any liberals want to ensure that they have liberal children, the best thing to do would be come up with names that result in KA 19, in addition to the other things that I've mentioned that are in their control. They could also read up on any of the other KA numbers and dictate those traits, as well. Although I can't say that I necessarily agree with the underlying concept of KA numbers, as it seems to imply reincarnation and I am a Christian, it is undeniable that the descriptions in the book are accurate, including mine for KA 21. So, the question of why it would be correct without the underlying concept being correct is one worth thinking about. But I appreciate all true information about myself wherever I can find it.

Last but not least, my favorite source that I have found so far is the Peoplay website. At this site, all you have to do is put in your full birth name and birthday and something akin to a Madden depth chart (my favorite video game) comes up with point rankings for your attributes, in addition to other interesting things:

VIP to the END.

And although it doesn't reflect on my page, there is one that is clearly the most interesting to me: "lonely star." Underneath this designation, it says that one has a "hidden sense of superiority" or "open narcissism," implying that narcissism is something that is ingrained because of name and birthday and not any other factors (I am not sure how it is generated exactly but am leaning towards just birthday from what I've seen, as everything seems to be there before you put in name and doesn't change). On one of my Facebook pages, I have tons of friends who research and share information as I do (at their best), and they are always slamming narcissists and their behavior as one of the legs of the "dark triad" (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). When this happens, I share this information to show them that it is ingrained and not something that should be discriminated against, but I have unfortunately gotten no significant input on the information or the implications of it.

Donald John Trump's Peoplay

Joseph Robinette Biden Junior's Peoplay

Another thing that I have noticed is that, as one can see above, it is a common occurrence among people in positions of power, or men of high stature, including recent Presidents of the United States. According to my research, out of the last five presidents (starting with Clinton), four have had this trait. And while Barack Hussein Obama The Second is not (a) Peoplay official (I once thought he was according to name and birthday information provided as fact on the internet), he does do things indicative of it, as seen here. I am always willing to re-assess, correct and evolve, and I think this is crucial to the research process as well.

So, in light of this information, is it such a "crazy" stretch (as observers have said) to wear a shirt bought at the mall, as I do, that states "Republicans are Red/Democrats are Blue/Neither one gives a c*ap about YOU!"? It says in the information that narcissists "tend to turn down advice and requests of others" instead of wanting to help as servants of the people. Could it be that their only concern is more economic and political power, as asserted in William Cooper's Behold a Pale Horse, and the transfer of power we just had in the country isn't really that much of a change? Could it be that the public has mistaken these leaders for benevolent empaths and they might not be worthy of the adulation they receive just for being rich, famous, and powerful people? Could they be involved in even more sinister activities akin to the revelations of Epstein Island, vindicating someone such as conspiracy theorist and model (according to 365) David Icke who once said in an interview that there is a strong correlation of people in positions of power to pedophilia*? Could many of these figures not be Godly men/women as they often claim, but have really made a deal with the devil and joined evil men to achieve their aspirations, by any means necessary and whatever the cost**? It shouldn't seem so crazy to the public now in my opinion.

Lecturer and model David Icke.

* While I am not a listener or supporter of David Icke (or Alex Jones because of previous unaddressed falsehoods), I don't believe anyone can be fully "debunked," as a documentary is titled concerning Icke, and all claims need to be listened to and researched in one's search for the truth.

** It should be noted that I believe many of the celebrities I've mentioned have done the same as Jay-Z, and I am not endorsing them. I just know that the reader will be familiar with them and are using them as examples concerning the information. Other examples of them saying such things include Eminem saying he "sold (his) soul to the devil" and "will never get it back" and Tupac (quoted in the picture below) saying he "sold (his) soul for a chance to kick it and bang." Interestingly, Tupac's Sanatan destiny is 4, saying that he "know(s) how to enjoy the good life" yet is "somehow never satisfied and wanting more," like Trump. Completely different people, different colors of skin, but same essential destiny. Later in "Good Life," Big Syke says it "cost him his soul" for him and his associates to live it.

Once you look at it, you know.

While I will leave that up to the reader to decide, I will not budge on the accuracy of "the science" that speaks for itself and many aren't aware of (and mock if they are made aware of it without investigating). It frustrates me that on my Facebook page, I always see people doing Nametests that give them common vague paragraph results, in addition to no negatives at all. If there is a test about their "one negative," it will always "really be a positive in disguise." If there is a "narcissist vs. empath" test, it will always give them "100% empath" from what I've seen, even if Peoplay says the opposite from their birth information. It is abundantly clear to me that most people do not care about the actual truth (as it says I do in my 2 Sanatan destiny), but what they want to be true, and they will shut down and deny any negatives that come up. As one book I read once said, they are incapable of deep self-knowledge because of this. I also once read somewhere that Trump (a 5 dayer) said he would be afraid to look at such an analysis because of what it might say, which confirms what I'm saying. To say that "it takes courage," as some have, to look at it and acknowledge it to me is ridiculous, but nevertheless still seems to be true.

Lastly, to wrap things up, I want to say that I am not picking on those who are openly narcissistic by nature. In fact, that's the point of the article: that it is through no fault of their own and is like any other flaw. If one examines the info above for me, there are also things that I would judge to be negative, but I accept them all as true and have been called those things before. It is how others perceive me, after all, as it says on Sanatan about destiny.

When I posted an article for the World Race that said these things, calling Richard Sherman a narcissist (I shared one of his posts on Facebook saying this, then minutes later he posted an animation of him dancing in front of a mirror saying he is a winner), I feel I got a strong message from God to repent for my words, as no one is perfect (he is Peoplay official, and also a 30 physical beauty). While I am sorry for in any way implying that it is his fault given the information provided, I still stand by some things, especially if I've had conflicts with others (who have flat-out denied that it's even true from fantasy land) and it's trying to be determined who might be right in a specific situation. And since people continue to pay homage to these people while continuing to ignore me and others trying to bring them the truth, I will continue to (metaphorically) "blast on these hoes" like warrior and leader Oscar Jerome Jackson Junior until that changes or I'm dead. Because the only danger most of us truthseekers really pose is to the ignorance of most people who have almost certainly never heard of these things (not necessarily their fault) and refuse to investigate and discuss even if you bring it up (their fault), leading to a very lonely existence craving to find other souls as dedicated to finding out what it's really all about.

how to

About the Creator

John Hess

Writer, poet, captivating speaker.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.