United States Fertilizers Market Size and Forecast (2025–2033)
Rising Precision Farming, Bio-Based Inputs, and High Crop Demand Propel America’s Fertilizer Future
The United States Fertilizers Market is expected to reach US$ 42.65 billion by 2033, rising from US$ 27.42 billion in 2024, according to Renub Research. This reflects a CAGR of 5.03% during 2025–2033, driven by the increasing demand for food production, technological advancements in fertilizer formulation, and the rapid adoption of precision agriculture across major farming states. With grains and cereals accounting for a substantial share of fertilizer consumption, the U.S. remains one of the world’s most influential agriculture-driven economies.
From chemical and dry fertilizers to organic and specialty variants, the U.S. fertilizers industry is undergoing a profound transformation. Growing environmental regulations, sustainability commitments, and shifting consumer preferences are reshaping fertilizer production and application methods nationwide.
United States Fertilizers Industry Overview
Agriculture remains a strategic pillar of the U.S. economy, and fertilizers play a crucial role in strengthening food security and enhancing soil productivity. As the demand for nitrogen, phosphate, and potash fertilizers continues to increase, farmers are adopting modern, data-driven tools to optimize nutrient use.
The market is experiencing strong momentum due to:
Precision and smart farming technologies such as drones, GPS systems, AI-based farm tools, and soil sensors.
Government initiatives promoting soil health management and sustainable agricultural practices.
Increased biofuel crop cultivation, particularly corn and soybeans.
Rising adoption of organic and bio-based fertilizers, aligned with consumer preference for clean-label foods.
Customized fertilizer blends suited to regional soil profiles and crop requirements.
In addition, the integration of digital platforms for soil monitoring and crop diagnostics has enabled growers to apply fertilizers more precisely, cutting wastage and enhancing yield. Agricultural cooperatives and research institutions are deepening awareness about nutrient balance, soil testing, and environmentally responsible fertilization.
Biofuels Fueling Fertilizer Demand
A major growth catalyst is the expanding U.S. biofuel sector. As of January 2024, renewable diesel and biofuel manufacturers reached a production capacity of 4.3 billion gallons annually, an increase of 1.3 billion gallons from 2023 (U.S. EIA data). Ethanol production—primarily from corn—remains the backbone of the biofuel industry.
This growth translates directly into higher fertilizer usage due to the nutrient-intensive requirements of biofuel feedstock crops.
Soil Degradation and Climate Challenges Boosting Market Need
Significant soil degradation, rising temperatures, and shifting precipitation patterns require scientifically balanced fertilizers to improve soil resilience and maintain crop yields. Specialty fertilizers—such as controlled-release products, micronutrient blends, and organic additives—are gaining traction to counter these challenges.
Key Factors Driving the United States Fertilizers Market Growth
1. Growing Adoption of Precision Agriculture
Precision agriculture is revolutionizing fertilizer use across America’s farms. Using drones, GPS-guided tractors, automated spreaders, and real-time soil mapping, farmers are applying nutrients only where and when needed. This approach maximizes efficiency and reduces environmental footprints.
Key benefits driving adoption include:
Reduced nutrient runoff
Lower fertilizer input costs
Higher crop yields
Better nutrient use efficiency
Enhanced environmental compliance
The integration of AI-driven analytics helps forecast nutrient requirements, predict soil deficiencies, and customize fertilizer blends. As precision agriculture expands, so will demand for controlled-release, customized, and slow-release fertilizers built for data-driven farming.
2. Rising Demand for Sustainable and Organic Fertilizers
Sustainability is reshaping the U.S. fertilizer landscape. With rising consumer preference for organic foods and chemical-free farming, organic and bio-based fertilizers are seeing unprecedented growth.
Drivers include:
Federal and state incentives for regenerative agriculture
Increased awareness of soil microbiome health
Lower risk of nutrient leaching and pollution
Growing adoption of microbial and enzyme-based fertilizers
Waste-to-fertilizer initiatives under circular economy models
Biofertilizers—derived from beneficial microbes—enhance nutrient uptake and promote soil biodiversity. Meanwhile, organic fertilizers such as compost and manure enhance long-term soil health.
These trends will strengthen as environmental regulations tighten and climate-smart agriculture becomes a national priority.
3. Expansion of Horticulture and Specialty Crop Cultivation
High-value horticulture crops—fruits, vegetables, nuts, and ornamental plants—continue to expand across states like California, Florida, and New York. These crops require precise nutrient management, propelling demand for:
Micronutrient-rich fertilizers
Water-soluble fertilizers
Controlled-release formulations
Specialty blends for landscaping and turf
Urban gardening, greenhouse farming, and hydroponic production are growing rapidly, boosting demand for nutrient-rich, water-efficient fertilizers.
Challenges in the United States Fertilizers Market
1. Environmental Concerns and Regulatory Pressures
Environmental sustainability remains a major challenge. Excessive fertilizer use contributes to:
Nitrogen runoff
Water eutrophication
Soil degradation
Greenhouse gas emissions
Consequently, federal and local authorities have tightened norms on fertilizer composition and usage. Compliance requires significant investment from manufacturers and can increase costs for farmers.
Transitioning toward eco-friendly formulations—such as biodegradable or low-emission fertilizers—demands high R&D costs, posing a barrier for smaller manufacturers.
2. Raw Material Price Volatility and Supply Chain Issues
The U.S. fertilizer industry depends heavily on raw materials such as natural gas, phosphates, and potash—much of which is imported. The market faces ongoing risks from:
Global supply chain disruptions
Rising shipping and logistics costs
Import tariffs
Currency fluctuations
Geopolitical tensions
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities, prompting companies to explore domestic sourcing, strategic partnerships, and long-term procurement contracts to stabilize supplies.
United States Fertilizers Market Overview by Key States
California
California’s vast agricultural diversity—from almonds to grapes to citrus—drives demand for tailored fertilizer solutions. Sustainable and organic fertilizers are increasingly adopted, while water shortages promote fertigation-based nutrient delivery.
Texas
Texas leads in large-scale cultivation of grains, cotton, and forage crops. High nutrient requirements and frequent drought conditions push farmers toward precision nutrient management and water-efficient practices.
New York
Known for dairy, horticulture, and specialty crops, New York’s fertilizer market is shaped by organic farming trends and stringent environmental regulations. Greenhouse and urban farming also contribute to steady fertilizer consumption.
Florida
Florida’s sandy soils demand frequent nutrient replenishment, especially for citrus, berries, and turf. Water quality concerns have accelerated adoption of controlled-release and environmentally friendly fertilizers, particularly in landscaping and golf course management.
Recent Developments in the U.S. Fertilizers Market
January 2025:
The U.S. Department of Energy granted Michigan Potash a US$ 1.26 billion loan to strengthen domestic natural fertilizer production.
September 2024:
Itafos expanded into Brazil by opening a new office in Bahia, aiming to increase its sales volume contribution from 20% to nearly 30% by 2025.
September 2024:
The USDA awarded AdvanSix a US$ 12 million grant under the Fertilizer Production Expansion Program, supporting domestic production capacity and supply chain stability.
Market Segmentation
By Type
Nitrogen Fertilizers: Urea, Ammonium nitrate, Ammonium sulfate, Anhydrous ammonia, Others
Phosphorus Fertilizers: Superphosphates, MAP, DAP
Potassium Fertilizers: Potash, SOP
Bio-Fertilizers: Microbial, Organic variants
By Category
Organic
Inorganic
By Form
Dry
Liquid
By Application
Agriculture
Horticulture
Gardening
Others
By Crop
Grassland
Vegetables
Fruits/Treenuts
Roots/Tubers
Sugar Crops
Fiber Crops
Oil Palm
Soybeans
Maize
Rice
Wheat
Others
By States
California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, New Jersey, Washington, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Virginia, Michigan, Maryland, Colorado, Tennessee, Indiana, Arizona, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Missouri, Connecticut, South Carolina, Oregon, Louisiana, Alabama, Kentucky, and the Rest of United States.
Key Players Covered
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
The Andersons Inc.
The Mosaic Company
Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC
Haifa Group
ICL Group Ltd
SQM (Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA)
Koch Industries Inc.
Nutrien Ltd.
Each company’s profile includes an overview, key executives, revenue performance, SWOT analysis, and recent developments.
Final Thoughts
The U.S. fertilizers market is entering a dynamic growth phase fueled by precision agriculture, sustainability-driven innovation, and rising crop demand from the food and biofuel sectors. While environmental regulations and supply chain challenges pose obstacles, they are also steering the industry toward cleaner, resilient, and technologically advanced solutions.
With increasing fertilizer customization, digital nutrient management tools, and investments in domestic production, the U.S. fertilizer industry is well-positioned for a transformative decade. Stakeholders who innovate early—particularly in bio-based and controlled-release technologies—will lead this emerging landscape.
About the Creator
jaiklin Fanandish
Jaiklin Fanandish, a passionate storyteller with 10 years of experience, crafts engaging narratives that blend creativity, emotion, and imagination to inspire and connect with readers worldwide.
Keep reading
More stories from jaiklin Fanandish and writers in Earth and other communities.
GCC Hydroponics Market Blooms Amid Sustainability Push and Food Security Goals
Introduction: GCC Leads the Desert-to-Green Revolution The GCC Hydroponics Market is witnessing exponential growth, evolving from a niche innovation into a core pillar of the region’s agricultural sustainability strategy. Valued at USD 229.24 million in 2024, the market is forecast to touch USD 702.48 million by 2033, expanding at a healthy CAGR of 13.25%, according to Renub Research.
By jaiklin Fanandish3 months ago in Earth
Supreme Court to Review Monsanto’s Bid for Immunity in Roundup Lawsuits
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review Monsanto’s appeal seeking immunity from lawsuits related to its popular herbicide, Roundup. This decision marks a critical moment for both the company and individuals claiming health damages from the chemical, which contains glyphosate—a substance under scrutiny for potential links to cancer. The review could have wide-reaching implications for corporate accountability, public health, and the legal landscape surrounding chemical products. Background on Roundup and Legal Challenges Roundup, a herbicide produced by Monsanto (now owned by Bayer), has been a staple in agriculture and home gardening for decades. Glyphosate, its active ingredient, was introduced as a highly effective solution for weed control. However, in recent years, scientific studies and lawsuits have raised concerns about its potential carcinogenic effects. Thousands of plaintiffs have claimed that exposure to Roundup caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other health issues. Numerous state and federal courts have seen extensive litigation, with some plaintiffs receiving multimillion-dollar verdicts. Monsanto has consistently defended the product, emphasizing that regulatory agencies worldwide have deemed glyphosate safe when used as directed. Monsanto’s Bid for Immunity Monsanto is appealing for legal immunity, arguing that its use of Roundup was regulated and approved by federal agencies, and therefore the company should not be held liable in civil lawsuits. The company contends that federal oversight should preempt individual claims, a legal doctrine known as federal preemption. In essence, Monsanto is asserting that because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has evaluated and permitted glyphosate use, states or courts should not hold the company personally accountable for alleged harm. Why the Supreme Court’s Review Matters The Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case is significant for several reasons: Corporate Accountability: A ruling in favor of Monsanto could strengthen corporate defenses in cases where products are federally regulated, potentially limiting lawsuits against companies producing similar chemicals or pharmaceuticals. Public Health: Plaintiffs and advocacy groups argue that a corporate victory could undermine accountability for harmful products and reduce incentives for companies to rigorously test safety. Legal Precedent: The case could set a nationwide precedent regarding federal preemption, influencing how courts balance regulatory approval with civil liability. The Supreme Court’s interpretation could reshape the legal landscape for product liability and consumer protection in the United States. Stakeholder Perspectives Plaintiffs and Advocacy Groups For those affected by Roundup, the Supreme Court review is a critical opportunity to hold a powerful corporation accountable. Many plaintiffs argue that Monsanto failed to adequately warn users of the potential risks associated with glyphosate exposure. “People shouldn’t have to choose between using a product as intended and risking their health,” says Laura Mitchell, an attorney representing multiple plaintiffs in Roundup lawsuits. “A ruling that shields Monsanto from liability could leave victims without recourse.” Advocacy groups, such as environmental and cancer prevention organizations, emphasize that transparency and accountability are essential, particularly for chemicals widely used in agriculture and landscaping. Monsanto and Bayer Monsanto, now part of Bayer, maintains that Roundup is safe when used according to label instructions. Bayer has publicly stated that legal challenges have cost billions but that the company continues to stand behind its products. The firm argues that courts must respect federal regulatory authority to avoid creating conflicting standards between federal law and state-level lawsuits. “If companies could be held liable despite following federal regulations, it would set a concerning precedent for innovation and regulatory compliance,” a Bayer spokesperson said. Broader Implications The Supreme Court review has implications far beyond Monsanto and Roundup: Agricultural Industry: Glyphosate and similar herbicides are widely used in crop production. Legal outcomes could influence labeling, usage guidelines, and liability risk for other companies in agriculture. Consumer Products: The ruling could affect cases involving pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and other regulated products, particularly when federal agencies approve them. Regulatory Authority vs. Civil Liability: The decision may clarify the balance between federal oversight and state-level tort claims, potentially shaping how courts interpret the limits of corporate immunity. Previous Court Decisions Lower courts have issued mixed rulings in Roundup lawsuits. Some courts awarded substantial damages to plaintiffs, while others limited awards or found in favor of Monsanto. These inconsistent outcomes underscore the complexity of balancing scientific evidence, regulatory approval, and legal responsibility. Federal appeals courts have previously sided with both sides in separate cases, making Supreme Court intervention necessary to establish uniform legal standards nationwide. Public and Media Reaction Media coverage of Monsanto’s legal challenges has been extensive, reflecting public concern over chemical safety and corporate responsibility. Many reports highlight the tension between regulatory approvals and individual health claims, questioning whether federal endorsements automatically protect companies from lawsuits. Public sentiment is divided. Supporters of corporate immunity argue that companies need protection to operate and innovate without fear of excessive litigation. Opponents worry that such immunity could prioritize corporate interests over public health. What to Expect The Supreme Court will now evaluate key questions: Does federal regulatory approval preempt state-level claims of harm? Can companies be held liable even if they followed federal guidelines? How should courts balance scientific uncertainty with civil justice? The decision, expected within the next year or two, will be closely watched by lawyers, plaintiffs, corporations, and advocacy groups alike. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s review of Monsanto’s bid for immunity in Roundup lawsuits represents a landmark moment in American legal history. The case has the potential to redefine corporate liability, influence public health policy, and set precedent for future disputes involving federally regulated products. For plaintiffs, the stakes are deeply personal—seeking justice for alleged health impacts caused by widespread chemical exposure. For Monsanto and other corporations, the outcome could determine the limits of accountability in a regulated marketplace. As the Supreme Court deliberates, the nation watches closely, recognizing that the ruling will resonate far beyond Monsanto, affecting consumers, companies, and the broader debate over safety, regulation, and responsibility in the United States.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Earth
Oil Well Abandonment Services: Responsible Closure for Long-Term Environmental Safety
Oil and gas production is only one chapter in the life of a well. When extraction ends, what happens next is just as important as the energy once produced. Oil well abandonment services ensure that inactive wells are closed in a safe, controlled, and permanent manner, preventing environmental damage and protecting surrounding land for future use. 🌍
By andersenintusabout 3 hours ago in Earth
My New Book is Finally Here
My poetry collection Beautiful and Brutal Things is done. It's actually done and finally published over 270 pages. Over a year of my life went into this book. More than a year, really. Long days at my computer, sometimes seven days a week because I couldn't stop even when I probably should have. Then two months of editing that felt harder than the writing itself. But it's finished, and I'm still standing, and the book is real.
By Tim Carmichael2 days ago in BookClub
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.