The journey of Life this life is not a journey to the grave
with the intention of arriving safely and well
it is to skid in broadside In a cloud of smoke
thoroughly used up, totally worn out proclaiming:
wow, what a ride it is the greatest journey you will ever be on
at the end you will look back and realize
that there is no ultimate purpose
there is no end goal
that life is a continuous dance
where you do not arrive at a particular place on the floor
but to enjoy every step of the way
the world is a looking glass it gives back
to every man a true reflection of
his own thoughts
we live in a world created by our own thoughts
this reality is our illusion
there is no reality but a reality created within ourselves
if we want to change our experience we need to change the world
if we want to change the world
it starts with changing of our own lives
this universe is a masterpiece of abundance
and we are the designers the artists
rule your mind or
it will rule you
there's no point in living for the future
if you do not know how to live now
this moment is all you truly have
because happiness is not a destination
but a way of life
it is not at another place but this place
it is not for another hour but this hour
the power for creating a better future is
contained in the present moment you
create a good future by creating a good
present
so do not worry do not complain accept
things as they are
let things go
make the present
the focus your life
other people have remembered they come back
to us they say hey don't worry don't be
afraid ever because this is just a ride
don't let your mind take control
think simply live simply
there's nothing in this world that can
trouble you as much as your thoughts
overthinking is a misuse of your imagination
it will create problems that weren't
Life is a journey that is full of surprises. It can be thrilling, challenging, and at times, overwhelming. But amidst all the ups and downs, one thing remains constant – the power of positivity. A positive attitude can change everything. It can turn obstacles into opportunities, failures into lessons, and setbacks into comeba
In order to cultivate positivity, it is important to focus on the present moment. The past is gone, and the future is yet to come. The only moment that truly matters is right now. By living in the present, you can fully appreciate the beauty of life and all that it has to offer.
Another way to stay positive is to surround yourself with like-minded people. People who share your values, beliefs, and goals can provide support, encouragement, and inspiration. They can help you stay motivated when the going gets tough, and celebrate with you when you achieve your goals.
Finally, it is important to maintain a healthy work-life balance. While work is important, it should not be the only thing that defines you. Make time for hobbies, interests, and relationships that bring you joy and fulfillment. By taking care of yourself, you will be better equipped to handle the challenges that life throws your way.
Remember, life is a journey, not a destination. It is up to you to make the most of every moment and create a life that is full of happiness, purpose, and meaning. So go out there and enjoy the ride!
even there do not worry do not stress and lastly remember that
life can only be understood backwards
but it must be lived forwards
no-one said it's going to be easy, trust in the universe
and surrender to it. let it go
this journey is yours and yours alone.
have faith in the universe.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Luah Lempekeh and writers in Earth and other communities.
Don't Tell My Therapist
Lena had been seeing her therapist, Dr. Patel, for over a year now. She had initially started therapy to deal with her anxiety and depression, but over time, she had come to rely on Dr. Patel for so much more. He had become a confidant, a sounding board, and a source of support in her life.
By Luah Lempekeh3 years ago in Earth
Inside Trump's $11 Billion Health Plan to Replace “Neo-Colonial” USAID
In the landscape of global health aid, few proposals have stirred as much debate as former President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to restructure American assistance abroad. Dubbed an $11 billion health initiative aimed at replacing USAID’s current framework, the plan seeks to pivot away from what Trump and his allies have criticized as the “neo-colonial” approach of U.S. foreign aid. While the plan promises greater efficiency and impact, experts are split on whether it is a practical solution or a politically driven gamble. Trump’s Critique of USAID The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a central pillar of American foreign assistance, distributing billions in aid annually to address health crises, food insecurity, and development challenges worldwide. However, Trump’s administration and its supporters have often described USAID’s approach as bureaucratic, inefficient, and reflective of a “neo-colonial” mindset. In public statements, Trump argued that the U.S. was spending taxpayer dollars on programs that benefited foreign governments or contractors more than the intended local communities. Critics of the plan say that while USAID has flaws—as any large bureaucracy does—its extensive networks and decades of experience provide an unmatched capacity to deliver aid efficiently and safely. The Core of the $11 Billion Proposal At the heart of Trump’s proposal is an $11 billion fund designed to consolidate, modernize, and streamline U.S. health aid. Unlike the traditional USAID model, which relies heavily on long-term partnerships with governments and NGOs, the new plan emphasizes: Direct Impact Funding: Allocating resources to frontline health workers and local initiatives rather than intermediaries. Data-Driven Investments: Using real-time health data to target outbreaks and crises more efficiently. Private Sector Partnerships: Leveraging U.S. pharmaceutical companies, tech firms, and healthcare startups to deliver vaccines, treatments, and medical infrastructure. Shorter Program Cycles: Moving away from multi-year funding commitments in favor of more flexible, results-oriented programs. Proponents argue that this approach could reduce bureaucratic overhead and ensure U.S. aid reaches communities faster. By “cutting out the middlemen,” Trump supporters claim, America can avoid the pitfalls of slow-moving aid programs that sometimes fail to adapt to crises. Reactions from the Global Health Community Global health experts, however, have expressed concern about both the logistics and philosophy of the plan. Dr. Melissa Ortega, a senior researcher at the Global Health Policy Institute, explained, “The idea of bypassing established structures like USAID may sound appealing on paper, but in practice, it risks undermining decades of institutional knowledge. Health systems are complex, and short-term projects cannot replace long-term capacity building.” Some critics have also questioned the characterization of USAID as “neo-colonial.” While U.S. foreign aid has historically been tied to geopolitical interests, many programs today are designed collaboratively with recipient countries and local organizations. Reducing oversight could unintentionally increase the risk of misuse, corruption, or health inequities. On the other hand, supporters of Trump’s plan point to examples of inefficiency in USAID programs, citing cases where aid was delayed or mismanaged. By introducing more direct funding models, they argue, U.S. taxpayer dollars could achieve a higher “return on health outcomes.” Political Implications Trump’s health aid overhaul proposal is not just about international development—it is also deeply political. Framing USAID as a “neo-colonial” institution resonates with a populist narrative that America should prioritize its own citizens and assert greater control over how taxpayer money is spent abroad. Domestically, the $11 billion plan faces scrutiny from Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether dismantling USAID’s systems could destabilize ongoing health programs in countries where the U.S. has long-term commitments. The potential impact on global health security—including the fight against pandemics like COVID-19—adds another layer of concern. Internationally, U.S. allies and partner nations are watching closely. Sudden shifts in aid delivery could disrupt health programs in low- and middle-income countries, many of which rely on predictable funding cycles to maintain vaccination campaigns, maternal health services, and disease surveillance. Possible Benefits and Risks If executed carefully, the Trump-backed model could bring several benefits: Faster Response Times: Direct funding could accelerate delivery of vaccines, treatments, and emergency support. Innovation Boost: By partnering with private sector companies, the plan could accelerate development of new health technologies. Accountability: With performance-based metrics, the plan may better measure the impact of U.S. aid. However, the risks are equally significant: Disruption of Existing Programs: Abrupt changes could destabilize ongoing health projects. Loss of Expertise: USAID’s decades of experience in navigating local governance, supply chains, and community engagement may be hard to replace. Geopolitical Fallout: Allies accustomed to collaborating with USAID might see the move as destabilizing, reducing cooperation on global health initiatives. Looking Ahead As Trump and his allies continue to advocate for this $11 billion overhaul, the debate over the future of U.S. health aid is intensifying. Proponents view it as a necessary modernization of an outdated system, while critics fear it could undercut decades of carefully built infrastructure and global partnerships. Ultimately, the success of this plan will hinge on its ability to balance efficiency with stability, innovation with oversight, and political objectives with humanitarian needs. For now, the proposal remains controversial, representing a dramatic departure from traditional approaches to U.S. foreign aid. Whether it will reshape global health for the better—or simply create more uncertainty—remains to be seen. In the end, the Trump health plan is as much about ideology as it is about dollars. It challenges the conventional wisdom of international development and asks whether a more streamlined, results-focused approach can truly replace a system built over decades. As the world watches, the stakes could not be higher: the future of U.S. global health aid—and the lives it touches—hangs in the balance.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Earth
Nitrogen is necessary for young tropical rain forests to combat climate change.
By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood, tropical rainforests contribute to the slowing of climate change. Forests that develop quickly are even more important because they absorb carbon more quickly.
By Francis Dami2 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.