Mysterious Bermuda, by a diving enthusiast crashed through the camouflage, so that this sea is no longer mysterious
Mysterious Bermuda
As we are familiar with the mystery of the Bermuda Triangle is not so mysterious. Just because people in this area the occurrence of some "strange things" is relatively more, plus the media can render, so many people will think that this place is extremely dangerous and mysterious, but the truth is not so. And once on December 5, 1945, a formation of five U.S. Air Force TB Avenger fighter jets in the Bermuda Triangle accident, flying over this area, the entire formation of all the fighter jets disappeared strangely.
The first time I saw the movie, I was able to see it. The company's main goal is to provide a better solution to the problem. After the U.S. Army, the summary of the accident investigation report is given in the conclusion: the cause is not known. But when the matter was sealed for more than half a century, things suddenly came to a turning point. In August 2001, an American man named Mark Bleacher, diving near the waters of the Bermuda Islands.
When he dived to a depth of about 55 meters, he suddenly found an object similar to a plane. After this, Mark Bleacher was even more eager to dive closer to observe, he found that this fighter jet may be a World War I period or a World War II period fighter jet. After all, compared to the fighter jets of modern society, this fighter jet is completely counted as an old antique. And in the aircraft's tail fins, the man also found and wrote down the aircraft's combat number - U.S. Air. Flight-2. Although not knowing the specific meaning of this string of numbers, the man still chose to report to the official.
02
And after this, the official then compared the information of this aircraft and found that it was one of the five fighter planes in the Bermuda Triangle hours in 1945. After learning this news, the official search for the other four planes was also full of confidence. What's more, even if the wreckage of the other four planes could not be found, in fact, the initial incident about the disappearance of the U.S. Air Force Flight 19, also counted as the truth revealed. This can also be seen in the so-called Bermuda Triangle mystery is not a paranormal phenomenon in people's imagination.
The reason why people are not able to find out the real reason is that they have not found it. The fact is that the plane is staying at the bottom of the sea, only that people have not been able to find it successfully because they originally guessed the wrong location. After the wreckage of the fighter jet was found, the United States sent a team of experts to the site of the accident to investigate the cause of the aircraft accident. During the investigation, the experts found that the fighter did not have any signs of attack, nor did it appear to be running low on fuel. So the cause of the plane crash is most likely because of the extreme weather encountered only.
The first time I saw the plane, I thought it was the Florida Keys. Because of this, the entire unit thought their formation of aircraft was flying over the Gulf of Mexico. When the entire formation arrived over the Bermuda Islands, it was because of the extreme weather that caused the aircraft to vibrate violently in the air, and eventually, an accident occurred. To know even in modern technology, the aircraft is still more afraid of very extreme weather, let alone in which age.
Even the fighter jets, in the face of the threat of nature, will still look very small. After understanding the cause of the accident of the flight formation, people have their judgment about the rescue plane that disappeared afterward because of search and rescue: the reason for the loss of both is the same, both because of the impact of extreme weather, which eventually appeared uncontrollable and caused the whole plane to explode, and because of this, so even now this rescue plane still has no way to find. And time has passed so many years want to find again the possibility of more slim.
Conclusion
So many things in this world can be justified to explain, and not just speculate on the mystery or unknown and so on. Bermuda has been rumored to be a magical sea, in fact, with human rumors and exaggerated words, so the mask of disguise also lets the world less to explore the courage. If we do not go to discover, their development is a kind of limit.
About the Creator
Trump Slams UK Deal to Hand Over Chagos Islands After Previously Backing It
If you thought politics couldn’t surprise you anymore, Donald Trump just proved otherwise. In a dramatic U-turn, the former U.S. president criticized the United Kingdom’s decision to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius—a deal he had previously backed. What was once considered a solution to a decades-long dispute has now become a hot topic, sparking debates about strategy, diplomacy, and international trust.
By Muhammad Hassanabout 2 hours ago in Earth
Inside Trump's $11 Billion Health Plan to Replace “Neo-Colonial” USAID
In the landscape of global health aid, few proposals have stirred as much debate as former President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to restructure American assistance abroad. Dubbed an $11 billion health initiative aimed at replacing USAID’s current framework, the plan seeks to pivot away from what Trump and his allies have criticized as the “neo-colonial” approach of U.S. foreign aid. While the plan promises greater efficiency and impact, experts are split on whether it is a practical solution or a politically driven gamble. Trump’s Critique of USAID The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a central pillar of American foreign assistance, distributing billions in aid annually to address health crises, food insecurity, and development challenges worldwide. However, Trump’s administration and its supporters have often described USAID’s approach as bureaucratic, inefficient, and reflective of a “neo-colonial” mindset. In public statements, Trump argued that the U.S. was spending taxpayer dollars on programs that benefited foreign governments or contractors more than the intended local communities. Critics of the plan say that while USAID has flaws—as any large bureaucracy does—its extensive networks and decades of experience provide an unmatched capacity to deliver aid efficiently and safely. The Core of the $11 Billion Proposal At the heart of Trump’s proposal is an $11 billion fund designed to consolidate, modernize, and streamline U.S. health aid. Unlike the traditional USAID model, which relies heavily on long-term partnerships with governments and NGOs, the new plan emphasizes: Direct Impact Funding: Allocating resources to frontline health workers and local initiatives rather than intermediaries. Data-Driven Investments: Using real-time health data to target outbreaks and crises more efficiently. Private Sector Partnerships: Leveraging U.S. pharmaceutical companies, tech firms, and healthcare startups to deliver vaccines, treatments, and medical infrastructure. Shorter Program Cycles: Moving away from multi-year funding commitments in favor of more flexible, results-oriented programs. Proponents argue that this approach could reduce bureaucratic overhead and ensure U.S. aid reaches communities faster. By “cutting out the middlemen,” Trump supporters claim, America can avoid the pitfalls of slow-moving aid programs that sometimes fail to adapt to crises. Reactions from the Global Health Community Global health experts, however, have expressed concern about both the logistics and philosophy of the plan. Dr. Melissa Ortega, a senior researcher at the Global Health Policy Institute, explained, “The idea of bypassing established structures like USAID may sound appealing on paper, but in practice, it risks undermining decades of institutional knowledge. Health systems are complex, and short-term projects cannot replace long-term capacity building.” Some critics have also questioned the characterization of USAID as “neo-colonial.” While U.S. foreign aid has historically been tied to geopolitical interests, many programs today are designed collaboratively with recipient countries and local organizations. Reducing oversight could unintentionally increase the risk of misuse, corruption, or health inequities. On the other hand, supporters of Trump’s plan point to examples of inefficiency in USAID programs, citing cases where aid was delayed or mismanaged. By introducing more direct funding models, they argue, U.S. taxpayer dollars could achieve a higher “return on health outcomes.” Political Implications Trump’s health aid overhaul proposal is not just about international development—it is also deeply political. Framing USAID as a “neo-colonial” institution resonates with a populist narrative that America should prioritize its own citizens and assert greater control over how taxpayer money is spent abroad. Domestically, the $11 billion plan faces scrutiny from Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether dismantling USAID’s systems could destabilize ongoing health programs in countries where the U.S. has long-term commitments. The potential impact on global health security—including the fight against pandemics like COVID-19—adds another layer of concern. Internationally, U.S. allies and partner nations are watching closely. Sudden shifts in aid delivery could disrupt health programs in low- and middle-income countries, many of which rely on predictable funding cycles to maintain vaccination campaigns, maternal health services, and disease surveillance. Possible Benefits and Risks If executed carefully, the Trump-backed model could bring several benefits: Faster Response Times: Direct funding could accelerate delivery of vaccines, treatments, and emergency support. Innovation Boost: By partnering with private sector companies, the plan could accelerate development of new health technologies. Accountability: With performance-based metrics, the plan may better measure the impact of U.S. aid. However, the risks are equally significant: Disruption of Existing Programs: Abrupt changes could destabilize ongoing health projects. Loss of Expertise: USAID’s decades of experience in navigating local governance, supply chains, and community engagement may be hard to replace. Geopolitical Fallout: Allies accustomed to collaborating with USAID might see the move as destabilizing, reducing cooperation on global health initiatives. Looking Ahead As Trump and his allies continue to advocate for this $11 billion overhaul, the debate over the future of U.S. health aid is intensifying. Proponents view it as a necessary modernization of an outdated system, while critics fear it could undercut decades of carefully built infrastructure and global partnerships. Ultimately, the success of this plan will hinge on its ability to balance efficiency with stability, innovation with oversight, and political objectives with humanitarian needs. For now, the proposal remains controversial, representing a dramatic departure from traditional approaches to U.S. foreign aid. Whether it will reshape global health for the better—or simply create more uncertainty—remains to be seen. In the end, the Trump health plan is as much about ideology as it is about dollars. It challenges the conventional wisdom of international development and asks whether a more streamlined, results-focused approach can truly replace a system built over decades. As the world watches, the stakes could not be higher: the future of U.S. global health aid—and the lives it touches—hangs in the balance.
By Muhammad Hassan6 days ago in Earth
Wild Card Weekend Recap: What Happens Now?
I think I figured out why I love Wild Card Weekend so much. It's because it's the first playoff anything of the calendar year. The NFL season starts in the fall, and once upon a time, the champion was crowned either on or slightly before New Year's. The evolution of the NFL schedule has resulted in the playoffs starting just into the New Year, and currently, the final week of the season falls on the first weekend of the New Year, with Wild Card Weekend coming a week after that. So yes, chronologically, the NFL's Wild Card Weekend serves as the first playoff anything of the calendar year.
By Clyde E. Dawkins7 days ago in Unbalanced
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.