Is science always right?

In the history of science, it is common to overturn and revise original erroneous theories. Take physics, for example: Represented by Aristotle's philosophy thought is put forward after one thousand years, its theory describes the motion of objects (geocentrism, sports must have driver) has never been one to overthrow until Newton's laws, puts forward the three completely overthrew the theory of predecessors, opened the door of modern physics human master the methods to measure the speed of light, found that the speed of light is constant, It is found that a new theory is urgently needed to correct the errors of Newtonian mechanics in high-speed reference frames. Einstein developed the theory of relativity almost single-handedly, establishing a new view of time and space (negating the absolute and simultaneity) that correctly described how objects behave at high speed or with strong gravity. Human observation of microscopic material increased to a new high precision, cannot be explained in classical mechanics, therefore developed after the advent of quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, people found him and general relativity cannot be unified, and need a fix two modern physics based theory conflict where grand unified theory, attempts to unified strength, weak force and electromagnetic force. String theory /M theory proposes an attempt to explain that all elementary particles are just different manifestations of cosmic strings. According to the current cosmologists' observations on the mass and rotation speed of galaxies, it is found that the gravitational force is not enough to support the centripetal force, so it is speculated that there must be dark energy and dark matter in the universe. The Standard Model of particle physics explains everything we see so far, but this dark matter we've never seen before, and its composition is unlike anything we know of so far, and scientists are working on it...... So we can basically see that modern science is not complete, and there will certainly be new theories to improve the current physics in the future. Science is a way of understanding the world, not a result. Any religion will tell you this is the way the world must be, and you can't question me; I must be right, forever. Almost all religious theories are mysterious, and the core theories are basically inseparable from "after death", "heaven", "hell", "ghosts" and other things that cannot prove that he is right or wrong. The prophecies of religion are all about cow tongues and ghosts, the unattainable end of the world. There's almost no way to confirm or deny it. The worst thing about religion is being denied, that is, blasphemy. Severe punishment laws were enacted to prevent blasphemy. Almost all religious texts contain a vicious curse against blasphemy. In the days of religious rule, blasphemers were almost dead. In human history, religions have often tortured or even killed infidels or "blasphemers". There was a lot of strife and war between different religions. Massacres and genocides occurred from time to time. As a third party, you can't tell who's right from who's wrong. But science says experiments will tell; Please look at everything dialectically and allow anyone to doubt any theory that exists. All scientific theories must be made clear, and what you say must be proved or denied by experiment (falsifiability). Scientific predictions can always be proved or disproved. Several of the predictions of relativity - light deflected by gravity, mercury's perihelion precession, clock slowness, gravitational redshift, gravitational waves - were confirmed. What science wants more than anything else is for authority to be denied and established theories to be overturned. In order to attract more people to blaspheme, they even set up huge prizes (such as the famous Nobel Prize) to reward those who hit their predecessors hardest in the face with wealth and fame. So there are countless people to this effort, the successful overthrow of the authority of the basic fame and wealth; Many people are famous for it. In particular, physicists, such as Newton, Kelvin, PASCAL and Ampere, are forever remembered by human beings as units. As a third party, if you see two theories in conflict, you can just do an experiment to prove who is right and who is wrong. Whether the science is right or not, whether you believe it or not, depends on where you are. The essence of science is doubt, not faith. The development of science needs the revision of generations of scientists, and no scientific theory can be absolutely correct. Why do you say that? As long as science does not stop its pace of development, science will never be true. Because we can never know if the physical systems we build with mathematical models are consistent with the real world. No matter how advanced the technology of the future may be, the means of measurement are bound to be limited, and the real world will always allow for finer things than minimal measurement accuracy; We have no way of knowing the smallest "pixel" in the real world, or whether the world has infinite details. So mankind will never find an "ultimate theory". Moreover, the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics today states that it is impossible to accurately measure the position and velocity, time and energy of a particle at the same time. This almost destroyed the ideal of human "ultimate theory". Take the current theory of quantum physics as an example: if the unit of any property of the research object is less than Planck units (for example, the length is less than Planck length, or the energy is greater than Planck energy), then the current theory of physics fails. So why does religion influence the world so widely? Witchcraft and religion have been around since the birth of man; The birth of science, though controversial, is generally considered to have occurred in the time of Thales, Pythagoras, Aristotle, Archimedes, etc. Many people are given their faith at birth. It's so easy to believe something without a brain. It is much harder to understand why.