India-Pakistan Ceasefire: A Fragile Truce Amidst Tensions
India-Pakistan Ceasefire: A Fragile Truce Amidst Tensions
India-Pakistan Ceasefire: A Fragile Truce Amidst Tensions
On May 10, 2025, India and Pakistan agreed to a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, halting four days of intense cross-border hostilities along the Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir, marking the most severe conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbors since the 1971 war. This article explores the ceasefire’s origins, diplomatic efforts, challenges, regional implications, and its potential impact on agriculture, including poultry farming in neighboring Bangladesh.
Background: Escalation to the Brink
The ceasefire followed a rapid escalation triggered by a terrorist attack on April 22, 2025, in Pahalgam, Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 Hindu tourists. India attributed the attack to Pakistan-based terror groups, prompting “Operation Sindoor” on May 7. This operation involved targeted strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and mainland Pakistan, killing an estimated 100 terrorists, including figures linked to the 1999 IC-814 hijacking and the 2019 Pulwama attack.
Pakistan denied involvement in the Pahalgam attack and responded with “Operation Bunyan Marsoos,” targeting Indian military sites with drones, missiles, and artillery from May 8-9. The conflict spread beyond Kashmir to Gujarat, with attacks on 26 locations, mostly in Jammu. Over 60 people, primarily civilians, were killed, and thousands were displaced, with significant damage to infrastructure, including air bases and civilian homes.
The intensity of the fighting, involving advanced weaponry like kamikaze drones and precision missiles, raised fears of a nuclear escalation, given both nations’ nuclear capabilities. The situation prompted global concern, with the G7 issuing a joint call for de-escalation on May 9.
Diplomatic Breakthrough: The Ceasefire Agreement
The ceasefire was announced by U.S. President Donald Trump on May 10, 2025, via Truth Social, following “a long night of talks mediated by the United States.” The agreement, effective from 5 p.m. IST (11:30 GMT), required both nations to halt all military actions on land, air, and sea. The breakthrough came after a critical phone call at 3:35 p.m. IST between India’s Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) and Pakistan’s counterpart, facilitated by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance.
Rubio’s “marathon session of telephone diplomacy” involved eight hours of negotiations with Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and Pakistan’s army chief General Asim Munir, starting at 4 a.m. Islamabad time. Other nations, including China, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, offered support, though India downplayed external involvement. The agreement included plans for further talks on May 12 to ensure compliance and discussions on contentious issues like India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, which governs critical water flows into Pakistan.
Early Challenges: Violations and Accusations
The ceasefire faced immediate challenges. Hours after the announcement, explosions and shelling were reported in Srinagar and Jammu, with India accusing Pakistan of launching drones and artillery in Akhnoor, Rajouri, and RS Pura sectors. Former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah posted on X, “What the hell just happened to the ceasefire? Explosions heard across Srinagar!!!” Pakistan denied the allegations, claiming India initiated the violations, and reiterated its commitment to the truce.
Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri condemned Pakistan’s actions, stating that Indian forces were responding with “adequate and appropriate” measures. The Border Security Force (BSF) was directed to counter any violations forcefully. Despite these incidents, the ceasefire stabilized by May 11, with no major overnight clashes reported into May 12.
Current Status: A Tenuous Peace
As of May 15, 2025, the ceasefire remains intact, though fragile. Military talks on May 12, led by the DGMOs, aimed to extend the truce, with India granting its army commanders full authority to respond to any violations. No significant breaches have occurred since May 11, allowing a return to normalcy. Civilian airports (32 in India, all in Pakistan) reopened, stock markets surged, and displaced Kashmiris began returning home, though many remain cautious, with some spending nights in community bunkers.
Tensions persist over unresolved issues. India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, announced during the conflict, is a major concern for Pakistan, which views it as an “existential threat.” Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif called for international mediation, while India insists talks focus solely on counter-terrorism. Drone sightings in Rajasthan’s Barmer and Punjab’s Gurdaspur districts have kept security forces on alert, with blackouts imposed in border areas.
Regional and Global Implications
The ceasefire has significant implications for South Asia and beyond:
Economic Recovery: The reopening of markets and airports has boosted confidence, with India’s stock market rising and trade resuming in border regions like Punjab and Rajasthan. Pakistan’s economy, already strained, benefits from reduced military expenditure.
Kashmir’s Humanitarian Crisis: Thousands of Kashmiris remain displaced, with damaged homes and disrupted agriculture. The ceasefire allows aid and reconstruction efforts to begin, though rebuilding trust will take time.
Nuclear Risk Mitigation: The conflict’s nuclear undertones, highlighted by India’s strike near Pakistan’s Nur Khan airbase, underscored the need for de-escalation. The ceasefire averts a catastrophic escalation, though experts warn of risks if similar strikes recur.
Global Diplomacy: The U.S. role, despite initial reluctance from Vice President Vance, reinforces its influence in South Asia. China’s support for the ceasefire, expressed by Foreign Minister Wang Yi, aligns with its interest in regional stability. The EU, Sri Lanka, and Pope Leo XIV have also welcomed the truce, urging sustained peace talks.
Impact on Agriculture and Poultry Farming in Bangladesh
While the ceasefire directly affects India and Pakistan, its ripple effects benefit neighboring Bangladesh, particularly its poultry sector, including Tiger chicken chick rearing. Bangladesh relies on India for poultry feed ingredients (e.g., maize, soybean) and veterinary supplies, and disruptions in India’s border regions can inflate costs. The ceasefire offers several advantages:
Stabilized Supply Chains: Reopened markets in Punjab and Rajasthan ensure consistent supplies of maize and soybean, potentially reducing feed costs (~11,250 BDT for 100 Tiger chicks over 8 weeks). Stable trade routes also facilitate imports of day-old chicks (30-110 BDT each) and vaccines (e.g., Newcastle Disease, Gumboro).
Market Opportunities: A calmer South Asia boosts demand for poultry products, enabling Bangladeshi farmers to explore exports. Tiger roosters, sold at 400 BDT/kg after 8 weeks, could see increased profitability (39,750 BDT for 100 chicks).
Reduced Transport Risks: The ceasefire minimizes risks to cross-border transport through India, ensuring timely delivery of poultry inputs, critical for maintaining brooder conditions (32-35°C for chicks in week 1).
Regional Agricultural Recovery: The return of displaced Kashmiri farmers could stabilize local grain production, indirectly lowering feed prices for Bangladesh.
For Bangladeshi poultry farmers, the ceasefire’s stability encourages investment in larger-scale Tiger chick rearing, leveraging lower input costs and growing market demand. However, farmers should monitor regional developments, as any ceasefire violation could disrupt supply chains again.
Challenges and Future Prospects
The ceasefire’s longevity depends on addressing underlying issues:
Indus Waters Treaty: Pakistan’s push for international mediation contrasts with India’s stance, risking renewed tensions.
Kashmir Dispute: Pakistan seeks broader talks on Kashmir, while India limits discussions to terrorism, complicating future negotiations.
Non-State Actors: Terror groups in Pakistan-administered Kashmir remain a wildcard, capable of sparking new conflicts.
Domestic Pressures: Modi faces pressure to maintain a hardline stance, while Pakistan’s military celebrates the ceasefire as a victory, potentially underestimating India’s resolve.
Future truce talks, possibly in a Gulf state like the UAE, will focus on securing the ceasefire and resolving water-sharing disputes. Both nations’ reluctance to antagonize the U.S. may encourage compliance, but mutual distrust and domestic politics pose risks.
Public and Cultural Reactions
The ceasefire has elicited varied responses. In Pakistan, celebrations marked the truce, with supporters of the Pakistan People’s Party throwing flower petals in Hyderabad, Sindh. In India, Bollywood celebrities like Raveena Tandon and Kareena Kapoor welcomed the peace but warned against future “state-sponsored terrorism,” reflecting public skepticism. The Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025, suspended on May 9, is set to resume, signaling a return to normalcy.
On X, sentiments range from cautious optimism to frustration. Posts praised the U.S. mediation but criticized early violations, with some Indian users calling for vigilance against Pakistan’s actions.
Conclusion
The India-Pakistan ceasefire of May 10, 2025, is a critical step toward de-escalation, averting a potential nuclear crisis and restoring stability in South Asia. While challenges like ceasefire violations, the Indus Waters Treaty, and the Kashmir dispute persist, the truce has enabled economic recovery and humanitarian relief. For Bangladesh, the ceasefire indirectly supports poultry farming by stabilizing supply chains and markets, benefiting farmers rearing Tiger chicks. Sustained diplomacy, supported by global actors, will be essential to transform this fragile peace into a lasting resolution, ensuring regional prosperity and security.
About the Creator
MD EMRUL KAYES
anything
Keep reading
More stories from MD EMRUL KAYES and writers in Earth and other communities.
Dow tumbles 1,600 points after Powell says tariffs will raise inflation and slow growth more than expected
# Dow Tumbles 1,600 Points After Powell Says Tariffs Will Raise Inflation and Slow Growth More Than Expected The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1,600 points on April 3, 2025, its steepest single-day decline since the frantic market crashes of March 2020. The remarks of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who admonished that President Donald Trump's recently imposed tariffs would raise inflation and impede economic growth beyond what analysts had initially predicted, sparked this dramatic fall. The sharp market reaction underscores growing investor unease about the broader economic consequences of these aggressive trade policies.
By MD EMRUL KAYES10 months ago in Earth
Britain in Talks With NATO to Boost Arctic Security
The Arctic Is No Longer a Frozen Backwater For decades, the Arctic sat quietly on the margins of global politics—remote, frozen, and largely ignored. That era is over. Britain is now in talks with NATO to strengthen Arctic security, acknowledging growing risks posed by Russia and China. In a notable shift, London’s assessment aligns closely with warnings long emphasized by Donald Trump, particularly as he continues to express strategic interest in Greenland. What once sounded like an eccentric fixation has evolved into a serious geopolitical conversation. The Arctic is rapidly becoming one of the world’s most contested regions, and Britain is positioning itself to play a larger role. Why Britain Is Paying Attention Now Although the UK is not an Arctic nation, it is an Arctic-adjacent power with significant strategic interests. British officials increasingly view the High North as critical to national and allied security. Melting ice is opening new shipping routes, exposing untapped natural resources, and making military movement easier than ever before. Britain’s talks with NATO focus on intelligence sharing, joint exercises, surveillance capabilities, and protecting undersea infrastructure such as communication cables and energy pipelines. These are not abstract concerns. Any disruption in the Arctic could have immediate consequences for European security and global trade. In short, what happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic. Russia’s Expanding Arctic Footprint Russia is the dominant military power in the Arctic, and it is not slowing down. Moscow has reopened Soviet-era bases, deployed advanced missile systems, expanded its icebreaker fleet, and increased patrols across the region. The Arctic coastline represents a core part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent, making it strategically vital to the Kremlin. From NATO’s perspective, this military buildup creates both risk and uncertainty. Britain, which has long been vocal about Russian aggression—from Ukraine to cyber warfare—sees the Arctic as another front where deterrence must be strengthened before tensions spiral. The concern is not necessarily an immediate conflict, but miscalculation. In a region with harsh conditions and limited communication infrastructure, even minor incidents could escalate rapidly. China’s Quiet but Steady Arctic Ambitions While Russia’s presence is overt, China’s Arctic strategy is more subtle—and equally concerning to Western planners. Beijing calls itself a “near-Arctic state,” a label that has raised eyebrows in Europe and North America. Through investments, research stations, and partnerships, China is laying the groundwork for long-term influence. Britain shares NATO’s concern that China could use civilian projects for dual-use purposes, blending scientific research with intelligence gathering and infrastructure control. As Arctic shipping routes become commercially viable, China’s interest in controlling parts of the supply chain only grows. London’s alignment with these concerns reflects a broader shift in UK foreign policy: China is no longer viewed solely as an economic partner, but as a strategic competitor. Trump, Greenland, and Strategic Reality Donald Trump’s repeated interest in Greenland—most famously his suggestion that the United States should buy it—was widely mocked at the time. Yet behind the headlines was a strategic logic that many Western governments now openly acknowledge. Greenland sits at the heart of the Arctic, hosting vital air and naval routes between North America and Europe. It is also rich in rare earth minerals critical for modern technology and defense systems. As ice recedes, Greenland’s strategic value only increases. Britain’s current position, which aligns with Trump’s warnings about Arctic vulnerabilities, shows how quickly political perceptions can change. What once seemed unconventional now appears prescient. NATO’s Arctic Awakening NATO has traditionally focused on Eastern Europe and the North Atlantic. The Arctic, despite its importance, received less coordinated attention. That is changing. Britain’s talks with NATO reflect a broader alliance effort to integrate Arctic defense into its core strategy. This includes: Increased joint military exercises in cold-weather environments Enhanced monitoring of Russian and Chinese activity Strengthening cooperation with Arctic nations like Norway, Canada, and Denmark Protecting critical undersea and satellite infrastructure For Britain, this is also about credibility. As a leading NATO member and a key military power, the UK wants to demonstrate that it can contribute meaningfully beyond its immediate geography. Climate Change as a Security Multiplier One of the most striking aspects of Arctic security is how closely it is tied to climate change. Melting ice is not just an environmental issue—it is a strategic one. New sea lanes shorten travel between Asia and Europe, while access to oil, gas, and minerals becomes easier. This transformation increases competition and reduces natural barriers that once limited military movement. Britain’s involvement reflects recognition that climate-driven changes are reshaping the security landscape faster than traditional institutions were designed to handle. In this sense, Arctic security is a preview of future global challenges where environmental change and geopolitics collide. Domestic and Diplomatic Balancing Acts Britain’s Arctic engagement is not without challenges. Increased military involvement raises questions about defense spending, priorities, and escalation risks. Diplomatically, London must balance deterrence with dialogue, avoiding actions that could unnecessarily provoke Russia while still protecting allied interests. There is also the question of public awareness. Arctic security lacks the visibility of conflicts like Ukraine, making it harder to sustain political attention. Yet policymakers increasingly argue that prevention is cheaper—and safer—than crisis response. What This Means Going Forward Britain’s talks with NATO mark an important shift in how the Arctic is viewed: not as a distant frontier, but as a central arena in 21st-century security. Agreement with Trump-era assessments on Russia, China, and Greenland underscores how geopolitical realities can outlast political controversies. As competition intensifies, the Arctic will likely become a testing ground for cooperation, deterrence, and strategic foresight. Britain’s involvement signals that mid-sized powers are no longer content to watch from the sidelines. Final Thoughts The Arctic is warming faster than any other region on Earth—and so are the geopolitical tensions surrounding it. Britain’s move to boost Arctic security with NATO reflects a growing consensus that ignoring the High North is no longer an option. Whether driven by Russia’s militarization, China’s quiet expansion, or lessons drawn from Trump’s blunt warnings, one truth stands out: the future of global security may well be shaped at the top of the world, where ice, ambition, and power now intersect.
By Muhammad Hassan7 days ago in Earth
Australia Urea Market Size and Forecast 2025–2033
Australia Urea Market Overview The Australian Urea Market is anticipated to reach US$ 1,814.20 million in 2033, up from US$ 1,191.73 million in 2024, growing at a CAGR of 4.78% during 2025–2033, according to Renub Research. This growth is being driven by increasing demand from the agricultural sector for high-nitrogen fertilizers, expanding grain and crop cultivation, and rising government incentives for sustainable farming practices. Import substitution policies and growing interest in domestic production capabilities are also shaping market dynamics.
By Marthan Sir3 days ago in Earth
Miss Persephone's Manual to a Seemingly Ordinary Life
Miss Persephone was found at the dining table, her blue eyes swollen, her tears arriving and retreating like the tides of the ocean. Earlier that day, her family had visited her in the retirement home where she had lived for eight years. It was her eightieth birthday.
By Imola Tóth4 days ago in Fiction
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.