How To Use XML Sitemaps To Boost SEO
how to use xml sitemaps to
What was considered best practice yesterday does not hold true today and this is especially relevant when it comes to XML sitemaps, which are almost as old as SEO itself.
The problem is, it’s time-consuming to sort valuable advice from all the misinformation on forums and social media about how to optimize XML sitemaps
So, while most of us recognize the importance of submitting sitemaps to Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools, as well as in the robots.txt file – for faster content discovery and refresh, more efficient crawling of SEO-relevant pages, and valuable indexing reporting to identify SEO issues – the finer details of implementing sitemaps to improve SEO performance may be missed.
Let’s clear up the confusion and dive into the current best practices for sitemap optimization.
In this article, we cover:
What is an XML sitemap?
How to create a sitemap.
Valid XML sitemap format.
Types of sitemaps.
Optimization of XML sitemaps.
XML sitemap best practice checklist.
What Is An XML Sitemap?
An XML sitemap is a file that lists all of your website’s URLs.
It acts as a roadmap to tell the crawlers of indexing platforms (like search engines, but also large language models (LLMs)) what content is available and how to reach it.
In the example above, a search engine will find all nine pages in a sitemap with one visit to the XML sitemap file.
On the website, it will have to jump through five internal links on five pages to find page 9.
This ability of XML sitemaps to assist crawlers in faster indexing is especially important for websites that:
Have thousands of pages and/or a deep website architecture.
Frequently add new pages.
Frequently change the content of existing pages.
Suffer from weak internal linking and orphan pages.
Lack of a strong external link profile.
Even though indexing platforms could technically find your URLs without it, by including pages in an XML sitemap, you’re indicating that you consider them to be quality landing pages.
And while there is no guarantee that an XML sitemap will get your pages crawled faster, let alone indexed or ranked, submitting one certainly increases your chances.
How To Create A Sitemap
There are two ways to create a sitemap: Static sitemaps that must be manually updated, or dynamic sitemaps that are updated in real-time or by a regular cron job.
Static sitemaps are simple to create using a tool such as Screaming Frog.
The problem is that as soon as you create or remove a page, your sitemap is outdated. If you modify the content of a page, the sitemap won’t automatically update the lastmod tag.
So, unless you love manually creating and uploading sitemaps for every single change, it’s best to avoid static sitemaps.
Dynamic XML sitemaps, on the other hand, are automatically updated by your server to reflect relevant website changes.
To create a dynamic XML sitemap you can do one of the following:
Ask your developer to code a custom script, being sure to provide clear specifications.
Use a dynamic sitemap generator tool.
Install a plugin for your content management system (CMS), for example, Yoast plugin for WordPress.
XML Version Declaration: Specifies the file type to inform indexing platforms what they can expect from the file.
UTF-8 Encoding: Ensures all the characters used can be understood.
Specify The Namespace: Communicates what rules the sitemap follows. Most sitemaps use the
Specify The Namespace: Communicates what rules the sitemap follows. Most sitemaps use the “http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9” namespace to show that the file conforms to standards set by sitemaps.org
This is followed by a URL container for each page. In a standard XML sitemap, there are only two tags that should be included for a URL
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from shoaib hamead and writers in Earth and other communities.
How to Start and Run a Successful Online Business: 5 Things I’ve Learned
It's been seven years since I started selling online courses for the construction inspection industry. My online education site has been fortunate enough to see 60% growth every year. Like any other online business, though, we’ve made mistakes. The mistakes didn’t cripple us; we learned from them and used them to improve our business.
By shoaib hamead11 months ago in Earth
Pyrolysis as a Strategic Instrument in Modern Forest Management
Forest management has entered a phase defined by competing pressures. Fire risk is rising. Biomass residues are accumulating. Carbon accounting expectations are tightening. Pyrolysis has emerged as a technical lever capable of addressing these constraints simultaneously. Its value lies not in abstract sustainability claims, but in its operational and ecological consequences when integrated into forestry systems.
By Wayne Shen6 days ago in Earth
China Bans Rare Earth and Strategic Exports to Japan After Takaichi’s Comments
China’s decision to ban certain rare earths and other strategic exports to Japan for military purposes has sent a sharp signal across the Asia-Pacific region. Triggered by comments from Japanese politician Sanae Takaichi, the move highlights how trade, technology, and national security are now inseparable in an era of intensifying geopolitical rivalry. What may appear on the surface as a targeted trade restriction is, in reality, part of a much broader struggle over influence, deterrence, and the future balance of power in East Asia. By using export controls as a political response, Beijing has once again demonstrated how economic tools are becoming central instruments of statecraft. The Spark: Takaichi’s Comments and Beijing’s Reaction Sanae Takaichi, a prominent conservative figure in Japanese politics, has been outspoken on issues related to defense, Taiwan, and Japan’s strategic autonomy. Her recent remarks — interpreted in Beijing as provocative and aligned with a more assertive military posture — appear to have crossed a red line for Chinese authorities. While Beijing did not frame its decision explicitly as retaliation, the timing left little doubt. China announced restrictions on the export of certain rare earth elements and other materials deemed sensitive for military applications, specifically targeting shipments to Japan. The message was unmistakable: political rhetoric has consequences, and China is prepared to use its economic leverage to enforce boundaries. Why Rare Earths Matter So Much Rare earth elements are not rare in geological terms, but they are extremely difficult and costly to process. China dominates global refining capacity, giving it outsized influence over supply chains essential to modern technology. These materials are critical for advanced weapons systems, electric vehicles, wind turbines, semiconductors, radar systems, and missile guidance technologies. Japan, despite being a technological powerhouse, relies heavily on imported rare earths, particularly from China. By restricting exports for military purposes, Beijing is targeting a strategic vulnerability. Even limited disruptions can slow production, raise costs, and force governments to rethink procurement and defense planning. Economic Statecraft in Action China’s move fits into a broader pattern of economic statecraft, where trade and investment tools are used to achieve political objectives. Over the past decade, Beijing has increasingly demonstrated a willingness to weaponize its economic position when disputes escalate. Japan is hardly alone in facing this pressure. Other countries have experienced similar tactics, from trade slowdowns to informal boycotts. What makes this case particularly sensitive is its explicit link to military use, pushing the dispute beyond economics and firmly into national security territory. For Beijing, the logic is straightforward. If rivals frame China as a threat, China will respond by reminding them of their dependencies. Japan’s Strategic Dilemma Tokyo now faces a difficult balancing act. On one hand, Japan has been steadily strengthening its defense posture in response to regional threats, including North Korea’s missile program and China’s growing military presence. On the other, it remains deeply integrated into China-centered supply chains. The export ban reinforces long-standing fears within Japan about overreliance on a single supplier for critical materials. It also strengthens arguments among Japanese policymakers for diversifying supply chains, investing in domestic processing, and deepening cooperation with allies. However, diversification takes time and money. Alternative suppliers exist, but scaling up production and refining capacity outside China is neither quick nor cheap. In the short term, Japan must manage the immediate impact while signaling resolve without provoking further escalation. Regional and Global Implications China’s decision is being closely watched across the region and beyond. For the United States and its allies, it underscores the strategic risks of concentrated supply chains and the urgency of building resilient alternatives. Washington has already been pushing for closer coordination with allies on critical minerals, including rare earths. The move against Japan may accelerate these efforts, encouraging deeper cooperation between the U.S., Japan, Australia, and European partners. At the same time, the episode adds another layer of tension to an already volatile regional environment. With disputes over Taiwan, maritime boundaries, and military modernization simmering, economic pressure increases the risk of miscalculation. A Message Beyond Japan While Japan is the immediate target, the signal is global. Beijing is reminding other countries that political statements, particularly on security matters, are not cost-free. The use of export controls as a response to rhetoric — not just policy actions — suggests a lowering threshold for economic retaliation. For middle powers navigating between China and the West, this creates a chilling effect. Governments may think twice before making public statements that could invite economic consequences, even when those statements align with domestic political priorities. Critics argue that such tactics undermine trust and accelerate decoupling. Supporters within China counter that the country is merely defending its interests in a hostile international environment. The Risk of Accelerated Decoupling Ironically, China’s use of export restrictions may hasten the very outcome it seeks to avoid: reduced dependence on Chinese supply chains. Each instance of economic pressure reinforces the perception that reliance on China carries political risk. Japan has already begun investing in rare earth recycling, alternative sourcing, and partnerships with resource-rich countries. This latest move is likely to intensify those efforts, even if it comes at higher short-term costs. Over time, a more diversified global supply chain could weaken China’s leverage. But in the near term, Beijing’s dominance remains a powerful tool — one it appears willing to use. Conclusion: Trade as a Battlefield China’s ban on certain rare earth and strategic exports to Japan is more than a trade dispute. It is a vivid example of how economic power is being deployed as a strategic weapon in a world defined by rivalry and mistrust. For Japan, the episode is a wake-up call about vulnerability and resilience. For China, it is a demonstration of strength and deterrence. And for the rest of the world, it is a reminder that in today’s geopolitical landscape, supply chains are as consequential as alliances. As tensions continue to rise, one thing is clear: the era of neutral trade is fading. In its place stands a world where economics and politics are tightly bound — and where a single comment can ripple through global markets and military planning alike.
By Muhammad Hassan4 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.