Absentmindedly I labored my feet into the garage with a bag meant for the recycling bin. The side door to the trash and recycling bins was thin and at that time of year, little defense against the biting cold on the other side. I flipped on the switch next to the door and took for granted the warm light that hung over my right ear as I leaned out. My body was stubbornly attached to the higher temperature of the garage as I hugged the door frame and struggled to deliver the recycling without any commitment to my task. Turning back toward the warmth I heard a thud and screech. I suspected the source of the noise, turned off the warm outdoor light, and ducked behind the door. I opened it slowly to see what I could see in the darkness. A screech over my head came so loudly that I cowered behind the side door and closed it to thwart anything that may want to follow me behind it. I paused to listen and opened the door again. In front of me were the recycling and garbage bins and just behind that is the fence that separated our yard from the neighbors. On their side, the copper yard ornaments that looked like giant metal daisies were spinning slowly and things seemed quiet again. I looked around in the dark and the twin pines in the neighbor’s yard were still and constant. Their presence gave the impression of authority in the dark the way they towered above our single-story houses. I waited for something to break the silence and just as I was all but convinced that what I heard earlier was gone, I was answered two-fold. A screech from on high came sailing down to my ears and my mind went instantly to my little dog. An owl can carry off a small dog if it feels so inclined and while I don’t know how likely the possibility is, I had heard enough speculation on the topic to ignite my concern. For a moment I feared I had walked in on an active hunt but then I heard the other. A higher and fearful screech came from my level on the ground, but nowhere I could see. I ran inside and grabbed a flashlight. I could make out a silhouette high in the leftward pine and illuminated the shape. A white-faced barn owl looked at me. Shocked, I lowered my flashlight. I instantly felt like I had done something wrong. Not shameful but incorrect, like I robbed the owl his protection of night. I assumed the owl was male from his low screech and position on high, but I had no way of knowing. Of my knowledge of barn owls, which was not a lot, one thing I knew was that this beautiful bird was far from home. Something was wrong because he was not meant to stop in my suburban neighborhood. Hardly any mice to hunt and unless they preferred small dogs and cats, they were halted by circumstance rather than choice. The second answer from the silence happened north of where I was standing. A high and desperate screech sounded from the neighboring yard and my feet stumbled forward to try to get a view. I could barely clear a cheek over the solid wooden fence and I decided instead to climb the recycling bin. I was not prepared for what I saw. A lump of white and brown feathers lay on the edge of a dormant brick planter a foot from the fence that separated us. I wouldn’t have known it was an owl if it hadn’t screeched a desperate cry. This owl was in trouble for sure, one of her eyes was half open and she looked dazed. I could see no other injuries but I can only imagine what would have stopped her. Even so, her screech was not a cry for help but more like an answer to a question. I decided it was a female because of the pitch of her screech and nothing more. Perhaps I was looking for a parallel to draw between what I was seeing and what I was going through. I always did place myself in the shoes of the main character if it were a woman, without hesitation. She was plainly hurt and needed to be rescued. But rescue is a human idea and it occurred to me that any help I could bestow may be more of a hindrance than a solution in her eyes. However, help rang from above as the male screeched down to her and again, she gave a wounded reply. I became hyper-alert and was called to the present as I stopped trying to insert myself and thought. What does help look like from an owl? The owl sat high in the pine was at the best vantage point to observe and anticipate any movement necessary to protect her. He called down to her continuously, checking in and remaining steady with the best support he could provide. What I was seeing was behavior akin to love and care and protection and steadiness as best I could understand it from my human ignorance. My eyes welled. I felt the warning in his screech and a duty not to interfere. I did the only thing I could that did not prompt an inner battle and went to the neighbor’s front door. There was an old man living there with a deeply unpleasant wife. They mostly kept to themselves and my interactions with him did not go beyond offering him assistance when his car broke down in the neighborhood one day. I knocked on his door and informed him that a barn owl was downed in his backyard and not to let his dogs out. I asked if I could assist and find a rescue center or haven to call. He rubbed his chin and inclined to the ground and said, “They’re pretty tough birds, best let them care for their own. If they are still there in the morning, I’ll call someone.” I was surprised by his lack of concern but strangely, I trusted him. His age told my impulses to quiet down. His calm spoke to my anxiety. I still felt a pull in my chest but truly felt like nothing was the best thing to do. I looked up at the male swaying on the branch of the pine as the wind picked up and said a quiet prayer for him as he watched over her. I felt like I had seen the most sophisticated story play out in from of me without words or any pretext and walked inside my home with an insight I couldn’t yet identify with clarity. But I knew I had learned something. I went to check in on the owls an hour later and they were gone.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from writers in Earth and other communities.
US Balks as UK and France Pledge Troops to Postwar Ukraine
As the war in Ukraine grinds on with no clear end in sight, the debate over what comes after the fighting has taken a sharper turn. The United States has signalled reluctance about committing troops to Ukraine once the war ends, even as the United Kingdom and France openly pledge to consider deploying forces in a postwar security role. The divergence has exposed differing strategic priorities among Western allies and raised new questions about how Ukraine’s future security will be guaranteed. While all three nations remain united in their support for Kyiv during the war, the emerging split over postwar troop commitments highlights the complexity of planning for peace in a conflict that continues to reshape Europe’s security landscape. What the UK and France Are Proposing British and French leaders have increasingly spoken about the need for long-term security arrangements for Ukraine once active hostilities end. Their position reflects a growing concern that any ceasefire or peace agreement could be fragile, leaving Ukraine vulnerable to renewed aggression. The idea under discussion is not a combat deployment in an active war zone, but rather a stabilisation or reassurance force. Such troops could help train Ukrainian forces, protect critical infrastructure, and serve as a visible deterrent against future attacks. Supporters argue that a limited but credible international presence would help ensure that any peace settlement is respected. For London and Paris, this approach fits within a broader European push to take more responsibility for continental security. Both governments see Ukraine not only as a partner but as a frontline state whose stability directly affects Europe as a whole. Why Washington Is Hesitant The United States, while remaining Ukraine’s most significant military backer during the war, has taken a more cautious stance on postwar troop deployments. American officials have stressed that there are no plans to send US forces into Ukraine, even after a potential peace agreement. This hesitation is rooted in several factors. First, Washington remains wary of any move that could risk a direct confrontation with Russia. Even in a postwar scenario, the presence of US troops on Ukrainian soil could be portrayed by Moscow as a provocation, escalating tensions rather than reducing them. Second, domestic considerations play a major role. After years of overseas military engagements, there is limited appetite among the American public and political class for new long-term deployments abroad, particularly in a region where risks remain high and outcomes uncertain. Finally, US strategy has increasingly emphasised supporting allies through funding, training, and equipment rather than large-scale troop commitments. From Washington’s perspective, enabling Ukraine to defend itself may be preferable to stationing American forces on the ground. A Question of Deterrence At the heart of the debate lies a fundamental question: what will actually deter future aggression against Ukraine? The UK and France appear to believe that a physical presence, however limited, would send a powerful signal of commitment. Troops on the ground would demonstrate that Ukraine’s security is directly tied to that of major European powers, raising the cost of any future attack. The US, by contrast, seems to place greater faith in alternative mechanisms such as long-term military aid, security guarantees, and sanctions frameworks. American officials argue that deterrence does not necessarily require boots on the ground, especially if Ukraine emerges from the war better armed and more integrated with Western institutions. This difference reflects broader strategic cultures. European powers, facing the immediate proximity of the conflict, may feel a stronger need for visible reassurance measures, while the US assesses risks from a more global perspective. Implications for NATO Unity Although Ukraine is not a NATO member, the discussion has clear implications for the alliance. Any deployment of UK or French troops would be closely scrutinised for what it means for NATO’s role and credibility. NATO operates on consensus, and the absence of US support for a postwar troop presence could complicate coordination. Even if London and Paris act independently or as part of a smaller coalition, questions would remain about command structures, rules of engagement, and the political backing required for such a mission. At the same time, the situation underscores a broader shift within NATO, with European members increasingly expected to shoulder more responsibility. If the UK and France proceed with their plans, it could mark a significant step toward a more autonomous European security posture. Ukraine’s Perspective For Kyiv, the debate is both encouraging and frustrating. On one hand, the willingness of major European powers to consider troop deployments signals long-term commitment and recognition of Ukraine’s security concerns. On the other hand, uncertainty from the US—Ukraine’s most powerful ally—adds another layer of unpredictability. Ukrainian leaders have consistently argued that security guarantees must be concrete, not symbolic. From their perspective, any postwar arrangement must ensure that Russia cannot simply regroup and strike again. Whether this is achieved through foreign troops, binding treaties, or accelerated integration with Western institutions remains an open question. What is clear is that Ukraine wants assurances that go beyond promises and declarations. The Risk of Mixed Signals One potential danger of the current divergence is the message it sends to Moscow. Differing positions among Western allies could be interpreted as hesitation or lack of unity, potentially weakening deterrence rather than strengthening it. At the same time, open debate is not necessarily a sign of weakness. Allies often disagree on tactics while remaining aligned on broader goals. The challenge will be ensuring that these differences do not undermine the core objective of securing a stable and sovereign Ukraine. Diplomats on both sides of the Atlantic are likely to continue working behind the scenes to narrow the gap, even if public statements suggest a clear divide. Looking Ahead The question of postwar Ukraine remains largely theoretical while fighting continues. Yet the discussion itself reveals how seriously Western governments are taking the long-term consequences of the conflict. The UK and France’s willingness to pledge troops reflects a belief that peace must be actively protected. The US reluctance highlights concerns about escalation, sustainability, and domestic support. Reconciling these approaches will be one of the most important diplomatic challenges once the guns eventually fall silent. For now, the disagreement does not signal a breakdown in alliance unity, but it does expose the difficult choices ahead. As the war continues, planning for peace is proving almost as complex—and politically sensitive—as managing the conflict itself.
By Muhammad Hassan8 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.