Garden of Eden Found Inside Earth?!
Hollow Earth
New York City, July 1996
Seismologist Dr. Paul Richards
and his team at Columbia University
make a wonderful declaration.
They find that while a full turn
of the World's surface requires 24 hours...
the iron center at the focal point of our planet
as a matter of fact turns quicker.
They were estimating the revolution
of the planet's center
corresponding to the outer layer of the Earth.
Furthermore, what they found was that it's not steady.
Also, it persuades individuals to think
that there is a separation between the two.
Perhaps it's not liquid stone.
It very well may be outside.
So when you put each of that information together,
it leaves open the thought,
the speculation that Earth is empty.
Might there at some point truly be immense, empty space
underneath the World's surface?
It sounds insane. But, for millennia
the conviction has continued that underneath our feet,
there are not simply caverns and passages...
yet, a whole underground world.
The possibility of the empty Earth
is that we live on a shell,
what's more, that inside the Earth
is an empty cavity
with its own climate, its own creatures
what's more, perhaps its own occupants.
The idea of an empty Earth
works out in a good way back before composed word.
We have pictograms.
Cave drawings.
Things that depict
either divinities emerging from the Earth
or on the other hand man attempting to speak with divinities in the Earth.
What's more, that is where the possibility of an empty Earth came from.
Of the multitude of old stories about empty Earth,
maybe the most captivating
is the one that includes the Nursery of Eden.
There is an old legend
that is recorded from an incredibly, old text
called the Sephir Temunah, "The Book of the Picture."
The legend tells us
that a cavern called Machpelah...
is the entryway
to the Nursery of Eden...
which exists in inward Earth.
In any case, here's the fascinating inquiry:
a nursery in a cavern?
Doesn't work like that.
Gardens have vegetation that develops,
requires sun.
In any case, in inward Earth, there's an inward sun.
Might Adam and Eve at some point have lived
in a lavish heaven profound underground?
The inconceivable idea that individuals could possess
underground spaces
has been embraced not simply in antiquated times,
yet in addition in the advanced time.
By the turn of the twentieth 100 years, truth be told,
the interest with empty Earth
was areas of strength for so
that another age of researchers and adventurers
set off to see as evidence
of the presence of a purported internal Earth.
Maybe the most entrancing of those campaigns
was driven by an American maritime official
named Naval commander Richard E. Byrd in 1926.
Naval commander Richard Byrd
was a well known American pilot and traveler.
Also, that's what he asserted
on one of the excursions that he made
toward the North Pole
in an airplane,
he went over a climate down beneath
that was extravagant and green with creatures.
Practically like a kind of Nursery of Eden, in the event that you like.
As such,
what was seen, maybe, by Chief naval officer Byrd
at the North Pole,
was really an entry into an equal world.
An equal presence
that exists and coincides with the actual Earth.
Is it conceivable that Chief naval officer Byrd
saw an entry to inward Earth
at the North Pole?
Very nearly hundred years after his supposed disclosure,
it's basically impossible to be aware without a doubt.
Be that as it may, current science is attempting to tackle
this exceptionally old secret
by leading seismic investigations
of the inside of the planet.
One of the bits of information that was truly earth-shaking
was when Washington College
found a lot of water
under the hull of the sea depths.
They could really peruse the waves
crashing on a shore
within the outside.
That was actually very exceptional.
At the point when I see reports like that,
it persuades me to think
basically that there's plausible
that we have an empty Earth.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Nashawn Manzano and writers in Earth and other communities.
Chinese Planetary Engineering: The Great Green Wall and the Reclamation of Climate
There are junctures in history where a civilization no longer chooses between comfort and progress, but between adaptation and extinction. At the dawn of the new millennium, China hit one of those silent thresholds where geography ceases to be a backdrop and becomes an adversary. The desert was advancing, not as a metaphor for decay, but as a physical, methodical, and relentless force. Sand was devouring the horizon, winds grew heavy with dust, and the soil lost its fertile memory, taking with it the promise of social stability.
By Laurenceau Porte4 days ago in Earth
US Warns Airlines About Military Activity in Parts of Latin America
Commercial aviation is built on predictability—clearly defined airspace, coordinated air traffic control, and shared international rules. When that predictability is disrupted, even subtly, the ripple effects can stretch far beyond the cockpit. That is exactly why a recent warning from the United States has caught the attention of airlines, governments, and travelers alike. In early 2026, US aviation authorities issued an advisory warning airlines about military activity in parts of Latin America, urging pilots to exercise heightened caution when flying over certain regions. While no immediate restrictions or flight bans were imposed, the message itself was clear: something in the skies has changed, and the risks—however limited—can no longer be ignored. This development is not just about aviation safety. It reflects a growing intersection between geopolitics, military operations, and civilian infrastructure in a region that has long balanced cooperation with tension. What Exactly Did the US Warn About? The advisory, released through official aviation safety channels, highlighted concerns over potential military activity affecting airspace across parts of Mexico, Central America, South America, and nearby oceanic regions. Airlines were advised to remain vigilant during all phases of flight, including cruising at high altitudes, takeoff, and landing. Unlike routine notices related to weather systems or airport congestion, this warning explicitly referenced security-related risks. These include the possibility of unexpected military movements, temporary airspace disruptions, and interference with navigation systems that modern aircraft rely on for safe operations. Importantly, the warning did not accuse any specific country of wrongdoing, nor did it suggest an immediate danger to passengers. Instead, it served as a precaution—one designed to ensure airlines adjust flight planning, monitoring, and communication protocols accordingly. Why Military Activity Matters to Civil Aviation To the average traveler, military exercises or operations may seem distant from the experience of flying on a commercial jet. In reality, the two worlds often share the same skies. Civilian aircraft depend heavily on satellite navigation, coordinated air traffic control, and stable airspace rules. Military operations—especially those involving fast-moving aircraft, surveillance systems, or electronic equipment—can introduce uncertainty into that environment. Some of the key risks aviation authorities monitor include: Unplanned military aircraft movements that may not follow civilian flight patterns Temporary airspace closures or restrictions that require last-minute rerouting Navigation signal disruptions, whether accidental or intentional Increased congestion in strategic corridors used by both civilian and military flights While these risks are typically managed through coordination and communication, heightened military activity raises the stakes. The FAA’s advisory suggests that such activity has reached a level where additional caution is warranted. The Geopolitical Context Behind the Warning The timing of the advisory is not accidental. Latin America has seen a noticeable rise in security operations and military coordination involving the United States over the past year. These efforts are largely focused on counter-narcotics missions, maritime security, and regional stability, particularly in areas with strategic shipping routes or ongoing political tension. At the same time, broader global dynamics—ranging from great-power competition to shifting alliances—have increased the strategic importance of air and sea routes across the Western Hemisphere. From Washington’s perspective, issuing an aviation warning is not about alarmism. It is about acknowledging that military and security activities in the region may temporarily affect civilian systems, including aviation. How Airlines Are Responding For airlines, advisories like this are not unusual—but they are taken seriously. Most major carriers already operate with layered safety systems that allow them to respond quickly to changing conditions. In practical terms, this warning may lead to: Slight route adjustments to avoid specific airspace Enhanced pilot briefings before flights Increased coordination with air traffic controllers Closer monitoring of navigation and communication systems So far, there have been no widespread flight cancellations or suspensions linked directly to the warning. That suggests airlines view the risk as manageable, provided proper precautions are followed. Reactions from Latin American Governments Some governments in the region have been quick to reassure the public. Officials have emphasized that their national airspace remains safe and fully operational, and that civilian flights continue without disruption. This response highlights an important tension: while the US warning is precautionary, it can still affect public perception. Tourism, business travel, and investor confidence are all sensitive to suggestions of instability—even when no immediate danger exists. As a result, many countries are walking a careful line between cooperating on aviation safety and defending their reputation for stability. What This Means for Passengers For travelers, the key takeaway is simple: commercial aviation remains safe. Warnings like this are designed to prevent incidents, not predict them. Passengers flying through or over affected regions may experience slightly longer flight times or minor schedule adjustments, but there is no indication of increased danger to civilian aircraft. In fact, the existence of such advisories demonstrates how seriously aviation authorities take even low-probability risks. A Sign of a More Complex World The US warning to airlines is a reminder that modern air travel does not exist in a vacuum. As military operations, security concerns, and geopolitical rivalries evolve, civilian systems—from shipping lanes to flight paths—are increasingly affected. This moment underscores a broader reality: the skies are becoming more crowded, more contested, and more interconnected with global politics. Managing that complexity will require continued transparency, cooperation, and vigilance from governments, regulators, and airlines alike. For now, planes continue to fly, passengers continue to travel, and the system continues to work. But behind the scenes, aviation authorities are quietly adjusting to a world where safety is shaped not just by weather and mechanics—but by geopolitics as well.
By Muhammad Hassanabout 15 hours ago in Earth
Comments (1)
You have a real talent for writing.