Dogen City concept looks to take urban living offshore
Floating sustainable city concept aims to address the challenges of climate change, population growth and rising sea levels.
Dogen City Concept Looks to Take Urban Living Offshore
In recent years, the concept of urban living has been reimagined and redefined in various ways. As cities become more crowded, the need for innovative solutions to housing, transportation, and environmental challenges has become increasingly urgent. One such innovative solution that has gained attention is the Dogen City concept, which looks to take urban living offshore.
The brainchild of Japanese engineering firm Shimizu Corporation, the Dogen City concept is a futuristic vision of a completely self-sustainable city floating on the ocean. Named after the legendary Japanese Zen master, Dogen, the concept aims to create a harmonious living environment that integrates modern technology with nature, while addressing the challenges faced by urban centers.
The idea behind Dogen City is to address several pressing issues simultaneously. First and foremost is the shortage of land available for urban development. As cities expand and populations increase, land becomes scarce and expensive. Building upward is an option, but that often comes with limitations and restrictions. By taking urban living offshore, Dogen City presents a viable solution to this problem.
Additionally, Dogen City aims to combat the escalating threat of climate change. With rising sea levels, coastal cities are increasingly prone to flooding and other natural disasters. By building cities on the water, Dogen City aims to minimize these risks by using advanced engineering techniques to make the city resilient against natural disasters. The floating city would be designed to withstand tsunamis, typhoons, and other extreme weather events, ensuring the safety of its residents.
One of the key advantages of the Dogen City concept is its focus on sustainability. The innovative design incorporates state-of-the-art technologies to generate renewable energy and efficiently manage resources. Solar panels, wind turbines, and wave energy converters would provide the city with clean and renewable energy. Rainwater would be collected, filtered, and reused to address water scarcity issues. By integrating vertical farming and hydroponic systems, Dogen City could also contribute to food security, reducing the need for extensive land use for agriculture.
Transportation is another crucial aspect of the Dogen City concept. Traditional urban centers often face congestion, pollution, and limited transportation options. Dogen City aims to address these issues by implementing a comprehensive network of smart transportation systems. Electric and autonomous vehicles would be the primary mode of transportation, reducing carbon emissions and alleviating traffic congestion. The city would also be connected to the mainland through efficient ferry services and docks, ensuring easy access for residents and visitors alike.
In terms of urban planning, the Dogen City concept advocates for a holistic approach that offers a high quality of life to its residents. The design includes spacious green areas, parks, and recreational facilities, fostering a connection with nature. The architecture would incorporate principles of biophilic design, maximizing natural light and ventilation to create healthier living spaces. With careful consideration given to community spaces and social infrastructure, Dogen City aims to create a close-knit and sustainable community.
While the Dogen City concept presents an exciting vision for the future of urban living, there are some challenges and considerations that need to be addressed. One of the main concerns is the cost of construction and maintenance. Building and maintaining a floating city would require substantial financial resources. Finding investors willing to fund such a large-scale project might be a challenge. Furthermore, the environmental impact of constructing a floating city on the marine ecosystem needs to be carefully studied to minimize potential harm.
Additionally, questions regarding governance and regulations arise. Who would oversee and manage the city? How would laws be enforced, and how would disputes be resolved? These are important questions that need to be answered to ensure the successful implementation and functioning of Dogen City.
In conclusion, the Dogen City concept presents an innovative and visionary approach to urban living. By taking urbanization offshore, this concept addresses issues such as land scarcity, climate change, and transportation challenges while fostering sustainability and a high quality of life for its residents. While there are hurdles to overcome, the possibilities presented by Dogen City are worth exploring as we seek new solutions for the future of urbanization. With further research, collaboration, and investment, we may witness the birth of floating cities that redefine urban living as we know it.
About the Creator
Richard Abolarinwa
As an Electrical engineer, I am passionate about finding creative solutions to complex problems. my interests extend beyond just electrical systems. I'm also a passionate writer with a love for health, technology, science, and engineering.
Keep reading
More stories from Richard Abolarinwa and writers in Earth and other communities.
Physicists create contained ball of turbulence in a tank
Turbulence is all around us, but it’s been a mystery to scientists for years. Part of the reason is that you can’t disconnect the phenomenon from its source (a spoon needs to stay in a cup of coffee when creating the effect).
By Richard Abolarinwa3 years ago in Earth
DoJ Attorneys Resign Over Decision Not to Investigate Agent in Minneapolis ICE Shooting
A Justice Department Decision Sparks Fallout Several US Department of Justice (DoJ) attorneys have resigned following an internal decision not to pursue a criminal investigation into a federal immigration agent involved in a shooting in Minneapolis, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter. The resignations have intensified scrutiny of the DoJ’s handling of the case and fueled public debate over law enforcement accountability, particularly when federal agents are involved. The shooting, which occurred during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in Minneapolis, has already drawn local outrage and national attention. The decision not to open a formal investigation has now added a new layer of controversy—this time from within the Justice Department itself. What Is Known About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Details surrounding the incident remain limited, as authorities have not released a full public account. What has been confirmed is that an ICE agent discharged a firearm during an operation, resulting in a civilian being shot. The condition of the victim has not been fully detailed in official statements, though local officials confirmed the individual survived. Local law enforcement initially responded to the scene, but jurisdictional authority shifted quickly due to the involvement of a federal agent. Under standard procedure, incidents involving federal officers are typically reviewed by the DoJ to determine whether a civil rights or criminal investigation is warranted. It was this review—and its outcome—that ultimately triggered internal dissent. Why DoJ Attorneys Walked Away According to sources familiar with the resignations, multiple attorneys—some with experience in civil rights and public integrity cases—objected strongly to the decision not to open a formal investigation. They argued that the shooting met the threshold for independent review, regardless of whether charges were ultimately brought. One former official described the decision as “a dangerous precedent,” warning that declining to investigate could erode public trust. Others reportedly felt that political considerations, rather than legal standards, influenced the outcome. While the DoJ has not publicly confirmed the number of resignations, officials acknowledged that departures occurred and said they were handled in accordance with internal procedures. The Justice Department’s Position In a brief statement, the Department of Justice said it had conducted an initial assessment of the incident and concluded that there was insufficient basis to proceed with a criminal investigation at this time. Officials emphasized that such decisions are made after reviewing available evidence, including use-of-force policies and witness statements. The department rejected claims that the decision was politically motivated, insisting that prosecutors follow established legal thresholds rather than public pressure. However, the DoJ declined to provide further details, citing the sensitive nature of law enforcement operations and personnel matters. Minneapolis Officials and Community Reaction In Minneapolis, the reaction has been swift and critical. City leaders and community advocates have called for greater transparency, arguing that federal agents operating within city limits should be subject to the same level of scrutiny as local police. “This isn’t about politics—it’s about accountability,” said a local civil rights advocate. “When someone is shot, there must be an independent investigation, regardless of the badge involved.” Protests and community meetings have followed, with residents demanding the release of body camera footage, operational details, and a clearer explanation for the DoJ’s decision. ICE Operations Under Renewed Scrutiny The shooting and subsequent fallout have reignited broader concerns about ICE enforcement tactics. Critics argue that immigration operations often take place with limited oversight, creating conditions where accountability gaps can emerge. Advocacy groups note that ICE agents are armed and authorized to use force, yet incidents involving shootings are relatively rare—and therefore require especially careful review when they occur. Supporters of ICE counter that agents operate in dangerous environments and must make split-second decisions, warning against rushing to judgment without full facts. Political Pressure and the Rule of Law The resignations have also raised questions about political pressure within federal law enforcement agencies. While no direct evidence has been made public, former prosecutors say internal disagreement of this magnitude is unusual and concerning. “When career attorneys resign over a single decision, it signals a serious breakdown of trust,” said a former federal prosecutor. “That doesn’t happen lightly.” Lawmakers from both parties have begun asking questions, with some calling for congressional oversight hearings into the incident and the DoJ’s decision-making process. Legal Standards vs Public Expectations At the heart of the controversy is a long-standing tension in US justice: the gap between legal thresholds for prosecution and public expectations of accountability. Opening an investigation does not imply guilt, but declining to investigate can be perceived as preemptively closing the door on transparency. Civil rights experts argue that even if prosecutors believe charges are unlikely, a formal investigation can still serve an important public interest. “The process matters as much as the outcome,” said one legal scholar. “Especially when federal authority is involved.” What Happens Next While the DoJ has indicated it will not revisit its decision at this time, pressure is mounting. Civil lawsuits, independent reviews, or congressional inquiries could still follow. Meanwhile, the resignations themselves may become part of a broader reckoning inside the Justice Department, as leaders assess how internal dissent is handled—and how public confidence can be restored. For the attorneys who resigned, the decision appears to have been a matter of principle. For the public, the unanswered questions surrounding the Minneapolis shooting remain unresolved. Conclusion: A Case That Won’t Fade Quietly The resignations of DoJ attorneys over the decision not to investigate an ICE agent involved in a Minneapolis shooting have turned a single law enforcement incident into a national flashpoint. Beyond the specifics of the case, the episode raises fundamental questions about accountability, transparency, and the independence of the justice system. Whether through further investigation, legal action, or political oversight, the issue is unlikely to disappear—and the consequences may shape how similar cases are handled in the future.
By Aarif Lashari6 days ago in Earth
Images Show Aftermath of Deadly Crash on Thai Railway Line
Some images stay with you long after you scroll past them. The photographs coming out of Thailand this week do exactly that. Twisted steel, overturned train carriages, scattered luggage, and exhausted rescue workers tell a devastating story — one that words alone cannot fully explain. A deadly crash on a Thai railway line has claimed multiple lives and left dozens injured, turning an ordinary journey into a nightmare. As images from the scene circulate globally, they reveal not just destruction, but grief, courage, and difficult questions about safety in one of Southeast Asia’s busiest rail networks. A Normal Journey That Ended in Disaster For the passengers on board, the day began like any other. People were heading to work, returning home, or traveling to see family. The train moved steadily along the tracks — until everything suddenly changed. According to officials, the crash occurred when heavy construction equipment collapsed onto an active railway line, striking a moving passenger train. The impact derailed multiple carriages, causing chaos inside the train as metal twisted and windows shattered. Within moments, smoke filled the air and cries for help echoed from inside the wreckage. For many passengers, there was no time to react. What the Images Reveal The aftermath photos are haunting. In some images, train carriages lie on their sides, crushed and burned. In others, rescue teams climb over debris, cutting through metal to reach trapped passengers. Personal belongings — backpacks, shoes, food containers — are scattered across the tracks, quiet reminders of lives abruptly interrupted. One particularly striking image shows emergency workers standing silently beside the wreckage, their faces reflecting exhaustion and sorrow. These visuals do more than document damage; they capture the emotional weight of the tragedy. Images like these remind us how fragile routine can be — how quickly normal life can turn into crisis. The Human Cost of the Crash Authorities confirmed that multiple people lost their lives, while dozens were injured, some critically. Hospitals in nearby areas were quickly overwhelmed as ambulances transported victims from the scene. Families rushed to medical centers, searching for loved ones. For many, the wait for information was agonizing. Phone calls went unanswered. Names were not immediately confirmed. In moments like these, uncertainty can be as painful as loss itself. Survivors have described scenes of panic, confusion, and shock. Some helped fellow passengers escape wrecked carriages. Others waited helplessly, trapped until rescuers could reach them. Rescue Efforts Under Pressure Emergency response teams acted quickly, working against time and unstable conditions. Firefighters, paramedics, and volunteers used cutting tools and heavy machinery to clear wreckage and pull survivors to safety. Despite the dangers, many rescuers worked for hours without rest. Some images show medics kneeling beside injured passengers on the ground, administering care before transport. Others show cranes lifting destroyed train cars away from the tracks. Their efforts likely saved lives — but the scale of the damage made the operation incredibly challenging. How Did This Happen? As the shock begins to settle, attention has turned to how such a catastrophic accident was allowed to occur. Early reports suggest the crash involved construction work taking place near or above an active railway line. This has raised serious concerns about oversight, safety planning, and coordination between construction teams and railway authorities. Questions being asked include: Why was heavy equipment operating so close to a moving passenger train? Were safety inspections properly conducted? Were warning systems or track closures considered? An official investigation is now underway, but for many families, answers will come too late. A Wake-Up Call for Railway Safety Thailand has invested heavily in rail infrastructure in recent years, aiming to modernize transport and improve connectivity. But this tragedy highlights the risks that come with rapid development when safety measures fail or are ignored. Experts warn that construction near live railway lines requires strict controls, constant monitoring, and zero tolerance for shortcuts. Even a single failure can lead to irreversible consequences — as this crash painfully demonstrates. Public trust in rail safety has been shaken, and restoring it will require transparency, accountability, and meaningful reform. Grief, Solidarity, and Remembrance In the days following the crash, communities across Thailand have expressed sorrow and support. Vigils have been held. Messages of condolence continue to pour in. Volunteers have donated blood and supplies to help victims and hospitals. The images from the scene have united people in grief — not just in Thailand, but around the world. They serve as a reminder that behind every headline are real people, real families, and real loss.
By Muhammad Hassan5 days ago in Earth
Comments (8)
beautiful and engaging article
very beautiful city, nice visuals.. Great job
The writer's engaging narrative style makes the article an enjoyable read.
beautiful city
beautiful city
thanks for sharing
great work
Nice work