Companion planting and natural pest control
Natural way to eliminate garden pests
Companion planting is a time-tested gardening technique that involves planting different species of plants close to each other for mutual benefit. This technique has been used for centuries to maximize the yield of crops and minimize the impact of pests on the plants. Companion planting is an excellent example of a natural pest control method that can be used to protect plants without relying on chemical pesticides.
The principle behind companion planting is that certain plants, when grown together, have a mutually beneficial relationship. For example, some plants are known to repel pests or attract beneficial insects that feed on pests. Other plants have a beneficial effect on the soil, improving its fertility, and reducing the incidence of plant diseases. By planting these plants together, gardeners can create a healthy ecosystem in which their crops can thrive.
One popular example of companion planting is the use of marigolds to control nematodes in vegetable gardens. Marigolds contain compounds that are toxic to nematodes, microscopic worms that can damage the roots of plants. By planting marigolds around the perimeter of a vegetable garden, gardeners can help to reduce the population of nematodes in the soil, which can lead to healthier plants and higher yields.
Another example of companion planting is the use of herbs to control pests. Some herbs, such as basil and rosemary, are known to repel pests like mosquitoes and flies. By planting these herbs in and around the garden, gardeners can help to keep these pests away from their crops.
Companion planting can also be used to attract beneficial insects to the garden. For example, planting flowers like lavender and cosmos can attract bees, which are essential for pollination. Ladybugs, which feed on aphids and other pests, can be attracted to the garden by planting certain types of flowers, such as daisies and yarrow.
In addition to companion planting, natural pest control methods can also include physical barriers and traps. For example, gardeners can use row covers to protect plants from pests like caterpillars and moths. These covers are made of lightweight fabric and can be placed over the plants, allowing air and water to pass through while keeping pests out. Traps can also be used to control pests like slugs and snails. These traps are usually made of a shallow container filled with beer or another attractant, which lures the pests in and drowns them.
One of the most significant benefits of companion planting and natural pest control methods is that they are environmentally friendly. Chemical pesticides can have a negative impact on the environment, polluting the soil, air, and water. In contrast, companion planting and natural pest control methods are safe and sustainable, creating a healthy ecosystem in which plants can grow and thrive.
Another benefit of companion planting is that it can help to reduce the amount of work required to maintain a garden. By planting complementary crops together, gardeners can help to reduce the incidence of plant diseases, minimizing the need for pesticides and other interventions. Additionally, companion planting can help to improve soil health, reducing the need for fertilizers and other soil amendments.
In conclusion, companion planting and natural pest control methods are excellent options for gardeners who want to protect their plants without relying on chemical pesticides. By planting complementary crops together, gardeners can create a healthy ecosystem in which their crops can thrive, while also attracting beneficial insects and repelling pests. In addition to being environmentally friendly, these methods can also help to reduce the amount of work required to maintain a garden. By using these natural pest control methods, gardeners can enjoy healthy and productive gardens while protecting the environment.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Phil Overton and writers in Earth and other communities.
Growing Tomatoes
Tomatoes are a popular and versatile fruit that are enjoyed by many people around the world. They are relatively easy to grow, and can be grown in a variety of different environments, including in pots, raised garden beds, and traditional garden plots. In this overview, we will discuss the basics of growing tomatoes, including planting, watering, fertilizing, and harvesting.
By Phil Overton3 years ago in Earth
Britain in Talks With NATO to Boost Arctic Security
The Arctic Is No Longer a Frozen Backwater For decades, the Arctic sat quietly on the margins of global politics—remote, frozen, and largely ignored. That era is over. Britain is now in talks with NATO to strengthen Arctic security, acknowledging growing risks posed by Russia and China. In a notable shift, London’s assessment aligns closely with warnings long emphasized by Donald Trump, particularly as he continues to express strategic interest in Greenland. What once sounded like an eccentric fixation has evolved into a serious geopolitical conversation. The Arctic is rapidly becoming one of the world’s most contested regions, and Britain is positioning itself to play a larger role. Why Britain Is Paying Attention Now Although the UK is not an Arctic nation, it is an Arctic-adjacent power with significant strategic interests. British officials increasingly view the High North as critical to national and allied security. Melting ice is opening new shipping routes, exposing untapped natural resources, and making military movement easier than ever before. Britain’s talks with NATO focus on intelligence sharing, joint exercises, surveillance capabilities, and protecting undersea infrastructure such as communication cables and energy pipelines. These are not abstract concerns. Any disruption in the Arctic could have immediate consequences for European security and global trade. In short, what happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic. Russia’s Expanding Arctic Footprint Russia is the dominant military power in the Arctic, and it is not slowing down. Moscow has reopened Soviet-era bases, deployed advanced missile systems, expanded its icebreaker fleet, and increased patrols across the region. The Arctic coastline represents a core part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent, making it strategically vital to the Kremlin. From NATO’s perspective, this military buildup creates both risk and uncertainty. Britain, which has long been vocal about Russian aggression—from Ukraine to cyber warfare—sees the Arctic as another front where deterrence must be strengthened before tensions spiral. The concern is not necessarily an immediate conflict, but miscalculation. In a region with harsh conditions and limited communication infrastructure, even minor incidents could escalate rapidly. China’s Quiet but Steady Arctic Ambitions While Russia’s presence is overt, China’s Arctic strategy is more subtle—and equally concerning to Western planners. Beijing calls itself a “near-Arctic state,” a label that has raised eyebrows in Europe and North America. Through investments, research stations, and partnerships, China is laying the groundwork for long-term influence. Britain shares NATO’s concern that China could use civilian projects for dual-use purposes, blending scientific research with intelligence gathering and infrastructure control. As Arctic shipping routes become commercially viable, China’s interest in controlling parts of the supply chain only grows. London’s alignment with these concerns reflects a broader shift in UK foreign policy: China is no longer viewed solely as an economic partner, but as a strategic competitor. Trump, Greenland, and Strategic Reality Donald Trump’s repeated interest in Greenland—most famously his suggestion that the United States should buy it—was widely mocked at the time. Yet behind the headlines was a strategic logic that many Western governments now openly acknowledge. Greenland sits at the heart of the Arctic, hosting vital air and naval routes between North America and Europe. It is also rich in rare earth minerals critical for modern technology and defense systems. As ice recedes, Greenland’s strategic value only increases. Britain’s current position, which aligns with Trump’s warnings about Arctic vulnerabilities, shows how quickly political perceptions can change. What once seemed unconventional now appears prescient. NATO’s Arctic Awakening NATO has traditionally focused on Eastern Europe and the North Atlantic. The Arctic, despite its importance, received less coordinated attention. That is changing. Britain’s talks with NATO reflect a broader alliance effort to integrate Arctic defense into its core strategy. This includes: Increased joint military exercises in cold-weather environments Enhanced monitoring of Russian and Chinese activity Strengthening cooperation with Arctic nations like Norway, Canada, and Denmark Protecting critical undersea and satellite infrastructure For Britain, this is also about credibility. As a leading NATO member and a key military power, the UK wants to demonstrate that it can contribute meaningfully beyond its immediate geography. Climate Change as a Security Multiplier One of the most striking aspects of Arctic security is how closely it is tied to climate change. Melting ice is not just an environmental issue—it is a strategic one. New sea lanes shorten travel between Asia and Europe, while access to oil, gas, and minerals becomes easier. This transformation increases competition and reduces natural barriers that once limited military movement. Britain’s involvement reflects recognition that climate-driven changes are reshaping the security landscape faster than traditional institutions were designed to handle. In this sense, Arctic security is a preview of future global challenges where environmental change and geopolitics collide. Domestic and Diplomatic Balancing Acts Britain’s Arctic engagement is not without challenges. Increased military involvement raises questions about defense spending, priorities, and escalation risks. Diplomatically, London must balance deterrence with dialogue, avoiding actions that could unnecessarily provoke Russia while still protecting allied interests. There is also the question of public awareness. Arctic security lacks the visibility of conflicts like Ukraine, making it harder to sustain political attention. Yet policymakers increasingly argue that prevention is cheaper—and safer—than crisis response. What This Means Going Forward Britain’s talks with NATO mark an important shift in how the Arctic is viewed: not as a distant frontier, but as a central arena in 21st-century security. Agreement with Trump-era assessments on Russia, China, and Greenland underscores how geopolitical realities can outlast political controversies. As competition intensifies, the Arctic will likely become a testing ground for cooperation, deterrence, and strategic foresight. Britain’s involvement signals that mid-sized powers are no longer content to watch from the sidelines. Final Thoughts The Arctic is warming faster than any other region on Earth—and so are the geopolitical tensions surrounding it. Britain’s move to boost Arctic security with NATO reflects a growing consensus that ignoring the High North is no longer an option. Whether driven by Russia’s militarization, China’s quiet expansion, or lessons drawn from Trump’s blunt warnings, one truth stands out: the future of global security may well be shaped at the top of the world, where ice, ambition, and power now intersect.
By Muhammad Hassan5 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.