Anecdote: Why did the Mayan civilization disappear? Rarely wiped out by aliens?
Mayan Civilization
Why did the Mayan civilization disappear?
The Mayan civilization first appeared in the Neolithic Age in 1500 BC, mainly distributed in today's southeastern Mexico Vitima, El Salvador and other areas.
The Mayan civilization was a group of ancient Indians.
An ancient and wise tribe, the history of the Mayan civilization is divided into pre-classical, classical and post-classical periods.
The reason why the Mayan civilization is well-known is because they made 5 predictions that shocked the world, predicted the demise of the Mayan civilization, predicted the appearance of planes and rockets, predicted the appearance of Hitler, the demon of war, and predicted the appearance of the world war. The eruption, which predicted the destruction of Earth on December 21, 2012, of which the first four predictions have been fulfilled.
But the fifth prophecy has so far not been fulfilled.
From the 4th century AD to the 9th century AD, which is the classical period of the Mayan civilization, the Mayan civilization was at its peak.
At that time, the Mayans were astonishing in their attainments in astronomy, mathematics, agriculture and art.
To give an example from astronomy, they used a complex formula to calculate that the time for the earth to revolve around the sun is 365.2420 days, which is different from the 365.24 we calculated by using the calculation. The difference between 22 days is only 0.0002 days, which is about 18 seconds.
This seems very incredible today. This has also made the Mayan civilization a topic that people have talked about for hundreds of years.
But by the 15th century AD, the glorious Mayan civilization gradually declined, and in just a few decades, the Mayan civilization was completely submerged in the long history.
Some people say that the Mayan civilization perished because they revealed their secrets and were punished by God.
Some people say that the demise of the Mayan civilization was an alien invasion.
in order to find answers.
Scientists risked their lives to go deep into the Mayan ruins in the virgin jungle.
Ultimately, they came up with the following possible reasons through extensive research:
1. Population explosion theory
The Mayan civilization developed over thousands of years. It has grown from a small tribe with a population of only tens of thousands to a super tribe with a population of millions or even tens of millions.
However, the places where the Mayans lived were mostly virgin jungles with lush trees. The place with the open platform has few tens of millions of people, and it is rugged among the narrow woods, which caused a lot of pressure on the society at that time, and problems and contradictions also followed.
For example, food shortages, poor living environment, etc., over time, the Mayan civilization gradually declined and annihilated.
2. The theory of geological disasters
The place where the Mayan civilization was located at that time was the intersection of two different geological belts, and the geological environment was very complex. Not to mention the mutual extrusion between two different bags, which makes earthquakes and volcanic eruptions often occur in that area. These natural disasters are destructive, lasting for a long time, and also show periodicity.
Some of the volcanoes at that time are still likely to erupt again today.
In the face of natural disasters, human beings are insignificant. Today's human beings cannot effectively resist natural disasters such as earthquakes and active volcanoes, let alone the Mayans hundreds of years ago.
3. Alien invasion
Speaking of alien invasions, people thought that the advanced civilization of the Maya at that time was attracted to aliens.
The aliens thought that the Mayans would threaten them, so they came to Earth and wiped out the Mayan civilization in one fell swoop.
But later this statement was gradually denied by people, and more people believed that the Maya were invaded by surrounding tribes and led to their demise.
Although the Mayans were highly academically accomplished, they were not good at fighting.
In order to compete for the advanced achievements of the Mayans, the surrounding tribes invaded the Mayan tribes.
The Mayan invaders, who faced ill-fated wars, defeated the Mayans effortlessly.
This can also explain the Mayan civilization, why the negative is so fast?
About the Creator
tannie rusty
little science knowledge
Keep reading
More stories from tannie rusty and writers in Earth and other communities.
Hawking reminded human beings to escape the earth, why is this? Maybe you should listen
Hawking is known as the most famous physicist in modern history. Hawking has devoted his life to the universe, but it is a pity that Hawking passed away in 2018. Although he was ill and only had the brain and a few fingers to move, he still proposed The black hole theory has made great contributions to human exploration of the universe.
By tannie rusty3 years ago in Earth
DoJ Attorneys Resign Over Decision Not to Investigate Agent in Minneapolis ICE Shooting
A Justice Department Decision Sparks Fallout Several US Department of Justice (DoJ) attorneys have resigned following an internal decision not to pursue a criminal investigation into a federal immigration agent involved in a shooting in Minneapolis, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter. The resignations have intensified scrutiny of the DoJ’s handling of the case and fueled public debate over law enforcement accountability, particularly when federal agents are involved. The shooting, which occurred during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in Minneapolis, has already drawn local outrage and national attention. The decision not to open a formal investigation has now added a new layer of controversy—this time from within the Justice Department itself. What Is Known About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Details surrounding the incident remain limited, as authorities have not released a full public account. What has been confirmed is that an ICE agent discharged a firearm during an operation, resulting in a civilian being shot. The condition of the victim has not been fully detailed in official statements, though local officials confirmed the individual survived. Local law enforcement initially responded to the scene, but jurisdictional authority shifted quickly due to the involvement of a federal agent. Under standard procedure, incidents involving federal officers are typically reviewed by the DoJ to determine whether a civil rights or criminal investigation is warranted. It was this review—and its outcome—that ultimately triggered internal dissent. Why DoJ Attorneys Walked Away According to sources familiar with the resignations, multiple attorneys—some with experience in civil rights and public integrity cases—objected strongly to the decision not to open a formal investigation. They argued that the shooting met the threshold for independent review, regardless of whether charges were ultimately brought. One former official described the decision as “a dangerous precedent,” warning that declining to investigate could erode public trust. Others reportedly felt that political considerations, rather than legal standards, influenced the outcome. While the DoJ has not publicly confirmed the number of resignations, officials acknowledged that departures occurred and said they were handled in accordance with internal procedures. The Justice Department’s Position In a brief statement, the Department of Justice said it had conducted an initial assessment of the incident and concluded that there was insufficient basis to proceed with a criminal investigation at this time. Officials emphasized that such decisions are made after reviewing available evidence, including use-of-force policies and witness statements. The department rejected claims that the decision was politically motivated, insisting that prosecutors follow established legal thresholds rather than public pressure. However, the DoJ declined to provide further details, citing the sensitive nature of law enforcement operations and personnel matters. Minneapolis Officials and Community Reaction In Minneapolis, the reaction has been swift and critical. City leaders and community advocates have called for greater transparency, arguing that federal agents operating within city limits should be subject to the same level of scrutiny as local police. “This isn’t about politics—it’s about accountability,” said a local civil rights advocate. “When someone is shot, there must be an independent investigation, regardless of the badge involved.” Protests and community meetings have followed, with residents demanding the release of body camera footage, operational details, and a clearer explanation for the DoJ’s decision. ICE Operations Under Renewed Scrutiny The shooting and subsequent fallout have reignited broader concerns about ICE enforcement tactics. Critics argue that immigration operations often take place with limited oversight, creating conditions where accountability gaps can emerge. Advocacy groups note that ICE agents are armed and authorized to use force, yet incidents involving shootings are relatively rare—and therefore require especially careful review when they occur. Supporters of ICE counter that agents operate in dangerous environments and must make split-second decisions, warning against rushing to judgment without full facts. Political Pressure and the Rule of Law The resignations have also raised questions about political pressure within federal law enforcement agencies. While no direct evidence has been made public, former prosecutors say internal disagreement of this magnitude is unusual and concerning. “When career attorneys resign over a single decision, it signals a serious breakdown of trust,” said a former federal prosecutor. “That doesn’t happen lightly.” Lawmakers from both parties have begun asking questions, with some calling for congressional oversight hearings into the incident and the DoJ’s decision-making process. Legal Standards vs Public Expectations At the heart of the controversy is a long-standing tension in US justice: the gap between legal thresholds for prosecution and public expectations of accountability. Opening an investigation does not imply guilt, but declining to investigate can be perceived as preemptively closing the door on transparency. Civil rights experts argue that even if prosecutors believe charges are unlikely, a formal investigation can still serve an important public interest. “The process matters as much as the outcome,” said one legal scholar. “Especially when federal authority is involved.” What Happens Next While the DoJ has indicated it will not revisit its decision at this time, pressure is mounting. Civil lawsuits, independent reviews, or congressional inquiries could still follow. Meanwhile, the resignations themselves may become part of a broader reckoning inside the Justice Department, as leaders assess how internal dissent is handled—and how public confidence can be restored. For the attorneys who resigned, the decision appears to have been a matter of principle. For the public, the unanswered questions surrounding the Minneapolis shooting remain unresolved. Conclusion: A Case That Won’t Fade Quietly The resignations of DoJ attorneys over the decision not to investigate an ICE agent involved in a Minneapolis shooting have turned a single law enforcement incident into a national flashpoint. Beyond the specifics of the case, the episode raises fundamental questions about accountability, transparency, and the independence of the justice system. Whether through further investigation, legal action, or political oversight, the issue is unlikely to disappear—and the consequences may shape how similar cases are handled in the future.
By Aarif Lashari6 days ago in Earth
Images Show Aftermath of Deadly Crash on Thai Railway Line
Some images stay with you long after you scroll past them. The photographs coming out of Thailand this week do exactly that. Twisted steel, overturned train carriages, scattered luggage, and exhausted rescue workers tell a devastating story — one that words alone cannot fully explain. A deadly crash on a Thai railway line has claimed multiple lives and left dozens injured, turning an ordinary journey into a nightmare. As images from the scene circulate globally, they reveal not just destruction, but grief, courage, and difficult questions about safety in one of Southeast Asia’s busiest rail networks. A Normal Journey That Ended in Disaster For the passengers on board, the day began like any other. People were heading to work, returning home, or traveling to see family. The train moved steadily along the tracks — until everything suddenly changed. According to officials, the crash occurred when heavy construction equipment collapsed onto an active railway line, striking a moving passenger train. The impact derailed multiple carriages, causing chaos inside the train as metal twisted and windows shattered. Within moments, smoke filled the air and cries for help echoed from inside the wreckage. For many passengers, there was no time to react. What the Images Reveal The aftermath photos are haunting. In some images, train carriages lie on their sides, crushed and burned. In others, rescue teams climb over debris, cutting through metal to reach trapped passengers. Personal belongings — backpacks, shoes, food containers — are scattered across the tracks, quiet reminders of lives abruptly interrupted. One particularly striking image shows emergency workers standing silently beside the wreckage, their faces reflecting exhaustion and sorrow. These visuals do more than document damage; they capture the emotional weight of the tragedy. Images like these remind us how fragile routine can be — how quickly normal life can turn into crisis. The Human Cost of the Crash Authorities confirmed that multiple people lost their lives, while dozens were injured, some critically. Hospitals in nearby areas were quickly overwhelmed as ambulances transported victims from the scene. Families rushed to medical centers, searching for loved ones. For many, the wait for information was agonizing. Phone calls went unanswered. Names were not immediately confirmed. In moments like these, uncertainty can be as painful as loss itself. Survivors have described scenes of panic, confusion, and shock. Some helped fellow passengers escape wrecked carriages. Others waited helplessly, trapped until rescuers could reach them. Rescue Efforts Under Pressure Emergency response teams acted quickly, working against time and unstable conditions. Firefighters, paramedics, and volunteers used cutting tools and heavy machinery to clear wreckage and pull survivors to safety. Despite the dangers, many rescuers worked for hours without rest. Some images show medics kneeling beside injured passengers on the ground, administering care before transport. Others show cranes lifting destroyed train cars away from the tracks. Their efforts likely saved lives — but the scale of the damage made the operation incredibly challenging. How Did This Happen? As the shock begins to settle, attention has turned to how such a catastrophic accident was allowed to occur. Early reports suggest the crash involved construction work taking place near or above an active railway line. This has raised serious concerns about oversight, safety planning, and coordination between construction teams and railway authorities. Questions being asked include: Why was heavy equipment operating so close to a moving passenger train? Were safety inspections properly conducted? Were warning systems or track closures considered? An official investigation is now underway, but for many families, answers will come too late. A Wake-Up Call for Railway Safety Thailand has invested heavily in rail infrastructure in recent years, aiming to modernize transport and improve connectivity. But this tragedy highlights the risks that come with rapid development when safety measures fail or are ignored. Experts warn that construction near live railway lines requires strict controls, constant monitoring, and zero tolerance for shortcuts. Even a single failure can lead to irreversible consequences — as this crash painfully demonstrates. Public trust in rail safety has been shaken, and restoring it will require transparency, accountability, and meaningful reform. Grief, Solidarity, and Remembrance In the days following the crash, communities across Thailand have expressed sorrow and support. Vigils have been held. Messages of condolence continue to pour in. Volunteers have donated blood and supplies to help victims and hospitals. The images from the scene have united people in grief — not just in Thailand, but around the world. They serve as a reminder that behind every headline are real people, real families, and real loss.
By Muhammad Hassan5 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.