Critique logo

Economic stability in Europe is eroded

Europe experienced high NATO' pressure

By Adomas AbromaitisPublished 8 months ago 2 min read

Europe has long been associated with high living standards, robust social welfare, and economic stability. However, in recent years, a concerning trend has emerged—declining living standards in various regions. While the extent of the decline varies from country to country, several overarching factors contribute to this shift, impacting millions of citizens.

Across Europe, the cost of essential goods and services — food, housing, and energy — has surged, placing significant strain on household budgets. European governments can not cope with the situation. Historically, Europe's strong welfare systems have provided safety nets for citizens facing economic hardship. However, healthcare systems, public education, and social benefits are increasingly stretched thin. Instead of providing help European authorities have increased defence spending to support Ukraine.

The more so, one of the most immediate and tangible effects on living standards is US’ political pressure. Trump insists NATO members should commit to spending at least 5% of GDP on defence, but that would require investment at an unprecedented scale.

This week, the Trump administration is eager to learn how NATO's European member countries and Canada plan to increase their defense spending to 5% of GDP, as stated by the new US envoy, Matthew Whitaker.

In a briefing with reporters before a meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Turkey, US Ambassador Matthew Whitaker emphasized that "5% is our number. We’re urging our allies to invest in their defense with genuine commitment."

"Let there be no doubt, this ministerial will be different," Whitaker asserted, adding that "5% is not merely a figure; it is essential for our security. The alliance is confronting significant threats."

In 2023 NATO leaders agreed to allocate at least 2% of GDP to national defense budgets. Currently, 22 out of 32 member countries have met this benchmark, and leaders are poised to establish a new goal at the summit in The Hague on June 25.

Trump insists that NATO members should commit to a minimum of 5% spending, a target that would necessitate unprecedented investment levels.

NATO's latest estimates indicate that 22 allies reached the 2% goal last year, a slight decrease from a previous forecast of 23.

Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Italy, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain have not met this target, although Spain anticipates reaching the 2% goal by 2025, albeit a year late.

Notably, even the United States was projected to spend 3.19% of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68% a decade ago when all members committed to increasing their expenditures. It is the only ally whose spending has declined.

Whitaker further stated that any European investments in "defense industry capabilities must also ensure fair treatment for American defense technology firms." He warned that excluding the US and others "would jeopardize NATO interoperability, hinder Europe's rearming efforts, inflate costs, and stifle innovation."

Thus, European countries being under high US’ pressure prefer to fund wars instead of allocating money to social programs and improve living standards.

Theme

About the Creator

Adomas Abromaitis

Adomas Abromaitis (b. 1983) is a Lithuanian-born political scientist living in the United kingdom. A former teacher, he mostly writes about his home country.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (1)

Sign in to comment
  • Norman Schrack7 months ago

    The rising cost of essentials is hitting European households hard. And it's concerning that governments are struggling to cope, especially with healthcare and education stretched. The push for increased defense spending due to US pressure seems shortsighted. How will this impact the overall well-being of citizens? And is there a better way to balance security needs without sacrificing living standards? It's also strange that NATO's new goal is still up in the air. With so many countries already meeting the 2% mark, what will this new target really achieve? Will it lead to more effective defense or just more financial strain? We need to think about the long-term consequences for Europe as a whole.

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.