Sometimes the Truth is Evident
Hidden within a "theory"
I don't believe that "things" keep popping up for no good reason. Ok, so stop and re-read that, please. Have you ever experienced a thread of uncommon shockers occur when you are just browsing through normal life activities, like searching for a good movie or documentary to watch, or breezing through local/nationwide news articles that catch your eye or interest?
I call those threads, "shockers"...well, because they are shocking...at least they are to me. But then I ask myself, "Why am I seeing this? And now that I have, what do I do with this information?"
Sometimes outrageous "truths" are too much for people to handle. Maybe they are then just put on a shelf called too crazy to be real. Some label them as "conspiracies." Others might only turn away and pretend they didn't see anything, hear anything, and never speak about it again.
But, I for one, believe in gaining information and researching. (In an objective fashion, of course.) I don't draw conclusions until I have researched, asked questions about my findings, and tried to find the answer to those questions. One question I always ask, "Who would profit from this?" I don't like being pessimistic about humans, but I do know that greed exists. And that is a powerful driver in human nature and in politics.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1) As some of you may recall, I wrote the following article in the CRIMINAL community of Vocal. I was heartbroken and deeply emotional when I read about and further researched this death occurrence in an Alabama prison and what had happened to this young man's family afterwards when they found out that the body of their beloved was missing his heart.
2) I was later surprised that one of my followers on Vocal (who only commented on one completely different story of mine under the "Art" community,) was from his profile (with no stories of his own on Vocal,) "Senior Trial Counsel, U.S. Attorney’s Office | 20+ years in law | Federal litigation & fraud expert | Former CEO | Mentor & community leader." His office in in Birmingham, Alabama.
Was I freaked out? Yes, a little. Intimidated? Nope!
3) Having lived in Tupelo, Mississippi in the 80's and 90's, I couldn't help but be interested in a documentary I found on Netflix this year and highly recommend: The Kings of Tupelo!
Excerpt from the above Time article: "This is the inciting point for Netflix’s new docu-series The Kings Of Tupelo: A Southern Crime Story. The three-part series follows the life of Curtis (known informally as Kevin), an Elvis Presley impersonator in Tupelo, the birthplace of the singer, and examines how conspiracy theories led to his dramatic arrest in 2013, the efforts to clear his name, and how an unexpected rival was at the root of the crime."
By the way, I follow Kevin Curtis on Facebook, but have never met him. But our stories converge because of "missing body parts." His story is fascinating, but he has paid a high price for being outspoken. I urge you to listen to Kevin's story about what he saw in a hospital morgue and what he learned about funeral homes in Mississippi.
4) And the LATEST in the news comes from Texas:
NOW LET'S REVIEW: If you've taken the time to explore these articles, you will begin to see the UNETHICAL truth and know that these atrocities are MORE THAN JUST A Conspiracy....
I know that macabre details may bother you, but after NBC released the "outrageous truth," here are some of the changes that have occurred:
4) Paul Kevin Curtis is now trying to get a bill passed in Mississippi (he has been unsuccessful up to now and you can understand why if you watch the documentary)...
"My HBR 6631 to regulate bone tissue organ and body parts harvesting in Mississippi.
Please share. I created this legislation to save lives and close the secret back door to funeral homes, owners/Directors, morticians, body brokers and others who profit from the dead illegally by cutting up people after they are transported following an accident or death and selling parts of their bodies on the black market." https://www.facebook.com/therealpaulkevincurtis
5) I am re-thinking my "donate my organs" after death on my drivers license. But that's another story...
About the Creator
Shirley Belk
Mother, Nana, Sister, Cousin, & Aunt who recently retired. RN (Nursing Instructor) who loves to write stories to heal herself and reflect on all the silver linings she has been blessed with :)
Keep reading
More stories from Shirley Belk and writers in Criminal and other communities.
EEK...I got a Jury Summons
Yesterday I picked my mail up from the box at the corner. Much to my horror, surprise, dismay (definition of "eek" from Oxford Dictionary,) there it was...a summons to appear for jury duty! And not just any jury duty...the grand jury of my parish (what counties are called in Louisiana.) That's the reward you get for things like voting and being an adult. You get a chance to do your civic duty.
By Shirley Belk2 years ago in Criminal
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 6 days ago in Criminal
Federal Law Enforcement Shooting in Minneapolis Sparks National Debat
## **Federal Law Enforcement Shooting in Minneapolis Sparks National Debate** In early 2026, a serious incident unfolded in Minneapolis when federal law enforcement officers shot a civilian during a large-scale operation in the city. The event immediately drew public attention and ignited widespread discussion about the role of federal agencies, public safety, and accountability. The shooting occurred in a residential area, creating fear and confusion among residents and prompting strong reactions from local leaders and community groups.
By America today 7 days ago in Criminal
Bruce Lee and The God of War: Kuan Ti
It starts with love.. The Power to the God Of War and Wealth Walk into a Chinese restaurant (even in Oklahoma, USA), a Chinese police station, a kung fu martial arts studio or even a Chinese temple and you often see a red faced warrior holding a heavy quan-do (spear like weapon).
By WILD WAYNE : The Dragon King7 days ago in Chapters
Comments (5)
God, this is devastating to hear. There’s such grimness in this world.
That's horrible. By the way, I'm NOT an organ donor, under the advice of my old biology professor in college years ago. He suggested to everyone in his class not to check the box and explained his reasoning. It was enough to make an impression on me back then.
Whoa, that's quite the thread of shockers. The importance of research before jumping to conclusions is a powerful message. Love your objective and inquisitive approach.
It's the families, isn't it? They want to believe that their loved ones are laid to rest and trust the people they give them to to ensure that's done with respect. Not nice, Shirley.
Interesting and disturbing information. I'm not too fond of conspiracy theories but I do love true crime stories, and I will be taking a closer look at a couple you listed.