Alejandro Henriquez - The Bronx Serial Killer: Guilty or Innocent? | A Deep Dive into the Crimes, the Trial, and the Mystery

The Bronx has always carried a certain edge. I felt that edge as a young Special Agent working fugitive cases in those Bronx neighborhoods. Anyone who's walked its blocks long enough knows the rhythm — kids chalking sidewalks, mothers watching from windows, men leaning on stoops while the hum of traffic and sirens fills the air. It's a place that survives, even when the world writes it off. But survival turned into suspicion in the late '80s and early '90s, when young girls started vanishing from streets that should have been safe.

These weren't runaways or kids caught up in trouble. Shamira Bello, Lisa Rodriguez, Jessica Guzman — their names became more than obituaries. They became warnings whispered between neighbors, reasons to lock doors earlier, proof that evil could wear a familiar face.

When the bodies were found, strangled or suffocated and dumped like garbage, the neighborhood stopped breathing easy. Parents didn't just worry over the usual dangers of city living; now there was something far darker stalking their daughters. The community demanded answers. The police needed a suspect. And pretty soon, both found what they were looking for in a cab driver named Alejandro "Alex" Henriquez.

To investigators, he was the thread linking it all together — the so-called Bronx Serial Killer. To the families who buried their girls, he was proof that a monster could look like your neighbor, could shake your hand, could offer your daughter a ride home. And to Henriquez himself? He's a man who's spent over three decades behind bars, claiming everyone got it wrong.

That's the story we're stepping into here: a borough gripped by fear, a justice system under crushing pressure, and a convicted killer who swears the real murderer walked free while he took the fall. The question that haunts this case isn't just what happened to those three girls — it's whether the man paying for their deaths is the one who actually killed them. Let’s explore, and you tell me what you, my friends think.

A Serial Killer

The Bronx in the late 1980s and early 1990s was a tough place to grow up. Drugs, gangs, poverty, and crime stained the corners of a borough, like the whole city itself, really never slept. But between 1988 and 1990, something darker than the usual crime headlines began to take shape. Girls were going missing. Strangled or suffocated, dumped in wooded lots and roadside brush. The community whispered the words no neighborhood wants to hear: a serial killer.

It didn’t take long before one name was splashed across newspapers and television screens: Alejandro “Alex” Henriquez. To police, he was the common denominator, the common thread in all three murders. To prosecutors, he was a manipulator who preyed on young girls who knew and trusted him. To the victims’ families, he was a neighborhood guy, now a monster.

But Henriquez has never admitted guilt. Almost 35 years later, and even after spending decades in prison, he continues to say: “I didn’t kill anyone.”

Who was Alejandro Henriquez really—and was justice done?

The Background: A Bronx Son Comes of Age

Born and raised in the Bronx, Henriquez was the product of the borough’s unruly streets. Childhood friends described him as quiet, sometimes charming, but prone to temper and very controlling. By adulthood, Henriquez cut the figure of a working-class family man. He was married, held steady jobs—a cab driver, a security guard—and was no stranger to the neighborhood kids who often came around his home.

But peeling back that ordinary façade revealed a man with a troubled personal life. He juggled by his own depiction, many girlfriends, despite being married with children, and he piled lies on top of lies, hiding affairs, debts, and secrets. Former acquaintances said he had a way of bending the truth until it suited him.

And when young girls turned up dead, police began to see Henriquez not as a family man, but as a predator hiding in plain sight.

The Victims: Lives Cut Short

Behind every quote about “serial killers” are real human beings who once lived, laughed, and should have grown up to see adulthood, old age. In Henriquez’s case, three names became etched in the tales of The Bronx.

Shamira Bello (14 years old)

In 1988, Shamira’s life ended brutally. Strangled and discarded, she never came home. Police later tied her to Henriquez through social circles—he knew her, just like the others.

Lisa Rodriguez (21 years old)

Lisa was a young mother trying to hold her world together. In 1990, she was last seen in Henriquez’s company. Days later, her body was discovered. Perhaps most damning—the sweatpants found on Lisa’s body belonged to Henriquez’s wife. Henriquez justified this detail, saying Lisa had borrowed them after a beach outing. To investigators, it linked him to the crime scene with chilling intimacy.

Jessica Guzman (10 years old)

Jessica’s murder struck the Bronx like a lightning bolt. A fourth grader who left home one evening on a shopping errand for her mom and never came back, her death in 1990 shattered parents across the city. She was found suffocated in a wooded area a week later. Henriquez admitted to being the last person to see her alive.

Each of these girls came from communities already under strain. Their deaths didn’t just rob families—they terrorized an entire borough already terrorized by crime.

The Investigation: Connecting the Dots

By 1990, the NYPD faced scorching heat from city leaders and an outraged public. Mothers refused to let daughters walk alone. Newspapers screamed about a Bronx serial killer.

Detectives worked the connections. What did they keep discovering? Henriquez was at the center of it all. Each victim shared a link to him. He was the last to see Jessica alive. He was spotted with Lisa Rodriguez. He knew Shamira socially.

Still, one problem loomed: no DNA, no fingerprints, no “smoking gun.” Almost all of the evidence was circumstantial. What tied the cases together wasn’t laboratory science, but human testimony. A landlady who saw Alex with a victim. A witness at a crime scene. Intimate details only the killer would know. Patterns in who he targeted and how.

Prosecutors argued the math was simple: when three victims share the same acquaintance, that man isn’t just unlucky. He’s guilty.

The Trial: Guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?

Henriquez faced trial in 1992 for the murders of Shamira Bello, Lisa Rodriguez, and Jessica Guzman. The jury heard about sweatpants belonging to his wife turning up on Lisa, about Jessica’s last night alive, about Henriques being seen just yards away from a location where a victim was found, and about Henriquez’s tangled web of lies.

Jurors wrestled with the evidence. Some admitted later they weren’t fully convinced. One juror even went on record saying Henriquez “didn’t fit the person sitting there.” But the verdict was guilty, and Henriquez was handed 75 years to life.

Families gasped in relief in the courtroom. Justice had been done, at least in their eyes.

Henriquez’s Side: The Voice of Innocence

Decades later, Henriquez still sits in a New York State prison. If you ask him, the system framed him.

On the Piers Morgan episode Serial Killer: Interview with the Bronx Serial Killer, Henriquez denied it all. He swore he never killed anyone—not even an animal. He branded the police case as weak, built on “lies and deception.”

He explained his version of damning details—the sweatpants, the timing, the eyewitnesses—as coincidences or misunderstandings. He admitted his flaws: cheating on his wife, controlling tendencies, but not murder. To this day, he insists he was the target of police under enormous pressure to make an arrest and desperate to silence public outrage by pinning the murders on someone.

Beyond Conviction: Questions and Theories

Like many true-crime stories, the Henriquez saga leaves cracks big enough for doubt to creep through.

The Case for Guilt

• All three victims shared a direct link to Henriquez.
• No similar murders cropped up in the Bronx after his arrest.
• His lies and manipulations fit the psychological profile of a killer.

The Case for Innocence

• No physical evidence: no DNA, no blood, no conclusive forensics.
• Reliance on circumstantial links and witness statements, always vulnerable to error.
• At least one juror expressed doubt publicly years later.

Was Henriquez railroaded to ease community panic? Or is his continued denial just another manipulation? Even after three decades, the answers are still blurred.

The Bronx Community: Fear, Grief, and Aftermath

Cases like this don’t just live in court transcripts. They carve scars. In 1990, the funerals said it all. Jessica Guzman’s coffin covered in a flag sent by the President. Thousands of neighbors filled the church pews and sidewalks. Parents clutching their children tighter.

People looked at Henriquez and saw either justice or injustice. To some, he was the bogeyman finally behind bars. To others, he was a scapegoat for a system drowning under pressure, a city drowning in crime.

The Bronx went on. But the whispers of those murders, of a borough under siege, still haunt street corners and stoops more than thirty years later.

Conclusion: The Lingering Shadow of Alejandro Henriquez

So, was Alejandro Henriquez—The Bronx Serial Killer—guilty or innocent?

The law says guilty. Families of victims say guilty. Yet, he himself says innocent, his eyes clear, his voice unwavering, even decades into a sentence with little chance of parole.

For the Bronx, the case is more than about one man. It’s about how fear could bend justice. About how communities demand accountability when children are murdered. About how grief still lingers when the body count, living and dead, is higher than what the court acknowledged.

Maybe Henriquez is exactly who the papers said he was. Or maybe—just maybe—society locked up a man because he made the easiest target.

That’s the weight of this story. Like so many true-crime cases, it forces us to look at the fragile line between closure and doubt, and what justice really means for the living left behind. So, what do you think, my friends? Comment and let me know.

Remember, folks, every crime has a story. My mission. Tell it.

If you enjoy my writing, would you consider a tip of $1.00, $2.00, $3.00, or $5.00 using the Vocal Media tipping link? Thank you!

This post may contain affiliate links. If you click on these links and make a purchase, I may earn a commission at no additional cost. I only recommend products or services that add value to my readers.

Remember to visit MJonCrime on YouTube for Videos, Shorts, and our MJonCrime Podcast. Also, visit MJonCrime True Crime Reads for great True Crime books for your True Crime reading pleasure.