Al-Qadir Trust Case ?

Introduction

Al-Qadir Trust case. This article provides a chronological timeline of events and attempts to answer pertinent questions based on the timeline and evidence.

---

Timeline of Events

1. May 15, 2019

Imran Khan, then Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), announced the establishment of Al-Qadir University in Jhelum, under the Al-Qadir Trust.

2. December 2, 2019

Shahzad Akbar presented a National Crime Agency (NCA) case during a cabinet meeting.

3. December 3, 2019

The NCA closed its investigation into Malik Riaz in London, releasing £190 million, including £50 million from a property (One Hyde Park) and £140 million in cash, to Malik Riaz and his family.

4. Transfer of Funds to Pakistan

The funds, previously frozen during the investigation, were transferred to Pakistan on Malik Riaz’s directive. The amount was deposited into the Supreme Court's account as part of a settlement.

5. December 26, 2019

Al-Qadir University was registered under the Al-Qadir Trust. Bahria Town pledged to fund its construction.

6. January 2020

Bahria Town purchased 460 kanals (approximately 9200 marlas) of land for Rs. 243 million (around Rs. 26,500 per marla). The land was transferred to Zulfi Bukhari.

7. April 2020

Zulfi Bukhari and Babar Awan were removed as trustees of the Al-Qadir Trust. Bushra Bibi and Farah Gogi replaced them.

8. January 2021

Zulfi Bukhari transferred the 460 kanals to the Al-Qadir Trust.

9. March 2021

An MoU was signed between Bahria Town and Bushra Bibi for the construction of Al-Qadir University.

10. November 2021

Imran Khan inaugurated Al-Qadir University with a capacity of 500 students.





---

Analysis of the Case

Key Allegations

1. Bribery in the Form of Land Donation

The allegation states that Malik Riaz used land and construction expenses as a bribe to adjust his £190 million settlement.

2. Misuse of Authority

Imran Khan allegedly used his position for personal benefit.

---

Examining the Evidence

1. Was the Land a Bribe?

The land was transferred to the Al-Qadir Trust by Zulfi Bukhari.

Zulfi Bukhari, a key figure in the transaction, was not summoned to court. Without his testimony, how can guilt be established?

The £190 million settlement was not proven to be proceeds of corruption in the UK.

2. Legal Standing of the Trust

The trust-owned land cannot be used for personal benefit under the law.

The prosecution failed to prove any misuse of trust property.

3. Housing Societies and Land Value

Malik Riaz’s donation of land likely boosted the value of nearby Bahria Town projects. Such practices are common in the real estate sector to enhance property values.



---

Judicial Oversights

1. The prosecution failed to present critical documents or evidence.

2. Contradictions in the case were dismissed as "natural" instead of benefiting the accused.



3. Despite the absence of definitive proof, convictions were based on speculative interpretations.



---

Conclusions

Malik Riaz's Motivation

Malik Riaz’s donation aligns with typical real estate strategies to enhance property value.

Lack of Evidence Against Imran Khan

The allegations of bribery and misuse of authority lack credible evidence. Without proving the £190 million as corruption proceeds, the case becomes tenuous.

Judicial Bias

The judgment reflects speculative reasoning rather than legal certainty.

The Al-Qadir Trust case raises significant questions about judicial processes, the role of evidence, and motivations behind such cases. It remains a contentious issue, underscoring the need for transparency and fairness in high-profile investigations.