Belitsoft's Guide to Outsourcing ASP.NET Development

This guide explains how to outsource ASP.NET projects effectively and what to look for in an outsourcing partner - especially for projects of different scopes, budgets, and durations. It highlights why Eastern Europe has become a prime region for .NET outsourcing, combining technical expertise with cost efficiency.

Key insights are illustrated through Belitsoft, a .NET specialist company, demonstrating critical success factors. Whether you’re new to outsourcing or fine-tuning an existing approach, the practical tips here are designed to help you get better results from your ASP.NET development efforts.

Benefits of Outsourcing ASP.NET Development

It’s worth noting why companies outsource ASP.NET development in the first place.

Access to Expertise

Gain specialized ASP.NET skills (Blazor, Web API, Azure) that may not be available in-house. A good outsourcing firm brings a highly skilled talent pool of .NET developers, QA engineers, UI/UX designers, etc. This is useful if you need experts in newer frameworks like Blazor or cloud integration that your team lacks.

Cost Efficiency

Reduce development costs with lower labor rates in outsourcing destinations. For example, Eastern Europe offers competitive pricing – companies can save a significant percentage (often up to 50–60%) compared to U.S. or Western European development costs without compromising quality.

Many firms find Eastern European developers provide an optimal blend of reasonable rates and high quality.

Faster Scaling

Quickly scale your team size for a project. Rather than hiring and training new staff, an outsourcing partner can supply additional experienced developers on short notice. Top providers can ramp up team size or add specialists (like cloud architects or extra QA) to meet project needs. This flexibility accelerates development and helps meet tight deadlines.

Focus on Core Business

By outsourcing development work, your internal team can focus on core business tasks (product management, strategy, etc.) while the external team manages the implementation. The outsourcing partner often manages a lot of the development process (especially in project-based engagements), reducing your management overhead.

Global Talent Pool

Outsourcing opens the door to global talent. Regions like Eastern Europe are known for highly educated and proficient .NET developers, giving you a wide selection of skilled engineers. You’re not limited to local hiring constraints.

Types of ASP.NET Projects You Can Outsource

ASP.NET (and the broader .NET) is used to build many kinds of software. Any of these project types can be outsourced. Align with a vendor experienced in the specific type of project you need.

Web Applications and Portals

ASP.NET Core is a go-to framework for developing modern web applications, from content-rich websites to customer portals.

If you plan to build a web app or an e-commerce site, look for a team with a strong track record in web UI/UX and front-end integration alongside .NET backend skills. For example, a vendor that has built web portals or e-commerce sites with ASP.NET will understand responsive design, user experience, and integrating the front-end with the ASP.NET backend.

Enterprise Systems and Complex Platforms

.NET is often used for large-scale enterprise software (such as CRM or ERP systems). These projects involve complex integrations, high security, and scalability requirements. If you’re overhauling or developing an enterprise system, you’ll want an outsourcing partner that excels at complex, large-scale projects and has experience with enterprise-grade architecture.

Such a partner should understand aspects like single sign-on, multi-tier architecture, and testing, which are critical for enterprise solutions.

APIs and Backend Services

ASP.NET Web API (part of ASP.NET Core) is used for building RESTful APIs and microservices.

If you’re outsourcing development of a backend service or API, ensure the vendor has experience creating well-documented, scalable APIs (for example using ASP.NET Web API or Azure Functions) and follows best practices for security and performance. Integration experience with databases, caching, and cloud services is also important here.

Legacy System Modernization & Maintenance

Many organizations have legacy .NET Framework applications that need maintenance or migration to newer platforms. You can outsource this type of work to specialists in legacy modernization. A suitable partner will offer long-term support and know how to gradually refactor or rebuild legacy apps on modern .NET without disrupting business. If your goal is maintenance or a one-time migration, clarity of scope is key, and you might structure it as a fixed-price project (more on pricing models later).

Mobile and Desktop Applications

.NET is not limited to web – technologies like .NET MAUI can build cross-platform mobile apps. If your project involves these, ensure the outsourcing team has that specific expertise. For example, a financial company might need a secure desktop trading app (WPF) plus a web portal – a full-service .NET firm could manage both under one roof.

Not all web-focused .NET developers know mobile/desktop frameworks. A partner with the relevant portfolio will add value by accelerating development.

Technical Expertise and Skills to Seek

When outsourcing ASP.NET development, the technical skill set of the partner is very important. ASP.NET is part of a broad Microsoft stack, so you’ll want a team proficient in the specific technologies your project requires.

ASP.NET Core and Framework

Ensure the developers are experienced in ASP.NET Core (latest version) for modern web development, and even legacy ASP.NET Framework if your project involves older components.

They should follow current best practices (dependency injection, asynchronous programming, secure coding).

You can ask about their familiarity with ASP.NET MVC for web apps and ASP.NET Web API for building APIs. A competent team will use MVC or newer patterns appropriately to create modular, testable code.

Top .NET teams often highlight their ability to manage the entire stack – for example, building a front-end in Blazor, an API in ASP.NET Core, and integrating it with Azure cloud services and even legacy .NET components if needed.

Blazor and Modern Web UI

Blazor is a newer framework for building rich client-side web UIs using C# instead of JavaScript. If a SPA (Single Page Application) or interactive web UI is a focus, look for a vendor who has delivered Blazor applications and understands its architecture.

Experience with React or Angular is a plus too, but Blazor-specific knowledge ensures they can use its strengths (like real-time state sync between client and server via Blazor Server, or WebAssembly nuances for Blazor WebAssembly).

Cloud Integration (Azure Services)

An ASP.NET project often involves cloud hosting or services.

If you plan to deploy on Microsoft Azure, the outsourcing partner should have Azure-certified developers and hands-on experience with relevant services.

This might include Azure App Services for hosting, Azure SQL or Cosmos DB for data, Azure DevOps for CI/CD, Azure Functions for serverless components, etc.

A team familiar with cloud architecture will design your application to be cloud-native (handling auto-scaling, distributed caching, security, etc.).

If using AWS or GCP instead, check for their experience with those clouds in a .NET context.

Database and Integration Skills

Virtually all ASP.NET applications need database integration.

Ensure the team knows Microsoft SQL Server and ORMs like Entity Framework. If you have specific integration needs (integrating with a legacy Oracle database, or using NoSQL stores, or connecting to third-party APIs), confirm the vendor has done similar integrations.

DevOps and CI/CD

Modern software development expects rapid, reliable deployments.

A mature .NET outsourcing partner should assist with setting up Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment pipelines (often via Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, or Jenkins) and infrastructure as code for deployments.

Ask if they have DevOps engineers or at least developers skilled in Docker, container orchestration, and cloud management, as those are increasingly part of delivering a complete solution.

During evaluation, ask for examples of past projects using the same technologies you need. If your project prioritises Blazor on the front-end, an API backend, and Azure cloud, for example, the ideal partner will have demonstrable experience in all those areas – not just generic .NET knowledge.

An experienced vendor can even guide you on which technologies make sense for your goals.

Other Things to Look for When Choosing an ASP.NET Development Agency

Relevant Project Experience

Look for a track record of projects similar to yours. If you need a fintech application, does the vendor have past fintech or financial system projects? If it’s a healthcare app, do they understand things like HIPAA compliance or HL7 standards? Having domain experience means less time explaining basics and fewer mistakes in sensitive areas.

Many .NET outsourcing companies specialize in certain industries (finance, healthcare, e-learning, etc.), which can be a big advantage. For example, a provider that has built healthcare software will know privacy regulations and likely have reusable frameworks for audit trails, data encryption, etc.. A firm that built multiple e-learning platforms would grasp features like multi-tenant architecture for schools, SCORM compliance, etc.

Domain expertise isn’t mandatory for all projects, but it can greatly accelerate development and reduce errors for complex, regulated industries. A partner that has solved similar business problems before requires less hand-holding and often proposes better solutions.

Quality Assurance and Process Maturity

A reliable ASP.NET partner should keep their work to a high standard. Ask about their QA and testing practices. Do they have dedicated QA engineers? Do they write automated tests (unit tests, integration tests) as part of development?

The best firms follow strict QA processes: peer code reviews, static code analysis, use of tools to detect vulnerabilities, etc. They might adhere to standards like OWASP for security and ISO 9001 for quality management.

If your project involves sensitive data, check that the vendor is familiar with data protection regulations (GDPR in Europe, etc. and has security protocols in place.

Process maturity also includes their development methodology – do they use Agile/Scrum? How do they manage source control and deployments?

You can ask how they manage a typical sprint or how they ensure maintainable code (one indicator is if they mention clean coding practices and documentation). An agency with formalized processes will generally produce more reliable, secure code – critical for long-term maintainability.

Reputation and References

Do due diligence on the agency’s industry reputation. Look for independent client reviews or testimonials, such as on GoodFirms, or Gartner Peer Insights. Consistent positive feedback about things like on-time delivery, quality of work, and good support is a green flag. Ask the vendor for references – a solid company will readily connect you with past or current clients who can share their experience. If possible, speak directly to one or two references and ask about the project delivered, communication, any challenges and how they were managed.

Also check the company’s years in business and stability. An agency with 10+ years of operation and a substantial team is less likely to fold or run into financial trouble mid-project.

Size of the company (which we discuss more below) can correlate with stability – bigger firms often have more established processes. However, even a smaller firm with long operating history and consistent clients can be a safe bet. You want assurance that the partner will be around to support you not just during development but for any post-launch support or future phases.

Engagement Models and Pricing Options

When outsourcing, you can structure the collaboration in different ways. It’s important to choose an engagement model and pricing model that suits your project’s nature and your management preferences.

With a project-based contract, you hand the whole job to the vendor for a price you both lock in ahead of time. It works only when you already have clear requirements, scope, and deadlines. The vendor delivers the finished solution for that agreed price—even if their costs run over.

• Pros. You know the total cost up front. You don’t have to manage the team day to day - the vendor owns the deadline and results.
• Cons. The deal is rigid. If you need changes, you must file a change request and pay extra. It demands heavy planning and detailed specs at the start to avoid misunderstandings.

When to use

A fixed-price model is ideal for short-term projects with clear, stable requirements – for example, developing a small module or doing a one-time migration where you can detail exactly what’s needed.

Many clients also use a fixed-price engagement as a trial project with a new vendor to test their capabilities on a small, low-risk piece of work.

Time & Materials (T&M)

With a time-and-materials (T&M) contract, you pay for the hours (or days/months) the team actually puts in at a set rate. Because you’re simply paying for time, you can tweak the scope, swap features, or steer the project in a new direction without signing a new contract — perfect when requirements are fuzzy or likely to change.

• Upside. Maximum flexibility.
• Trade-offs. The final price is open-ended. Costs rise if the project grows. You must stay involved — tracking hours, setting priorities, and checking progress to keep the budget on track.

When to use

T&M is recommended for longer-term or evolving projects where flexibility is needed - a product development where new ideas may come up, or an R&D project. It’s also suitable if you prefer to be actively involved in directing the work, since you can continuously reprioritize tasks under a T&M approach.

Dedicated Team (Monthly Retainer)

The dedicated team model is a long-term version of collaboration. You rent a vendor’s developers full-time — they work only for you — and you pay a fixed monthly fee for each team member.

You’re hiring a remote extension of your team through the outsourcing provider. You can manage this dedicated team’s day-to-day tasks as if they were your employees, or ask the vendor to provide management – it’s flexible.

The pricing is usually transparent: for example, you pay a flat monthly fee per developer or a total monthly fee for the team, which covers their salary and the vendor’s overhead.

The dedicated team model gives you full control and consistency – the team becomes deeply familiar with your project over time, and you avoid the churn of switching developers in and out. It’s excellent for ongoing development needs and when you want the team to fully integrate with your processes (using your tools, attending your meetings, etc.).

The main considerations are that you’ll be paying for the team regardless of fluctuations in workload (since they are reserved for you), and you need enough management capacity to direct the team’s work (unless you hire a project manager through the vendor as well).

When to use

A dedicated team is ideal for long-term projects or continuous development work where you need additional staff for an extended period. If you foresee that you’ll need, say, 3 .NET developers for the next 12 months to work on features and maintenance, a dedicated team model is likely the most efficient and cost-effective approach.

Many companies use this model for staff augmentation (more on this below) – to augment their internal team with specific skills or extra hands on a long-term basis.

Often, outsourcing providers offer flexible engagement contracts and might even let you start in one model and transition to another as needs change. For example, you might begin with a fixed-price MVP development, and then switch to a T&M engagement for ongoing feature additions post-launch. A reliable partner will help you choose a model that fits your budget and timeline while ensuring quality doesn’t suffer.

Tip

No matter the model, insist on transparency in pricing and reporting. Good vendors will provide detailed breakdowns of work (time reports in T&M, or clear milestone-based payments in fixed-price) and will be open about rates/costs upfront. This helps build trust and prevents nasty surprises later on.

Collaboration Approaches: Full Outsourced Team vs. Team Augmentation

When engaging an ASP.NET outsourcing partner, you should also decide how you want the external developers to integrate with your organization.

Outsourced Full Project Team (Independent Delivery)

In this scenario, you hand over a project or a defined scope to the vendor, and they assemble their own team to deliver it end-to-end. The outsourced team might include developers, testers, a project manager, and other roles as needed – a self-contained team responsible for the project outcome.

They will still collaborate with your stakeholders for requirements and feedback, but the vendor’s project manager typically runs the daily work.

This approach is useful if you lack internal bandwidth or expertise to manage the project directly. It’s common in project-based outsourcing and often goes along with fixed-price or managed T&M contracts.

The benefit is that the vendor takes on project management and delivery risks, and you get a turnkey solution.

However, you have somewhat less direct control over individual developers (you interface mainly through the vendor’s management), and success depends heavily on the vendor’s processes and oversight. This model works best when you trust the vendor’s expertise and want to focus on high-level oversight rather than micromanaging technical tasks.

Staff Augmentation (Embedded Developers)

In this approach, you integrate outsourced developers into your existing internal team. The external personnel act as an extension of your in-house staff – often working under your team leads or project managers.

You assign tasks to them just like you would to your employees, and they attend your team meetings, follow your procedures, and report on progress in your tools. They are dedicated team members only employed by the outsourcing firm.

Staff augmentation is ideal when you already have an ongoing project and just need to fill specific skill gaps or increase capacity. For example, your team might be proficient in front-end, but you bring in an outsourced ASP.NET backend developer to join the team and manage server-side work. Or if you have a tight deadline, you augment with a few extra developers to speed up development.

The benefit is full control and seamless teamwork – the line between internal and external team blurs. However, the onus is on you to manage the augmented staff and ensure productive collaboration (which includes onboarding them to your processes and providing daily guidance).

Many outsourcing providers support both modes. Leading agencies often offer flexible engagement where you can start with a couple of developers augmenting your team, and if needed, scale up to a larger dedicated team managed in a way that fits your organization.

For example, Belitsoft provides everything from a small team to augment your staff to a fully managed dedicated team, accommodating short-term needs as well as multi-year partnerships. This flexibility is valuable – you might begin by embedding one expert into your team, but later entrust a whole project module to the vendor’s team as trust grows.

Many outsourcing relationships involve a blend. For example, you might have a dedicated team at the vendor that functions as a satellite team to your engineering department – they mostly work independently on assigned modules (with their own scrum master from the vendor) but also join weekly calls with your in-house team to synchronize efforts. This can give you the best of both worlds: the vendor provides managerial structure, but the team is integrated enough to feel like your own.

The key is to clarify expectations and integration level upfront. If you choose staff augmentation, treat the outsourced devs like your employees (include them in meetings, give them access to documentation, etc.). If you choose a fully outsourced team, establish clear milestones, communication protocols, and check-in points so you stay informed on progress. Successful outsourcing depends on collaboration and transparency regardless of the model.

Short-Term Projects vs. Long-Term Partnerships

The duration and continuity of your outsourcing engagement will influence how you plan and whom you select. Outsourcing can work for a one-off short assignment or as an ongoing partnership – but the approach in each case differs slightly.

Short-Term or Small Tasks (a few weeks to 3–6 months)

For a short engagement – say building a prototype, adding a specific feature, or a 3-month development sprint – you’ll likely structure it as a project-based contract focused on quick results.

In these cases, many clients prefer a fixed-price arrangement if the scope is clear, to ensure the budget is capped.

When evaluating vendors for a short project, look at their ability to start fast and deliver quickly. Can they onboard in days? Do they have ready-to-use frameworks or templates that could accelerate development?

You might favor a smaller, specialized team for a short task, as they can sometimes deliver faster with less overhead.

However, even for a short project, don’t sacrifice good practices – ensure the vendor will use proper version control, documentation, and testing, because you’ll have to maintain this code after they hand it off.

It’s also wise to assess how self-sufficient they are. You want minimal management overhead. A good tactic is to do an initial trial project with a new vendor on a small task to gauge their performance, before potentially engaging them for a longer project.

Long-Term Projects or Ongoing Support (6 months and beyond)

For a longer-term collaboration – for example, a year-long development of a complex system or continuous development/support indefinitely – you should approach vendor selection and setup more as you would a long-term partner.

Factors like the vendor’s stability and financial standing become important (you don’t want them going out of business mid-project), so look for firms with an established track record (many years in business, solid client references).

The engagement model here is often more flexible: commonly time-and-materials or a monthly dedicated team, since requirements might evolve over time.

For long-term success, it’s important to consider team continuity and integration. You may effectively embed the outsourced developers as an extension of your own team, so cultural fit and communication routines matter even more. You’ll want to know about the vendor’s employee retention – high turnover on their side could disrupt your project if team members constantly change.

When interviewing for a long-term engagement, ask how they manage knowledge transfer (so that know-how isn’t lost if someone leaves) and how they scale teams over time.

A top vendor will often assign a consistent point of contact or project manager and even let you interview and approve each team member that joins your project.

For long projects you are seeking a strategic partner, not just a code shop – the vendor should be willing to invest in understanding your business and be adaptable as needs evolve. Long-term partnerships also benefit from geographic and cultural proximity - this is where nearshore Eastern European partners shine, as regular communication over months/years is easier with minimal time zone gaps and strong cultural alignment.

Tailor the contract to the engagement length too: short projects might warrant stricter milestone-based payments and acceptance criteria, whereas long-term ones might be more open-ended with regular reviews and adjustable scope.

Why Agency Size Matters (Finding the Right-Sized Partner)

One question often asked is how much the size of an outsourcing agency should factor into your decision. The size (in terms of number of employees or developers) does have practical implications.

Ability to Scale the Team

Larger agencies (hundreds of developers or more) have the obvious advantage of being able to ramp up a big team quickly. If you suddenly need 5 extra ASP.NET developers, a big company likely has people on the bench or can reassign from other projects. With a small boutique firm (say 10-20 developers total), if you needed a large team or a very specific skill, they might not have anyone available and would need time to hire.

Expecting a tiny firm to staff 10+ engineers in weeks is not realistic – for a project requiring dozens of engineers, a big provider is more equipped. If your project is a company-wide challenge requiring lots of resources, lean toward bigger vendors.

Process and Flexibility

Large companies typically have more formalized processes, layers of management, and perhaps stricter protocols. This can be good for predictability and handling very complex projects.

Smaller companies tend to be more agile and flexible in their processes – they can adjust to your needs more readily and often their senior leadership is directly involved in projects to ensure success.

If you value a nimble approach and custom attention, a mid-sized vendor might deliver that better.

Cost Differences

The size of the firm can influence cost structure. Big firms have higher overhead (more management, sales, etc.), which can sometimes make them pricier for the same work.

Mid-sized firms may operate more leanly, potentially giving you a better rate or at least ensuring you pay only for actual development rather than funding a giant corporate structure.

Large firms, however, might offer volume discounts or have more ability to negotiate on price for bigger contracts.

Don’t assume a bigger company will cost less or more – evaluate on a case-by-case basis.

Attention to Your Project

Will the agency treat you as an important client? At a very large outsourcing company (thousands of employees), unless you’re bringing a massive contract, you might be one of dozens of clients and could get lost in the shuffle.

A smaller vendor is likely to give you more attention and prioritize your success, because each client is a big part of their business. If having a very attentive partner is important to you, you might lean towards a firm where your project will get the A-team and plenty of management focus.

Stability

Larger companies that have been around for a while do offer some peace of mind in terms of stability – they’re less likely to shut down or run into financial issues. They usually have established HR policies, training, and can replace team members if someone leaves without much disruption.

In mid-sized firms (say 50-200 people), you often get a nice balance: big enough to be stable, small enough to be personal.

Focusing on Eastern Europe for ASP.NET Outsourcing

There are many destinations worldwide for outsourcing (including Asia, Latin America, etc.), but Eastern Europe has become a top region for outsourcing ASP.NET development – particularly for Western clients. If you’re considering outsourcing, Eastern European countries like Poland and others offer compelling advantages.

Eastern Europe boasts a rich history of strong technical education and engineering talent. Countries such as Poland produce large numbers of skilled software developers, many of whom specialize in .NET technologies.

These developers are known for proficiency in ASP.NET, .NET Core, and related Microsoft technologies.

You’ll also find expertise in modern fields like cloud computing, AI/ML, and DevOps in the region. Outsourcing to Eastern Europe gives you access to experienced ASP.NET developers who can build secure, scalable applications just as well as (or better than) local hires in the West.

Due to the lower cost of living and market rates, hiring developers in Eastern Europe is significantly more affordable than hiring in Western Europe or North America.

Unlike some ultra-low-cost regions where quality may suffer, Eastern Europe tends to offer great value for money: high quality at reasonable rates.

If you want world-class ASP.NET development at a competitive price, with minimal communication hurdles, Eastern Europe is an excellent region to consider. Of course, talent exists globally, but Eastern Europe’s combination of skill, cost, and culture has made it a preferred outsourcing hub for .NET projects.

This doesn’t mean you should ignore other regions entirely – there are great .NET teams in Asia, Latin America, etc. However, extremely low-cost options must be chosen carefully, as quality can vary. Many companies find Eastern Europe hits the sweet spot between cost and quality.

Example: What an Ideal Eastern European ASP.NET Partner Offers (Belitsoft Case)

Consider Belitsoft – since it was mentioned as an example – which is a software development agency in Eastern Europe. Belitsoft (headquartered in Poland, with Eastern European development centers) exemplifies many of the qualities you’d seek in an outsourcing partner:

Proven Track Record

Founded in 2004, Belitsoft has decades of experience in outsourcing and has grown to a team of 200+ professionals. Longevity and growth indicate stability and success in delivering for clients. In fact, Belitsoft has been recognized in industry rankings among the top .NET development companies, being highlighted for its expertise and client satisfaction. This suggests a strong reputation in the ASP.NET outsourcing space.

Technical and Domain Expertise

Belitsoft’s core strength is custom software development with Microsoft .NET technologies. We use ASP.NET and .NET Core to build a variety of platforms. For example, we have delivered solutions ranging from telemedicine apps and eLearning systems to CRM and enterprise tools, covering domains like healthcare, education, and general enterprise sectors. This breadth means we have experience with web apps, complex backends, and integrations. If your project were in healthcare or e-learning, Belitsoft’s background would be immediately relevant. We also keep up with modern tech: our team can build front-ends in Blazor, robust Web APIs, and integrate with Azure cloud services.

Quality and Communication

Clients often choose Belitsoft for its flexibility, clean code, and transparent communication. These are exactly the traits one should look for in any agency. Flexible means we adapt to client needs (whether it’s engagement model or changes in requirements). Clean code indicates a focus on maintainability and high engineering standards – key for long-term success. Transparent communication means we keep clients in the loop, use clear reporting, and have fluent English skills. Being based in Eastern Europe, Belitsoft offers nearshore advantages like close time zones and cultural alignment for European clients, plus fluent English communication for international clients. This offers smooth collaboration without language barriers.

Engagement Flexibility

Belitsoft provides flexible engagement models – whether a client needs just a couple of developers to augment their internal team or a fully managed dedicated team to manage a project. We accommodate short-term projects by bringing in specialists for a specific goal, and also excel at long-term partnerships, with some client relationships spanning many years. This suggests a commitment to building lasting partnerships and an ability to scale with the client’s needs over time. It’s exactly what you want in a partner: start small if needed, but with the option to grow the engagement.

English-Speaking, Western-Aligned Team

Like many Eastern European firms, Belitsoft’s team offers fluent English and a work culture that meshes well with Western clients. We emphasize collaborative, open communication and have experience working with clients from the US and Europe. This is a good assurance that time zone and cultural differences won’t impede the project.

Client Success and Reliability

Belitsoft cites that some of their clients have stayed for many years – a sign of reliability and consistent performance. Long-term clients mean the agency is not just delivering one-off projects but continuously adding value (in a staff augmentation or product development capacity). We also mention being trusted by clients in critical sectors, we have strong NDA practices, data security, and can pass vendor security assessments often required by healthcare or enterprise clients.

Belitsoft demonstrates what a capable ASP.NET outsourcing firm from Eastern Europe can offer: deep .NET know-how, experience in multiple industries, a sizable talent pool, and a professional approach to quality and communication. Agencies like Belitsoft can manage projects ranging from building a web app from scratch to taking over maintenance of a legacy system, all while working closely with the client’s team in a transparent manner.

Of course, every client should do their own due diligence, but the example shows that when you find a partner with the right combination of technical skill, communication, and flexible engagement options, outsourcing ASP.NET development becomes a very effective strategy.

Originally pubslihed here