Trader logo

Trump Changes Course and Delays Some Tariffs on Mexico and Canada.

A strategic shift is intended to alleviate trade tensions and promote the ratification of the USMCA.

By forhad hossainPublished 11 months ago 3 min read
Trump Changes Course and Delays Some Tariffs on Mexico and Canada.
Photo by History in HD on Unsplash

Trump Changes Course and Delays Some Tariffs on Mexico and Canada.

A strategic shift is intended to alleviate trade tensions and promote the ratification of the USMCA.

The former president Donald Trump revealed in May 2019 that his Mexico and Canada taxation plans would no longer proceed. A brief pause emerged in the twelve-month dispute over steel aluminum and broader commercial relations. While Trump did not eliminate the proposed taxes he chose to withhold their implementation. U.S. lawmakers together with business groups and other national governments strategically pushed for calming the situation at this time. The political leaders desired to secure congressional support for the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

Background: Tariffs and Trade Wars

In March 2018 the Trump administration implemented steel tariffs at 25% and aluminum tariffs at 10% for Canadian and Mexican imports as well as other nations under national security provisions of Section 232 from the Trade Expansion Act. The Canada and Mexico governments responded immediately to U.S. tariffs by implementing tariff restrictions on U.S. products worth $12.5 billion including agricultural exports and U.S. steel items and pork and bourbon products. When negotiations produced the USMCA to replace NAFTA these trade disputes ended up affecting the negotiation process in late 2018. The ratification initiative halted because Canada and Mexico set conditions requiring elimination of all implemented metals tariffs.

The Delay: A Calculated Move

The Trump administration made the decision to put an indefinite hold on the tariffs when it encountered political opposition from lawmakers and warnings from manufacturers that supply chain disturbances as well as rising expenses would occur. The administration decided to lift the tariffs at this moment specifically to quicken the process of USMCA legislative approval between all three countries.

President Trump declared that he would suspend tariff implementation since both Canada and Mexico demonstrate “cooperation” in advancing the USMCA negotiations. This postponement of taxation temporarily minimized economic worries yet it preserved the possibility of additional tariffs in case talks failed.

Reactions: Relief and Skepticism

The decision drew praise from business leaders and lawmakers. Business officials through the Chamber of Commerce declared this development beneficial for American employees and market participants and Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada saw positive progress in the outcome. Mexican officials positively received the trade agreement because it successfully prevented Trump from imposing an additional 5% tariff he announced through his past immigration conflicts.

Critics, however, remained wary. Senator Chuck Grassley expressed concerns about the continued trade sector restrictions because of remaining business uncertainty. Labor unions together with select Democratic Party figures expressed doubts about whether the USMCA properly handled disparities in worker compensation alongside environmental protection rules.

Implications for the USMCA and Beyond

The delay in tariff implementation played an essential role in advancing the USMCA until it received ratification from all three nations by 2020. This agreement introduced contemporary changes to NAFTA through new labor practices and digital framework and auto manufacturing guidelines. Youths in the economy observed that the temporary halt in tariffs showed trade instability during Trump's era of American sovereignty-first administration.

Conclusion: A Balancing Act

Trump postponed tariffs because he made an unusual tradeoff between protectionist words and diplomatic practicality. Temporary suspension of punitive measures allowed the administration to win vital backing for the USMCA at the same time it retained leverage for upcoming trade discussions. The situation proved that economic interdependence exists between North American countries at the same time it exposed the dangers of using trade policy as a weapon for political ends.

The temporary postponement of USMCA tariffs in 2019 demonstrates to the Biden administration the difficult path which exists between market confrontation and collaborative trade relationships when dealing with globalized economic systems.

adviceeconomyinvestingpersonal financecareer

About the Creator

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.