Elon Musk Misses The Irony Of His Latest Well-Meaning Proposal

Elon Musk has made another announcement again, perhaps indicative of an ego-boosting kind of power his money gives him. According to the BBC, "he will pay the legal bills of anyone who is treated unfairly by their employer for their activity on his X social media platform" (like posting or liking tweets). This financial assistance would also have 'no limits'!

Fine words and intention, but can they be taken seriously?

Musk has obviously put on his free speech superhero cape to champion anyone prevented from using his platform freely by these perceived 'unfair employers', except the real irony is that he completely ignored his own high-handed unfairness to workers with this statement. In recent months, Musk has come under increasing scrutiny for his own treatment of staff; being known for his "demanding and sometimes erratic" behaviour as a boss.

Some of the allegations against Musk include:

• Firing employees on a whim.
• Taking criticism personally, even when it's a matter of worker or customer safety.
• Disposing of executives quicker than they can settle at at their desks.
• Demanding that employees work long hours and weekends.
• Creating a culture of sexism and harassment.

On specific cases, Musk was sued by a former SpaceX flight attendant, in 2018, who accused him of sexual misconduct. Musk denied the allegations, but settled the case out of court for $250,000.

In 2022, Musk laid off thousands of X (Twitter) employees, which represented about half of the company's workforce. The layoffs were justified by his comment that Twitter needed to "streamline" its operations. He also defended his management style, saying that he was simply trying to create the "best possible products and services". However, some employees claimed that the layoffs were unnecessary and that Musk was just trying to use them to cut costs.

In March 2023, Musk apologised for publicly mocking a former Twitter employee with a disability, and also questioned the work performance of another former employee, who had been laid off.

Not Upholding Promises

Elon Musk has also been accused of reneging on a promise to pay staff their full annual bonuses. In October 2022, Musk acquired Twitter for $44 billion. In the months leading up to the acquisition, Twitter executives, including former Chief Financial Officer Ned Segal, told employees that they would be paid their full annual bonuses. However, after the acquisition, Musk reportedly told employees that they would only be paid 50% of their target bonuses.

In June 2023, a group of Twitter employees sued Musk and Twitter, alleging that Musk had breached his contract with them by reneging on the promise to pay their full annual bonuses. The lawsuit is still pending.

Musk has defended his decision to pay employees only 50% of their target bonuses, saying that Twitter was "not profitable" in 2022 and that he needed to cut costs. However, the employees who filed the lawsuit argue that Musk is simply trying to enrich himself at the expense of Twitter's employees.

It remains to be seen whether Musk will be held liable for reneging on his promise to pay staff their full annual bonuses. However, the lawsuit is a clear sign of the growing discontent, among his former employees, with Musk's seemingly cavalier and uncaring management style.

Overall, critics among his employees have accused him of unprofessional behaviour which has mainly served to create a hostile work environment. They cited his public mocking of employees, his false statements about the company, and his erratic behaviour on Twitter as creating a climate of fear and uncertainty.

It is difficult to discern Elon Musk's motives behind his latest 'do-good' statement. Is he seeking to rehabilitate his reputation as a boss? To make up for his unpopular staff decisions so far? Or to gain kudos for defending his users? Whatever the reason, he completely missed the irony of his words which would suggest that he starts with himself and his own approach, if he genuinely wishes to defend his users.

After all, while he is fighting his users' unfair employers, who will be fighting his negative treatment of his own employees?

RELATED PODCAST: 3 Simple, Sure-Fire Ways For Getting What You Want

• Like this post? Action speaks louder than intention. Show your appreciation with a SUBSCRIPTION and/or tip. Thanks for your support!