Journal logo

Brazil bans the ''X'' social media

NEWS

By IshayaPublished about a year ago 3 min read
Brazil bans the ''X'' social media
Photo by Alexander Shatov on Unsplash

Elon Musk’s X Faces Severe Crisis in Brazil Amidst Controversy and Declining Value

Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, formerly known as Twitter, is grappling with one of its most severe crises to date. The platform has been suspended in Brazil, one of its largest markets, due to ongoing concerns about hate speech and misinformation. This dramatic turn of events follows a month-long dispute between X and Brazilian authorities, culminating in a suspension order issued by Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandra de Moraes over the weekend. A ruling by Brazil's Supreme Court on whether to uphold the suspension is expected later today.

The root of the crisis lies in X’s contentious approach to content moderation. When Musk acquired Twitter in a $44 billion deal and rebranded it as X, he advocated for fewer restrictions on speech. Musk, who positions himself as a “free speech absolutist,” believes that freedom of speech is compromised if unpopular or controversial opinions are suppressed. This philosophy has led to significant policy changes on the platform, including the reinstatement of controversial figures such as Andrew Tate and Tommy Robinson, who had been banned from Twitter for their inflammatory content.

The recent tensions between Musk and Brazilian authorities highlight a broader conflict regarding the platform’s content policies. Over the past month, Brazilian regulators have raised alarms about the proliferation of misinformation and hate speech on X. In response, Musk publicly criticized the Brazilian judge, calling her an “evil dictator.” This confrontation has amplified the scrutiny of X’s content management practices and intensified the regulatory pressure on the platform.

The situation in Brazil comes on the heels of a related controversy in France involving Pavel Durov, the CEO of the encrypted messaging app Telegram. France's stance on holding platform CEOs accountable for illegal content has added to the complexities facing tech companies. In this climate, Musk hinted on X that limiting operations to countries with strong constitutional protections for free speech might be a prudent strategy.

The broader implications of Brazil’s suspension are significant, given the country’s large and active user base. Estimates suggest that between 20 to 40 million Brazilians use X each month. With over 220 million people in Brazil, the suspension not only affects a substantial portion of X’s global audience but also underscores the platform’s vulnerability to regulatory actions in major markets.

The commercial impact of these controversies is severe. X has already faced widespread advertising boycotts from major companies such as Apple, Disney, and Unilever, significantly affecting its revenue. According to recent figures from the Washington Post, investment managers Fidelity have reduced their stake in the company by 72%. This drastic write-down has seen X’s valuation plummet from $44 billion at the time of Musk’s takeover to approximately $13 billion.

Technology journalist Chris Stocker Walker emphasized the gravity of the situation, noting that the scale of Brazil’s market makes the suspension particularly impactful. The platform's struggle to navigate regulatory challenges and its diminishing market value reflect broader difficulties in its business model. Musk’s approach, which embraces controversy as a means to attract attention, appears to be backfiring. The suspension in Brazil and other ongoing disputes suggest that X’s troubles may persist unless significant changes are made.

In summary, X’s recent challenges, particularly the suspension in Brazil, underscore the platform’s precarious position in the global social media landscape. The clash over content moderation policies, coupled with declining commercial performance and regulatory pressures, paints a troubling picture for the future of X. As the situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor the outcomes of legal rulings and regulatory decisions, which will likely have far-reaching implications for X’s operations and its standing in the social media market.

business

About the Creator

Ishaya

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (1)

Sign in to comment
  • Cindy Calderabout a year ago

    If it's banned in Brazil, you know it must be bad....

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.