Trump precludes one more official discussion against

Trump precludes one more official discussion against

Donald Trump has precluded one more official discussion against his opponent Kamala Harris before November's political decision.

He said on Thursday - two days after the pair's most memorable standoff in Philadelphia - that Harris just needed a rematch since he "obviously" won.

A few moment surveys taken after Tuesday's challenge showed citizens felt Harris had performed better compared to her conservative rival.

Trump added that Harris ought to all things being equal "center" on her occupation as VP.

Soon after, at a mission rally in North Carolina, Harris answered by saying they "owe" citizens another discussion since "what is in question couldn't be more significant".

Surveys recommend the two up-and-comers are in a very close race with only two months to go before the political decision.

Both guaranteed triumph after Tuesday's hour and a half discussion on ABC News, in which Harris shook Trump with a line of individual goes after that put him on edge. These included remarks about the size of his meeting groups and his lead during the 6 January 2021 mob at the US State house.

Trump and his allies have since blamed the two ABC writers that directed the discussion of being unjustifiable and one-sided for Harris. He said on Thursday that he didn't require another discussion.Shortly after, at a campaign rally in North Carolina, Harris responded by saying they "owe" voters another debate because "what is at stake could not be more important".

Polls suggest the two candidates are in an extremely tight race with just two months to go before the election.

Both claimed victory after Tuesday's 90-minute debate on ABC News, in which Harris rattled Trump with a string of personal attacks that put him on the defensive. These included comments about the size of his rally crowds and his conduct during the 6 January 2021 riot at the US Capitol.

Trump and his supporters have since accused the two ABC journalists that moderated the debate of being unfair and biased in favour of Harris. He said on Thursday that he did not need another debate."When a prizefighter loses a fight, the first words out of his mouth are 'I want a rematch'," Trump wrote in a lengthy Truth Social post on Thursday.

"Polls clearly show that I won the debate against comrade Kamala Harris, the Democrats' radical left candidate... and she immediately called for a second debate," he added.

The former president held a rally in Arizona on Thursday and gave an interview with Telemundo Arizona backstage. "We just don't think it's necessary," he said of a second debate with Harris. "We think we've discussed everything and I don't think they want it either."

The Harris campaign, however, called for a second debate immediately after Philadelphia and continued to do so on Thursday. They said voters "got to see the choice they will face at the ballot box: moving forward with Kamala Harris or going backwards with Trump".

"Vice-President Harris is ready for a second debate. Is Donald Trump?" the campaign said.

Speaking after the debate, various Trump campaign surrogates - including Florida Republican Representative Matt Gaetz - said they believed Trump would welcome another debate.

However, Trump said on Fox News the following morning that the debate had been "rigged" and that he was "less inclined" to attend another after his "great night".

His decision on Thursday also appeared to contradict earlier messaging from his own campaign. On Wednesday morning, Jason Miller, a senior adviser to the former president, told CNN that Trump “has already said that he is going to do three debates".

Both campaigns had reportedly been in discussions over a debate on NBC News on 25 September. The network has not commented on Trump's latest statement.

'Trump needs a new angle'

Adam Green, the co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee - an organisation that has advised the Harris-Walz campaign on economic messaging - told the BBC that Trump's decision was a "double favour" to the Harris campaign.

"Voters will have a lasting impression of Kamala Harris as looking presidential and standing on their side," he said. "That will probably do her very well."

"Another debate would potentially help Harris, but could also shake up the existing glow that surrounds her," Mr Green added.

Jeremy Petersen, an independent voter from Utah, told the BBC that he was not surprised by Trump's decision.

"If [Trump] doesn't feel like he can score some social media soundbites, there's no benefit for him to show up," said Mr Petersen, who added that he would probably support Harris after the Philadelphia debate.

"He felt that Harris wouldn't have the type of performance she did and now he's running scared," Mr Petersen added. "He can't stop her momentum via