Humans logo

They Called It Procedure

The word used when responsibility needs a disguise

By Megan StroupPublished 15 days ago 4 min read
They Called It Procedure
Photo by Hennie Stander on Unsplash

The room went quiet in a way that didn’t feel respectful.
It felt practiced.


Someone cleared their throat. Someone else folded a piece of paper they hadn’t been reading. A sentence was delivered carefully, like it had been rehearsed in front of a mirror.


“This is just procedure.”


The words landed softly. Too softly. They didn’t sound like harm. They didn’t sound like a decision. They sounded neutral. Clean. Almost helpful.


Procedure has a way of doing that.


It shows up after something goes wrong, but before anyone admits it did. It arrives with forms and timelines and polite voices. It promises order when what you’re really facing is damage.


I’ve heard it said in hospital rooms, in offices, in court-adjacent spaces that smell faintly of copier toner and stale coffee. Every time, it carries the same message: no one here is personally responsible.


It wasn’t a choice.


It wasn’t judgment.


It was just how things are done.


The strange thing is how quickly that explanation works on a room. Shoulders relax. Pens start moving again. The discomfort gets filed away, not because it’s resolved, but because it’s been renamed.
Procedure doesn’t deny that something happened.


It just drains it of meaning.


You can feel it in the pauses. The way people stop asking questions, not because they’re satisfied, but because they’ve learned which questions won’t go anywhere. There’s an invisible line you’re not supposed to cross, and procedure marks it neatly.


What happened to you matters emotionally.


What happened on paper is all that counts.


There’s a particular tone people use when they invoke policy. Calm. Even. Almost kind. As if getting upset would be a misunderstanding on your part, not a response to theirs. As if pain becomes unreasonable the moment it doesn’t fit into a checkbox.


And maybe that’s the point.


Procedure turns human moments into administrative ones. It takes something messy and alive and flattens it into something manageable. Something no one has to carry home with them.
I’ve noticed how often it appears after silence. After the sirens stop. After the headlines move on. After everyone agrees, quietly, that this is the part where we’re supposed to accept what happened and learn how to live with it.


There’s rarely a villain in these stories. Just a chain. One step leading to another, each small enough to excuse on its own. Each technically correct. Each backed by a policy written by someone who won’t be in the room when it’s enforced.


That’s how accountability dissolves. Not in a dramatic refusal, but in fragments.


“I was following guidelines.”


“My hands were tied.”


“That decision wasn’t mine to make.”


By the time you reach the end of the chain, there’s no one left to talk to. Just a system that shrugs without shoulders.


What makes this harder is how familiar it all feels. We’re raised to trust systems. To believe that rules exist for a reason. And most of the time, they do. Most of the time, they’re invisible because they’re working.


But when they fail, they don’t fail loudly.


They fail quietly. Politely. With documentation.


And if you push back, if you say this doesn’t feel right, you’re often met with confusion. Not hostility. Confusion. As if you’ve misunderstood the situation by expecting empathy where efficiency was promised.


There’s an unspoken lesson in that moment. One we learn early and carry with us longer than we should.


Don’t take it personally.


Even when it is.


What’s unsettling is how easy it is to internalize. To start questioning your own reaction. To wonder if you’re being difficult, emotional, unreasonable. Procedure doesn’t just deflect responsibility outward—it pushes doubt inward.


Maybe this is just how things work.


Maybe I expected too much.


Maybe this isn’t worth fighting.


And so the story ends without an ending. No apology. No acknowledgment. Just a conclusion stamped and filed and archived somewhere you’ll never see.


Later, when you try to explain it to someone else, you’ll struggle to find the words. Because nothing technically happened. Not in a way that fits into a neat sentence. Not in a way that sounds serious enough when spoken out loud.


That’s another trick of procedure. It makes harm harder to name.
We live in a time where everything is documented, recorded, tracked. And yet so much of what actually hurts never makes it into the record. It exists in tone. In timing. In what wasn’t said. In the moment you realized the conversation was already over, even though you were still in the room.


Policy can tell you what’s allowed.


Procedure can tell you what’s next.


Neither can tell you how it felt.


And maybe that’s what lingers the longest. Not the event itself, but the quiet understanding that there was no space for your experience in the process designed to handle it.


They’ll call it procedure tomorrow, too.


Say it the same way.


Mean it the same way.


And somewhere between the forms and the rules, another human moment will be reduced to something manageable. Something safe. Something no one has to take responsibility for.


Except the person who lives with it afterward.

fact or fictionhumanityStream of Consciousness

About the Creator

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.