The Effects of Internet Reliance on Our Lives and Brains
Good or bad?
The increasing reliance on the internet has had a profound impact on our daily lives. From our relationships to the way we gather information and interact with others, the online world has revolutionized how we navigate the world. Not only has it transformed our external experiences, but it has also left its mark on our brains.
The Global Connectivity
The internet has connected people from all corners of the globe. In 2016, an estimated 3.5 billion individuals accessed online services worldwide. China took the lead with 721 million users, followed by India, and the US with 290 million users. English emerged as the most commonly spoken language online, closely followed by Chinese and Spanish.
Generational Shifts in Internet Usage
The reliance on the internet varies across generations, largely dependent on those who had to adapt to the new technology and those who grew up with it readily accessible. Generation X, born between the mid-1960s and early 1980s, logged an average of 110 minutes of mobile internet usage each day. In contrast, Millennials, born from the early 80s onward, and who grew up with the internet, averaged 185 minutes per day.
Impact on Communication and Shopping
Social media and messaging apps have become integral to our lives, with over a billion people regularly using apps like WhatsApp, and even more engaging with platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. As internet usage increases, our behavior changes. Communication through these platforms is now far more common, leading to a decline in phone calls and text messages. Additionally, the convenience of online shopping and services has caused a sharp decline in the use of traditional brick-and-mortar stores, transforming our towns and cities.
The Changing Landscape of Memory
With a wealth of information at our fingertips, the prevalence of the internet is altering the way our brains function. Millennials, in particular, have been found to be more forgetful than previous generations. This is attributed to the constant distractions that connectivity brings. Memory formation relies on the repetition and contemplation of information in our short-term memory, strengthening its storage in our long-term memory. However, the constant influx of new information hinders this process, resulting in less permanent storage. Additionally, the knowledge that information is readily available online diminishes the need to form a memory of it. For instance, while previous generations would have memorized directions on a map, today, there is a reliance on GPS apps on our phones.
The Smartphone Addiction
Our increasing dependency on smartphones has made us more prone to distraction. Constantly checking for messages or updates has cultivated a habit of being easily diverted. Consequently, our brains are less accustomed to transitioning into deeper modes of thinking, making it more challenging to do so when necessary. Research indicates that the continuous flow of information has also led to a loss of cognitive control. Our ability to control our thoughts and focus diminishes as we become reliant on our phones and apps to provide information, making it more difficult to determine what is truly important to focus on.
The Pursuit of Novelty
Our attention is increasingly drawn to new information rather than what is truly essential. While technology undeniably affects the way our brains work, it is not necessarily negative. Throughout history, inventions have allowed us to devote less time to certain tasks, freeing us to allocate our time elsewhere. For example, the invention of washing machines reduced the time spent on cleaning clothes, enabling individuals to engage in other activities or work. Likewise, faster communication and information retrieval on the internet increases our mental capacity for other processes. However, reducing screen time can help keep our brains active and adaptable. It is crucial to be mindful of the amount of time spent on distractions each day.
Conclusion
The internet has undoubtedly transformed our lives and even left a mark on our brains. The increasing reliance on the online world has changed the way we communicate, gather information, and interact with our environment. While this shift presents challenges, it also opens up new opportunities for growth and productivity. By being aware of the impact of the internet on our brains and consciously managing our screen time, we can harness the benefits while maintaining cognitive agility and focus.
"Although technology is clearly affecting the way our brains work, it's not necessarily a bad thing."
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Petra Rattan and writers in Humans and other communities.
A Lie is a Lie
n a world where misinformation and deception have become pervasive, the importance of truth cannot be overstated. A lie is a lie, no matter how it is presented or justified. It is a distortion of reality, intended to mislead and manipulate. In this article, we will delve into the nature of lies, exploring their consequences and the ethical implications they carry. By shedding light on this topic, we hope to encourage a society built on honesty and integrity.
By Petra Rattan2 years ago in Humans
Trump’s Proposed Credit Card Cap Spotlights Americans’ Debt. Would It Help
Credit card debt in the United States has reached staggering levels, and former President Donald Trump’s latest proposal aims to tackle the issue head-on. According to his plan, banks and credit card companies would face a cap on the interest rates they can charge consumers. At first glance, this sounds like a straightforward solution to a growing problem, but a closer look reveals the complexity of America’s debt landscape and the challenges any policy must navigate to be truly effective. The Debt Dilemma As of late 2025, Americans collectively owe more than $1.2 trillion in credit card debt, a record high. Household debt has steadily risen over the past decade, fueled by stagnant wages, inflation, and the rising cost of essentials such as housing, healthcare, and education. For many, credit cards are no longer a convenience—they’re a lifeline, a way to bridge the gap between income and expenses. Trump’s proposal seeks to limit the annual percentage rates (APRs) that credit card companies can charge. Supporters argue that high interest rates trap consumers in a vicious cycle of debt, where paying off balances becomes nearly impossible. Critics, however, caution that such caps could have unintended consequences, like discouraging banks from issuing credit to higher-risk borrowers, potentially leaving some consumers without access to necessary financial tools. How Would the Cap Work? The proposed plan would implement a maximum APR on all credit card accounts, though the exact percentage has yet to be publicly finalized. The intent is to provide relief to the roughly 40% of American households carrying balances month-to-month, many of whom pay rates exceeding 20% annually. In theory, capping interest rates would reduce the financial burden on these borrowers. A consumer carrying a $5,000 balance with a 25% APR could save hundreds or even thousands of dollars in interest payments over a year if rates were capped at, say, 15%. For families living paycheck to paycheck, this could be the difference between staying afloat and defaulting. Potential Benefits Immediate Relief for Borrowers: Lower interest rates would allow more of each monthly payment to go toward the principal, helping people pay off debt faster. Reduced Financial Stress: For Americans struggling to cover minimum payments, a cap could ease anxiety and improve mental well-being. Consumer Protection: High-interest credit cards disproportionately affect lower-income households, so a cap could make the system fairer. Some economists argue that even a modest reduction in interest rates could have a ripple effect on the broader economy. If consumers spend less on interest and more on goods and services, it could stimulate demand, benefiting businesses and potentially supporting job growth. The Risks and Trade-Offs While the benefits sound compelling, implementing a credit card cap is not without risks: Credit Access Might Shrink: Banks may respond to lower allowable interest rates by tightening lending standards. Those with lower credit scores could find it harder to qualify for cards, leaving them with fewer options to manage expenses. Fees Could Rise: Financial institutions might offset lower interest rates by increasing annual fees, late fees, or other charges. The net effect for consumers could be less favorable than expected. Innovation May Stall: Banks and fintech companies often use interest rates to price risk. Limiting this flexibility could reduce incentives to develop new financial products tailored to consumer needs. These challenges highlight the tension between protecting consumers and maintaining a functional credit system. Any policy must balance relief with sustainability to avoid unintentionally hurting those it aims to help. Why Americans Are Paying Attention Trump’s proposal comes at a politically charged moment. Inflation may have eased slightly, but wages haven’t kept pace with costs, and household debt remains a pressing concern. A recent survey found that nearly 60% of Americans worry about their ability to manage monthly credit card payments. With the midterm elections on the horizon, proposals like this gain traction because they resonate with voters’ everyday struggles. For many Americans, credit card debt is more than just numbers on a statement—it’s a source of stress, a limitation on lifestyle choices, and an obstacle to long-term financial goals. Limiting interest rates could provide tangible relief and signal that policymakers are paying attention to these challenges. Historical Context Interest rate caps are not a new idea. In the 1970s and 1980s, states implemented various usury laws to limit how much lenders could charge. While some measures helped consumers, others inadvertently restricted access to credit. The mixed outcomes underscore the importance of careful implementation and oversight. Modern proposals, including Trump’s, aim to avoid these pitfalls by targeting specific consumer protections while attempting to preserve lending options. How successful this approach will be remains to be seen. Would It Actually Help? Experts suggest that a credit card cap alone will not solve America’s debt problem. While it could provide temporary relief for many, it doesn’t address the underlying issues driving debt growth, such as wage stagnation, high living costs, and insufficient financial education. However, as part of a broader strategy—including financial literacy programs, better consumer protections, and support for savings and emergency funds—it could be an important step. Lower interest rates may prevent people from spiraling into unmanageable debt while giving them breathing room to regain control of their finances. Conclusion Trump’s proposed credit card cap shines a spotlight on a critical issue: Americans are struggling under the weight of mounting debt, and immediate relief could be life-changing for millions. While the plan has potential benefits, it is not a silver bullet. Policymakers must carefully weigh the trade-offs to ensure the solution helps those in need without creating new problems. Ultimately, the conversation sparked by this proposal may be just as valuable as the policy itself. It forces a national discussion on debt, fairness, and financial security—a conversation that affects nearly every household in the country. As Americans navigate a complex financial landscape, thoughtful solutions, whether through interest caps or broader reforms, are essential to creating a more equitable and manageable path toward financial stability.
By Muhammad Hassana day ago in Humans
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.