Reason Why I Won't Relocate Out of Nigeria - Frank Edoho
Frank Edoho opens up
Nigerian media personality Frank Edoho is speaking during a new interview on Nigeria Info Xtra about the realities of the hardships currently facing Nigeria, and also answering the question of he will choose to japa in the face of these economic times. Here's what Frank Edoho had to say about both.
**Before reading on, please make sure to sign up for my newsletter below so you don't miss out on any new and interesting lists, articles, and stories that I post every single day. At the end of each week, I'll compile all the best stories from the week and send them right to your inbox, so you don't miss out on any of the hottest things that have happened throughout the week. Sign up now so you always get alerted!
Speaking about the troubling state of Nigeria right now, Frank Edoho said:
FRANK EDOHO: Anywhere I go, you see a mob of people coming to beg. It shows that the nation is not doing well, although some hypocritical people like giving the impression that, "Oh, Nigeria is doing great."
Nigeria isn’t doing great because if you look at the people on the streets, you will find out. I mean, you give somebody 500 naira, and you see the profuse gratitude that comes out of them—it shows that this country is heading towards penury.
Yet, in spite of everything, Nigerians remain generous. That same person you gave 500 naira will look around, see someone else who is hungry, and say, "Okay, you know what? I have 200 naira out of my 500—take."
We are very generous people.
And then when asked if he would ever choose to relocate and leave the country, Frank Edoho said:
FRANK EDOHO: No, I wouldn't.
If I go to a country that's already structured, that means I have to start from the dregs. You can't do that. I'm sorry. I'd rather stay here and see if I can make it work.
I see that the place where opportunity is vast is a place that is not very well developed. I'm not saying Nigeria is not developed, but what I'm saying is that in terms of structure, we still have a lot of work to do.
So, I’d rather emboss my name in the building blocks of development than go and try to etch my impact—just a bit—on an already structured society.
That's what I feel.
Reacting to his words, reactions were mixed. Some agreed saying "I agree with him completely. Don't let anybody finesse you out of position" while others disagreed saying "Speaking English. Hunger will change your answer."
What do you think about what Frank Edoho had to say? Your matter to me, so please share them in the comments below, or on my Jide Okonjo Facebook post. Let's keep the conversation going and I can't wait to see your thoughts on this.
That's All.
I hope you’ve had fun. Don’t forget to subscribe to my newsletter if you don’t already for more stories like this - collated every week and sent right to your inbox so you don't miss out on anything.
Also, if you want to earn money, I've made a free tutorial called FREE TUTORIAL: How I Earn Daily Side-Income Through Photo Editing (2025). Basically, in addition to blogging, I also make a side income through photo-editing work, so if you want to check out my tutorial on how I do that, click here.
To catch up on other content you might have missed, click here.
Until next time, have a wonderful rest of your day
About the Creator
Jide Okonjo
This account is dedicated to TWO things:
🇳🇬 Nigerian news stories for my dedicated Nigerian readers.
💡 The Six Figure Series (A Vocal Exclusive) for writers, readers, and fans of Vocal.
Keep reading
More stories from Jide Okonjo and writers in Humans and other communities.
What Vocal Sent When I Crossed 25,000 Reads (Photo)
So, this is pretty cool, pretty sweet, and pretty interesting, and you may not know this. But when you cross certain Vocal milestones, the company sends you something. At least, it did for me (not sure if they still do now, so please let me know in the comments if you received the same when you crossed your own milestones).
By Jide OkonjoExclusive • about a year ago
Trump Imposes Novel Tariffs Tailored to Hit Foreign Sales of High-End Chips
In a move that has captured international attention, former President Donald Trump’s administration has announced a set of tariffs aimed specifically at high-end semiconductor chips exported from the United States. Unlike traditional tariffs, which broadly target products from a particular country or industry, these new measures are highly selective, focusing on the most advanced chips—those powering everything from AI applications to cutting-edge electronics. A Strategic Strike on Technology Exports High-end semiconductors are the lifeblood of modern technology. They’re the brains behind smartphones, data centers, supercomputers, and increasingly, artificial intelligence systems. By targeting only the most advanced chips, the Trump administration is signaling a strategic approach: slow down the technological advancement of foreign competitors without broadly disrupting the global supply of lower-end electronics. Industry analysts argue that these “novel tariffs” are less about generating revenue and more about economic leverage. The United States has long held a dominant position in semiconductor design and fabrication. By selectively imposing tariffs, it aims to preserve this edge while influencing foreign companies to reconsider their global supply chains. How the Tariffs Work The mechanism of the new tariffs is unusually precise. They are not blanket tariffs on all semiconductor exports but rather on specific classes of chips, particularly those above a certain processing power or designed for AI, autonomous vehicles, and military applications. For example, a mid-range chip used in standard consumer electronics might escape additional duties entirely, while the newest GPUs or AI accelerators could face substantial import fees abroad. This approach reflects an unprecedented level of sophistication in trade policy, combining economic strategy with technological prioritization. Global Market Repercussions The immediate effect of these tariffs is likely to ripple through the semiconductor industry. Countries heavily reliant on U.S. high-end chips—such as China, South Korea, and members of the European Union—may face supply constraints, leading to increased costs for electronics manufacturers. Companies may have to adjust by stockpiling inventory, seeking alternative suppliers, or investing in domestic chip production. China, in particular, has already begun exploring strategies to circumvent U.S. tariffs by boosting its domestic semiconductor capabilities. The country has poured billions into local chip manufacturing, aiming to reduce dependency on American high-end technology. The new tariffs may accelerate these efforts, potentially fueling a longer-term technological competition between the U.S. and China. Domestic Implications While designed to pressure foreign competitors, the tariffs may also have side effects domestically. American companies that rely on foreign markets for revenue—like Nvidia, Intel, and AMD—could see reduced international sales if foreign customers face higher prices. Some experts warn that this could slow U.S. semiconductor growth in the short term, even as the administration tries to strengthen domestic control over technology exports. Furthermore, these tariffs highlight the growing intersection between trade policy and national security. By protecting certain chip technologies, the U.S. aims to prevent sensitive applications—particularly those related to defense and AI—from falling into the hands of competitors. This signals a broader trend: trade policy is no longer just about economics; it’s about geopolitical strategy. Reactions from Industry and Analysts Industry responses have been mixed. Semiconductor companies recognize the strategic importance of protecting high-end technology but are wary of the market disruptions these tariffs could trigger. Some have called for careful implementation to avoid unintentionally stifling innovation or complicating international partnerships. Economists, meanwhile, are debating the long-term impact. Some argue that targeting high-end chips specifically is a clever approach that minimizes harm to consumers while maximizing leverage over foreign competitors. Others warn that it could encourage countries to accelerate their own technological independence, potentially eroding U.S. dominance in the semiconductor sector over time. Lessons from History This is not the first time that trade policy has intersected with technology. In the past, U.S. administrations have restricted exports of certain military-grade technologies or components. However, these new tariffs stand out for their precision and scale. By focusing on commercially critical chips, the Trump administration is creating a new template for trade interventions in a high-tech era. Historically, such policies have had mixed results. In some cases, export restrictions successfully slowed technological progress abroad; in others, they accelerated domestic innovation in the targeted countries. How this round of tariffs will play out remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the semiconductor market will not be the same. Strategic Implications for the Future The imposition of targeted chip tariffs reflects a broader recognition that technology and trade are inseparable in the 21st century. As AI, quantum computing, and other advanced technologies become increasingly critical to economic and military power, nations are treating semiconductors as strategic assets rather than mere commodities. For U.S. policymakers, this move is as much about maintaining technological leadership as it is about trade balance. For global competitors, it is a signal to innovate rapidly and reduce reliance on foreign high-end components. For companies and consumers, it underscores the fragility and complexity of modern supply chains, where a single policy change can reverberate across industries and continents. What to Watch Next Analysts will be watching closely to see how countries respond, whether alternative suppliers can fill gaps, and how American companies adapt to potential international pushback. Investors, tech firms, and governments alike will need to consider both the short-term disruptions and the long-term strategic shifts that these tariffs may trigger. Ultimately, Trump’s novel tariffs on high-end chips represent a new frontier in trade policy—where economic strategy, technological dominance, and national security intersect in unprecedented ways. Whether this approach strengthens U.S. influence in the semiconductor arena or inadvertently spurs competitors to catch up faster will shape the global tech landscape for years to come.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in Humans
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.