Quick Primer on MWI, QI and Reincarnation Theories

Here’s a clear map of how three ideas sit together: the many worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics, the “quantum immortality” thought experiment, and traditional notions of reincarnation and karma.

Short version: MWI is a physics interpretation; quantum immortality is a controversial philosophical inference from it; reincarnation and karma are religious-philosophical doctrines. They overlap mostly as metaphors, not as compatible scientific theories.

Many worlds in one minute

- Core claim: The quantum state never collapses. When a measurement-like interaction happens, the universal wavefunction evolves into non-interacting branches, each realizing a different outcome. Decoherence explains why branches don’t interfere and why outcomes look classical locally.

- What MWI does not add: No extra forces, no new moral laws, no preferred branch. It’s quantum mechanics with a different ontology.

Quantum immortality (QI) in one minute

- The idea: In a setup where a quantum outcome determines your survival, there will always be branches where you live. If you repeat it, there exist branches where you survive every trial. Therefore, “from the inside,” you never experience death.

- Why most experts reject it as guidance:

- Measure matters: Surviving branches shrink exponentially in weight (Born-rule squared amplitude). Almost all future yous die.

- Evidence problem: Survival isn’t confirmatory; dead observers can’t report. It’s unfalsifiable and anthropically biased.

- Ethics and prudence: Expected utility, weighted by measure, still says avoid lethal gambles. Do not attempt anything dangerous; QI is not a survival strategy.

Reincarnation and karma, very briefly

- Reincarnation: After death, a being is reborn. Variants differ:

- Hindu and Jain traditions often posit a persistent soul (atman/jiva) continuing across lives.

- Many Buddhist schools deny a permanent self (anatta), yet affirm continuity via causal aggregates (skandhas) carrying karmic imprints (vasanas).

- Karma: Moral causation. Intentional actions plant seeds that ripen as future experiences (pleasant or painful) for the same stream of being, sometimes across lifetimes. It’s normative and teleological: the structure of reality links deeds to outcomes with moral meaning.

Where MWI and reincarnation/karma align—superficially

- Continuity without essence: Buddhist no-self plus causal continuity echoes, in spirit, MWI’s pattern-based view where identity is a process rather than an indivisible soul.

- Proliferation of futures: Both suggest many possible outcomes from present choices. In MWI, all outcomes occur in parallel branches; in karmic views, different outcomes occur across time and lives.

- Moral cultivation as distribution shaping: If you care about all your “future continuations,” then your present intentions and habits influence a distribution of futures—an intuition akin to “sowing and reaping.”

Where they diverge—deeply

- Moral law vs neutral physics:

- Karma: Built-in moral causation; virtuous acts tend to bear good fruit for the agent’s stream.

- MWI: No moral bookkeeping. Physics is indifferent to virtue. Branch weights follow amplitudes, not ethics.

- Temporal rebirth vs parallel branching:

- Reincarnation: Sequential lives across time, typically with a causal link from a death to a later birth.

- MWI: Coexisting branches now. Branching accompanies measurements; it is not “after death you hop to another body.”

- Identity carrier:

- Reincarnation: Often presumes a carrier (soul or stream of aggregates).

- MWI: No extra carrier; each branch contains a version of you with local continuity. No cross-branch information transfer or memory.

- Teleology and justice:

- Karma encodes moral teleology (justice across lives).

- MWI lacks any such telos; it’s descriptive, not prescriptive.

Is quantum immortality “reincarnation” in disguise?

- Not really. QI posits continued first-person experience only in branches where you survive. That is survival within the same lifetime, not rebirth as another person. It has no mechanism for moral deserts, no cross-branch migration, and no memory continuity beyond ordinary survival.

- Even as “immortality,” QI fails in a practical sense: cumulative hazards (aging, disease, accidents) make the measure of indefinitely surviving copies approach zero. That’s not a meaningful guarantee of endless life, and it gives no basis for ethical living.

Metaphorical bridges you can responsibly draw

- Expected-value karma: If you care about all your future successors measure-proportionally (a natural stance in MWI), then acting kindly increases the expected well-being across your future branches and those of others. This resembles a secular, probabilistic “karma”: choices propagate consequences.

- Habit and path dependence: In both karmic and secular views, repeated intentions shape future states. In MWI, habits correlate with clusters of branches where those habits keep paying off (or harming you). No cosmic ledger—just causation and statistics.

- No-self resonance: If the self is a process, not a substance, both Buddhist philosophy and MWI-friendly philosophies (pattern identity) can converse fruitfully about continuity without a soul. But this remains philosophy, not physics validating doctrine.

Common misconceptions to avoid

- “Many worlds guarantees I can’t die.” False. Most measure ends in death. Do not risk your life based on this idea.

- “Entanglement or MWI lets me reincarnate as someone else.” No. There is no mechanism to jump branches, possess another body, or transfer memories across branches.

- “Good deeds steer me into better branches.” Physics doesn’t privilege moral outcomes. Good deeds can causally improve outcomes in ordinary ways—health, trust, cooperation—not via amplitude favoritism.

If you want a coherent ethical stance inside MWI

- Care across branches by measure: Weigh outcomes by their quantum probabilities. This recovers standard prudence and compassion.

- Avoid anthropic traps: Surviving a risk isn’t evidence that risks are safe.

- Practice ordinary virtue: Regardless of metaphysics, kindness and responsibility reliably improve lives in the branches you can influence.

Three takeaways

- MWI is a serious, testable-equivalent interpretation of quantum theory; it does not add moral machinery.

- Quantum immortality is a speculative, largely untestable inference; it should not guide life-or-death choices.

- Reincarnation and karma are religious-philosophical frameworks about moral continuity; they are not implied by MWI. At best, one can draw metaphors about causation, habits, and caring for the distribution of futures.

If you’re exploring further, try: David Wallace (Everett and decision theory), Wojciech Zurek (decoherence), and Buddhist philosophy on no self and karma (e.g., the Abhidharma or contemporary expositions).

Julie O’Hara

THANK YOU for reading my work. I am a global nomad/permanent traveler, or Coddiwombler, if you will, and I move from place to place about every three months. I am currently in Chile and from there, who knows – probably Argentina? I enjoy writing articles, stories, songs and poems about life, spirituality and my travels. You can find my songs linked below. Feel free to like and subscribe on any of the platforms. And if you are inspired to, tips are always appreciated, but not necessary. I just like sharing.

YouTube Top Song List.

https://www.YouTube.com/results?search_query=julia+o%27hara+top+songs

Amazon PlayList

https://www.amazon.com//music/player/artists/B0D5JP6QYN/julia-o'hara

Spotify PlayList

https://open.spotify.com/artist/2sVdGmG90X3BJVn457VxWA

You can also purchase my books here:

https://www.lulu.com /spotlight/julie-ohara

I am also a member of Buy Me A Coffee – a funding site where you can “buy me a cup of coffee.”

https:www.buymeacoffee.com/JulieOHara