So, here we are again. It's my honor to share this moment with you, my friend. Currently I'm sitting on my floor thanking my heart for it's continuous work and remembering an Easter of my childhood. Do I remember the year of this happened? No, however it's the content that matters here.
From what I can recall, Easter this year was introduced by a warm breeze and a blue sky that ushered the sun with poise (The poise being, as per usual, of course.) Our neighbor directly across the street asked if my mom and I were open to attending a sermon. She was, and I'm sure still is, a plump and faithful lady. Walking by the path of the biblical Christ, and with pride it walks with her. Being the granddaughter of a preacher - the church, religious trauma, and bible studies were not fundamental factors of my upbringing. Before I continue - I'm sorry if you were a victim of religious attacks, or any trauma brought by a force that was masked as love. You didn't deserve it, but I'm proud of you for persevering and I admire your strength.
We agreed to attend, who would deny a celebration of rebirth. The church wasn't too far from our neighborhood. A hop skip and a couple jumps away if you will. It wasn't a rich, or giant congregation, stained glass and metal pipe rails adding distinct character. On our way there I grew anxious, my mind racing with the thoughts of not fitting in. Heart pacing at the idea that I would be called out, and dragged for not claiming my space the pews. Eventually we find a spot among the pastel sea and the flapping of fans; there we sit and wait for the preacher to share the word. To my surprise, he starts this oration by pointing out the new faces. His eyes gazing, and when he saw a fresh face his hand would rise. Guiding the person to their feet, asking their name and then prompting the rest of us to greet them. A collective salutation was easy enough, I thought, all I needed to do was acknowledge and clap. At the time not knowing how impactful acknowledgement can be. Smile and wave boys, smile and wave. His eyes met mine, I rose and spoke my name. The church erupted and a sharp chill spread through my body like lightning, it was so intense I instantly teared up. Smiles my way resembling God itself. Even now, I find myself tearing up at the memory of it. Love lived there in that church and I was lucky enough to feel it. That building held no judgement of where I'd been, or any wrong I've done. To be met with that was unfamiliar, a bit uncomfortable, how could I deserve to be seen through divine love? Ha!
I've come to realize addressing one's presence is important. People, you, and I - deserve to be met where we are without condemnation or condonement. External opinions aren't be sought in order to validate our existence, but damn does it feel good to be seen. To be seen through a lens of love and forgiveness, to be held with and to be kissed by grace.
For me God isn't some dude in the sky dictating what is and isn't a sin. God just is. It's the exchange of energy between your fellow human and animal, plant, or element. It's the sweetness of fruit, the caress of bushes on hikes, the songs of birds as the sun rises, the creativity we hold, a hug from a loved one, the pages of a book, the breath that fills my lungs, giving a compliment, giving and receiving gifts, the cradling of water when I lay in a bath, the sound of wind. Everyday I find more ways that God lives through life. Through love, pain, grief, appreciation, and acceptance. The capacity of duality we hold gives us the opportunity to display the many faces of this existence.
You are a miracle, a gift straight from the creator itself. Every moment is a chance for Spirit to experience life - and through us! It's a magical thing to be able to recognize and utilize the power we hold within us. How lucky are we to be all we ever need to be!?!
About the Creator
Lyn
Perhaps I have a fear of being forgotten, or maybe it's the subconscious cries of my ancestors who couldn't speak for themselves. Either way, I can't afford to make the shadows my home.
May peace be with you, fellow traveler.
Autonomy Is The Real Privilege
Good morning, freedom-seekers! Today we’re gonna be looking at autonomy. A strange word, I know; one many would probably look at blankly and run away from on sight. We’re gonna figure out what it actually means, consider how it’s achieved, and decipher just how deeply most of us are tangled up in dependence without realising it.
By That ‘Freedom’ Guyabout 12 hours ago in Humans
Trump Voices Reluctance at Nominating Hassett as Fed Chair
Former President Donald Trump has publicly expressed reluctance to nominate economist Kevin Hassett as the next Chair of the Federal Reserve, igniting discussion across political and financial circles. Hassett, a well-known economic adviser during Trump’s administration, has long been considered a candidate capable of bridging the divide between market confidence and presidential expectations. Yet Trump’s latest statements suggest hesitation, prompting questions about the dynamics between the White House, the Federal Reserve, and Wall Street. The Federal Reserve and Its Importance The Federal Reserve, or Fed, is the central bank of the United States and plays a crucial role in steering the economy. Its responsibilities include controlling inflation, stabilizing employment, and guiding monetary policy through tools such as interest rates and quantitative easing. The selection of a Fed Chair is one of the most significant economic decisions a president can make, as the position directly impacts financial markets, consumer confidence, and international economic relations. Hassett’s name has circulated in financial and political circles as a potential candidate due to his extensive background in economic policy. He previously served as Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under Trump and has consistently advocated for growth-oriented policies. His nomination could signal continuity with Trump-era economic priorities, but the former president’s reluctance has created uncertainty. Trump’s Reluctance In recent interviews, Trump expressed hesitation over formally nominating Hassett, citing concerns about market volatility and potential political backlash. Analysts suggest several factors could be influencing his reluctance: Public Scrutiny: Nominating a high-profile economist invites intense media attention and political debate. Any misstep could impact Trump’s image and perceived influence over economic policy. Policy Differences: Although Hassett and Trump worked closely during his administration, disagreements over interest rates, inflation control, or fiscal strategy could cause hesitation. Timing and Strategy: The timing of a Fed nomination is critical. Trump may be weighing market conditions, congressional response, or broader political calculations before making a decision. Market Implications Financial markets respond strongly to news about Fed leadership. The Chair influences interest rates, lending policies, and overall investor confidence. Uncertainty around the nomination can lead to short-term market volatility, affecting stock prices, bond yields, and the U.S. dollar. Economists argue that hesitation in announcing a nominee could signal indecision or caution, which may affect investor sentiment. “Markets value predictability,” says Julia Ramirez, a senior economist at Global Insights. “A prolonged period without a clear candidate can create temporary instability, particularly in sectors sensitive to interest rate changes, such as banking and real estate.” Hassett’s Profile Kevin Hassett is widely recognized for his academic and policy expertise. He co-authored several influential works on economic growth, tax policy, and productivity. During his tenure as Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Hassett emphasized tax reform, deregulation, and measures aimed at stimulating investment. Supporters argue that Hassett’s experience equips him to manage complex economic challenges, including inflationary pressures, labor market fluctuations, and post-pandemic recovery strategies. Critics, however, question whether his policy preferences align with the current economic landscape, particularly with inflation and debt concerns dominating headlines. Political Dynamics Trump’s reluctance also reflects broader political dynamics. The Federal Reserve, while independent, often becomes a focal point for political debate. Decisions about leadership, policy direction, and rate adjustments carry political weight. By hesitating to nominate Hassett, Trump may be signaling caution, balancing his desire to influence economic policy with the need to avoid potential criticism from lawmakers, economists, or the media. The situation underscores the intersection of politics and economics, where decisions extend beyond technical expertise to considerations of public perception and political strategy. Historical Context Presidents have historically faced scrutiny over Fed appointments. The Chair’s term typically spans four years, but the position’s influence extends well beyond the tenure of any single administration. Past presidents have occasionally delayed nominations, weighing the impact on markets, the Senate confirmation process, and economic policy continuity. Trump’s reluctance echoes these historical patterns. By pausing, he may be ensuring that any nomination strengthens both market stability and his political positioning, rather than generating controversy or uncertainty. Potential Outcomes Several scenarios could emerge from Trump’s hesitation: Nomination Moves Forward: After careful consideration, Trump could formally nominate Hassett, signaling confidence in his abilities and reinforcing Trump-era economic priorities. Alternative Candidate: Hesitation might indicate Trump is exploring other options, potentially favoring a candidate with different policy views or broader bipartisan appeal. Prolonged Uncertainty: Extended delay could increase market anxiety and political debate, complicating the nomination process and influencing investor sentiment. Each outcome carries implications not only for Hassett and the Fed but also for the broader economy, highlighting the significance of leadership decisions at the nation’s central bank. Reactions from Economists and Analysts Reactions to Trump’s statements have been mixed. Some economists see the reluctance as prudent, emphasizing the need to assess market conditions and congressional sentiment before nominating a Fed Chair. Others view it as unnecessary delay, creating uncertainty in a period when stable leadership is critical. Investors and analysts are watching closely, understanding that the Fed Chair’s influence extends to mortgage rates, borrowing costs, and overall economic growth. Even perceived hesitation can ripple through financial markets, underscoring the intertwined nature of politics and economics. Conclusion Trump’s reluctance to nominate Kevin Hassett as Fed Chair highlights the complex balance between politics, economics, and leadership. While Hassett’s credentials suggest he could provide stability and continuity, the former president’s hesitation underscores the broader considerations at play, from market confidence to political optics. As discussions continue, the financial world and the public remain attentive. The Fed Chairship is one of the most consequential appointments in U.S. economic history, affecting everything from consumer borrowing to global markets. Whether Hassett eventually receives the nomination or an alternative candidate emerges, the situation illustrates the delicate interplay between political decision-making and economic stewardship—a dynamic that shapes not just Washington, but the daily financial lives of millions of Americans.
By Muhammad Hassan4 days ago in Humans
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.